NSG 4150 Week 2

Assignment Overview: Nurses can advocate for healthcare policies to promote justice, fairness, and health equity at facility, local, state, national, and global levels.

Week 2: Policy Letter Checkpoint

Note: The Policy Letter Checkpoint counts for 5% of the final course grade and supports the later Policy Advocacy Letter (submission in Week 6), which accounts for 15% of the final course grade.

Assignment Overview: Nurses can advocate for healthcare policies to promote justice, fairness, and health equity at facility, local, state, national, and global levels. Writing a letter of concern for or support towards a particular policy or legislation is an effective way to hold leaders accountable in their positions.

ORDER A WELL RESEARCHED, AI FREE ASSIGNMENT NSG 4150 Week 2 HERE

What is special with us? We prioritize customer satisfaction by offering a “pay after delivery” policy, meaning you will pay when you’re fully satisfied with the quality of your work. Our commitment to originality means that every assignment is compiled from scratch, thoroughly checked for plagiarism and AI, and tailored to meet your specific requirements. We guarantee timely delivery, meaning you are assured that your assignments will always be submitted on time.

Assignment Instructions: Complete the following steps to begin your Policy Advocacy Letter for this week’s checkpoint assignment. You will submit your responses in an APA-formatted paper (approximately 200 words in length) with in-text citations and references for any cited resources used to support your proposal.

Identify a pending healthcare bill that needs improvement or propose a new bill recommendation relevant to your current practice, community health needs, or personal interests. Submit a link or a PDF of the bill with your paper for this assignment. Note: Navigate to Congress.govLinks to an external site. and view the following video on how to search for legislationLinks to an external site..

Explain why that bill or recommendation is important. You must specify the exact piece of legislation in your paper and refer to its appropriate title – e.g., “Title VIII funding, H. R. 952”.

Identify a leader or change agent (local, state, and national leader/legislator) who is appropriate to advocate for this policy change or adoption. Briefly justify why that leader is an appropriate choice for this policy change or adoption. Note: To determine your representatives, navigate to orgLinks to an external site..

Identify the official mailing or email address of this leader. Note: Your elected officials’ email and physical addresses are available on their websites. You can find out who represents you on the HouseLinks to an external site. and SenateLinks to an external site.

Additional notes:

You are advocating for pending legislation. You cannot choose something that has already passed because if that is the case, no advocacy is necessary.

Always refer to your selected piece of legislation by its appropriate title – e.g., “Title VIII funding, H. R. 952”.

The elected official you contact must have the authority to vote for the proposed legislation. The mayor, governor, or assemblyman (woman) of a city would have no legislative authority and therefore would not be appropriate. You are most likely going to contact a state or federal member of Congress (House or Senate).

NSG 4150 Week 2 Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of a pending healthcare bill that needs improvement or a new bill recommendation and submission of a link or PDF of the bill

30 pts

Exceptional

Identified an appropriate pending healthcare bill that needs improvement or a new bill recommendation and provided a link or PDF of the bill.

15 pts

Developing

Identified a pending healthcare bill that needs improvement or a new bill recommendation that is not appropriate for the assignment and/or did not provide a functional link or PDF of the bill.

0 pts

Unacceptable

Failed to address criteria or did not submit assignment.
30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplanation of selected healthcare bill or new bill recommendation’s importance

30 pts

Exceptional

Provided a satisfactory explanation of the selected healthcare bill or new bill recommendation’s importance.

15 pts

Developing

Explanation of the selected healthcare bill or new bill recommendation’s importance is lacking detail.

0 pts

Unacceptable

Failed to address criteria or did not submit assignment.
30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification and justification of a leader or change agent (local, state, and national leader/legislator) who is appropriate to advocate for this policy change or adoption
30 pts

Exceptional

Identified an appropriate leader or change agent and provided a satisfactory justification as to why the leader is an appropriate choice for the selected policy change or adoption.

15 pts

Developing

Identified a leader who was not appropriate for the selected policy change or adoption and/or provided a poor justification as to why the leader is an appropriate choice for the selected policy change or adoption.

0 pts

Unacceptable

Failed to address criteria or did not submit assignment.
30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of the official mailing or email address of the selected leader

5 pts

Exceptional

Provided an accurate official mailing or email address of the selected leader.

0 pts

Unacceptable

Failed to address criteria or did not submit assignment.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting, Grammar, Spelling, & Mechanics

5 pts

Exceptional

Paper contains no errors related to APA formatting, grammar, spelling, and mechanics.

2 pts

Developing

Paper contains some errors related to APA formatting, grammar, spelling, and mechanics.

0 pts

Unacceptable

Paper contains extensive errors related to APA formatting, grammar, spelling, and mechanics.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

PreviousNext