NRS 460 Assignment: John Doe - Emergency Department Case Study

NRS 460 Assignment: John Doe – Emergency Department Case Study

Assessment Description

Use the “Case Study: John Doe – Emergency Department” template to complete the assignment.

This case study has indirect care experience requirements. The “NRS-460 – Case Studies: Indirect Care Experience Hours” form, found in the Topic 1 Resources, will be used to document the indirect care experience hours completed in the case study. As progress is made on the case study, update this form indicating the date(s) each section is completed. This form will be submitted in Topic 5.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NRS 460 Assignment: John Doe – Emergency Department Case Study

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 460 Assignment: John Doe – Emergency Department Case Study HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 1.3, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, and 4.2.

Attachments

Case Study: John Doe – Emergency Department – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total150 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Insufficient	3. Approaching	4. Acceptable	5. Target
Assessment Findings	0 points Three to five problems and health concerns present within the patient are listed. Prioritization of the problems and health concerns, including a rationale for each and a discussion of how each team member can contribute to the formation and improvement of diagnosis, is not present.	22.5 points Three to five problems and health concerns present within the patient are listed. Prioritization of the problems and health concerns, including a rationale for each and a discussion of how each team member can contribute to the formation and improvement of diagnosis, is incomplete or incorrect.	23.7 points Three to five problems and health concerns present within the patient are listed. Prioritization of the problems and health concerns, including a rationale for each and a discussion of how each team member can contribute to the formation and improvement of diagnosis, is present but lacks detail.	26.7 points Three to five problems and health concerns present within the patient are listed. Prioritization of the problems and health concerns, including a rationale for each and a discussion of how each team member can contribute to the formation and improvement of diagnosis, is detailed.	30 points Three to five problems and health concerns present within the patient are listed. Prioritization of the problems and health concerns, including a rationale for each and a discussion of how each team member can contribute to the formation and improvement of diagnosis, is thorough.
Interventions	0 points Description of the interventions required upon the patient’s arrival to the hospital to mitigate risk is not present.	16.88 points Description of the interventions required upon the patient’s arrival to the hospital to mitigate risk is incomplete or incorrect.	17.78 points Description of the interventions required upon the patient’s arrival to the hospital to mitigate risk is present but lacks detail.	20.03 points Description of the interventions required upon the patient’s arrival to the hospital to mitigate risk is detailed.	22.5 points Description of the interventions required upon the patient’s arrival to the hospital to mitigate risk is thorough.
Diagnostic Tests	0 points Rationale for two diagnostic tests that were ordered for the patient, including how these tests relate to the patient’s condition, is not present.	22.5 points Rationale for two diagnostic tests that were ordered for the patient, including how these tests relate to the patient’s condition, is incorrect.	23.7 points Rationale for two diagnostic tests that were ordered for the patient, including how these tests relate to the patient’s condition, is lacks detail.	26.7 points Rationale for two diagnostic tests that were ordered for the patient, including how these tests relate to the patient’s condition, is detailed.	30 points Rationale for two diagnostic tests that were ordered for the patient, including how these tests relate to the patient’s condition, is thorough.
Surgical Interventions	0 points Discussion of the possible surgical interventions necessary to address the patient’s fractures, including a description of the steps needed to ensure proper healing if no surgery is needed, is not present.	16.88 points Discussion of the possible surgical interventions necessary to address the patient’s fractures, including a description of the steps needed to ensure proper healing if no surgery is needed, is incomplete or incorrect.	17.78 points Discussion of the possible surgical interventions necessary to address the patient’s fractures, including a description of the steps needed to ensure proper healing if no surgery is needed, is present but lacks detail.	20.03 points Discussion of the possible surgical interventions necessary to address the patient’s fractures, including a description of the steps needed to ensure proper healing if no surgery is needed, is detailed.	22.5 points Discussion of the possible surgical interventions necessary to address the patient’s fractures, including a description of the steps needed to ensure proper healing if no surgery is needed, is thorough.
Pan Scan Results	0 points Discussion of the necessary interventions for treating the patient based on the Pan Scan results is not present.	16.88 points Discussion of the necessary interventions for treating the patient based on the Pan Scan results is incomplete or incorrect.	17.78 points Discussion of the necessary interventions for treating the patient based on the Pan Scan results is present but lacks detail.	20.03 points Discussion of the necessary interventions for treating the patient based on the Pan Scan results is detailed.	22.5 points Discussion of the necessary interventions for treating the patient based on the Pan Scan results is thorough.
Psychosocial and Spiritual Considerations	0 points Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is not present.	5.63 points Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is incomplete or incorrect.	5.93 points Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is present but lacks detail.	6.68 points Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is detailed.	7.5 points Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is thorough.
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.	0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.	5.63 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.	5.93 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.	6.68 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.	7.5 points No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Documentation of Sources Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.	0 points Sources are not documented.	5.63 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	5.93 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	6.68 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	7.5 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of errors.

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Assessment Findings

0 points

Three to five problems and health concerns present within the patient are listed. Prioritization of the problems and health concerns, including a rationale for each and a discussion of how each team member can contribute to the formation and improvement of diagnosis, is not present.

22.5 points

23.7 points

26.7 points

30 points

Interventions

0 points

Description of the interventions required upon the patient’s arrival to the hospital to mitigate risk is not present.

16.88 points

Description of the interventions required upon the patient’s arrival to the hospital to mitigate risk is incomplete or incorrect.

17.78 points

Description of the interventions required upon the patient’s arrival to the hospital to mitigate risk is present but lacks detail.

20.03 points

Description of the interventions required upon the patient’s arrival to the hospital to mitigate risk is detailed.

22.5 points

Description of the interventions required upon the patient’s arrival to the hospital to mitigate risk is thorough.

Diagnostic Tests

0 points

Rationale for two diagnostic tests that were ordered for the patient, including how these tests relate to the patient’s condition, is not present.

22.5 points

Rationale for two diagnostic tests that were ordered for the patient, including how these tests relate to the patient’s condition, is incorrect.

23.7 points

Rationale for two diagnostic tests that were ordered for the patient, including how these tests relate to the patient’s condition, is lacks detail.

26.7 points

Rationale for two diagnostic tests that were ordered for the patient, including how these tests relate to the patient’s condition, is detailed.

30 points

Rationale for two diagnostic tests that were ordered for the patient, including how these tests relate to the patient’s condition, is thorough.

Surgical Interventions

0 points

Discussion of the possible surgical interventions necessary to address the patient’s fractures, including a description of the steps needed to ensure proper healing if no surgery is needed, is not present.

16.88 points

17.78 points

20.03 points

22.5 points

Pan Scan Results

0 points

Discussion of the necessary interventions for treating the patient based on the Pan Scan results is not present.

16.88 points

Discussion of the necessary interventions for treating the patient based on the Pan Scan results is incomplete or incorrect.

17.78 points

Discussion of the necessary interventions for treating the patient based on the Pan Scan results is present but lacks detail.

20.03 points

Discussion of the necessary interventions for treating the patient based on the Pan Scan results is detailed.

22.5 points

Discussion of the necessary interventions for treating the patient based on the Pan Scan results is thorough.

Psychosocial and Spiritual Considerations

0 points

Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is not present.

5.63 points

Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is incomplete or incorrect.

5.93 points

Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is present but lacks detail.

6.68 points

Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is detailed.

7.5 points

Discussion of ways in which the nurse can address the patient’s psychosocial and spiritual needs is thorough.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

5.63 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

5.93 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

6.68 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

7.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Documentation of Sources

Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

0 points

Sources are not documented.

5.63 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

5.93 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

6.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

7.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of errors.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NRS 460 Assignment: John Doe – Emergency Department Case Study

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

NRS 460 Assignment: John Doe – Emergency Department Case Study