Assignment Effective analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond these systems and their mutual impact. For example, patient characteristics such as, racial and ethnic variables can play a role.
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/109907/modules/items/396159
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
NURS 6501 Week 8 Case Study Analysis
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Adobe/OrigImage- LgRendition/AdobeStockLicense_191797895.jpeg)
An understanding of the musculoskeletal systems is a critically important component of disease and disorder diagnosis and treatment. This importance is magnified by the impact that that this system may have on another. A variety of factors and circumstances affecting the emergence and severity of issues in one system can also have a role in the performance of the other.
Effective analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond these systems and their mutual impact. For example, patient characteristics such as, racial and ethnic variables can play a role.
ORDER A WELL RESEARCHED, AI FREE ASSIGNMENT NURS 6501 Week 8 Case Study Analysis HERE
What is special with us? We prioritize customer satisfaction by offering a “pay after delivery” policy, meaning you will pay when you’re fully satisfied with the quality of your work. Our commitment to originality means that every assignment is compiled from scratch, thoroughly checked for plagiarism and AI, and tailored to meet your specific requirements. We guarantee timely delivery, meaning you are assured that your assignments will always be submitted on time.
An understanding of the symptoms of alterations in musculoskeletal systems is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment. For APRNs this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.
In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify the elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.
NURS 6501 Week 8 Case Study Analysis To prepare:
By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.
The Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)
In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following:
The musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes that would account for the patient presenting these symptoms.
Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning. How these processes interact to affect the patient.
Submit your Case Study Analysis Assignment by Day 7 of Week 8.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates
(https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates) ). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
WK8Assgn2_LastName_Firstinitial
- Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||
| Develop a 1- to 2- page case study | 30 to >27.0 pts Excellent | 27 to >24.0 pts Good | 24 to >22.0 pts Fair | 22 to >0 pts Poor | |
| analysis, examining the
patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms. |
The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. …
The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of |
The response describes the patient symptoms. …
The response includes accurate, explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is |
The response describes the patient symptoms
in a manner that is vague or inaccurate……. The response includes explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who present these symptoms and is supported by |
The response describes the patient symptoms
in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing…… The response does not include explanations of the musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes of patients who |
30 pts |
| patients who present these
symptoms and is |
supported by evidence and/or
research, as |
explanations that are vague or based
on inappropriate |
present these symptoms, or the
explanations are |
||
| supported by
evidence and/or |
appropriate, to
support the |
evidence/research. | vague or based on
inappropriate |
||
| research, as appropriate, to
support the |
explanation. | evidence/research. | |||
| explanation. | |||||
| Explain how the |
30 to >27.0 pts |
27 to >24.0 pts |
24 to >22.0 pts |
22 to >0 pts |
30 pts |
| highlighted processes interact to affect the
patient. |
Excellent The response includes an
accurate, complete, |
Good
The response includes an accurate explanation of |
Fair
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how |
Poor
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how |
|
| detailed, and
specific |
how the
highlighted |
the highlighted
processes interact |
the highlighted
processes interact |
||
| explanation of how the
highlighted |
processes
interact to affect the patient and |
to affect the patient,
with explanations that are based on |
to affect the patient,
with explanations that are based on |
||
| processes
interact to affect the patient and is |
is supported by evidence and/or
research, as |
inappropriate
evidence/research. |
inappropriate or missing
evidence/research. |
||
| supported by
evidence and/or |
appropriate, to
support the |
||||
| research, as | explanation. | ||||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||||
| appropriate, to support the explanation. | ||||||||
| Explain any |
25 to >22.0 pts |
22 to >19.0 pts |
19 to >17.0 pts |
17 to >0 pts |
||||
| racial/ethnic
variables that may impact physiological functioning. |
Excellent
The response includes an accurate, complete, |
Good
The response includes an accurate explanation of |
Fair
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of |
Poor
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of |
||||
| detailed, and specific
explanation of |
racial/ethnic
variables that may impact |
racial/ethnic
variables that may impact physiological |
racial/ethnic
variables that may impact physiological |
|||||
| racial/ethnic
variables that |
physiological
functioning and |
functioning, and/or
explanations that |
functioning, or the
explanations are |
25 pts |
||||
| may impact physiological
functioning and |
is supported by evidence and/or
research, as |
are based on inappropriate
evidence/research. |
based on
inappropriate or no evidence/research. |
|||||
| is supported by
evidence and/or |
appropriate, to
support the |
|||||||
| research, as appropriate, to
support the |
explanation. | |||||||
| explanation. | ||||||||
| Written Expression |
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…… A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
4 to >3.5 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time….. The purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. |
3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%– 79% of the time. … The purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. |
3 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. |
5 pts | |||
| and Formatting – Paragraph
Development and |
||||||||
| Organization:
Paragraphs make |
||||||||
| clear points that support well-
developed ideas, |
||||||||
| flow logically, and
demonstrate |
||||||||
| continuity of ideas. Sentences are
carefully focused |
||||||||
| —neither long and
rambling nor short |
||||||||
| and lacking
substance. A clear |
||||||||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||||||
| and comprehensive
purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
||||||||||
| Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
4 to >3.5 pts Good Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
5 pts |
|||||
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins,
indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in- text citations, and |
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
4 to >3.0 pts Good Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. |
3 pts Fair Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. |
3 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
5 pts |
|||||
| reference list. | ||||||||||
| Total Points: 100 NURS 6501 Week 8 Case Study Analysis | ||||||||||
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
NURS 6501 Week 8 Case Study Analysis
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!