NURSFPX4020 Capella University Safety Improvement Plan Analysis Paper

NURSFPX4020 Capella University Safety Improvement Plan Analysis Paper

NURSFPX4020 Capella University Safety Improvement Plan Analysis Paper

For this assessment, you will develop a Word document or an online resource repository of at least 12 annotated professional or scholarly resources that you consider critical for the audience of your safety improvement plan, pertaining to medication administration, to understand or implement to ensure the success of the plan.

NURSFPX4020 Capella University Safety Improvement Plan Analysis Paper Resources:

Collaboration and Teamwork

Chard, R., & Makary, M. A. (2015). Transfer-of-care communication: Nursing best practices. AORN Journal, 102(4), 329–342.

• Consider applying some of the communications best practices highlighted in this article to how you communicate your tool kit.

Dietz, A. S., Pronovost, P. J., Mendez-Tellez, P., Wyskiel, R., Marsteller, J. A., Thompson, D. A., & Rosen, M. A. (2014). A systematic review of teamwork in the intensive care unit: What do we know about teamwork, team tasks, and improvement strategies? Journal of Critical Care, 29(6), 908–914.

• The authors discuss best practices related to teamwork and team improvement, some of which may help you think about how best to present the information in your tool kit.

Kalisch, B. J., Aebersold, M., McLaughlin, M., Tschannen, D., & Lane, S. (2015). An intervention to improve nursing teamwork using virtual simulation. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 37(2), 164–179.

• This article presents a feasibility study for use of a simulation to improve teamwork among nursing staff.

Malamed, C. (n.d.). ;Using wikis for learning and collaboration. ;Retrieved from http://theelearningcoach.com/elearning2-0/using-wi…

• This article may be helpful as you think about how to put together your tool kit for your assessment.

MindTools. (n.d.). ;How to create a wiki: Setting up a collaborative online workspace. ;Retrieved from https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/how-to-cre…

• MindTools provides a practical overview of wikis, including their history and purpose, as well as how to build them.

BLOGS

Wolf, D. M., & Morouse, K. M. (2015). ;Using blogs to support informatics nurses’ curriculum needs. ;Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, ;19(2), 1–9.

• This article looks at the use of blogs and other online platforms to improve learning and communication, as well as patient care.

GOOGLE SITES

Refer to the following links to help you build your tool kit:

• G Suite Learning Center. (n.d.). ;Get started with Sites. ;Retrieved from https://gsuite.google.com/learning-center/products…
• Google. (n.d.). ;Google Sites. ;Retrieved from https://sites.google.com
• Google. (n.d.). ;Sites help. ;Retrieved from https://support.google.com/sites/?hl=en#topic=
• Resources for safety and improvement measures in geropsychiatric care. ;(n.d.). Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/view/safetyimprovementmea…

Also Read:

NURSFPX4020 Capella Assessment 3: Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation

NURS-FPX4020 Assessment 2 Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan.

BUILDING PROFESSIONAL EFFICACY AND VISIBILITY

 

Kaminski, J. (2016). Why all nurses can/should be authors. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 11(4), 1–7.

• This editorial urges nurses to be active contributors to ongoing research, journals, blogs, and other outlets to increase visibility of their valuable perspectives on health care.

EVALUATING RESOURCES

The Library of Congress. (n.d.). Evaluating Internet resources: An annotated guide to selected resources. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/rr/business/beonline/selectbib…

• This Web page collects resources related to evaluating the reliability and relevance of information from electronic sources. The format of this page may also be a helpful model for the resource list you are assembling.

BUILDING PROFESSIONAL EFFICACY AND VISIBILITY

Kaminski, J. (2016). Why all nurses can/should be authors. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 11(4), 1–7.

• This editorial urges nurses to be active contributors to ongoing research, journals, blogs, and other outlets to increase visibility of their valuable perspectives on health care.

Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan Example

Root cause analysis (RCA) systematically and methodologically investigates an occurrence to identify the reason for a system failure that might not be apparent initially after the incident. System and personal failures can lead to patient safety risks, including medication errors (Center for Drug Evaluation & Research, 2019).

A root cause analysis was conducted to investigate an incident in the surgical postoperative unit that involved a morphine overdose. The purpose of this paper is to describe this incident, conduct a root cause analysis, and develop a safety improvement plan to prevent these occurrences in the future in the organization.

Root-Cause Analysis of Falls of Medication Errors

Charlie is a 20-year-old white female who had an emergency appendectomy three days ago due to acute appendicitis. Today, he still complains of severe pain at the incision site and the abdomen. During the review in the afternoon, his surgeon prescribed oral morphine 10mg Stat for his pain and documented that prescription in writing in the patient’s physical records. The same evening, four other patients were admitted from the operating room and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).

RN, the day shift nurse in charge of the room, delegated the administration of morphine to a student nurse because she was attending to the new admissions. Charlie had been on IV painkillers in the first two days but showed suboptimal pain control. The student nurse picked IV morphine rarely used in the unit, and administered 10ml instead of the 10mgs prescribed by the surgeon.

The surgeon, who happened to be the head of the department of surgery, and the nurse manager in charge of the department agreed that a root cause analysis of the issue be done because there had been prior near misses in the last in the same department.

The RN discovered the issue on her hourly reviews when she noted that Charlie was becoming drowsy and confused and had vomited twice about half an hour after drug administration. The event necessitated the use of naloxone use to reverse the side effects of morphine overdose. A multidisciplinary care team was formed that monitored Charlie’s postoperative healing and recovery.

Analysis of Root Causes

The most common practice factors involved in medication errors include training, engagement, motivation, and work organization system. Interruptions commonly lead to medication errors by breaching the work organization system, thus increasing the risk of making medication errors of omission due to a break in concentrations (Schroers et al., 2022).

Possible outcomes are wrong medication, wrong dose, or wrong route in medication administration. Transitions in care provide a high risk of making medication errors. During this time, there are high chances of a break in the continuity of care, which can involve the patient medication lists.

Human factors contributing to the medication error included understaffing leading to nursing overload and delegation. The use of untrained personnel, the nurse student, to perform medication administration could contribute to the error due to inadequate competencies (Schroers et al., 2020).

Failure to double-check the prescription before medication administration led to the wrong medication and the wrong route of administration. A high patient-to-nurse ratio n could also contribute to medication errors from fatigue and burnout.

Documentation is a crucial method for interprofessional and intra-professional communication. Using manual documentation to provide prescriptions can cause medication errors due to illegible writing and confusion from lookalike sound-alike (LASA) drugs (Wondmieneh et al., 2020).

Communication is also important in medication reconciliation and double-checking the medication before administration. This could reduce the risk of medication errors in this case. Current methods of documentation utilize health technology to improve accuracy, efficiencies, and effectiveness in communication.

The nurse practice environment could also play a part in a medication error. Environmental factors such as shift and nurse staffing capacities can contribute to medication safety (Savva et al., 2022). Additional work is created for nurses in understaffed environments. This contributes to fatigue and exhaustion, which can cause medication errors.

The nurse, therefore, works to complete more tasks in a shorter time and may omit some tasks to save time. A surgical environment is a busy environment for a nurse, and completing all designated tasks can require additional speed. In Charlie’s case, poor documentation, understaffing, lack of communication, and poor care transition were the root causes of the medication error.

Application of Evidence-Based Strategies

Root causes of medication errors can be classified as personal and contextual factors. Personal factors are related to the clinician factors, while contextual factors are due to circumstances under which these errors occur. About 8%–25% of medication errors occur due to administration. About 48% – 53% of these errors can occur due to intravenous drug administrations (MacDowell et al., 2021).

In an ideal setting, medication administration should follow a sequential and controlled procedure. Practice, environmental, equipment, and communication factors contribute to medication errors related to medication administration. Shift reporting, staffing, nurse fatigue, poor communication, and interruption are the most commonly reported cause of medication safety risks.

Various strategies have been implemented in advanced settings to prevent medication errors. These strategies include but are not limited to the use of technology, medication reconciliation, interdisciplinary team collaboration, communication, and coordination (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2018).

The use of technology reduces medication errors by about 50%. Some of the technologies that have been employed to reduce, prevent and reduce medication errors are clinical decision support systems (CDSS), computerized physician order entry (CPOE), and electronic health records (EHRs).

These technologies can be synchronized in one technology system for the organization. Most importantly, clinicians must be trained on how to use these medications to enhance usability and uptake to make the process or error reduction realistic.

Medication reconciliation is an evidence-based strategy that has been documented and practiced for a long time now. However, when and where to practice medication reconciliation varies from organization to organization protocols. Performing medication reconciliation at every point of care transition makes this strategy more potent and effective.

More than 70% of medication errors are reduced when medication reconciliation is done at admission, shifting, patient transfer, and discharge (Rosenthal & Burchum, 2020). This strategy should not only be practiced by nurses but also by other clinicians.

Interdisciplinary collaboration, communication, and coordination are strategies that make other strategies effective. Without these interdisciplinary efforts, medication reconciliation and technology use can be challenging to achieve. Nurses and nurse leaders play important roles in ensuring interdisciplinary approaches through effective and timely communication and collaboration. The process of nursing care coordination sums up this strategy.

Collecting and disseminating pertinent patient information to all stakeholders can improve patient safety. This process requires assistance from technology and nursing education to make it efficient. Coordinating with the patient is also crucial so that they know what they are taking, why they are taking it, and what it can do when not taken properly. This is achieved through patient education to improve compliance and thus adherence.

Improvement Plan with Evidence-Based and Best-Practice Strategies

The National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention definition of medication errors emphasizes their preventability (Tariq et al., 2022). Various quality improvement plans can be implemented to prevent medication errors in the aforementioned scenario.

My improvement plan for this seating will include three actions: incorporate technology in prescription, conduct bedside shift reporting, and conduct mandatory medication reconciliation at every point of care transition. As aforementioned, transitions in patient care provide the most chances for medication errors. Therefore, they can also provide the best opportunity for clinicians to prevent these errors.

Implementing CPOEs and CDSS will assist the clinician with prescription and decision-making by providing alerts and warning for potential medication safety risks. These technologies also provide clinicians with platforms for communication and collaboration. They will make the process of interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination efficient.

The last part of the plan is to implement bedside shift reporting to provide an opportunity for medication reconciliation. Handing over at the patient’s bedside will enhance care collaboration that will also be patient-centered, thus lowering the risk for patient safety concerns.

This plan aims are preventing future medication errors and empower interdisciplinary participation in the unit through the three strategies. Expected outcomes include reduced patient medication adverse events, improved patient satisfaction, reduced patient stay, and improved patient-centeredness in care. Implementation of the plan will adopt a PDSA cycle process for projects. Completion of the first cycle can take about three months, and regular monitoring and evaluations will be conducted to ensure project effectiveness.

Existing Organizational Resources

Implementation of the above quality and safety improvement plan will require human and technological resources. While it aims at solving the human shortage at the same time, this plan will require the human skills to actualize the technological plans. A health information system will be the first essential resource for plan implementation.

Human resources that would be required include nurse informaticists and healthcare system technologists. An electronic health information system is required to support various technologies that would be implemented to actualize the project plans. Existing resources in the organization include human resources and electronic health records.

Conclusion

The medication safety issue involved a young adult, a postoperative patient, who received a morphine overdose jeopardizing his safety. Root cause analysis revealed various root causes of medication safety: poor communication, understaffing, and poor care transitioning. Evidence-based literature has documented the above causes, either personal or contextual. Medication administration has been a significant source of medication errors.

Strategies to reduce these errors have included medication reconciliation, health technology use, and interdisciplinary teams. Communication, collaboration, and coordination have been effective in patient safety risk reduction. The quality improvement plan to address the issue included implementation of CDSS, using CPOE, and implementing bedside shift reporting. Human resources and electronic health records are vital resources that will be required to actualize this plan.

NURSFPX4020 Capella University Safety Improvement Plan Analysis Paper References

• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2018, August). Care Coordination. Ahrq.gov. https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/care/coordination.html
• Center for Drug Evaluation, & Research. (2019, August 23). Working to Reduce Medication Errors. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/information-consumers-and-patients-drugs/working-reduce-medication-errors
• MacDowell, P., Cabri, A., & Davis, M. (2021). Medication Administration Errors. Intensive Care Medicine. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/medication-administration-errors
• Rosenthal, L., & Burchum, J. (2020). Lehne’s pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice nurses and physician assistants (2nd ed.). Saunders.
• Savva, G., Papastavrou, E., Charalambous, A., Vryonides, S., & Merkouris, A. (2022). Exploring nurses’ perceptions of medication error risk factors: Findings from a sequential qualitative study. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 9, 23333936221094856. https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936221094857
• Schroers, G., Ross, J. G., & Moriarty, H. (2020). Nurses’ perceived causes of medication administration errors: A qualitative systematic review. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 47(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.09.010
• Schroers, G., Ross, J. G., & Moriarty, H. (2022). Medication administration errors made among undergraduate nursing students: A need for change in teaching methods. Journal of Professional Nursing: Official Journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 42, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.05.012
• Tariq, R. A., Vashisht, R., Sinha, A., & Scherbak, Y. (2022). Medication dispensing errors and prevention. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519065/
• Wondmieneh, A., Alemu, W., Tadele, N., & Demis, A. (2020). Medication administration errors and contributing factors among nurses: a cross-sectional study in tertiary hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Nursing, 19(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-0397-0