PHI 413 Topic 2 Assignment: Case Study on Moral Status: The Case for Fetal Abnormality

PHI 413 Topic 2 Assignment: Case Study on Moral Status: The Case for Fetal Abnormality

PHI 413 Topic 2 Assignment: Case Study on Moral Status: The Case for Fetal Abnormality

Case Study on Moral Status: The Case for Fetal Abnormality

            In medical and nursing practice there are always situations that present a moral dilemma or what are usually called ethical dilemmas. These situations would normally require that a decision maker base their decision on some moral theory or Christian worldview position (Banes-Berceli, 2017; Gray, 2022). In the case study on which this paper is based, a pregnant immigrant lady by the name Jessica whose boyfriend is named Marco discovers that the child she is carrying has got fetal abnormalities. Dr Wilson who is her primary care physician advises her that she should abort the fetus because of the abnormalities. Since she comes from a staunchly Christian family she and her aunt by the name of Maria categorically refuse this suggestion. But the boyfriend is of a different opinion and agrees with the physician that the pregnancy needs to be terminated on grounds of fetal abnormality. This paper is about the decisions that will be taken by each of the above persons and the moral theories that will inform these decisions.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PHI 413 Topic 2 Assignment: Case Study on Moral Status: The Case for Fetal Abnormality HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Christian View of the Nature of Human Persons and the Compatible Theory of Moral Status

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

PHI 413 Topic 2 Assignment: Case Study on Moral Status: The Case for Fetal Abnormality

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

            The nature of human persons as per the Christian worldview is that human life is sacred and that life begins at conception. The Christian Bible states that God created a person in his own image and that it is only God that can create and give life. For this reason, there is no human being who can take away another human being’s life. In other words, the Christian worldview is that fetuses that are unborn are as human as a person who has already been born. This view is supported by the fact that a fetus has a heart that actively beats just like that of a human being that has already been born. The Christian view holds that God creates every human being with a purpose for them to fulfil in the world. This includes the unborn fetus whether they are deformed or not. This is why according to the Christian worldview the fetus with abnormalities should be left to be born even if it will have disabilities from the fetal abnormalities.

            The Christian worldview is compatible with two theories of moral status. These theories are those of Human Properties and of Moral Agency (Banes-Berceli, 2017; Beckwith & Thornton, 2020; White, 2020). The moral status theory of Human Properties states that life commences at conception and the result of fertilization is a human with all the moral and ethical rights as a grown adult human. It also states that only humans have status. The theory of moral status based on Moral Agency on the other hand dictates that humans with the ability to discern right from wrong should act as moral agents. With regard to this case, the theory based on Human Properties means that as the Christian view prescribes, the life of the unborn fetus is sacred and should not be terminated. That based on Moral Agency on the other hand would mean that the physician and the boyfriend would be judged on the decision they took of terminating the pregnancy from a moral standpoint of right and wrong.

            The above is related to the intrinsic human value and dignity in that the sanctity of life is not acquired but it is automatically achieved following conception. The human being is dignified and hence moral judgment dictates that no other human being should even think of terminating the life of another human because of this dignity that is intrinsic. This is regardless of the situation of the moment. However, the contrary argument would also be that intrinsic human value and dignity means that allowing the fetus with known abnormalities to grow to term and be delivered would result in a child that has serious disabilities and that will then suffer for the rest of their lives. From this particular viewpoint, this in itself would be more immoral than terminating the life of the fetus when they are still without sentience (the ability to feel pain and pleasure).   

The Theories Used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr Wilson in Determining the Moral Status of the Fetus

            According to their resistance to the suggestion by the physician Dr Wilson that the pregnancy be terminated due to the fetal abnormalities noted, Jessica and her aunt Maria are using the moral status theory of Human Properties. It states as has been mentioned above that all life begins at fertilization (Banes-Berceli, 2017). Jessica’s boyfriend Marco on his part is using the moral status theory of Cognitive Properties. This theory states that moral status is conferred when a person has cognitive abilities such as memory, perception, understanding, thinking, language and self-awareness (Banes-Berceli, 2017). Cleary, an unborn fetus does not have all these. For this reason, the moral status theory of Cognitive Properties seems to give Marco the backing for agreeing with Dr Wilson on the need for terminating the pregnancy on grounds of abnormalities.

            From the case study, Dr Wilson who is the physician that suggested the termination is also using the same moral status theory of Cognitive Properties. As the physician he has determined that there will be a 1:4 chance that the child will be born with Down’s syndrome. Terminating the pregnancy at this stage when the fetus still does not possess any cognitive abilities would thus be better than allowing the child to be born after which it will suffer for the rest of its life.   

The Theory that I Concur With and Why

            Personally I would go with the moral status theory of Cognitive Properties. It would make sense that despite the fact that the fetus is a human with nutritional and metabolic needs, it still does not have cognitive ability. Given that it will be born as a child with a disability, it would be morally better to spare it the lifelong suffering by terminating the pregnancy at this stage in which it still does not know of feel anything. This will also be in line with Childress and Beauchamp’s ethical principle of nonmaleficence (Banes-Berceli, 2017; Beckwith & Thornton, 2020). It would influence the recommendation by providing a rationale for terminating the pregnancy as recommended by the physician.

Conclusion

            Moral status is conferred by several theories. The Christian worldview is congruent with some of these theories and especially that of Human Properties that states that life begins at conception. This case presents an ethical and moral dilemma between the moral status theory of Human Properties (Christian view) and that of Cognitive Properties. Jessica and Maria are on one side (Human Properties) while Dr Wilson and Marco are on the other side (Cognitive Properties) as far as the moral judgment of the case is concerned.    

References

Banes-Berceli, A. (2017). Theories of moral status. https://www.studocu.com/en/document/oakland-university/biomedicine-and-disease/lecture-notes/theories-of-moral-status/1044276/view  

Beckwith, F., & Thornton, A.K. (2020). Moral status and the architects of Principlism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 45(4-5), 504–520. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaa019

Gray, K. (2022). Moral status: Definition, philosophy, and criteria. https://study.com/academy/lesson/moral-status-definition-philosophy-criteria.html

White, N.H. (2020). God, humanity, and human dignity. Grand Canyon University. https://lc.gcumedia.com/phi413v/practicing-dignity-an-introduction-to-christian-values-and-decision-making-in-health-care/v1.1/#/chapter/2

Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and the required topic Resources, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:

What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity?
Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected?
How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?
What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?
Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

Case Study on Moral Status – Rubric

Christian View of the Nature of Human Persons and Compatible Theory of Moral Status

Collapse All

60 points

MAIN

CONTENT

Resources                                                                              Collapse All

99+

T2   Topic 2: God, Humanity, And Human Dignity

May 9 – 15, 2022       Max Points: 230

T1               Objectives:

 

T2                   1. Explain the Christian view of the nature of human persons.

2. Compare the Christian view of intrinsic human value and dignity in contrast to secular views T3                            of personhood.

3. Evaluate how the concept of intrinsic human dignity is applied in the process of ethical T4                            decision-making.

T5

AP

Optional – Topic 2: Optional Resources

SSC

For additional information, see the “Topic 2: Optional Study Resources” that are

recommended.

PHI-413V-RS-T2Optio…

Philosophy – Ethics: Moral Status

View the video “Philosophy – Ethics: Moral Status,” by Jeff Sebo, from Wireless Philosophy.

https://youtu.be/smu…

Optional – Joni and Friends

For additional information, the Joni and Friends website is recommended:

PHI-

https://www.joniandfr…

413

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 2 from Practicing Dignity.

2                                   https://www.gcumedi…

                 The Image of God, Bioethics, and Persons with Profound Intellectual Disabilities

4                                          Read the attached article, “The Image of God, Bioethics, and Persons With Profound

                 Intellectual Disabilities,” by Devan Stahl and… Read More

Criteria Description

Christian View of the Nature of Human Persons and Compatible Theory of Moral Status

  1. Excellent 60 points

Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is clear, thorough, and explained with a deep understanding of the relationship to intrinsic human value and dignity.

Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

  1. Good 51 points

Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is clear, thorough, and and explains the relationship to intrinsic human value and dignity. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

  1. Satisfactory 45 points

Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is

Case Study on Moral Status – Rubric

Christian View of the Nature of Human Persons and Compatible Theory of Moral Status

Collapse All

60 points

JCID 6.1-6.2 – Article – …

99+

        Assessments                                                                           Expand All

                       Topic 2 DQ 1

T1                    GO TO DISCUSSION

 

T2

T3                                             Topic 2 DQ 2

T4                    GO TO DISCUSSION

T5

Case Study on Moral Status

SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT

SSC

Start Date                            Due Date                              Points       Rubric              Status

           May 9, 2022, 12:00 AM         May 22, 2022, 11:59 PM         200           View Rubric        Reassigned

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and the required topic Resources, write a 750-1,000-

word reflection that answers the following questions:

1. What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity?

PHI-                 2. Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to

413                      determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected?

3. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?

4. What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the

               recommendation for action?

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

2

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is

           expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

4

           This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to

Criteria Description

Christian View of the Nature of Human Persons and Compatible Theory of Moral Status

  1. Excellent 60 points

Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is clear, thorough, and explained with a deep understanding of the relationship to intrinsic human value and dignity.

Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

  1. Good 51 points

Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is clear, thorough, and and explains the relationship to intrinsic human value and dignity. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

  1. Satisfactory 45 points

Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is

Case Study on Moral Status – Rubric

Christian View of the Nature of Human Persons and Compatible Theory of Moral Status

Collapse All

60 points

become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

99+

           You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

           Attachments

PHI-413V-RS-T2CaseStudyFetalAb…

T1                                              Week 2 Participation

T2                    GO TO DISCUSSION

T3

T4

T5

SSC

Criteria Description

Christian View of the Nature of Human Persons and Compatible Theory of Moral Status

  1. Excellent 60 points

Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is clear, thorough, and explained with a deep understanding of the relationship to intrinsic human value and dignity.

Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

  1. Good 51 points

Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is clear, thorough, and and explains the relationship to intrinsic human value and dignity. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

  1. Satisfactory 45 points

Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

PHI 413 Topic 2 Assignment: Case Study on Moral Status: The Case for Fetal Abnormality

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

error: Content is protected !!
Open chat
WhatsApp chat +1 908-954-5454
We are online
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?