Week 1 Discussion: AACN Essentials Informatics Self-Assessment

Week 1 Discussion: AACN Essentials Informatics Self-Assessment

Week 1 Discussion: AACN Essentials Informatics Self-Assessment

AACN Essentials Informatics Self-Assessment (graded)

Discussion

Purpose

This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following Course Outcome (CO).

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 2: Analyze data from all relevant sources, including technology, to inform the delivery of care. (PO 2)

Due Date

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

Posts in the discussion on two different days

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Discussion

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Week 1 Discussion: AACN Essentials Informatics Self-Assessment HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Discussion Question

Download and open the AACN Essentials Self-Assessment

Links to an external site.. Complete the self-assessment of your current comfort levels and total your score. If you are willing, please share your results with your classmates in your discussion post. (Remember, this is the starting point for our course and the start of the knowledge we will learn over 8 weeks).

As you reflect on your score, identify areas where your knowledge could use improvement. Whether you are a new graduate or a seasoned nurse, it is important to keep in mind that all professional nurses are knowledge workers. Utilizing the readings from your textbook, describe your current knowledge base in informatics and how you can improve your knowledge as they relate to nursing informatics and AACN essential. What additional questions do you have as they relate to nursing informatics and the AACN essentials?

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answer Post

•Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and

•Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts
16 pts

100% Excellent

Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

14 pts

88% Good

Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

13 pts

80% Fair

Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

6 pts

38% Poor

Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and minimally demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not answer the discussion question(s).
16 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Sources

•Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson,

•Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source,

•All sources are credited within the body of the post,

•Evidence supports the discussion, and

•APA format is not required but is encouraged.
12 pts

100% Excellent

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

11 pts

88% Good

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

10 pts

80% Fair

Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not integrate any evidence.

12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reply Post

•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,

•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and

•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.
14 pts

100% Excellent

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

12 pts

88% Good

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.

11 pts

80% Fair

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.

0 pts
0% Missing

No reply post to classmates or instructor.
14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates Professionally

All posts:

•are clear and concise,

•are respectful, civil, and caring, and

•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
8 pts

100% Excellent

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

7 pts

88% Good

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

6 pts

80% Fair

All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

3 pts

38% Poor

All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

0 pts

0% Missing

All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.

8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

•Posts in the discussion on two different days
0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 Points)

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Total Points: 50

A Sample Of This Assignment Written By One Of Our Top-rated Writers

Week 1: Discussion: AACN Essentials Informatics Self-Assessment

AACN Essentials Informatics Self-Assessment

I achieved a cumulative score of 27 out of a potential 48. I saw that, in the majority of crucial areas, I was excellent, with just three becoming very good. I did not achieve a high level of proficiency in any of the domains. This implies that there is a need for progress in several domains to attain proficiency in the field of nursing informatics. The integration of informatics has become an essential component of healthcare systems. Nursing informatics facilitates healthcare coordination by enabling the exchange of patient information across healthcare providers, hence expediting the process of making informed care choices (Bove, 2019). The ease of transfer of care and decision-making is facilitated. About my self-evaluation, it is important to enhance my understanding of patient care technologies and their practical application in delivering high-quality and safe care to the patient demographic (Backonja et al., 2021). The field of information technology is accompanied by ethical concerns and considerations. Consequently, I need to enhance my proficiency in identifying and implementing security, privacy, and confidentiality protocols to safeguard the integrity of patient health information (Strudwick et al., 2019).

The incorporation of information technology into healthcare systems is essential for carers and healthcare institutions in the current technological age (Kleib et al., 2021). Hence, I need to adopt a proactive approach and actively engage in the assessment of information systems within practical contexts. As stated by Mohamed and Abouzaied (2021), active engagement in the policy formulation process will be necessary. I want to enhance my proficiency in many aspects of information technology and informatics during this course, with the ultimate objective of achieving a high level of excellence (Bove & Sauer, 2022). Furthermore, I am interested in comprehending the most effective strategies for protecting health information privacy and maintaining confidentiality.

References

Backonja, U., Langford, L. H., & Mook, P. J. (2021). How to Support the Nursing Informatics Leadership Pipeline. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, Publish Ahead of Print(1). https://doi.org/10.1097/cin.0000000000000827

Bove, L. A. (2019). Integration of Informatics Content in Baccalaureate and Graduate Nursing Education. Nurse Educator, 45(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000000734

Bove, L. A., & Sauer, P. (2022). Nursing Faculty Informatics Competencies. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, Publish Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1097/cin.0000000000000894

Kleib, M., Chauvette, A., Furlong, K., Nagle, L., Slater, L., & McCloskey, R. (2021). Approaches for defining and assessing nursing informatics competencies. JBI Evidence Synthesis, Publish Ahead of Print(4), 794–841. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-20-00100

Mohamed, L. K., & Abouzaied, M. T. (2021). Self-assessment of nursing informatics competencies and attitudes among baccalaureate-nursing students. Egyptian Nursing Journal, 18(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.4103/enj.enj_40_20

Strudwick, G., Nagle, L., Kassam, I., Pahwa, M., & Sequeira, L. (2019). Informatics competencies for nurse leaders. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(6), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1097/nna.0000000000000760