Assignment: NR 706 Week 3 Health Informatics Beyond the Acute Care Environment

Assignment: NR 706 Week 3 Health Informatics Beyond the Acute Care Environment

Assignment: NR 706 Week 3 Health Informatics Beyond the Acute Care Environment

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is for you to analyze different clinical information systems’ features and functionality and determine the most beneficial system for your healthcare setting.

BUY A CUSTOM-PAPER HERE ON; Assignment: NR 706 Week 3 Health Informatics Beyond the Acute Care Environment

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. We have attached a well-researched, instruction-compliant sample at the end of the instructions. If you are satisfied with the sample, you can request us to customize your assignment. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper. Kindly scroll down to review the sample.

Instructions

Conduct an online search for two different electronic health record (EHR) software solutions you view as beneficial to your healthcare setting. Examples may include, but are not limited to, the following: eClinicalWorks, McKesson, Cerner, Allscripts, Athena Health, GE Healthcare, Epic, Care360, Practice Fusion, OptumInsight, and NEXTGEN.

Then, address the following:

1. Identify two selected EHR software solutions and describe three features of each software solution.
2. Compare and contrast the benefits of the two selected EHR software solutions.
3. Select an EHR software solution that is best suited for your workplace environment and provide the rationale for your selection.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

• Link (webpage): Graduate Discussion Grading Guidelines and RubricLinks to an external site.

Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

2. Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
3. Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)

Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

2. Use information technology to collect and analyze data to generate evidence-based nursing practice across healthcare settings. (PC 4; PO 7)
3. Evaluate the types of healthcare information systems, knowledge-based systems, and patient care technology and the impact on patient safety, quality of care, and outcome measurement. (PC 4; PO 7)
4. Resolve ethical and legal issues related to the use of information, communication networks, and information and patient care technology. (PCs 2, 4; PO 6)

 Assignment: NR 706 Week 3: Health Informatics Beyond the Acute Care Environment Sample

Week 3 References

Benda, N., Veinot, T., Sieck, C., & Ancker, J. (2020). Broadband internet access is a social determinant of health! American Journal of Public Health, 110(8), 1123. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305784

Brooks, R., Nieto, O., Swendeman, D., Myers, J., Lepe, R., Cabral, A., Kao, U., Donohoe, T., & Conulada, W. (2020). Qualitative evaluation of social media and mobile technology interventions designed to improve HIV health outcomes for youth and young adults living with HIV: A HRSA SPNS initiative. Health Promotion Practice 21(5), 693-704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839920938704

McBride, S., & Tietze, M. (2023). Nursing informatics for the advanced practice nurse: Patient safety, quality, outcomes, and interprofessionalism (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing Company.

Week 3 Consumer Informatics/Telehealth Case Study Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is for you to investigate telehealth and technology relationships to social justice principles.

Case Study Scenario

Watch the following video.

Consumer Informatics/Telehealth Case Study (1:55)

Transcript

[MUSIC] Mr. Kasich is a 77-year old who was recently taken to the emergency room after he fell when trying to get out of bed. There, he was found to have a blood glucose level of 35 milligrams per deciliter and was diagnosed with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypoglycemia despite many years of well-maintained the blood glucose levels. After further assessment, Mr. Kasich was transferred to a medical room in the hospital. 

His background includes diagnosed with type two diabetes mellitus, advanced congestive heart failure and lung cancer. Has Medicare parts A and B. Lives with wife in a remote area that is 40 miles from the closest healthcare provider. Is proficient using his home computer. Mr. Lane is a 42-year old who was admitted for exacerbation of heart failure. 

His background includes has diabetes mellitus type two. Is a long-haul truck driver with a large trucking company. Is privately insured. Is single and primarily lives in his truck. Both Mr. Kasich and Mr. Lane are going home with telehealth consisting of a telemonitoring device that transmits weight, blood pressure, blood glucose levels and pulse oximetry to a remote telehealth nurse.

Even though the use of telehealth does not often include hands on interaction, the goal of keeping patients out of a hospital is consistent with quality nursing practice. Telehealth applications are designed to enhance the patient experience and improve clinical outcomes while providing care for patients in their home environment rather than an institutional setting. Telehealth supports self-care by empowering patients, which is a central tenet of nursing practice.

Instructions

Review the case scenario above and address the following:

1. Examine concepts such as equity, respect, self-determinism, health literacy, cyclic disadvantage, and healthcare disparities among marginalized populations or groups and how they affect patient outcomes.
2. Compare and contrast how each patient in the video may benefit from telehealth services and the ethical considerations from the viewpoint of the nurse.
3. Propose barriers that must be removed to achieve well-being, sufficiency, and healthcare access for all.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

• Link (webpage): Graduate Discussion Grading Guidelines and RubricLinks to an external site.

Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

2. Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
3. Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)

Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

3. Design programs that monitor and evaluate outcomes of care, care systems, and quality improvement. (PC 4; PO 7)
4. Evaluate the types of healthcare information systems, knowledge-based systems, and patient care technology and the impact on patient safety, quality of care, and outcome measurement. (PC 4; PO 7)
5. Appraise consumer health information sources for accuracy, timeliness, and appropriateness. (PC 4; PO 7)
6. Resolve ethical and legal issues related to the use of information, communication networks, and information and patient care technology. (PCs 2, 4; PO 6)

Due Dates

• Initial Post: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday
• Follow-Up Posts: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

NR 706 Week 4: Information Technology as the Basis for Quality Improvement

Week 4 References

Harris, C., Garrubba, M., Melder, A., Voutier, C., Waller, C., King, R., & Ramsey, W. (2018). Sustainability in healthcare by allocating resources effectively (SHARE) 8: Developing, implementing and evaluating an evidence dissemination service in a local healthcare setting. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2932-1

McBride, S., & Tietze, M. (2023). Nursing informatics for the advanced practice nurse: Patient safety, quality, outcomes, and interprofessionalism (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing Company.

Otitigbe, J. (2017). Fishbone facilitation reflection: Team-based cause-and-effect study can point the way to the real problem. ISE: Industrial & Systems Engineering at Work, 49(7), 48-51.

Reed, J. E., Howe, C., Doyle, C., & Bell, D. (2018). Simple rules for evidence translation in complex systems: A qualitative study. BMC Medicine, 16(1) 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1076-9

Schaefer, J. D., & Welton, J. M. (2018). Evidence-based practice readiness: A concept analysis. Journal of Nursing Management, 26(6), 621-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12599

Warnick, R. E., Lusk, A. R., Thaman, J. L., Levick, A. H., & Seitz, A. D. (2020). Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to enhance safety and efficiency of Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Journal of Radiosurgery and SBRT, 7(2), 115-125.