Assignment: Topic 2 The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a comparison on different research designs to better understand their designs and application. Understanding the different types of research design is important so that nurses can effectively apply evidence-based research into practice to address issues and offer better patient care

Assignment: Topic 2 The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a comparison on different research designs to better understand their designs and application. Understanding the different types of research design is important so that nurses can effectively apply evidence-based research into practice to address issues and offer better patient care

Assignment: Topic 2 The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a comparison on different research designs to better understand their designs and application. Understanding the different types of research design is important so that nurses can effectively apply evidence-based research into practice to address issues and offer better patient care

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a comparison on different research designs to better understand their designs and application. Understanding the different types of research design is important so that nurses can effectively apply evidence-based research into practice to address issues and offer better patient care.

You will utilize your approved nursing practice problem to complete the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments for this course and NUR-590, during which you will synthesize all of the sections into a final written paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

Review feedback from your instructor on your “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Identification of Nursing Practice Problem,” submitted in Topic 1. If your original proposed nursing problem was outside the scope of nursing practice or not conducive to an evidence-based practice project proposal, work with your instructor to identify a new topic prior to beginning this assignment. If your proposed topic requires revision, complete this prior to beginning this assignment.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Conduct a literature search on your approved nursing practice problem. Find two translational research articles, one quantitative article, and one qualitative article. Using the “Translational Research Graphic Organizer,” present your proposed topic and, in the tables provided, compare one translational study to the quantitative study, and one translational study to the qualitative study.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Attachments

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total100 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory

4. Good

5. Excellent

Nursing Practice Problem (Revision)

Nursing Practice Problem (Revision)
0 points

The nursing practice problem was not included, or the required revisions were not made.

8 points

The changes failed to meet the criteria for a relevant nursing practice problem for an evidence-based practice project proposal. Additional revisions are still required for approval.

8.8 points

Revisions were made accordingly to improve the proposed nursing practice problem, but some aspects are inaccurate or unclear. Additional revisions are still required for approval.
9.2 points

NA

10 points

The nursing practice problem is clearly presented and approved. No revision was required, or all necessary revisions are were made.

Translational and Traditional Articles

Translational and Traditional Articles
0 points

More than two articles selected do not meet the assignment criteria. At least one article is omitted.

12 points

Two articles do not meet the assignment criteria. It is unclear how one or two of the articles support the proposed nursing practice problem.
13.2 points

One article does not meet the assignment criteria. Overall, the articles generally support the proposed nursing practice problem. The proposed problem would be better supported with the selection of one or two different articles.
13.8 points

The articles meet the assignment criteria and provide adequate support for the proposed nursing practice problem.
15 points

A quantitative article and a qualitative article were each compared to a translational research article. The articles are peer-reviewed, published within the last five years, and pertain to the nursing practice problem. The assignment criteria are fully met.

Comparison of Methodology Between Translational and Traditional Research

Comparison of Methodology Between Translational and Traditional Research
0 points

The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is omitted.
12 points

The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.
13.2 points

A summary comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear.

13.8 points

The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity.

15 points

The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is thorough and accurate. A clear understanding of translational and traditional methodologies is demonstrated.

Comparison of Goals Between Translational and Traditional Research

Comparison of Goals Between Translational and Traditional Research
0 points

The comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is omitted.
12 points

The comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.

13.2 points

A summary comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear.
13.8 points

A comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity.
15 points

The comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is thorough and accurate. An understanding of goals between traditional and translational research is evident.

Comparison of Data Collection Between Translational and Traditional Research

Comparison of Data Collection Between Translational and Traditional Research
0 points

The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is omitted.
12 points

The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.
13.2 points

A summary comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear.

13.8 points

The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity.
15 points

The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is thorough and accurate. An understanding of goals between traditional and translational research is evident.

Observations (Similarities and Differences)

Observations (Similarities and Differences)
0 points

The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are not discussed.
16 points

The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are only partially discussed. The narrative is vague and contains inaccuracies.
17.6 points

The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are summarized. More information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies.
18.4 points

The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy
20 points

The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are detailed and informative.

Mechanics of Writing

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed
4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
4.4 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
4.6 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
5 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Documentation of Source

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
0 points

Sources are not documented.

4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

4.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
4.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.