Assignment: NRS 445 Topic 2 Benchmark – Ethical Conduct of Scholarly Activities

Assignment: NRS 445 Topic 2 Benchmark – Ethical Conduct of Scholarly Activities

Assignment: NRS 445 Topic 2 Benchmark – Ethical Conduct of Scholarly Activities

Assessment Traits

Benchmark

Requires Lopeswrite

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

Assignment: NRS 445 Topic 2 Benchmark – Ethical Conduct of Scholarly Activities

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Assessment Description

The focus of this assignment is to apply the principles detailed in the Belmont Report to case studies involving human subjects in research or a quality improvement project.

Utilize the “Ethical Conduct of Scholarly Activities” document to complete this assignment.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: NRS 445 Topic 2 Benchmark – Ethical Conduct of Scholarly Activities HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:

RN-BSN

4.3: Promote the ethical conduct of scholarly activities [AACN ]

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 1.2, 4.3, 9.1, 10.2

Attachments

NRS-445-RS-T2EthicalConductofScholarlyActivities

Benchmark – Ethical Conduct of Scholarly Activities – Rubric

Rubric Criteria

Total 140 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Case 1: Respect for Person

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person.
0 points

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is not present.
12.6 points

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is present.
14.95 points

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is detailed.
16.8 points

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is thorough.

Case 1: Beneficence

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence.
0 points

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is not present.
12.6 points

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is present.
14.95 points

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is detailed.
16.8 points

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is thorough.

Case 1: Justice

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice.
0 points

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is not present.
12.6 points

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is present.
14.95 points

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is detailed.
16.8 points

Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is thorough.

Case 2: Respect for Person

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person.

0 points

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is not present.
12.6 points

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is present.

14.95 points

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is detailed.

16.8 points

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is thorough.

Case 2: Beneficence

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence.
0 points

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is not present.
12.6 points

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is present.
14.95 points

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is detailed.
16.8 points

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is thorough.

Case 2: Justice

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice.
0 points

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is not present.

12.6 points

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is inaccurate or incomplete.

13.27 points

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is present.

14.95 points

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is detailed.
16.8 points

Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is thorough.

Ethical Principles, Christian Worldview, and Nursing Practice

Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice.
0 points

Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice is not present.

8.4 points

Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice is inaccurate or incomplete.
8.85 points

Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice is present.
9.97 points

Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice is detailed.

11.2 points

Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice is thorough.

Demonstration of Professional Aptitude for Ethical Conduct (B) (B)

Overall demonstration of professional aptitude for application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. (C.4.3) (C4.3)
0 points

The learner does not demonstrate professional aptitude in the application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. Rationale is not appropriate or does not reflect the assignment criteria and nursing content. Support for both factual and subjective responses is not provided.

10.5 points

The learner inconsistently demonstrates professional aptitude in the application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. Rationale is lacking and does not reflect the assignment criteria and nursing content in many scenarios. Overall, support for both factual and subjective responses is lacking.
11.06 points

The learner demonstrates adequate professional aptitude for application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. Rationale is mostly appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content and provides general support for both factual and subjective responses throughout.
12.46 points

The learner demonstrates professional aptitude for application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. Rationale is appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content and provides support for both factual and subjective responses throughout.
14 points

The learner clearly demonstrates professional aptitude for application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. Rationale is appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content and provides strong support for both factual and subjective responses throughout.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
6.3 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
6.64 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
7.48 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
8.4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
4.2 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
4.42 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
4.98 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
5.6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

Assignment: NRS 445 Topic 2 Benchmark – Ethical Conduct of Scholarly Activities

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

error: Content is protected !!
Open chat
WhatsApp chat +1 908-954-5454
We are online
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?