Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders| NRNP 6675

Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders| NRNP 6675

Between 10% and 20% of the population experience personality disorders. They are difficult to treat as individuals with personality disorders are less likely to seek help than individuals with other mental health disorders. Treatment can be challenging as they do not see their symptoms as painful to themselves or others.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON; Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders| NRNP 6675

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. We have attached a well-researched, instruction-compliant sample at the end of the instructions. If you are satisfied with the sample, you can request us to customize your assignment. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper. Kindly scroll down to review the sample.

Paraphilic disorders are far more common in men than in women, and generally quite chronic, lasting at least two years. Treatment of these disorders usually involves both psychotherapeutic and pharmacologic treatments.

In this Assignment, you will explore personality and paraphilic disorders in greater detail. You will research potentially controversial elements of the diagnosis and/or treatment and explain ethical and legal considerations when working with these disorders.

To Prepare

• Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide on assessing, diagnosing, and treating personality and paraphilic disorders.
• Select a specific personality or paraphilic disorder from the DSM-5-TR to use for this Assignment.
• Use the Walden Library to investigate your chosen disorder further, including controversial aspects of the disorder, maintaining the therapeutic relationship, and ethical and legal considerations.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: NICE Guidelines. (2010). Antisocial personality disorder: Prevention and management

• Links to an external site..
  https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg77
• Boland, R. Verdiun, M. L. & Ruiz, P. (2022).  Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (12th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
  •  Chapter 19 “Personality Disorders”
• Thapar, A., Pine, D. S., Leckman, J. F., Scott, S., Snowling, M. J., & Taylor, E. A. (Eds.). (2015). Rutter’s child and adolescent psychiatry (6th ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
  • Chapter 67, “Disorders of Personality”
  • Chapter 68, “Developmental Risk for Psychopathy”
  • Chapter 69, “Gender Dysphoria and Paraphilic Sexual Disorders” (pp. 988–993 only)
• Zakhari, R. (2021). The psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner certification review manual. Springer Publishing Company.
  • Chapter 14, “Personality Disorders”

Required Media

• Buchanan, N. T. (2020, April 13). Lecture 14 part 3: Paraphilic disorders

• Links to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykkMo9t0bxs
• MDedge. (2020, January 22). Personality disorders with Dr. Frank Yeomans
• Links to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESQIDslCX_s

Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders| NRNP 6675 Sample

The Assignment

In 2–3 pages:

• Explain the controversy that surrounds your selected disorder.
• Explain your professional beliefs about this disorder, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.
• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a patient that may present with this disorder.
• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to this disorder that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

By Day 7 of Week 7

Submit your Assignment.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK7Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

BUY A CUSTOM PAPER HERE ON: Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders| NRNP 6675

Rubric

NRNP_6675_Week7_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6675_Week7_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome In 2–3 pages, address the following: • Explain the controversy that surrounds your selected personality or paraphilic disorder.	15 to >13.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100% The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. 13 to >11.0 ptsGood 80%–89% The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. 11 to >10.0 ptsFair 70%–79% The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. 10 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69% The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Or the response is missing.	15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome • Explain your professional beliefs about your selected disorder, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.	25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100% The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references. 22 to >19.0 ptsGood 80%–89% The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references. 19 to >17.0 ptsFair 70%–79% The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current. 17 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69% The response includes a vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing.	25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome • Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder.	30 to >26.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100% The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. 26 to >23.0 ptsGood 80%–89% The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. 23 to >20.0 ptsFair 70%–79% The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. 20 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69% The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Or the response is missing.	30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome • Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.	15 to >13.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100% The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. 13 to >11.0 ptsGood 80%–89% The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. 11 to >10.0 ptsFair 70%–79% The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. 10 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69% The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing.	15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.	5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100% Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. 4 to >3.5 ptsGood 80%–89% Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair 70%–79% Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. 3 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69% Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation	5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100% Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors 4 to >3.5 ptsGood 80%–89% Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair 70%–79% Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors 3 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69% Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100% Uses correct APA format with no errors 4 to >3.5 ptsGood 80%–89% Contains 1-2 APA format errors 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair 70%–79% Contains 3-4 APA format errors 3 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69% Contains five or more APA format errors	5 pts
Total Points: 100