NRS 465 Week 7 Assignment: Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

NRS 465 Week 7 Assignment: Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

NRS 465 Week 7 Assignment: Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment will be to develop an evaluation plan for your capstone change project.

Review your implementation plan including the objectives and outcomes and review your required resources. Then, develop a process to evaluate the intervention if it were implemented.

Use the “Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan” template to complete the assignment.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRS 465 Week 7 Assignment: Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 3.1

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total20 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Project Objective

List a minimum of three project objectives.

0 points

A list of project objectives is missing.
6 points

A list of at least three project objectives is incomplete or inaccurate.
6.32 points

A list of at least three project objectives is present but lacks detail.
7.12 points

A list of at least three project objectives is mostly detailed.
8 points

A list of at least three project objectives is thorough and accurate.

Measurable Project Outcome

List a minimum of three measurable project outcomes.
0 points

A list of measurable project outcomes is missing.

4.5 points

A list of at least three measurable project outcomes is incomplete or inaccurate.
4.74 points

A list of at least three measurable project outcomes is present but lacks detail.

5.34 points

A list of at least three measurable project outcomes is mostly detailed.

6 points

A list of at least three measurable project outcomes is thorough.

Data Collection

Explain the type of data that will be collected to measure this outcome.

0 points

An explanation of the type of data that will be collected to measure this outcome is missing.
1.05 points

An explanation of the type of data that will be collected to measure this outcome is incomplete.

1.11 points

An explanation of the type of data that will be collected to measure this outcome is present but lacks detail.

1.25 points

An explanation of the type of data that will be collected to measure this outcome is mostly detailed.
1.4 points

An explanation of the type of data that will be collected to measure this outcome is thorough and accurate.

Necessary Tools

Explain the necessary tools to collect data.
0 points

An explanation of the necessary tools to collect data is missing.

1.05 points

An explanation of the necessary tools to collect data is incomplete or inaccurate.

1.11 points

An explanation of the necessary tools to collect data is present but lacks detail.
1.25 points

An explanation of the necessary tools to collect data is mostly detailed.
1.4 points

An explanation of the necessary tools to collect data is thorough and accurate.

Responsibility of Data Collection

Identify who will be responsible for data collection.
0 points

An identification of who will be responsible for data collection is missing.
0.9 points

An identification of who will be responsible for data collection is incomplete or inaccurate.
0.95 points

An identification of who will be responsible for data collection is present but lacks detail.
1.07 points

An identification of who will be responsible for data collection is mostly detailed.
1.2 points

An identification of who will be responsible for data collection is thorough and accurate.

Data Communication

Describe how the data collected will be communicated to the team.
0 points

A description of how the data collected will be communicated to the team is missing.
0.9 points

A description of how the data collected will be communicated to the team is incomplete.

0.95 points

A description of how the data collected will be communicated to the team is present but lacks detail.
1.07 points

A description of how the data collected will be communicated to the team is mostly detailed.
1.2 points

A description of how the data collected will be communicated to the team is thorough.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
0.6 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
0.63 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
0.71 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

0.8 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.