Week 5 Assignment: Course Project Milestone: Annotated Bibliography

Week 5 Assignment: Course Project Milestone: Annotated Bibliography

Week 5 Assignment: Course Project Milestone: Annotated Bibliography

Start Assignment

  • Due Nov 28 by 12:59am
  • Points 100
  • Submitting a file upload

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapters 9, 10
  • Lesson
  • Minimum of 5 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook)

    ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Week 5 Assignment: Course Project Milestone: Annotated Bibliography HERE

    Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Instructions
First, return to your topic chosen in the week three assignment.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

Week 5 Assignment: Course Project Milestone: Annotated Bibliography

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

  • Answer this question: What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side in that debate?
  • Next, articulate and then evaluate the ethical positions  using Kantian ethics (that is, the categorical imperative) relative to the long standing debate (that is your topic chosen in the week three assignment).
  • Finally, create a complete annotated bibliography for 5 academic scholarly sources. You will annotate each source. The sources should be relevant to your topic chosen in the week three assignment.

Include the following:

  • Publication details
  • Annotation (a detailed reading of the source)

Each annotation section should include the following:

  • Summarize key points and identify key terms (using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses).
  • Describe the controversies or “problems” raised by the articles.
  • State whether you agree or disagree and give reasons.
  • Locate one or two quotations to be used in the final research project.
  • Evaluate the ways in which this article is important and has helped you focus your understanding.

Use the following as a model:

APA Reference
Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education1(1), 58-63.

Annotation Example
In this article, Mezirow (2003) makes a distinction between “instrumental” and “communicative” learning. “Instrumental learning” refers to those processes which measure and gauge learning, such as tests, grades, comments, quizzes, attendance records and the like. “Communicative learning,” on the other hand, refers to understanding created over time between individuals in what Mezirow calls “critical-dialectical-discourse,” (p. 59) which is a fancy way of saying, important conversation between 2 or more speakers. Another key idea Mezirow discusses is “transformative learning,” (p. 61) which changes the mind, the heart, the values and beliefs of people so that they may act better in the world. Mezirow argues that “hungry, desperate, homeless, sick, destitute, and intimidated people obviously cannot participate fully and freely in discourse” (p. 59). On the one hand, he is right: there are some people who cannot fully engage because their crisis is so long and deep, they are prevented. But, I don’t think Mezirow should make the blanket assumption that everyone in unfortunate circumstances is incapable of entering the discourse meaningfully. One thing is certain: if we gave as much attention to the non-instrumental forms of intelligence–like goodness, compassion, forgiveness, wonder, self-motivation, creativity, humor, love, and other non-measured forms of intelligence in our school curriculums, we’d see better people, actors in the world, and interested investigators than we currently have graduating high school.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 4-7 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page

Grading

This activity will be graded based on the Assignment Grading Rubric.

Course Outcomes (CO): 5, 6

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Rubric

ETHC445 Week 5 Assignment Rubric – 100 pts.

ETHC445 Week 5 Assignment Rubric – 100 pts.
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content
40 pts

Addresses all aspects of the questions, applying professional knowledge, and research regarding weekly concepts.

34 pts

Addresses most aspects of the questions, applying professional knowledge, , and research regarding weekly concepts.

30 pts

Addresses some aspects of the questions, applying professional knowledge, and research regarding weekly concepts.

24 pts

Minimally addresses the questions, applying professional knowledge, and research regarding weekly concepts.

0 pts

No effort

40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Communication
10 pts

Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

8.5 pts

Presents information in an organized manner (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

7.5 pts

Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

6 pts

Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).

0 pts

No effort

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Integration
10 pts

Paper includes reference to 2 scholarly sources and properly integrates the sources.

7 pts

Paper includes reference to 2 scholarly sources but does not properly integrate the sources.

0 pts

Paper does not make reference to a scholarly sources.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
10 pts

Paper meets all source requirements, and is properly formatted in APA style throughout (i.e. title page, spacing, font, in-text citations and references.)

8.5 pts

Paper meets all source requirements, and is mostly properly formatted in APA style (i.e. title page, spacing, font, in-text citations and references.)

7.5 pts

Paper meets all source requirements, and is somewhat properly formatted in APA style (i.e. title page, spacing, font, in-text citations and references.)

6 pts

Paper fails to meet source requirements and/or is improperly formatted in APA style throughout

0 pts

No effort

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotated Bibliography
30 pts

Includes a strong annotation and your own conclusions for all five sources, demonstrating relevance and thorough understanding of the source

25.5 pts

Includes a strong annotation and your own conclusions for four sources, demonstrating relevance and thorough understanding of the source

22.5 pts

Includes a strong annotation and your own conclusions for three sources, demonstrating relevance and thorough understanding of the source

18 pts

Includes a strong annotation and your own conclusions for one to two sources, demonstrating relevance and thorough understanding of the source

0 pts

No effort

30 pts
Total Points: 100

PreviousNext

 

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

Week 5 Assignment: Course Project Milestone: Annotated Bibliography

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

error: Content is protected !!
Open chat
WhatsApp chat +1 908-954-5454
We are online
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?