Week 7: Assignment 1: Journal Entry 1
Time LogNote: Add rows as needed. Total: Weeks 1-3  Struggling to meet your deadline ?Get assistance on Week 7: Assignment 1: Journal Entry 1 done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW! Total Weeks 4-7 Total: Weeks 8-11 Total Practicum Hours Completed for Course
JournalDuring week four to seven of the practicum, I refined the practice problem as low knowledge scores among new graduate nurses on the management of diabetic ulcers. I identified and refined the problem through the help of the organization’s leadership team and diabetes team, who pointed out the knowledge gaps among the new grad nurses that should be addressed in the practicum project. In addition, I identified the change practices that will address the practice problem, including conducting staff education programs on the management of diabetic ulcers. The aim of this change is to ensure new grad nurses have the required knowledge to provide high standards of care. From my research, I found that theoretical and practical training programs are crucial. Nurses should be supported to participate in the programs to increase their engagement in diabetic ulcer management (Kaya & Karaca, 2018). In week five, I identified the sources of evidence to address the practice problem. They include research reports, scientific and academic journals, books, clinical practice guidelines, scientific/nursing organizational websites, monitoring and evaluation data, and e-alerts. I selected these sources because they have a wide range of information, including clinical guidelines, systematic reviews, controlled trials, and quantitative and qualitative research (Lehane et al., 2019). Furthermore, I developed a search strategy that I will use to gather evidence for the practice problem. I developed a comprehensive search strategy to help retrieve peer-reviewed articles related to the practice problem. The search strategy will help to retrieve recent articles, which will ensure that the evidence-based practice solutions to the problem are not outdated. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References
AACN. (2006). The Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice.
Kaya, Z., & Karaca, A. (2018). Evaluation of nurses’ knowledge levels of diabetic foot care management. Nursing Research and Practice, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8549567
Lehane, E., Leahy-Warren, P., O’Riordan, C., Savage, E., Drennan, J., O’Tuathaigh, C., … & Hegarty, J. (2019). Evidence-based practice education for healthcare professions: an expert view. BMJ evidence-based medicine, 24(3), 103-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111019
Walden University. (n.d.). Doctor of Nursing Practice: Learning Outcomes. Accredited Online University | Walden University. https://www.waldenu.edu/online-doctoral-programs/doctor-of-nursing-practice#program-outcomes
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Week 6: Evidence Critique and Appraisal
In Module 2, you began to explore sources and gather evidence related to your practice problem. The evidence you have gathered will need to be critiqued and appraised to develop recommendations that will support a proposed practice change.
This week will serve as your opportunity to begin this process of evidence critique and appraisal. You will also review the work completed thus far related to your practice problem in developing recommendations for a proposed practice change, which you will develop throughout the remainder of the course. This work will begin in Week 6 and culminate in recommendations offered in Week 11.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Critique and appraise evidence related to practice problems*
*Assigned in Week 6 of Module 3 and submitted in Week 11 of Module 5.
Learning Resources
Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021). Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.
- Chapter 6, “Evidence Appraisal: Research” (pp. 129–162)
- Chapter 7, “Evidence Appraisal: Nonresearch” (pp. 163–188)
Hickey, J. V., & Giardino, E. R. (Eds.). (2021). Evaluation of quality in health care for DNPs (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.
- Chapter 10, “Evaluation of Patient Care Based on Standards, Guidelines, and Protocols” (pp. 247–266)
Practicum Resources (click to expand/reduce)
Document: Practicum Time Log and Journal (Microsoft Word document)
Walden University Practicum Guidelines
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/DNP/Manuals
Meditrek. (n.d.). https://edu.meditrek.com/Default.html
Optional Resources (click to expand/reduce)
Benson, L. A. (Ed.). (2021). The DNP professional: Translating value from classroom to practice. Slack Incorporated.
Sipes, C. (2020). Project management for the advanced practice nurse (2nd ed.). Springer Publishing Company.
White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terhaar, M. F. (Eds.). (2021). Translation of evidence into nursing and healthcare (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing Company.
What’s Coming Up in Weeks 7 and 8?
Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images
In the next 2 weeks, you will continue your work on your practice problem by selecting and creating a project management plan. You will also explore the best tools and strategies that you might use to implement your change management plan.
Next Week
NURS_8502_Week8_Assignment2_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
| Select a project management tool most appropriate to design and plan your project. | Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The plan is completed using a selected tool that is clearly appropriate for the design and plan of the project. |
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The plan is completed using a selected tool that is appropriate for the design and plan of the project. |
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The plan is completed using a selected tool that is vaguely appropriate for the design and plan of the project. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The plan is completed using a selected tool that is not appropriate for the design and plan of the project, or it is missing. |
| Develop a project management plan to design and plan your project. | Points Range: 40 (40%) – 40 (40%)
A complete Project Management Plan is submitted. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
An incomplete Project Management Plan is submitted, or it is missing. |
| Identify SMART objectives to lead the project. | Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The plan includes SMART objectives that clearly align with the project. |
Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The plan includes SMART objectives that align with the project. |
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The plan includes SMART objectives that inaccurately or vaguely align with the project. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The plan includes SMART objectives that inaccurately or vaguely align with the project, or it is missing. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. |
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. |
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
| Total Points: 100 | ||||
Name: NURS_8502_Week8_Assignment2_Rubric
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
Week 7: Assignment 1: Journal Entry 1
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!