Workplace Environment Assessment Essay Paper

Workplace Environment Assessment Essay Paper

Workplace Environment Assessment Essay Paper

Workplace environments such as patient care settings should be supportive to ensure that the staff has good working environments to help enhance patient outcomes. The implication is that the environment significantly affects patient and nursing outcomes. Therefore, organizations should strive to cultivate positive cultures, such as interprofessional collaboration and patient safety culture (O’Donovan et al.,2019). Respect for diversity and civil behaviors to help support a positive work environment and lower the chances of incivility. As such, the purpose of this assignment is to examine the results of the work environment assessment, review relevant literature, and present evidence-based strategies for creating high-performance interprofessional teams.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON; Workplace Environment Assessment Essay Paper

The Work Environment Assessment

            From the responses, our workplace is moderately healthy, with a score of 85. There is a high level of employee satisfaction, engagement, and morale. There are sufficient resources for professional growth and development. There is an emphasis on employees’ wellness and self-care. The score, therefore, indicates that our organization is civil. Various aspects were supervised from the assessment. For example, the organization has been known to value efficient, safe, and high-quality patient care, and it has also consistently achieved a high ranking based on quality and safe patient care and patient satisfaction. However, the facility has been having complications with retaining the staff, an indication which could be a reflection that the staff is not that satisfied. As such, I expected a lower score. The next aspect which surprised me was the score obtained regarding the application of teamwork in the organization. It has been evident that nurses use teamwork when offering care to patients. They also have been using multidisciplinary teams in care assessment, planning, implementation, and monitoring. Nonetheless, the scores related to teamwork were low, which was a surprise to me.

There are also other ideas that I believed and got confirmed by the workplace assessment. For example, the organization obtained lower scores connected to conflict resolution. The organization has operated for a long time without putting in place a formal structure for conflict resolution. Hence a considerable number of conflicts remain unresolved. This was confirmed by lower scores. The assessment of the organizations showed that my workplace is moderately healthy. The high scores were obtained since the organization values the use of effective strategies that promote patient care. Therefore, there is a need to integrate strategies that would help the organization work on the areas of weakness.

Reviewing of Literature

 The theory presented in the chosen article highlights how heightened levels of student stress and nursing faculty, workload,  faculty superiority, and the attitudes of student entitlement all lead to incivility. Therefore, this concept is a reflection of how stressors can lead to incivility in nursing practice as well as nursing education. The article highlights various stressors, such as lack of skills and knowledge, organizational conditions, unclear expectations and roles, and work overload. According to the theory presented in the article, it is important to model effective communication to help address incivility since it has been shown that effective communication helps in lowering the incidences and impacts of civility (Clark et al.,2011).

The theory presented in this article is related to the results of the work environment assessment. For example, it is important to note that the organization has been using effective communication to help drive forward patient safety and efficiency forward, which saw the organization obtain high scores in this regard. Therefore, it helped the organization to obtain a moderately healthy status. On the other hand, a lack of effective communication has been observed in conflict resolution times, where the organization lacks a formal model of communication that can help resolve conflicts. As such, the organization had low scores in the area. The organization can apply this theory to create stronger work teams by using effective communication as part of conflict resolution (Griffin et al.,2014). This will help the workers to solve their conflicts better and create stronger teams by working together.

Evidence-Based Strategies to Created High-Performance Interprofessional Teams

            The workplace assessment revealed that the organization is moderately healthy. However, various strategies can still be applied to address the shortcomings revealed in the assessment to improve the organization. One of the strategies that can be used is to enhance employee engagement in organizational issues. One aspect that was found to lead to lower retention rates is the minimal involvement of the staff in organizational issues. Therefore, their engagement on organizational issues should be enhanced. The use of staff engagement has been supported by literature (Huang & Pun, 2022). Another strategy is rewarding employees who perform well. Such a strategy will lead to motivating the staff and increasing their job satisfaction, productivity, and retention. The strategy will also likely reduce conflicts as employees will be rewarded based on their performance (Seitovirta et al.,2018). Various strategies can also be implemented to bolster successful practice. For example, the organization can use open communication, an effective reward system as well as an appropriate conflict resolution mechanism.

Conclusion

            Workplace incivility negatively impacts both patient outcomes and the nursing activities performed to improve patient outcomes. Workplace assessment can be key to revealing how civil the work environment is. The workplace assessment performed revealed that the organization is moderately civil; as such, various strategies can be used to help improve the organization.

References

Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., & Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practice: Nurse leader perspectives. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(7/8), 324-330. 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822509c4

Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535–542. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20141122-02

Huang, Q., & Pun, J. (2022). Views of Hospital Nurses and Nursing Students on Nursing Engagement—Bridging the Gap Through Communication Courses. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 915147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915147

Seitovirta, J., Lehtimäki, A.-V., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K., Mitronen, L., & Kvist, T. (2018). Registered nurses’ perceptions of rewarding and its significance. Journal of Nursing Management, 26(4), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12571

O’Donovan, R., Ward, M., De Brún, A., & McAuliffe, E. (2019). Safety culture in health care teams: A narrative review of the literature. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(5), 871–883. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12740

BUY A CUSTOM PAPER HERE ON; Workplace Environment Assessment Essay Paper

The Assignment (3-6 pages total):

Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)

• Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
• Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
• Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
• Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)

• Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
• Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
• Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)

• Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
• Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
• Course resources linked below

BUY A CUSTOM PAPER HERE ON; Workplace Environment Assessment Essay Paper

Criteria	Ratings					Pts
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment *Template, completed in the week 7 discussion, should not be submitted with this assignment · Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace. · Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea that you believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. · Explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of your workplace.	45 to >40.0 pts Excellent The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace……. The responses thoroughly and clearly identify two surprising things about the results and thoroughly describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. … The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.	40 to >35.0 pts Good The responses accurately describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace……. The responses accurately identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. … The responses accurately explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.	35 to >31.0 pts Fair The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague or inaccurate……. The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague or inaccurate……. The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.		31 to >0 pts Poor The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing…… The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. … The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggest about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.	45 pts
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature · Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article you selected. · Explain how the theory or	15 to >13.0 pts Excellent The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the theory or concept	13 to >11.0 pts Good The responses accurately describe the theory or concept presented in the	11 to >10.0 pts Fair The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected	10 to >0 pts Poor The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected		15 pts

 

Criteria	Ratings				Pts
concept presented	presented in the	article selected. …	that is vague or	that is vague and
in the article relates	article selected. …	The responses	inaccurate……. The	inaccurate, or is
to the results of	The responses	accurately explain	responses explain	missing…… The
your Work	accurately and	how the theory or	how the theory or	responses
Environment	completely explain	concept	concept presented	explain how the
Assessment. ·	how the theory or	presented in the	in the article	theory or concept
Explain how your	concept presented	article relates to	relates to the	presented in the
organization could	in the article	the results of the	results of the Work	article relates to
apply the theory	relates to the	Work Environment	Environment	the results of the
highlighted in your	results of the Work	Assessment. …	Assessment that is	Work
selected article to	Environment	The responses	vague or	Environment
improve	Assessment. …	accurately explain	inaccurate……. The	Assessment that
organizational	The responses	how an	responses explain	is vague and
health and/or	accurately and	organization could	how an	inaccurate, or is
stronger work	thoroughly explain	apply the theory	organization could	missing…… The
teams. Be specific	how an	highlighted in the	apply the theory	responses
and provide	organization could	selected article to	highlighted in the	explain how an
examples.	apply the theory	improve	selected article to	organization
	highlighted in the	organizational	improve	could apply the
	selected article to	health and/or	organizational	theory
	improve	stronger work	health and/or	highlighted in the
	organizational	teams……. Specific	create stronger	selected article to
	health and/or	examples are	work teams that is	improve
	stronger work	provided which	vague or	organizational
	teams……. Specific	may support the	inaccurate. …	health and/or
	and detailed	responses.	Vague or	create stronger
	examples are		inaccurate	work teams that
	provided which		examples are	is vague and
	fully support the		provided which	inaccurate, or is
	responses.		may support the responses.	missing. … Specific
				examples are not
				provided to
				support the
				responses.
Part 3: Evidence- Based Strategies to Create High- Performance Interprofessional Teams · Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to	20 to >17.0 pts Excellent Using the literature, the responses clearly and thoroughly recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings	17 to >15.0 pts Good Using the literature, the responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings	15 to >13.0 pts Fair Using the literature, the responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the	13 to >0 pts Poor Using the literature, the responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings	20 pts

 

Criteria	Ratings							Pts
address any	revealed in the	revealed in the			Work Environment		revealed in the
shortcomings	Work Environment	Work Environment			Assessment that is		Work
revealed in your	Assessment. …	Assessment. …			vague or		Environment
Work Environment	The responses	The responses			inaccurate, or only		Assessment that
Assessment. ·	clearly and	accurately			recommends one		is vague and
Recommend at	thoroughly	recommend at			strategy…… The		inaccurate, only
least two strategies	recommend at	least two			responses		recommends one
that can be	least two	strategies that can			recommend at		strategy, or is
implemented to	strategies that can	be implemented to			least two strategies		missing…… The
bolster successful	be implemented to	bolster successful			that can be		responses
practices revealed	bolster successful	practices revealed			implemented to		recommend at
in your Work	practices revealed	in the Work			bolster successful		least two
Environment	in the Work	Environment			practices revealed		strategies that
Assessment.	Environment Assessment.	Assessment.			in the Work Environment		can be implemented to
					Assessment that is		bolster
					vague or		successful
					inaccurate, or only		practices
					recommends one		revealed in the
					strategy.		Work
							Environment
							Assessment that
							is vague and
							inaccurate, only
							recommends one
							strategy, or is
							missing.
Resource Synthesis	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent		4 to >3.0 pts Good			3 to >2.0 pts Fair	2 to >0 pts Poor
	Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course- specific resources.		Using proper in- text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource.			Using proper in- text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course- specific resources.	The response does not integrate outside and course- specific resources or no in-text citations are used.	5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting— Paragraph Development and Organization:	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Paragraphs and sentences follow			4 to >3.0 pts Good Paragraphs and sentences follow		3 to >2.0 pts Fair Paragraphs and sentences follow	2 to >0 pts Poor Paragraphs and sentences follow	5 pts

 

Criteria	Ratings									Pts
Paragraphs make	writing standards for			writing standards			writing standards		writing
clear points that	flow, continuity, and			for flow, continuity,			for flow,		standards for
support well-	clarity…… A clear and			and clarity 80% of			continuity, and		flow, continuity,
developed ideas,	comprehensive			the time.			clarity 60–79% of		and clarity less
flow logically, and	purpose statement,			…Purpose,			the time. …		than 60% of the
demonstrate	introduction, and			introduction, and			Purpose,		time……. No
continuity of ideas.	conclusion are			conclusion of the			introduction, and		purpose
Sentences are	provided, which			assignment are			conclusion of the		statement,
carefully focused—	delineates all			stated but are			assignment is		introduction, or
neither long and	required criteria.			brief and not			vague or off topic.		conclusion is
rambling nor short				descriptive.					provided.
and lacking
substance. A clear
and comprehensive
purpose statement
and introduction is
provided, which
delineates all
required criteria.
Written Expression and Formatting— English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.	4 to >3.0 pts Good Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.			3 to >2.0 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.			2 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.		5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct APA format with no errors.		4 to >3.0 pts Good Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.			3 to >2.0 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.			2 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.	5 pts