Assignment: NUR711 Week4  Evidence Synthesis and Tables

Assignment: NUR711 Week4  Evidence Synthesis and Tables

Assignment: NUR711 Week4  Evidence Synthesis and Tables

Evidence Synthesis and Tables

Assignment

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to develop a synthesis of evidence using five research articles to support an evidence-based intervention.

The development of the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool builds a body of research evidence about a practice problem and evidence-based intervention for implementation in a practice change project. Continually adding research studies to the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool builds the foundation for the synthesis of research for a practice change project.

BUY A CUSTOM PAPER HERE ON; Assignment: NUR711 Week4  Evidence Synthesis and Tables

As you incorporate published research study findings into your own writing, you create a synthesis of the research information. Before learning how to write a synthesis, it is important to define this term. At its most basic level, a synthesis involves combining two or more summaries. Synthesis writing is more difficult than it might first appear because this combining must be done in a meaningful way.

A synthesis requires critical reading and thinking to compare different material, highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. When a practice scholar synthesizes successfully, they present new ideas based on interpretations of published research evidence. Conceptually, it can be helpful to think about synthesis existing at both the local (or paragraph) level and the global (or paper) level. Synthesis is all about collecting information from different sources and merging the information together as one content.

Please note that this week 4 assignment is the is the first part of the Week 6 assignment. You will receive feedback from your course faculty on this assignment and will be required to use the feedback to revise this paper and add as a section of the Week 6 assignment.

Instructions

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of this assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

Download the following tools linked below (located in the Student Resource Center under Project & Practicum Resources).

Link (Word doc): Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal ToolLinks to an external site.

Link (Word doc): Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary ToolLinks to an external site.

Use five (5) level I, II, or III peer-reviewed primary research studies and/or systematic reviews that focus on the evidence-based intervention for the selected practice problem. Four research articles that focus on the evidence-based intervention included in this synthesis may be from previous courses. One peer-reviewed research article that focuses on the evidence-based intervention must be new to this synthesis and not used in previous courses. All articles should be current, published within the past 5 years. Enter the articles for the synthesis into the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool. For new articles for this synthesis, Highlight the author’s name in the Johns Hopkins individual Evidence Summary Table.

Use the most current version of Microsoft Word that is the format for all Chamberlain University College of Nursing found in student resources. The Document is labeled DNP and will end in “docx.”

All Chamberlain University policies related to plagiarism must be observed.

Review the rubric for the grading criteria.

The assignment includes the following components:

Title Page

Title of the paper

Student name

Chamberlain University College of Nursing

Course number and course name

Session month and year

Introduction

Write a one-sentence purpose statement.

Introduce the practice problem. (Cited)

Introduce the evidence-based intervention using research study evidence. (Cited)

Describe the significance of the practice problem at the national level (1 paragraph).

Significance

Prevalence

Mortality

Economic ramifications of the practice problem. (Cited)

Evidence Synthesis: Using a minimum of five research articles (published within the past 5 years) to support the evidence-based intervention, write a synthesis of evidence to include the following:

Include a minimum of 5 research articles to support the evidence-based intervention with citations (4 articles can be from previous courses).

Identify and discuss the main themes and salient points that emerge from the sources. (Cited)

Contrast the main points from evidence sources. (Cited)

Present an objective overarching synthesis of research statement supporting the evidence-based intervention. (Cited)

Conclusion

Include a summary of practice problem.

Include a summary of the evidence synthesis which supports the evidence-based intervention (cite all sources).

Appendix: Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table

Include the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool as the Appendix (With only one appendix, there is no need to label this Appendix A).

Complete all sections of the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool for each research study.

Identify the quality and the level of evidence for all research studies.

Enter the information for a minimum of 5 research articles level I, II, or III that focus on the evidence-based intervention and published within the last 5 years into the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table.

APA Standards and References

Use appropriate Level I headers.

Create the reference page.

Each reference has a matching citation and citations are in current APA style.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

Length: 3-4 pages (not including title page, reference page, and appendix)

1-inch margins

Double-spaced pages

12-point Times New Roman font or 11-point Arial

Headings & subheadings

In-text citations

Title page

References page

Appendix

Standard English usage and mechanics

Program Competencies

This assignment enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)

Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)

Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve healthcare. (POs 6, 7)

Analyzes healthcare policies to advocate for equitable healthcare and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health.

Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Examine the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in leading financial planning and management across healthcare settings. (PCs 5, 8; POs 2, 4, 9)

Develop strategies to lead project planning, implementation, management, and evaluation to promote high value healthcare. (PCs 1, 3, 4; POs 3, 5, 7)

Late Assignment Policy applies

Rubric

Week 4 Assignment Grading Rubric

Week 4 Assignment Grading Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
Requirements:

1. Write a one-sentence purpose statement.

2. Introduce the practice problem.

3. Introduce the evidence-based intervention using research study evidence. (Cited)

30 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth introduction.

27 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient introduction.

24 pts
Includes 2 requirements and/or provides a partial introduction.

0 pts
Provides an undeveloped introduction.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePractice Problem
Requirements:

1. Significance

2. Prevalence

3. Mortality

4. Economic ramifications of the practice problem (Cited)

45 pts
Includes all data requirements and provides an in-depth discussion about the practice problem.

41 pts
Includes at least 3 requirements and/or provides a sufficient discussion about the practice problem.

36 pts
Includes at least 2 requirements and/or provides a partial discussion about the practice problem.

0 pts
Provides an undeveloped discussion about the practice problem.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence Synthesis to Support the Evidence-Based Intervention
Requirements:

1. Include a minimum of 5 research articles to support the evidence-based intervention with citations. (4 articles can be from previous courses).

2. Identify and discuss the main themes that emerge from the sources. (Cited)

3. Contrast the main points in the evidence sources. (Cited)

4. Present an objective overarching synthesis of research statement supporting the evidence-based Intervention. (Cited)

55pts
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth synthesis of research evidence supporting the evidence-based Intervention.

49 pts
Includes at least 3 requirements and/or provides a sufficient synthesis of research evidence supporting the evidence-based Intervention.

44 pts
Includes at least 2 requirements and/or provides a partial synthesis of research evidence supporting the evidence-based Intervention

0 pts
Provides an undeveloped synthesis of research evidence supporting the evidence-based Intervention.

pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

Requirements:

1. Includes a summary of practice problem.

2. Includes a summary of the evidence synthesis which supports the evidence-based intervention. (Cited)

30 pts
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth summary in the conclusion.

27 pts
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient summary in the conclusion.

24 pts
Includes at least 1 requirement and/or provides a partial summary in the conclusion.

0 pts
Provides an undeveloped summary of the practice problem and evidence synthesis.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppendix: Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table
Requirements:

1. Include the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool as the Appendix.

2. Complete ALL sections of the Johns Hopkins Table for or each article.

3. Identify the quality and the level of evidence for all research studies.

4 .Enter the information for a minimum of 5 research articles level I, II, or III that focus on the evidence-based intervention and published within the last 5 years into the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table.

40 pts
Includes all requirements of the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table and provides an in-depth evidence table presentation.

36 pts
Includes 3 requirements of the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table and/or provides a sufficient evidence table presentation.

32 pts
Includes 2 requirement of the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table and/or provides a partial evidence table presentation.

0 pts
Includes less than all requirements of the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table and/or provides an underdeveloped evidence table presentation.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Standards
Requirements:

1. Uses appropriate Level I headers.

2. Create a reference page(s).

3. Each reference has a matching citation and citations are in current APA style.

4. Paper length is 3-4 pages excluding title page, reference pages, and appendix.

10 pts
Includes all requirements of APA style and standards.

9 pts
Includes 3 requirements of APA style and standards.

8 pts
Includes 2 requirements of APA style and standards.

0 pts
Includes 1 requirement of APA style and standards.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Writing
Requirements:

1. Standard English grammar and sentence structure

2. No spelling or typographical errors

3. Organized presentation of ideas

10 pts
Includes all requirements of clarity of writing.

9 pts
Includes 2 requirements of clarity of writing.

8 pts
Includes 1 requirement of clarity of writing.

0 pts
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or demonstrates poor clarity of writing.

10 pts

Total Points: 220

Assignment: NUR711 Week4  Evidence Synthesis and Tables Sample

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON; Assignment: NUR711 Week4  Evidence Synthesis and Tables

	Author and Date	Evidence Type	Sample, Sample Size, Setting	Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question	Observable Measures	Limitations	Evidence Level, Quality
1	Bernburg et al. (2020)	Randomized Controlled Trial	❑                 N/A	The study showed first indications that training in mental health self-care skills for junior nurses could be a supportive approach for nurses starting work in hospital departments.	perceived work stress and emotional exhaustion.	Small sample size limits general conclusions and the external validity of the study results.	Level I: High quality
2	Aryankhesal et al. (2019)	Systematic review of randomized controlled trial	❑                 N/A	The results showed that the most interventions used to improve burnout were improving communication skills, teamwork, participatory programs, and psychological interventions (Yoga, meditation, and mindfulness).	Burnout rates	Studies using the same interventions were too small, implying the need for cautious interpretation when attempting to generalize the findings.	Level I: High quality
3	Shiri et al. (2023)	Narrative  review of randomized control trials	❑                 N/A	The review found that several workplace interventions were effective in improving work ability, well-being, perceived general health, work performance, and job satisfaction and in reducing psychosocial stressors, burnout, and sickness absence among healthcare workers.	workplace interventions	The current review was a narrative review that only searched PubMed, which may have missed some relevant publications from other databases.	Level I: High quality
4	Dall’Ora et al. (2020)	Narrative literature review	❑     N/A	Studies consistently show that adverse job characteristics (high workload, low staffing levels, long shifts, and low control) are associated with burnout in nursing.	work-related factors	The authors did not apply a formal quality appraisal instrument even though they noted critical omissions of essential details.	Level III: Good quality
5	Paiva-Salisbury and Schwanz (2022)	Case study	❑     N/A	Using evidence-based strategies like acceptance and commitment therapy to build resilience among professionals and pre-professionals reduced compassion fatigue.	Compassion fatigue.	The study must be interpreted cautiously, and other study designs should ideally corroborate their findings to strengthen the evidence for causation.	Level III: Good quality
			❑  N/A
			❑  N/A

Attach a reference list with full citations of articles reviewed for this Practice question.

Directions for Use of the Individual Evidence Summary Tool

Purpose

This form is used to document the results of evidence appraisal in preparation for evidence synthesis. The form provides the EBP team with documentation of the sources of evidence used, the year the evidence was published or otherwise communicated, the information gathered from each evidence source that helps the team answer the EBP question, and the level and quality of each source of evidence.

Article Number

Assign a number to each reviewed source of evidence. This organizes the individual evidence summary and provides an easy way to reference articles.

Author and Date

Indicate the last name of the first author or the evidence source and the publication/communication date. List both author/evidence source and date.

Evidence Type

Indicate the type of evidence reviewed (for example: RCT, meta-analysis, mixed methods, quaLitative, systematic review, case study, narrative literature review).

Sample, Sample Size, and Setting

Provide a quick view of the population, number of participants, and study location.

Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question

Although the reviewer may find many points of interest, list only findings that directly apply to the EBP question.

Observable Measures

QuaNtitative measures or variables are used to answer a research question, test a hypothesis, describe characteristics, or determine the effect, impact, or influence. QuaLitative evidence uses cases, context, opinions, experiences, and thoughts to represent the phenomenon of study.

Limitations

Include information that may or may not be within the text of the article regarding drawbacks of the piece of evidence. The evidence may list limitations, or it may be evident to you, as you review the evidence, that an important point is missed or the sample does not apply to the population of interest.

Evidence Level and Quality

Using information from the individual appraisal tools, transfer the evidence level and quality rating into this column.