Assignment: NURS 6501 Week 5 Gastrointestinal Disorders

Assignment: NURS 6501 Week 5 Gastrointestinal Disorders

Assignment: NURS 6501 Week 5 Gastrointestinal Disorders

gastrointestinal Disorders

In this exercise, you will complete a Mind Map Template to gauge your understanding of this week’s content. Select one of the possible topics provided to complete your MindMap Template.

BUY A CUSTOM FREE PAPER HERE ON; Assignment: NURS 6501 Week 5 Gastrointestinal Disorders

Ulcers

After HP shots

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Pancreatitis

Liver failure—acute and chronic

Gall bladder disease

Inflammatory bowel disease

Diverticulitis

Jaundice

Bilirubin

Gastrointestinal bleed – upper and lower

Hepatic encephalopathy

Intra-abdominal infections (e.g., appendicitis)

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Lecturio Resources

Review the following Video Resources and Content Pages in the Lecturio Platform by clicking button below labeled Load Week 5: Learning Resources in a new window.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) (11:01 min)

Esophagitis (6:53 min)

Peptic Ulcer Disease (17:48 min)

Gastric Cancer (15:54 min)

Diverticulosis and Diverticulitis (9:22 min)

Ulcerative Colitis (10:17 min)

Crohn Disease (11:33 min)

Celiac Disease: Pathophysiology (7:41 min)

Irritable Bowel Syndrome (8:30 min)

Liver Disease: Introduction and Commonly Used Liver Tests (7:52 min)

Acute Pancreatitis: Definition, Etiology and Diagnosis (11:48 min)

Chronic Pancreatitis: Definition, Diagnosis and Etiology (3:54 min)Biliary Disease (3:27 min)

Approach to Patients with Jaundice with Case (8:51 min)

Gastrointestinal Bleeding (1:49 min)

Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding (1:45 min)

Appendicitis (7:26 min)

Renal Functional Anatomy (7:39 min)

Introduction to Renal Blood Flow (8:40 min)

Regulation of GFR and RBF (9:51 min)

Nephrolithiasis (Kidney Stones): Etiology, Epidemiology, and Pathogenesis with Case (5:41 min)

UTI: Pathogenesis and Etiology with Case (7:38 min)

If you have any technical issues, please contact the Customer Care Team at 1-800-925-3368.

Please take a few minutes to share your experience with Lecturio: Optional Survey

Required Resources

Document: NURS 6501 Concept Map Template

Download NURS 6501 Concept Map Template (Word document)

Supplementary Resources

Note: These readings are intended to serve as supplementary to the Lecturio content provided in this course. Please refer/review these supplementary resources should you need help in reinforcing concepts and in preparation for completing this week’s Assessments.

McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.

Chapter 38: Structure and Function of the Renal and Urological Systems including Summary Review

Chapter 39: Alteration of Renal and Urinary Function (stop at Fluids and electrolytes); Summary Review

Chapter 41: Structure and Function of the Digestive System (stop at Tests of digestive function); Summary Review

Chapter 42: Alterations of Digestive Function (stop at Cancer of the digestive track); Summary Review

Note: Although this resource page displays as an Assignment, it will not be counted towards your final grade. Your progress through the Lecturio resources will be reported as a percentage in the gradebook that will only be used as reference.

By Day 7 of Week 5

Submit your MindMap Template by Day 7 of Week 5.

Rubric

NURS_6501_Week 3, 5, 7, 9_Mind Map Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6501_Week 3, 5, 7, 9_Mind Map Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Select one of the possible topics provided and complete the MindMap Template.
1) Describe the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in your own words. What are the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis?

20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent

A thoroughly completed MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student’s own words. The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis.

17 to >14.0 pts
Good

A completed MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted. The response describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student’s own words. The response explains the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis.

14 to >12.0 pts
Fair

An inaccurately complete or vague MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student’s own words. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis.

12 to >0 pts
Poor

An incomplete MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student’s own words, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 2) What are the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis? How does the diagnosis impact other body systems and what are the possible complications?

20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.

17 to >14.0 pts
Good

The response accurately describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how the diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 3) What are other potential diagnosis that present in a similar way to this diagnosis (differentials)?

20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent

The response accurately and completely describes in detail the potential diagnoses that present in a similar way to the diagnosis provided.

17 to >14.0 pts
Good

The response accurately describes the potential diagnoses that present in a similar way to the diagnosis provided.

14 to >12.0 pts
Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the potential diagnoses that present in a similar way to the diagnosis provided.

12 to >0 pts
Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the potential diagnoses that present in a similar way to the diagnosis provided, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 4) What diagnostic tests or labs would you order to rule out the differentials for this patient or confirm the primary diagnosis?

20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis.

17 to >14.0 pts
Good

The response accurately describes the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis.

14 to >12.0 pts
Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis.

12 to >0 pts
Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 5) What treatment options would you consider? Include possible referrals and medications.

20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the treatment options they would consider. The response accurately and thoroughly describes potential referrals and medications.

17 to >14.0 pts
Good

The response accurately describes the treatment options they would consider. They response accurately describes potential referrals and medications.

14 to >12.0 pts
Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes potential referrals and medications.

12 to >0 pts
Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes possible referrals and medications, or is missing.

20 pts

Total Points: 100