NRS 645 Week 6 Assignment: Benchmark-Literature Review

NRS 645 Week 6 Assignment: Benchmark-Literature Review

NRS 645 Week 6 Assignment: Benchmark-Literature Review

Assessment Description

While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.

A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the PICOT question from the earlier “PICOT Question” template and information from the “Literature Evaluation Table” assignment to develop a review

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 645 Week 6 Assignment: Benchmark-Literature Review HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Using eight peer-reviewed articles, write 750-1,000-word review that includes the following sections:

Introduction section (including PICOT Question)

A summary of the purpose of the studies

A comparison of sample populations

A synthesis of the studies’ conclusions (when looking at all of the studies together, group the conclusions by themes )

A summary of the limitations of the studies

A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research

You are required to cite a minimum of eight peer-reviewed articles to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN-BSN

4.1: Advance the scholarship of nursing.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 4.1

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Benchmark – Literature Review – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total40 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Introduction

Provide an introduction section, including the PICOT question.
0 points

An introduction section, including the PICOT question, is missing.

1.5 points

An introduction section, including the PICOT question, is inaccurate or incomplete.
1.58 points

An introduction section, including the PICOT question, is present, but lacks detail.

1.78 points

An introduction section, including the PICOT question, is mostly detailed.
2 points

An introduction section, including the PICOT question, is thorough and accurate.

Purpose of Studies

Summarize the purpose of each study.

0 points

A summary of the purpose of each study is missing.
3 points

A summary of the purpose of each study is inaccurate or incomplete.
3.16 points

A summary of the purpose of each study is present but lacks detail.

3.56 points

A summary of the purpose of each study is mostly detailed.
4 points

A summary of the purpose of each study is thorough and accurate.

Comparison of Sample Populations

Compare the sample population(s) of each study.
0 points

A comparison of the sample population(s) of each study is missing.

3 points

A comparison of the sample population(s) of each study is inaccurate or incomplete.

3.16 points

A comparison of the sample population(s) of each study is present but lacks detail.
3.56 points

A comparison of the sample population(s) of each study is mostly detailed.

4 points

A comparison of the sample population(s) of each study is thorough and accurate.

Synthesis of Studies’ Conclusion (B)

Synthesize the conclusion of each study, grouping the studies by themes. The student demonstrates an understanding of evidence-based practice that will advance the scholarship of learning. (C4.1)
0 points

A synthesis of the conclusion of each study, grouping the studies by themes, is missing. The student was unable to incorporate evidence-based practice to advance the scholarship of learning.
7.5 points

A synthesis of the conclusion of each study, grouping the studies by themes, is inaccurate or incomplete. The student demonstrates an inconsistent ability to incorporate evidence-based practice that will advance the scholarship of learning.

7.9 points

A synthesis of the conclusion of each study, grouping the studies by themes, is present but lacks detail. The student demonstrates a general ability to incorporate evidence-based practice that will advance the scholarship of learning

8.9 points

A synthesis of the conclusion of each study, grouping the studies by themes, is mostly detailed. The student demonstrates an adequate ability to incorporate evidence-based practice that will advance the scholarship of learning.
10 points

A synthesis of the conclusion of each study, grouping the studies by themes, is thorough and accurate. The student demonstrates a clear ability to incorporate evidence-based practice that will advance the scholarship of learning.

Summary of the Limitations of the Study

Summarize the limitation(s) of each study.
0 points

A summary the limitation(s) of each study is missing.
3 points

A summary the limitation(s) of each study is inaccurate or incomplete.

3.16 points

A summary the limitation(s) of each study is present but lacks detail.

3.56 points

A summary the limitation(s) of each study is mostly detailed.
4 points

A summary the limitation(s) of each study is thorough and accurate.

Conclusion and Recommendations for Further Research

Include a conclusion, incorporating recommendation for further research.
0 points

A conclusion, incorporating recommendation for further research, is missing.
3 points

A conclusion, incorporating recommendation for further research, is inaccurate or incomplete.
3.16 points

A conclusion, incorporating recommendation for further research, is present but lacks detail.
3.56 points

A conclusion, incorporating recommendation for further research, is mostly detailed.
4 points

A conclusion, incorporating recommendation for further research, is thorough and accurate.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
2.1 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.

2.21 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
2.49 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
2.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
2.1 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.

2.21 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

2.49 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
2.8 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

1.8 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.

1.9 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
2.14 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

2.4 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

1.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1.9 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2.14 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
2.4 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
1.2 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1.26 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
1.42 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
1.6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.