Health Organization Evaluation Paper

Health Organization Evaluation Paper

 

Health Organization Evaluation

In the recent past, health care organizations have been on the verge of transformation to meet health care safety and quality of service delivery. The complexities in healthcare have been multifaceted, compelling healthcare organizations to plan and implement ways of improving care. Evaluating health care organizations allows the management to realize their current position in the development and the future (Gill& France, 2019). Mayo Clinic is one of the prominent health care institutions in the US with a broad network. The purpose of this paper would be to address the readiness of Mayo Clinic in meeting healthcare needs in the next decade.

Description of the Healthcare Organization

Mayo Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center in the US focusing on integrated education, healthcare, and medical research. The institution employs 4,500 scientists and physicians. Besides, it has 58,400 administrative and allied staff across all its branches in the US (Gill& France, 2019). The institution has three main branches: Rochester in Minnesota, Jacksonville in Florida, and Phoenix in Florida. The institutions train its professional in treating difficult cases through tertiary care and destination medicine.

Overall Readiness of Mayo Clinic

The Clinic is stable financially and has been resilient for the last decade. The ability to offer improved care to patients has allowed it to serve many patients who end up paying for the quality services offered at the institution. The constant increase in quality in health care services has allowed Mayo Clinic to develop a reputable brand in the US (Halamka & Cerrato, 2021). In 2018, the total current assets recorded from the institution were $2.427 million. In 2021, the assets at the Clinic had increased by 15%, implying that the current financial strength at the company is better than how it used to be six years ago. The current migration of the Clinic’s operations from analog to digital signifies that it has effectively financed its internal development. Therefore, the strong financial position makes the Clinic ready to meet the healthcare needs in the next decade.

Mayo Clinic has been increasing its attention in developing new evidence-based nursing practices developed from new knowledge to meet the needs of the patients. The nursing practice developed at the Clinic relies on research and theory in creating questions that researchers need to answer (Halamka & Cerrato, 2021). In answering clinical questions, the researchers at the Clinic discover new knowledge that aligns with the clinical practice improvement. The Clinic has developed its professionals to create a link practice and research as it aids in offering the needed care at the facility. One of the reasons that have been putting Mayo as the Clinic of preference is its ability to use tertiary care on patients. Patients would link with a hospital that carries out special care, and these are some of the measures that increase the quality-of-care delivery in a health care institution. The developed research system at the Clinic has effectively developed new and unique care that aids in meeting the patient outcome. This mode of operation would as well affect the readiness of the Clinic in the next decade as it continues to carryout medical research that would meet the needs of the patients in the future.

The new knowledge gained in nursing practice at the Clinic always seeks to find the solution to practical health care problems. The management converges all its resources in developing new theories that guide health care delivery by generating, giving new knowledge, and redefining the system. The medical research at the institution aids in explaining and organizing reality. They offer storage for research findings related to nursing practice (Gill& France, 2019). The ability to store all information aids future researchers to base their research on the provided nursing theories in developing new ideas. All research studies need intense testing and support from a theoretical approach to meet the application criteria in solving nursing practice problems. Mayo Clinic also provides an adequate testing ground for all research done by professionals.

Strategic Plan

The current quality healthcare services offered at Mayo Clinic need to compel the management into expanding its services to more states within the US. The increase of Mayo health care centers within the US would have not only an impact on the revenue at the Clinic but also increase the extent of medical research in the US. The network growth in the next decade needs to commence from starting other three main branches in different states with the US (Wyles et al., 2021). This plan would aim at increasing its services to the patient and train more health care professionals to meet the needs of the patients.

The nurse staffing should increase exponentially because of the overall plan of increasing its outlets across the US. The nurses would undergo mentorship programs in the main branches before being tasked with a role in any of the new or existing branches at the Clinic (Wyles et al., 2021). More nurse informatics would be allowed to work at the company as they possess the skills required to take the Clinic to the next level. The health care industry is currently undergoing a constant transformation that would need nurses equipped with the technological skills to increase the competitive advantage of the Clinic.

The resources at the Clinic would gear towards changing the system to meet the patients’ expectations. For example, purchasing technological equipment that treats diseases that many people deem untreatable would be possible in the next decade (Wyles et al., 2021). Each day starts with the measures and options of using the current resources to meet patients’ satisfaction as these patients form the pillar of the organization.

Potential Issues

One of the future successes of Mayo clinic relies on the integration of technology in every clinical aspect to meet its goals. The past experience that the Clinic has had from the integration of technology has been tremendous and increased its value over time. However, despite the significance that technology plays in achieving the goals at the Clinic, it comes with its risks. The increase in cybercrime has been affecting the widespread use of technology in healthcare for fear of losing patients’ confidential data to criminals (Gill& France, 2019). Despite security measures that the Clinic has taken to ensure the safety of confidential client information, cyber threats still remain an imminent danger to the organization. As the Clinic expands its other centers and technology in those centers, they create additional entry points into the system that cybercriminals could use to infiltrate the entire organization’s system.

Theoretical Model

The classic 4-step approach to strategic planning at Mayo Clinic is one of the theoretical models that would allow the Clinic to meet its objectives. The approach allows the Clinic to understand their current situation, future direction, strategy development, and how they would know that they have met their goals in the next decade (Neururer et al., 2018). The model would help Mayo clinic to have a holistic approach in developing and drafting the plan for the next decade.

Conclusion

Mayo Clinic has shown a positive role it has been playing in healthcare. The future of the organization depends on its ability to expand its services for many patients across the US. Tertiary care offered by the Clinic has been achieved through intense research coupled with the intense application of technology. Besides, the resources at the Clinic further show its readiness to meet health care needs in the next decade.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

References

Gill, P., & France, T. (2019). Accelerating diverse leader readiness through foresight and futures thinking. In Futures thinking and organizational policy (pp. 327-345). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94923-9_16

Halamka, J., & Cerrato, P. (2021). Understanding the role of digital platforms in technology readiness. Regenerative medicine, 16(03), 207-213. https://doi.org/10.2217/rme-2020-0135

Neururer, S. B., Lasierra, N., Peiffer, K. P., & Fensel, D. (2018). Formalizing the Austrian Procedure Catalogue: A 4-step methodological analysis approach. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 60, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.12.018

Wyles, S. P., Monie, D. D., Paradise, C. R., Meyer, F. B., Hayden, R. E., & Terzic, A. (2021). Emerging workforce readiness in regenerative healthcare. Regenerative medicine, 16(03), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.2217/rme-2020-0137

Assessment Description
Research a health care organization or network that spans several states with in the United States (United Healthcare, Vanguard, Banner Health, etc.). Assess the readiness of the health care organization or network you chose in regard to meeting the health care needs of citizens in the next decade.

Prepare a 1,000-1,250 word paper that presents your assessment and proposes a strategic plan to ensure readiness. Include the following:

Describe the health care organization or network.
Describe the organization’s overall readiness based on your findings.
Prepare a strategic plan to address issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction.
Identify any current or potential issues within the organizational culture and discuss how these issues may affect aspects of the strategic plan.
Propose a theory or model that could be used to support implementation of the strategic plan for this organization. Explain why this theory or model is best.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be appropriate for the assignment and relevant to nursing practice.

Rubric

Health Care Organization or Network assessment

Health Care Organization or Network

27 points

Criteria Description

Health Care Organization or Network

5. Excellent

27 points

Health care organization or network is clearly and accurately described.

4. Good

22.95 points

Health care organization or network is described. Some detail is needed for clarity.

3. Satisfactory

20.25 points

Health care organization or network is summarized. Some information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies related to the representation of the organization or network.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

17.55 points

Health care organization or network is partially presented. There are significant omissions and inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Health care organization or network is not described.

collapse Assessment of Overall Organizational Readiness assessment

Assessment of Overall Organizational Readiness

27 points

Criteria Description

Assessment of Overall Organizational Readiness

5. Excellent

27 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is described in detail. Degree of organizational readiness is established. Strong evidence and rationale support the assessment.

4. Good

22.95 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is described. Degree of organizational readiness is generally established. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.

3. Satisfactory

20.25 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is summarized. Degree of organizational readiness is partially established. More information, rationale, and support are needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

17.55 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is partially presented. There are significant omissions. Degree of organizational readiness is not established.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is omitted.

Strategic Plan assessment

Strategic Plan

36 points

Criteria Description

Strategic Plan

5. Excellent

36 points

The strategic plan is well developed. Network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction are addressed in detail. The plan is supported with strong evidence and rationale.

4. Good

30.6 points

The strategic plan addresses network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.

3. Satisfactory

27 points

The strategic plan generally addresses network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction. More information, rationale, and support are needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

23.4 points

Strategic plan is partially presented. Plan contains major omissions. The plan fails to address issues outlined in the assignment criteria.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Strategic plan is omitted.

Identification of Issues in Organizational Culture assessment

Identification of Issues in Organizational Culture

27 points

Criteria Description

Identification of Current or Potential Issues in Organizational Culture and Impact of These to Strategic Plan

5. Excellent

27 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture are clearly identified. The potential impact of these on the strategic plan is thoroughly described and supported with evidence and rationale.

4. Good

22.95 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture and the potential impact of these on the strategic plan are discussed. Some evidence or rationale is needed.

3. Satisfactory

20.25 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture are generally discussed. The impact of these on the strategic plan is summarized. Evidence and rationale are needed to support claims.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

17.55 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture are partially summarized. The potential impact of these on the strategic plan is unclear. There are omissions and inaccuracies throughout.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture and the impact of these to strategic plan are omitted.

Theory or Model to Support Implementation of Strategic Plan assessment

Theory or Model to Support Implementation of Strategic Plan

27 points

Criteria Description

Theory or Model to Support Implementation of Strategic Plan

5. Excellent

27 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates strong support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. Compelling rationale supports why the theory or model is the best choice.

4. Good

22.95 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. General rationale is provided for why the theory or model is the best choice.

3. Satisfactory

20.25 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates some support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. It is unclear why this theory or model is the best choice. More information is needed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

17.55 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is partially described. It is unclear how the theory or model would support implementation of strategic plan for the organization.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is omitted.

Thesis Development and Purpose assessment

Thesis Development and Purpose

9 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

9 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good

7.65 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory

6.75 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

5.85 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction assessment

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Argument Logic and Construction

9 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent

9 points

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good

7.65 points

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory

6.75 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

5.85 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) assessment

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

9 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

9 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

7.65 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory

6.75 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

5.85 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) assessment

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

3.6 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent

3.6 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good

3.06 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory

2.7 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

2.34 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources assessment

Documentation of Sources

5.4 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

5.4 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

4.59 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

4.05 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.51 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.