Assignment: NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation
Assignment: NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation
Assessment Description
The dissemination of an evidence-based practice project proposal is an important part of the final project. Dissemination of your project to a local association or clinical site/practice informs important stakeholders of evidence-based interventions that can improve clinical practice and ultimately patient outcomes.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON; Assignment: NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation
Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. We have attached a well-researched, instruction-compliant sample at the end of the instructions. If you are satisfied with the sample, you can request us to customize your assignment. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper. Kindly scroll down to review the sample.
For this assignment, develop a professional presentation that could be disseminated to a professional group of your peers.
Develop a 12-15 slide PowerPoint detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal. Create speaker notes of 100-250 words for each slide. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to create a voice-over or a video. Refer to the topic Resources for additional guidance on recording your presentation with Loom. Include an additional slide for the Loom link at the beginning and an additional slide for References at the end. Be sure to consider your personal demeanor and tone during the recorded presentation.
Include the following in your presentation:
- Introduction (include PICOT statement)
- Organizational Culture and Readiness
- Problem Statement and Literature Review
- Change Model, or Framework
- Implementation Plan
- Evaluation Plan
- Conclusion
You are required to cite a minimum of six peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
BUY A CUSTOM PAPER HERE ON: Assignment: NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation
Rubric
Criterion | 1. 1: Unsatisfactory | 2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory | 3. 3: Satisfactory | 4. 4: Good | 5. 5: Excellent |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Introduction
Introduction |
0 points
An introduction is not included. |
4.8 points
The introduction omits key aspects of the PICOT and fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation. |
5.28 points
The introduction generally presents the PICOT statement and most of the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation. |
5.52 points
The introduction is adequate. The PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation are discussed. |
6 points
The introduction is succinct, captures the attention of the audience, clearly identifies PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation. |
Organizational and Cultural Readiness
Organizational and Cultural Readiness |
0 points
The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is not included. |
9.6 points
The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is incomplete. |
10.56 points
The organizational culture and readiness are generally discussed and provide insight into some of the challenges faced by the organization. |
11.04 points
The organizational culture and readiness are adequately discussed and provide the necessary insight into the organization challenges. |
12 points
The organizational culture and readiness are thoroughly discussed and provide insight into the organization challenges. |
Problem Statement and Literature Review
Problem Statement and Literature Review |
0 points
The problem statement is not clearly stated. Research from the literature review is not included. |
14.4 points
The problem statement outlines the issue. Support from the research from the literature review is inconsistent. |
15.84 points
The problem statement summarizes the issue and uses evidence-based support from some of the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review provides general support overall. |
16.56 points
The problem describes the issue using evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide adequate rationale and support throughout. |
18 points
The problem statement is consistent throughout the presentation and concisely describes the issue using strong evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide excellent rationale and support throughout. |
Change Model or Framework
Change Model or Framework |
0 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are not described. |
9.6 points
The selected model or framework is and its application to the proposed implementation are only partially described. |
10.56 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are generally described. |
11.04 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are adequately described. |
12 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are thoroughly described. |
Implementation Plan
Implementation Plan |
0 points
The implementation plan is not described. |
9.6 points
The implementation plan is only partially described. |
10.56 points
The implementation plan is generally described and provides an overall outline for the various aspects. |
11.04 points
The implementation plan is adequately described and provides the details for the various aspects. |
12 points
The implementation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects. |
Evaluation Plan
Evaluation Plan |
0 points
The evaluation plan is not described. |
9.6 points
The evaluation plan is only partially described. |
10.56 points
The evaluation plan is outlined and provides general information for most aspects. |
11.04 points
The evaluation plan is adequately described and provides key information for the various aspects. |
12 points
The evaluation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects. |
Conclusion
Conclusion |
0 points
A conclusion is not presented. |
4.8 points
The conclusion mentions some aspects of the presentation, but there are some key aspects missing. |
5.28 points
The conclusion outlines the broad aspects of the presentation. |
5.52 points
The conclusion summarizes the key points of the presentation in a concise manner. |
6 points
The conclusion is short, clear and summarizes the key points of the presentation in a powerful and memorable way. |
Research
Research |
0 points
No outside sources were used to support the assignment. |
4.8 points
Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. |
5.28 points
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. |
5.52 points
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
6 points
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
Presentation
Presentation PowerPoint, speaker notes, Loom voice over or video. |
0 points
The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements. |
9.6 points
The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required elements. |
10.56 points
The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required elements. |
11.04 points
The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements. |
12 points
The submission is presented effectively, and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts. |
Aesthetic Quality
Aesthetic Quality |
0 points
Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content or the purpose of presentation is low quality. |
4.8 points
Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present. |
5.28 points
Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear. |
5.52 points
Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message. |
6 points
Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident. |
Synthesis
Synthesis |
0 points
Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is not logical and/or verifiable. |
4.8 points
Synthesis integrates ideas inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical. |
5.28 points
Synthesis integrates ideas but does not adequately form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements at times is confusing. |
5.52 points
Synthesis integrates ideas to form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements is logical and justified. |
6 points
Synthesis is unique. Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together. The combination of elements is verified. |
Mechanics of Writing
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use. |
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. |
4.8 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
5.28 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
5.52 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
6 points
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
Documentation of Sources
Documentation of Sources Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style. |
0 points
Sources are not documented. |
4.8 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
5.28 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
5.52 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
6 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |