NURS_6052Identifying Research Methodologies Essay
NURS_6052Identifying Research Methodologies Essay
Matrix Worksheet Template
Use this document to complete Part 1 of the Module 2 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies.
| Full citation of selected article | Article #1 | Article #2 | Article #3 | Article #4 |
 Struggling to meet your deadline ?Get assistance on NURS_6052Identifying Research Methodologies Essay done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Tolia, V. N., Murthy, K., Bennett, M. M., Greenberg, R. G., Benjamin, D. K., Smith, P. B., & Clark, R. H. (2018). Morphine vs. methadone treatment for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome. The Journal of Pediatrics, 203, 185-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.061
|
Sutter, M. B., Watson, H., Yonke, N., Weitzen, S., & Leeman, L. (2022). Morphine versus methadone for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome: a randomized controlled pilot study. BMC Pediatrics, 22(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03401-3 |
Davis, J. M., Shenberger, J., Terrin, N., Breeze, J. L., Hudak, M., Wachman, E. M., … & Lester, B. (2018). Comparison of safety and efficacy of methadone vs. morphine for treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatrics, 172(8), 741-748. Doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1307 |
Gullickson, C., Kuhle, S., & Campbell‐Yeo, M. (2019). Comparison of outcomes between morphine and concomitant morphine and clonidine treatments for neonatal abstinence syndrome. Acta Paediatrica, 108(2), 271-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14491 |
|
| Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest) | This article was chosen because it is a primary peer-reviewed article. It relates to the clinical issue of interest (Treating NAS in neonates) as it compares the efficacy of morphine and methadone. The ethics of research related to the issue of interest include nonmaleficence and beneficence.
|
This article was chosen since it is a primary research article with one of the best research designs (randomized controlled trial). It is relevant as it reports the findings comparing the effectiveness of methadone and morphine in treating neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. The ethics of research related to the clinical issue include informed consent. | This article was chosen because it directly relates to the clinical topic of interest. It is also a primary peer-reviewed article; hence the results are valued. It relates to the clinical issue as it reports the findings of the use of methadone and morphine in neonatal abstinence syndrome. Among the ethics of research related to the issue of interest is informed consent. | This article was also chosen due to the fact that it is a peer-reviewed article that addresses the area of interest. The article is related to the area of interest since it focuses on the use of morphine in treating NAS. |
| Brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article | The aim of the research was to compare the efficacy of morphine or methadone in reducing the length of stay among patients with neonatal abstinence syndrome. | The aim of this study was to compare the length of treatment and hospital length of stay when using methadone and morphine to treat neonatal opioid withdrawal. | The aim of this research was to determine the efficacy and safety of morphine and methadone in treating neonatal abstinence syndrome. | The aim of this study was to explore whether the addition of clonidine to morphine, as compared to morphine alone, is more effective in decreasing the length of treatment of patients with NAS. |
| Brief description of the research methodology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific. |
The research methodology used in the Cohort study method. This is a quantitative research method since the data obtained was statistically analyzed.
|
The research methodology used in the article is a single-center randomized controlled trial. This is also a quantitative study method. | The research methodology applied in this research is a randomized controlled trial which is a quantitative methodology. | The applied research methodology used is a retrospective cohort study design. This methodology is also quantitative. |
| A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected. |
One of the strengths of cohort studies is that they are less prone to bias, and they can offer better data quality on primary exposure. The methodology was reliable and valid, as identified from the statistical analysis of the data using various statistical parameters. |
Randomized controlled trials have various strengths, such as decreasing selection bias and minimizing confounding. The reliability and validity were evident as the methodology played a major role in eliminating bias hence reliable results. | Randomized controlled trials have various strengths, such as decreasing selection bias and minimizing confounding. The reliability and validity were evident as the methodology played a major role in eliminating bias hence reliable results. | Among the strength of the study include they are relatively cheaper and are more useful in cases of rare exposures. The validity and reliability were evident from the statistical parameters employed. |
| General Notes/Comments | This study supports the use of methadone treatment as it leads to decreased length of stay.
|
This article supports the identified clinical issue and shows the efficacy of using pharmacological approaches. | This randomized controlled trial showed that methadone has better impacts and hence should be preferred. | The major finding as the patients treated with the combination needed longer treatment time. |
References
Davis, J. M., Shenberger, J., Terrin, N., Breeze, J. L., Hudak, M., Wachman, E. M., … & Lester, B. (2018). Comparison of safety and efficacy of methadone vs. morphine for treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA pediatrics, 172(8), 741-748. Doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1307
Gullickson, C., Kuhle, S., & Campbell‐Yeo, M. (2019). Comparison of outcomes between morphine and concomitant morphine and clonidine treatments for neonatal abstinence syndrome. Acta Paediatrica, 108(2), 271-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14491
Sutter, M. B., Watson, H., Yonke, N., Weitzen, S., & Leeman, L. (2022). Morphine versus methadone for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome: a randomized controlled pilot study. BMC Pediatrics, 22(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03401-3
Tolia, V. N., Murthy, K., Bennett, M. M., Greenberg, R. G., Benjamin, D. K., Smith, P. B., & Clark, R. H. (2018). Morphine vs. methadone treatment for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome. The Journal of Pediatrics, 203, 185-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.061
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON; NURS_6052Identifying Research Methodologies Essay
To Prepare:
- Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.
- Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
- Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
- Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies
After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:
- The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
- A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
- A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
- A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
- A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
- Template for assignment, rubric, and course resources are linked below.
- Topic of clinical interest is treating drug withdrawal in neonates in a NICU setting. Treating NAS in neonates.
BUY A CUSTOM PAPER HERE ON; NURS_6052Identifying Research Methodologies Essay
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||
| Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each article. Your analysis should include the following: *The full citation of each peer- reviewed article in APA format *A brief statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest. *A brief description of the aims of the research of each article *A brief description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed methods approach. | 90 to >80.0 pts Excellent
The response accurately and clearly provides a full citation of each article in APA format……………… The responses accurately and thoroughly explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the aims of the research…… The responses accurately and clearly describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected. |
80 to >71.0 pts Good
The response accurately provides a full citation of each article in APA format……………… The responses accurately explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected. |
71 to >62.0 pts Fair
The response provides incomplete or inaccurate citations of each peer-reviewed article in APA format……………… The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including the explanation of the ethics…………….. The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the aims of the research of each article…………….. The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the research methodology used and the type of methodology used, with only some examples……………………. The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected. |
62 to >0 pts Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format or is missing….. The responses inaccurately & vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue, including the explanation of ethics of research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the aims of the research, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the research methodology used, the type of methodology used with no examples present, or they are missing. …The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the strengths of each of the methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of the methodology, or they are missing. |
90 pts |
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||||||
| Resource Synthesis | 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent | 4 to >3.0 pts Good | 3 to >2.0 pts Fair | 2 to >0 pts Poor | |||||
| The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the selection of articles and two or three course- specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix. | The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the selection of articles. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course- specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix. | The responses provided vaguely or inaccurately synthesize outside resources related to the selection of the articles. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix. | The responses provide a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources related to the selection of the articles and fail to integrate any resources to support the responses provided, or synthesis is missing. |
5 pts |
|||||
| Written Expression and Formatting— English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
4 to >3.0 pts Good
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3 pts Fair
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3 to >0 pts Poor
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
5 pts |
||||
|
Total Points: 100 |
|||||||||
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
NURS_6052Identifying Research Methodologies Essay
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!