NRS 445 Nursing Research and Evidence Based Practice Weekly Discussions & Assignments
NRS 445 Nursing Research and Evidence Based Practice Weekly Discussions & Assignments
NRS 445 Topic 1 Assignment: Literature Evaluation Table
Student Name:
Faculty Name:
Background of Nursing Practice Problem (one paragraph; no more than 250 words):
[elementor-template id="144964"]Patients are at an increased risk of healthcare-associated infections with the use of indwelling urinary catheters. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) increases morbidity and mortality in patients, as well as increases in financial burden to healthcare facilities.
PICO(T) Question: Use the PICOT question developed in Topic 1 Discussion Question (DQ) 2 and refine it as
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 445 Nursing Research and Evidence Based Practice Weekly Discussions & Assignments HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
needed.
PICO(T) Question Template | ||
P | Population | Hospital patients needing urinary diversion devices |
I | Intervention | Staff education on the use of devices and regular monitoring |
C | Comparison | Indwelling vs external urinary drainage systems |
O | Outcome | Reduction and prevention of developing CAUTI |
T | Timeline
(optional) |
Length of hospital stay |
Intervention | ||
In patients needing urinary diversion devices (P), how does staff education on the use of devices and regular monitoring (I) compared to indwelling vs external urinary drainage systems (C) affect reduction and prevention of developing CAUTI (O) within length of hospital stay (T)? | ||
Problem Statement | ||
It is not known if the implementation of staff education and regular monitoring (I) would impact reduction and prevention of CAUTIs (O) among patients needing urinary diversion devices (P). |
Criteria | Article 1 | Article 2 | Article 3 | Article 4 |
APA Reference
Include the GCU permalink or working link used to access the article |
Meddings, J., Manojlovich, M., Ameling, J. M., Olmsted, R. N., Rolle, A. J., Greene, M. T., Ratz, D., Snyder, A., & Saint, S. (2019). Quantitative Results of a National Intervention to Prevent Hospital-Acquired Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection. Annals of Internal Medicine, 171(7_Supplement), S38. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-3534
|
Quinn, M., Ameling, J. M., Forman, J., Krein, S. L., Manojlovich, M., Fowler, K. E., King, E. A., & Meddings, J. (2020). Persistent Barriers to Timely Catheter Removal Identified from Clinical Observations and Interviews. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 46(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.10.004 | Atkins, L., Sallis, A., Chadborn, T., Shaw, K., Schneider, A., Hopkins, S., Bunten, A., Michie, S., & Lorencatto, F. (2020). Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators and strategic behavioural analysis of interventions. Implementation Science, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01001-2
|
Mundle, W., Howell-Belle, C., & Jeffs, L. (2020). Preventing Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection: A Multipronged Collaborative Approach. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(1), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000418
|
Purpose/Aim of Study | To investigate the effect of a multimodal initiative on CAUTI in hospitals with high burden of health care-associated infection (HAI) | Identify common barriers to timely and appropriate catheter removal with the goal of developing potential interventions at later stages of the study. | Identify barriers to and facilitators of behaviors that lead to CAUTI in primary, community, secondary care and nursing homes; describe nationally adopted interventions, and assess which intervention is congruent with barriers and facilitators. | One hospital’s strategy to prevent and minimize CAUTI. |
Research question(s) | What are the effects of a multimodal initiative on CAUTI in hospitals with high burden of health-care associated infection (HAI)? | What are current challenges to timely catheter removal faced by frontline clinician? | Interventions implemented target behaviors related to catheter insertion, maintenance and removal, but to what extent? | Why are CAUTI rates higher in the general internal medicine units when compared with overall hospital rates? |
Design
Is the article qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods? Explain how you determined the type of research design. |
Quantitative. Data is collected using structured research instruments and is presented in the form of numbers | Qualitative. Research was conducted using observation of shadowing nursing during shift change, admissions and shadowing physicians during morning rounds. In-person interviews were also conducted. | Mixed. Using systematic reviews, content analysis and finding from matrices to identify barriers and facilitators leading to CAUTI | Quantitative
This article uses information by local data analysis and evidence-informed by local data analysis and evidence-informed practices with CAUTI. |
Setting
Where did the study take place? What type of setting: inpatient, outpatient, etc.? |
Acute care, long-term care and critical access hospitals | 20 bed unit providing intermediate or progressive care in a large academically affiliated tertiary hospital. | England. Primary, community and secondary care and nursing homes | 442 bed acute care academic health sciences center |
Sample
Number and characteristics of participants |
387 hospitals | 20 hospital staff, nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and physicians | 25 studies | Nursing unit administrators, the Magnet program director, director of nursing practice, infection prevention and control practitioners, information technology, general internists, CNSs from general internal medicine, surgery and critical care, and direct care nurses. |
Methods
Interventions/Instruments |
Prospective, national, nonrandomized, clustered, externally facilitated, pre-post observational quality improvement initiative | Interviews, observations of staff, reviewing surgery notes and documentation | Phase 1 review of barriers to and facilitators of CAUTI-related behaviors. Phase 2 review of interventions Phase 3 compared finding from Phases 1 & 2 | Bundled approach to care that would have the most positive impact on patient outcomes (decreased CAUTI). Identifying the need for improvement, developing CAUTI intervention, selecting CAUTI bundle components, leveraging the role of nursing, and launching the CAUTI bundle |
Analysis
How were the collected data analyzed? |
Raw aggregatete calculations | Content analysis conducted on interview and observation data using deductive and inductive approaches | Recorded intervention functions, policy, and behavior change techniques, the number of interventions present and the most and least frequent intervention functions | Comparative analysis was used. |
Outcomes/key findings of the study and implications for nursing practice
Summary of study results |
With the use of multimodal initiative, the risks of health care associated infections can reduce significantly; however, this multimodal intervention yielded not substantial improvements in CAUTI or urinary catheter utilization | Barriers included physicians not routinely reviewing catheter need, catheters not being noticed, use of Do Not Remove orders. Catheter data is inaccurate, hard to find or inaccurate, catheter removal is not a priority, confusion who has authority to remove, lack of awareness and agreement of standard protocols for removal, and communication barriers. | Frequent barriers (1) lack of time and equipment (2) lack of knowledge (3) beliefs about consequences (4) family requests (5) decisions based on non-medical criteria (6) social professional role and identity | Implementation of standardized practices aimed at reducing CAUTIs resulted in a 79% reduction in average CAUTI rates. |
Recommendations of the researcher | Future studies should focus on how to improve the prevention of CAUTI | Clinicians need ready access to accurate catheter data, more clearly delineated clinician roles for prompting removal, effective tools to facilitate discussions about catheter use, and standardized catheter removal protocols. | More process evaluation to determine why guidelines are not being implemented. | Organizations to use the design and implementation of a bundled and QI approach in their efforts to reduce and minimize CAUTI rates to positively impact health care-associated infetions (HAI), improve patient experience with delivery of care, decrease length of stay, and reduce morbidity and mortality. |
Explain how this article supports your proposed PICO(T) question. | Analyzes the effect of a multimodal initiative on CAUTI in hospitals with high burden of health care-associated infection (HAI) | The need for ready access to catheter data with clearly defined roles for prompting removal and discussions on catheter use and removal protocols | Shows reasons indwelling catheters are used | This article shows decrease in CAUTI with the use of (1) nurse-driven removal of urinary catheter algorithm determine indication and discontinuation (2) staff education to include roles and responsibilities, appropriate indications, and retention management, and (3) screen saver reminders. |
NRS 445 Topic DQ 1
Assessment Description
Statistical significance refers to the likelihood that the results of a study are not due to chance, while clinical significance refers to the practical importance of the results in terms of their impact on patient care. In other words, statistical significance is a measure of the strength of the evidence, while clinical significance is a measure of the relevance of the evidence to real-world situations.
Using a quantitative research article from one of the previous topics, analyze the p-value. What is it? Is it statistically significant? If your p-value is not statistically significant, what is the clinical significance? Generalizability of research depends on a variety of factors. List three factors of generalizability, and discuss whether this research article is generalizable to the nursing problem you are researching.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
NRS 445 Topic 2 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion
Topic 2 DQ 1
The three types of qualitative research designs are phenomenological, grounded theory, and ethnographic research. Compare the differences and similarities between two of the three types of qualitative studies and give an example of each.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 4.1, 4.2
Topic 2 DQ 2
Select a qualitative research article, different than the one you used in Topic 1, focusing on a clinical nursing problem of your choice. Use this research article to address the following questions:
Provide an APA reference of the article including a GCU permalink or working link used to access the article.
Study design: How did you determine that the article is qualitative? What study methodology is used?
Using the “CASP Qualitative Checklist,” found in topic Resources, evaluate the study. Based on your findings, summarize the critical appraisal of the selected research article.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
NRS 445 Topic 2 Assignment: Benchmark – Ethical Conduct of Scholarly Activities
Assessment Description
The focus of this assignment is to apply the principles detailed in the Belmont Report to case studies involving human subjects in research or a quality improvement project.
Utilize the “Ethical Conduct of Scholarly Activities” document to complete this assignment.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:
RN-BSN
4.3: Promote the ethical conduct of scholarly activities [AACN ]
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 1.2, 4.3, 9.1, 10.2
Attachments
NRS-445-RS-T2EthicalConductofScholarlyActivities-InstructorGuide.docxNRS-445-RS-T2EthicalConductofSc
Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu
Benchmark – Ethical Conduct of Scholarly Activities – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total140 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Case 1: Respect for Person
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person.
0 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is not present.
12.6 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is present.
14.95 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is detailed.
16.8 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is thorough.
Case 1: Beneficence
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence.
0 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is not present.
12.6 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is present.
14.95 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is detailed.
16.8 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is thorough.
Case 1: Justice
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice.
0 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is not present.
12.6 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is present.
14.95 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is detailed.
16.8 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is thorough.
Case 2: Respect for Person
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person.
0 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is not present.
12.6 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is present.
14.95 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is detailed.
16.8 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is thorough.
Case 2: Beneficence
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence.
0 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is not present.
12.6 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is present.
14.95 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is detailed.
16.8 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is thorough.
Case 2: Justice
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice.
0 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is not present.
12.6 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is present.
14.95 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is detailed.
16.8 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is thorough.
Ethical Principles, Christian Worldview, and Nursing Practice
Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice.
0 points
Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice is not present.
8.4 points
Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice is inaccurate or incomplete.
8.85 points
Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice is present.
9.97 points
Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice is detailed.
11.2 points
Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice is thorough.
Demonstration of Professional Aptitude for Ethical Conduct (B)
Overall demonstration of professional aptitude for application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. (C.4.3)
0 points
The learner does not demonstrate professional aptitude in the application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. Rationale is not appropriate or does not reflect the assignment criteria and nursing content. Support for both factual and subjective responses is not provided.
10.5 points
The learner inconsistently demonstrates professional aptitude in the application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. Rationale is lacking and does not reflect the assignment criteria and nursing content in many scenarios. Overall, support for both factual and subjective responses is lacking.
11.06 points
The learner demonstrates adequate professional aptitude for application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. Rationale is mostly appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content and provides general support for both factual and subjective responses throughout.
12.46 points
The learner demonstrates professional aptitude for application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. Rationale is appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content and provides support for both factual and subjective responses throughout.
14 points
The learner clearly demonstrates professional aptitude for application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. Rationale is appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content and provides strong support for both factual and subjective responses throughout.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
6.3 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
6.64 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
7.48 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
8.4 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
4.2 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
4.42 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
4.98 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
5.6 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
NRS 445 Topic 3 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion
Topic 3 DQ 1
Compare independent variables, dependent variables, and extraneous variables. Describe two ways that researchers attempt to control extraneous variables. Provide an example of how this is applied using a peer-reviewed, primary research article.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
Topic 3 DQ 2
Select a research article that uses a randomized controlled trial focusing on a clinical nursing problem of your choice. Use this research article to address the following questions:
Provide an APA reference of the article including a GCU permalink or working link used to access the article.
Using the “CASP Randomized Controlled Trial Checklist,” found in topic Resources, evaluate the study. Based on your findings, summarize the critical appraisal of the selected research article.
Do the benefits of the experimental intervention outweigh the harms and costs? Identify and discuss one other ethical consideration applicable to quantitative research studies such as this one.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
Resources
Collapse All ResourcesCollapse All
Nursing Research: Understanding Methods for Best Practice
Read Chapter 3 in Nursing Research: Understanding Methods for Best Practice.
View Resource
CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Standard Checklist
Refer to the “CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Standard Checklist,” from the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, for help in com
… Read More
https://casp-uk.net/images/checklist/documents/CASP-Randomised-Controlled-Trial-Checklist/CASP-RCT-Checklist-PDF-Fillable-Form.pdf
Ensuring Data Fidelity in Quantitative Research
Read “Ensuring Data Fidelity in Quantitative Research,” by Siegmund and Siedlecki, from Clinical Nurse Specialist (2021)
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00002800-202111000-00003&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
Essential Versus Nonessential: The Ethics of Conducting Non-COVID Research in a Population of Persons Living With Serious Illness During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Read “Essential Versus Nonessential: The Ethics of Conducting Non-COVID Research in a Population of Persons Living With Serious Illne
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00129191-202202000-00009&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
Experimental (Trial) Research
Read “Experimental (Trial) Research,” by Stoica, from Salem Press Encyclopedia (2021). This article presents information
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ers&AN=89164212&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1
Sampling Design in Nursing Research
Read “Sampling Design in Nursing Research,” by Curtis and Keeler, from American Journal of Nursing (2021). This article
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00000446-202103000-00024&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
NRS 445 Topic 3 Case Study MrD
Assessment Description
Use the “Case Study: Mr. D.” template and the “Functional Health Patterns Assessment Guide”, located in the topic Resources, to complete the assignment.
Case Study: Mr. D. has indirect care experience requirements. The “NRS-455 – Case Studies: Indirect Care Experience Hours” form, found in the Topic 1 Resources, will be used to document the indirect care experience hours completed in the case study. As progress is made on the case study, update this form indicating the date(s) each section is completed. This form will be submitted in Topic 3.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:
RN-BSN
2.4: Diagnose actual or potential health problems and needs.
2.8: Promote self-care management.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 2.3, 2.4, 2.8, 3.1, and 3.3.
Attachments
NRS-455-RS-T3-CaseStudyMrD.docx
Rubric Criteria
Clinical Manifestations in Mr. D.
6.5 point
Pathophysiology of Renal Dialysis and ESRD
19.5 points
Nonadherence to Diabetes Self-Management Plan (B)
13 points
Format/Documentation
5.2 points
Mechanics of Writing
7.8 points
Community Resources
6.5 points
Multidisciplinary Care Approach
13 points
Potential Health Risks (B)
19.5 points
Functional Health Patterns
13 points
Nursing Management and Health Promotion
13 points
Patient Education Plan
13 points
Criteria Description
5. Target
13 points
Development of patient education plan that could be offered to the patient for prevention of future events, health restoration, and maintaining renal status is thorough.
4. Acceptable
11.57 points
Development of patient education plan that could be offered to the patient for prevention of future events, health restoration, and maintaining renal status is detailed.
3. Approaching
10.27 points
Development of patient education plan that could be offered to the patient for prevention of future events, health restoration, and maintaining renal status is present but lacks detail.
2. Insufficient
9.75 points
Development of patient education plan that could be offered to the patient for prevention of future events, health restoration, and maintaining renal status is incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Development of patient education plan that could be offered to the patient for prevention of future events, health restoration, and maintaining renal status is not present.
NRS 445 Topic 4 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion
Topic 4 DQ 1
Statistical significance refers to the likelihood that the results of a study are not due to chance, while clinical significance refers to the practical importance of the results in terms of their impact on patient care. In other words, statistical significance is a measure of the strength of the evidence, while clinical significance is a measure of the relevance of the evidence to real-world situations.
Using a quantitative research article from one of the previous topics, analyze the p-value. What is it? Is it statistically significant? If your p-value is not statistically significant, what is the clinical significance? Generalizability of research depends on a variety of factors. List three factors of generalizability, and discuss whether this research article is generalizable to the nursing problem you are researching.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
Topic 4 DQ 2
Describe the influence “levels of evidence” have on practice changes. Identify the most reliable level of evidence and provide an example of the type of practice change that could result from this level of evidence.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 4.1
Assessment Description
The focus of this assignment is to apply the principles detailed in the Belmont Report to case studies involving human subjects in research or a quality improvement project.
Utilize the “Ethical Conduct of Scholarly Activities” document to complete this assignment.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:
RN-BSN
4.3: Promote the ethical conduct of scholarly activities [AACN ]
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 1.2, 4.3, 9.1, 10.2
Attachments
NRS-445-RS-T2EthicalConductofScholarlyActivities-InstructorGuide.docxNRS-445-RS-T2EthicalConductofSc
Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu
Benchmark – Ethical Conduct of Scholarly Activities – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total140 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Case 1: Respect for Person
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person.
0 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is not present.
12.6 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is present.
14.95 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is detailed.
16.8 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is thorough.
Case 1: Beneficence
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence.
0 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is not present.
12.6 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is present.
14.95 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is detailed.
16.8 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is thorough.
Case 1: Justice
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice.
0 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is not present.
12.6 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is present.
14.95 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is detailed.
16.8 points
Explanation of how Case Study 1 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is thorough.
Case 2: Respect for Person
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person.
0 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is not present.
12.6 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is present.
14.95 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is detailed.
16.8 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of respect for person, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in respect for person, is thorough.
Case 2: Beneficence
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence.
0 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is not present.
12.6 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is present.
14.95 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is detailed.
16.8 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of beneficence, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in beneficence, is thorough.
Case 2: Justice
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice.
0 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is not present.
12.6 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is inaccurate or incomplete.
13.27 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is present.
14.95 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is detailed.
16.8 points
Explanation of how Case Study 2 meets and does not meet the components of justice, as well as steps that can be taken by nurse or quality improvement manager to adhere to ethical principles in justice, is thorough.
Ethical Principles, Christian Worldview, and Nursing Practice
Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice.
0 points
Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice is not present.
8.4 points
Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice is inaccurate or incomplete.
8.85 points
Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice is present.
9.97 points
Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice is detailed.
11.2 points
Discussion of how the ethical principles of the Belmont Report align with the Christian worldview and with personal nursing practice is thorough.
Demonstration of Professional Aptitude for Ethical Conduct (B)
Overall demonstration of professional aptitude for application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. (C.4.3)
0 points
The learner does not demonstrate professional aptitude in the application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. Rationale is not appropriate or does not reflect the assignment criteria and nursing content. Support for both factual and subjective responses is not provided.
10.5 points
The learner inconsistently demonstrates professional aptitude in the application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. Rationale is lacking and does not reflect the assignment criteria and nursing content in many scenarios. Overall, support for both factual and subjective responses is lacking.
11.06 points
The learner demonstrates adequate professional aptitude for application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. Rationale is mostly appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content and provides general support for both factual and subjective responses throughout.
12.46 points
The learner demonstrates professional aptitude for application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. Rationale is appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content and provides support for both factual and subjective responses throughout.
14 points
The learner clearly demonstrates professional aptitude for application of ethical research guidelines, ethical behaviors, and advocacy for the protection of participants in scholarly initiatives and scholarly practice-based projects. Rationale is appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content and provides strong support for both factual and subjective responses throughout.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
6.3 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
6.64 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
7.48 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
8.4 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
4.2 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
4.42 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
4.98 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
5.6 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 445 Nursing Research and Evidence Based Practice Weekly Discussions & Assignments HERE
NRS 445 Topic 4 Assignment: Rough Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to synthesize a literature review that will be used to draw conclusions in order to propose an evidence-based practice change to address your identified nurse practice problem.
Using the “Literature Evaluation Table” assignment in Topic 1, and accompanying faculty feedback, you will synthesize the information created for your PICOT question into a literature review and evidence-based proposal.
In a 1,500-1,750-word paper, provide an overview that illustrates the research related to your particular PICOT question.
Use the following components from the “Literature Evaluation Table” to complete the assignment:
Identified practice problem
Two qualitative peer-reviewed research articles
Two quantitative peer-reviewed research articles
Use the “Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Guidelines” document to organize your paper.
You are required to cite a minimum of four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Attachments
NRS-445-RS-ResearchCritiquePICOTGuid
esources
Collapse All ResourcesCollapse All
Nursing Research: Understanding Methods for Best Practice
Read Chapter 3 in Nursing Research: Understanding Methods for Best Practice.
View Resource
CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Standard Checklist
Refer to the “CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Standard Checklist,” from the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, for help in com
… Read More
https://casp-uk.net/images/checklist/documents/CASP-Randomised-Controlled-Trial-Checklist/CASP-RCT-Checklist-PDF-Fillable-Form.pdf
Ensuring Data Fidelity in Quantitative Research
Read “Ensuring Data Fidelity in Quantitative Research,” by Siegmund and Siedlecki, from Clinical Nurse Specialist (2021)
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00002800-202111000-00003&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
Essential Versus Nonessential: The Ethics of Conducting Non-COVID Research in a Population of Persons Living With Serious Illness During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Read “Essential Versus Nonessential: The Ethics of Conducting Non-COVID Research in a Population of Persons Living With Serious Illne
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00129191-202202000-00009&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
Experimental (Trial) Research
Read “Experimental (Trial) Research,” by Stoica, from Salem Press Encyclopedia (2021). This article presents information
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ers&AN=89164212&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s8333196&groupid=main&profile=eds1
Sampling Design in Nursing Research
Read “Sampling Design in Nursing Research,” by Curtis and Keeler, from American Journal of Nursing (2021). This article
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00000446-202103000-00024&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
Optional – ThinkingStorm Online Tutoring
For additional information, the following is recommended:
Access “ThinkingStorm Online Tutoring,” located on the ThinkingSt
… Read More
https://www.thinkingstor
Rough Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total180 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Introduction Part 1: Nursing Practice Problem
Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay
0 points
Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is omitted.
9.45 points
Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is incomplete or inaccurate.
9.95 points
Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is present.
11.21 points
Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is detailed.
12.6 points
Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is thorough.
PICOT Question
Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received from instructor
0 points
Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received from instructor is omitted.
9.45 points
Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received from instructor is incomplete or inaccurate.
9.95 points
Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received from instructor is present with minor inaccuracies.
11.21 points
Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received from instructor is accurately written and uses the templated language.
12.6 points
Statement of updated PICOT question is concise, accurately written, and uses the templated language.
Method of Studies
Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question
0 points
Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question is omitted.
18.9 points
Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question is incomplete or inaccurate.
19.91 points
Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question is present.
22.43 points
Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question is detailed and demonstrates a basic understanding of research methods.
25.2 points
Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question is thorough and demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods.
Results of Studies
Summary of the key findings of the four studies
0 points
Summary of the key finding of the four studies is omitted.
18.9 points
Summary of the key finding of the four studies is incomplete or inaccurate.
19.91 points
Summary of the key finding of the four studies is present with some inconsistencies.
22.43 points
Summary of the key finding of the four studies is complete with some minor inconsistencies.
25.2 points
Summary of the key findings of the four studies is thorough and accurate.
Outcomes Comparison Part 1: Anticipated Outcome
Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question
0 points
Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is omitted.
9.45 points
Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is incomplete or inaccurate.
9.95 points
Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is present with some inconsistencies.
11.21 points
Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is complete with some minor inconsistencies and includes relevant details and supporting explanation.
12.6 points
Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is thorough and accurate with substantial relevant details.
Outcomes Comparison Part 2: Four Articles
Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome
0 points
Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is omitted.
9.45 points
Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is incomplete or inaccurate.
9.95 points
Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is present with some inconsistencies.
11.21 points
Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is complete with some minor inconsistencies.
12.6 points
Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is thorough accurate.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Changes Part 1: Link Between PICOT Question
Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem
0 points
Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem is omitted.
9.45 points
Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem is incomplete or inaccurate.
9.95 points
Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem is present with some inconsistencies.
11.21 points
Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem is complete with some minor inconsistencies.
12.6 points
Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem is thorough, and accurate.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change Part 2: EBP Proposal
Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting
0 points
Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting is omitted.
9.45 points
Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting is incomplete or inaccurate.
9.95 points
Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting is present with some inconsistencies.
11.21 points
Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting is complete and includes relevant details.
12.6 points
Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting is thorough with substantial relevant details.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
9.45 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.
9.95 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
11.21 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
12.6 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
9.45 points
Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
9.95 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
11.21 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
12.6 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
Evidence
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
8.1 points
Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
8.53 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
9.61 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
10.8 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
8.1 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
8.53 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
9.61 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
10.8 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
5.4 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
5.69 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
6.41 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
7.2 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
NRS 445 Topic 5 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion
Topic 5 DQ 1
The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in research studies to increase validity and reliability. What advantages or disadvantages do you see in using both types of methods in a nursing study? Provide an example of a nursing practice problem that could be studied using a mixed methods approach.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 4.1
Topic 5 DQ 2
According to the textbook, nurses in various settings are adopting a research-based (or evidence-based) practice that incorporates research findings into their decisions and interactions with patients. Analyze the role nurses play in improving health care quality and safety through the use of evidence-based practice (EBP). How do you see this role being applied in your workplace? What internal stakeholder perspectives would you need to consider, including stakeholder support, in order to successfully implement an EBP project in your workplace?
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to “RN-BSN Discussion Question Rubric” and “RN-BSN Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 1.1, 4.1, 5.1, 6.4, 10.3
NRS 445 Topic 5 Assignment: Final Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to incorporate the instructor-recommended revisions or changes from the Topic 3 “Rough Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal” to develop a 1,500-1,750-word final draft.
Use the “Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Guidelines” document to organize your essay. Questions under each heading should be addressed in the structure of a formal paper.
You are required to cite a minimum of four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 4.1, 4.2, 5.1
Attachments
NRS-445-RS-ResearchCritiquePICOTGuidelines.doc
Final Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total260 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Introduction Part 1: Nursing Practice Problem
Integration of revisions and changes indicated in instructor feedback for introduction of nursing practice problem from rough draft into final draft
0 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the introduction of nursing practice problem are not integrated into final draft.
13.65 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the introduction of nursing practice problem are incompletely or inaccurately integrated into the final draft.
14.38 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the introduction of nursing practice problem are integrated into the final draft with major inaccuracies.
16.2 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the introduction of nursing practice problem are integrated into the final draft with minor inaccuracies.
18.2 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the introduction of nursing practice problem are thoroughly and accurately integrated into the final draft OR no changes were indicated.
PICOT Question
Integration of revisions and changes indicated in instructor feedback for statement of PICOT question from rough draft into final draft
0 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the statement of PICOT question are not integrated into the final draft.
13.65 points
N/A
14.38 points
N/A
16.2 points
N/A
18.2 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the statement of PICOT question are thoroughly and accurately integrated into final draft OR no changes were indicated.
Method of Studies
Integration of revisions and changes indicated in instructor feedback for description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question from rough draft into final draft
0 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question are not integrated into the final draft.
27.3 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question are incompletely or inaccurately integrated into the final draft.
28.76 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question are integrated into the final draft with major inaccuracies.
32.4 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question are integrated into the final draft with minor inaccuracies.
36.4 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question are thoroughly and accurately integrated into final draft OR no changes were indicated.
Results of Studies
Integration of revisions and changes indicated in instructor feedback for summary of the key findings of the four studies from rough draft into final draft.
0 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for summary of the key findings of the four studies are not integrated into the final draft.
27.3 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for summary of the key findings of the four studies are incompletely or inaccurately integrated into the final draft.
28.76 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for summary of the key findings of the four studies are integrated into the final draft with major inaccuracies.
32.4 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for summary of the key findings of the four studies are integrated into the final draft with minor inaccuracies.
36.4 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for summary of the key findings of the four studies are thoroughly and accurately integrated into final draft OR no changes were indicated.
Outcomes Comparison Part 1: Anticipated Outcome
Integration of revisions and changes indicated in instructor feedback for explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question from rough draft into final draft
0 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question are not integrated into the final draft.
13.65 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question are incompletely or inaccurately integrated into the final draft.
14.38 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question are integrated into the final draft with major inaccuracies.
16.2 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question are integrated with minor inaccuracies.
18.2 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question, are thoroughly and accurately integrated into final draft OR no changes were indicated.
Outcomes Comparison Part 2: Four Articles
Integration of revisions and changes indicated in instructor feedback for comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome from rough draft into final draft
0 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome are not integrated into the final draft.
13.65 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome are incompletely or inaccurately integrated into the final draft.
14.38 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome are integrated into the final draft with major inaccuracies.
16.2 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome are integrated into the final draft with minor inaccuracies
18.2 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome, are thoroughly and accurately integrated into final draft OR no changes were indicated.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Changes Part 1: Link Between PICOT Question
Integration of revisions and changes indicated in instructor feedback for description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem from rough draft into final draft
0 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem are not integrated into the final draft.
13.65 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem are integrated into the final draft incompletely or inaccurately.
14.38 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem are integrated into the final draft with major inaccuracies
16.2 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem are integrated into the final draft with minor inaccuracies.
18.2 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem are thoroughly and accurately integrated into final draft OR no changes were indicated.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change Part 2: EBP Proposal
Integration of revisions and changes indicated in instructor feedback for proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting from rough draft into final draft
0 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting are not integrated into the final draft.
13.65 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting are integrated into the final draft incompletely or inaccurately.
14.38 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting are integrated into the final draft with major inaccuracies.
16.2 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting are integrated into the final draft with minor inaccuracies.
18.2 points
Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting are thoroughly and accurately integrated into final draft OR no changes were indicated.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
13.65 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.
14.38 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
16.2 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
18.2 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
13.65 points
Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
14.38 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
16.2 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
18.2 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
Evidence
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
11.7 points
Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
12.32 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
13.88 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
15.6 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
11.7 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
12.32 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
13.88 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
15.6 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
7.8 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
8.22 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
9.26 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
10.4 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
[elementor-template id="144964"]