Assignment: NUR 513 Week 2 Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer

Assignment: NUR 513 Week 2 Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer

Assignment: NUR 513 Week 2 Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer

Assessment Description

Advanced registered nurses work in highly collaborative environments and must collaborate with interdisciplinary teams in order to provide excellent patient care. Besides knowing the role and scope of one’s own practice, it is essential to understand the role and scope of other nurse specialties to ensure effective collaboration among nurses, the organization, and other professionals with whom advanced registered nurses regularly interact.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: NUR 513 Week 2 Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Use the “Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template” to differentiate how advanced registered nurse roles relate to and collaborate with different areas of nursing practice. Compare your future role with one of the following: nurse educator; nurse leader; family nurse practitioner; acute care nurse practitioner; graduate nurse with an emphasis/specialty in public health, health care administration, business, or informatics; clinical nurse specialist; doctor of nursing practice. Indicate in the appropriate columns on the template which roles you are comparing.

Make sure to compare the following areas of practice in your graphic organizer:
Ethics

Education

Leadership

Public Health

Health Care Administration

Informatics

Business/Finance

Specialty (e.g., Family, Acute Care)

Include any regulatory bodies or certification agencies that provide guidance or parameters on how these roles incorporate concepts into practice.

You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Ensure that the country in the source is relevant to your paper. Sources cited should be generalizable to the population being studied or discussed.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Attachments

NUR-513-RS-NursingRolesGraphicOrganizerT

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total120 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Targeted

Comparison of Roles in Relation to Ethics

Comparison of Roles in Relation to Ethics
0 points

A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is not included.
9.6 points

A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
10.56 points

A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is present.
11.04 points

A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is clearly provided and well developed.
12 points

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to ethics is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Comparison of Roles in Relation to Education

Comparison of Roles in Relation to Education

0 points

A comparison of roles in relation to education is not included.

9.6 points

A comparison of roles in relation to education is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
10.56 points

A comparison of roles in relation to education is present.
11.04 points

A comparison of roles in relation to education is clearly provided and well developed.
12 points

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to education is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Comparison of Roles in Relation to Leadership

Comparison of Roles in Relation to Leadership
0 points

A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is not included.
9.6 points

A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

10.56 points

A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is present.

11.04 points

A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is clearly provided and well developed.

12 points

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to leadership is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Comparison of Roles in Relation to Public Health

Comparison of Roles in Relation to Public Health
0 points

A comparison of roles in relation to public health is not included.
9.6 points

A comparison of roles in relation to public health is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
10.56 points

A comparison of roles in relation to public health is present.

11.04 points

A comparison of roles in relation to public health is clearly provided and well developed.
12 points

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to public health is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Comparison Roles in Relation to Health Care Administration

Comparison Roles in Relation to Health Care Administration
0 points

A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is not included.
9.6 points

A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
10.56 points

A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is present.
11.04 points

A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is clearly provided and well developed.
12 points

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Comparison of Roles in Relation to Informatics

Comparison of Roles in Relation to Informatics
0 points

A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is not included.
9.6 points

A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
10.56 points

A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is present.
11.04 points

A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is clearly provided and well developed.
12 points

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to informatics is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Comparison of Roles in Relation to Business or Finance

Comparison of Roles in Relation to Business or Finance
0 points

A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is not included.
9.6 points

A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
10.56 points

A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is present.
11.04 points

A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is clearly provided and well developed.
12 points

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Comparison of Roles in Relation to Specialty

Comparison of Roles in Relation to Specialty
0 points

A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is not included.
4.8 points

A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

5.28 points

A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is present.

5.52 points

A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is clearly provided and well developed.
6 points

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to specialty is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Required Sources

Required Sources
0 points

Sources are not included.

4.8 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.
5.28 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

5.52 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

6 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Visual Appeal

Visual Appeal
0 points

There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is evident.
4.8 points

Color is garish or typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited.

5.28 points

Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout.

5.52 points

Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and consistently.
6 points

Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and consistently.

Presentation

Presentation

0 points

The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.
4.8 points

The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required elements.
5.28 points

The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.
5.52 points

The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.

6 points

The submission is effectively presented, and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
4.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
5.28 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
5.52 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
4.8 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
5.28 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
5.52 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.