NRS 493 Week 3 Assignment: PICOT Question Paper

NRS 493 Week 3 Assignment: PICOT Question Paper

NRS 493 Week 3 Assignment: PICOT Question Paper

Assessment Description

Review your problem or issue and the study materials to formulate a PICOT (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome and Time) question for your capstone project change proposal. A PICOT question starts with a designated patient population in a particular clinical area and identifies clinical problems or issues that arise from clinical care. The intervention used to address the problem must be a nursing practice intervention. Include a comparison of the nursing intervention to a patient population not currently receiving the nursing intervention, and specify the timeframe needed to implement the change process. Formulate a PICOT question using the PICOT format (provided in the assigned readings) that addresses the clinical nursing problem.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 493 Week 3 Assignment: PICOT Question Paper HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

The PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project change proposal.

In a paper of 500-750 words, clearly identify the clinical problem and how it can result in a positive patient outcome.

Step 1: Create PICOT question; A PICOT question is presented and provides a clear framework for the capstone project change proposal. Your PICOT question should clearly outline all of these elements: patient, intervention, comparison, outcome and time.

Step 2: PICOT Problem: Identify the PICOT problem, what clinical problems or issues may arise from clinical care? The PICOT problem as it relates to evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patient care, health care agency, and nursing practice is thoroughly described.

Step 3: Describe nursing intervention: A nursing intervention used to address the problem. Compare the nursing intervention to a patient population not currently receiving the nursing intervention, and timeframe needed to implement the change process.

Step 4: Summarize Clinical Problem and Patient Outcome: The clinical problem and how it can result in a positive patient outcome.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

PICOT Question Paper – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total50 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

PICOT Question

PICOT Question
0 points

A PICOT question is not presented.
7.5 points

An incomplete PICOT question is presented. The PICOT does not follow the correct format.
7.9 points

A PICOT question is presented. The PICOT generally follows the correct format.
8.9 points

A PICOT question is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity.
10 points

A PICOT question is presented and provides a clear framework for the capstone project change proposal.

PICOT Problem

PICOT Problem
0 points

The PICOT problem as it relates to evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patent care, health care agency, and nursing practice is omitted.
7.5 points

The PICOT problem as it relates to evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patent care, health care agency, and nursing practice is incomplete.
7.9 points

The PICOT problem as it relates to evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patent care, health care agency, and nursing practice is summarized. More information and rationale are needed.
8.9 points

The PICOT problem as it relates to evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patent care, health care agency, and nursing practice is described. Some minor detail is needed for clarity.

10 points

The PICOT problem as it relates to evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, patent care, health care agency, and nursing practice is described. Some minor detail is needed for clarity.

Nursing Intervention

Nursing Intervention
0 points

The intervention and comparison are omitted
5.63 points

The intervention used to address the problem is not based on a nursing practice intervention. A comparison of the nursing intervention to a patient population not currently receiving the nursing intervention, and timeframe needed to implement the change process, are omitted.

5.93 points

A nursing intervention used to address the problem is presented. A comparison of the nursing intervention to a patient population not currently receiving the nursing intervention, and timeframe needed to implement the change process, are summarized. Some information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies.
6.68 points

A nursing intervention used to address the problem is presented. A comparison of the nursing intervention to a patient population not currently receiving the nursing intervention, and timeframe needed to implement the change process, are discussed.
7.5 points

A nursing intervention used to address the problem is clearly presented. A comparison of the nursing intervention to a patient population not currently receiving the nursing intervention, and timeframe needed to implement the change process, are thoroughly discussed.

Clinical Problem and Patient Outcome

Clinical Problem and Patient Outcome

0 points

The clinical problem and how it can result in a positive patient outcome are omitted.

5.63 points

The clinical problem and how it can result in a positive patient outcome are incomplete.

5.93 points

The clinical problem and how it can result in a positive patient outcome are summarized. More information and rationale are needed.
6.68 points

The clinical problem and how it can result in a positive patient outcome are presented. Some minor detail is needed for clarity.

7.5 points

The clinical problem and how it can result in a positive patient outcome are thoroughly discussed. Strong rationale is offered for support.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
2.63 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.

2.77 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
3.12 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
3.5 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

0 points

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 493 Week 3 Assignment: PICOT Question Paper HERE

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
2.63 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
2.77 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
3.12 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3.5 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
2.25 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
2.37 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
2.67 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
3 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

2.25 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
2.37 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2.67 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
1.5 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1.58 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
1.78 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
2 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.