NR 361 Week 3 Discussion: Standardized Terminology and Language in Informatics

NR 361 Week 3 Discussion: Standardized Terminology and Language in Informatics

NR 361 Week 3 Discussion: Standardized Terminology and Language in Informatics

Standardized Terminology and Language in Informatics

Discussion

Purpose

This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following Course Outcomes (COs).

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 3: Define standardized terminology that reflects nursing’s unique contribution to patient outcomes. (PO 3)

CO 8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in delivery of nursing care. (PO 8)

Due Date

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

Posts in the discussion on two different days

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Discussion

Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 361 Week 3 Discussion: Standardized Terminology and Language in Informatics HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Discussion Question

Standardized Terminology and Language in Informatics is an important part of healthcare. Nurses and healthcare workers need to understand and be able to communicate clearly.

Please select one of the following options and discuss your understanding of the role in healthcare and its potential impact on your practice.

Usability

Integration

Interface

Interoperability

Meaningful Use (Meaningful Use terminology has largely been replaced by the phrase ‘Promoting Interoperability’ or ‘PI’)

Reimbursement from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) payment

NANDA

NIC/NOC

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answer Post

•Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and

•Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts

16 pts

100% Excellent

Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

14 pts

88% Good

Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

13 pts

80% Fair

Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

6 pts

38% Poor

Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and minimally demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not answer the discussion question(s).
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Sources

•Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson,

•Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source,

•All sources are credited within the body of the post,

•Evidence supports the discussion, and

•APA format is not required but is encouraged.

12 pts

100% Excellent

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

11 pts

88% Good

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

10 pts

80% Fair

Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not integrate any evidence.
12 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reply Post

•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,

•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and

•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.
14 pts

100% Excellent

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

12 pts

88% Good

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.

11 pts

80% Fair

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

No reply post to classmates or instructor.

14 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates Professionally

All posts:

•are clear and concise,

•are respectful, civil, and caring, and

•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

8 pts

100% Excellent

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

7 pts

88% Good

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

6 pts

80% Fair

All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

3 pts

38% Poor

All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

0 pts

0% Missing

All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

•Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 Points)

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Total Points: 50

A Sample Of This Assignment Written By One Of Our Top-rated Writers

Standardized Terminology and Language in Informatics

Effective healthcare delivery relies on multiple tools, methods, and processes for enhancing health outcomes. Health informatics promotes innovation through technology integration into patient care processes. To ensure high-quality care and optimize technology use, healthcare professionals should be conversant with informatics terminologies and language. One of the dominant concepts is interoperability, with a high potential to influence healthcare multi-dimensionally.

Regarding its role in healthcare, interoperability is a foundation of high-quality care associated with timely communication and data sharing among health professionals. In the health context, interoperability denotes the ability of healthcare systems to connect and exchange information seamlessly (Torab-Miandoab et al., 2023). In this case, health professionals within the same department and across units can exchange crucial patient data for informed decision-making, such as treatment choices. To underline the significance of interoperable clinical systems, the lack of interoperability in healthcare causes disorganization and inaccessibility of medical information. The impacts are profound since the quality of patient care is compromised if medical data is inaccessible or disorganized due to the increased probability of medical errors and redundant testing (Li et al., 2021). Interoperability also saves healthcare resources by facilitating quick information exchange, preventing treatment delays.

Interoperability has a high potential to improve nursing and impact the nurse’s role. According to Szarfman et al. (2022), the successful implementation of data-driven practice depends on accurate collection and secure exchange of massive amounts of complex data. In nursing, such data is derived from imaging devices, patient interviews, devices, and laboratory assays. The implication is that nursing must promote interoperable standards to realize the promise of health informatics. Besides, nurses should embrace an expanded role as a part of the interoperability ecosystem comprising healthcare systems, nursing professionals, and processes for sharing, exchanging, and accessing protected health information. Above all, nursing should be a shared responsibility where participants work together to ensure data privacy and security essentials are followed according to the established guidelines.

References

Li, E., Clarke, J., Neves, A. L., Ashrafian, H., & Darzi, A. (2021). Electronic health records, interoperability and patient safety in health systems of high-income countries: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open, 11(7), e044941. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044941

Szarfman, A., Levine, J. G., Tonning, J. M., Weichold, F., Bloom, J. C., Soreth, J. M., … & Altman, R. B. (2022). Recommendations for achieving interoperable and shareable medical data in the USA. Communications Medicine, 2(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-022-00148-x

Torab-Miandoab, A., Samad-Soltani, T., Jodati, A., & Rezaei-Hachesu, P. (2023). Interoperability of heterogeneous health information systems: a systematic literature review. BMC Medical Informatics And Decision Making, 23(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02115-5