Assignment: ARC Grading NU 690 AGPCNP II

Assignment: ARC Grading NU 690 AGPCNP II

St. Joseph’s College

NU 690 – AGPCNP II

ARC Assignment

Purpose: The ARC group seminar is designed to promote active learning through agency, reflection, and collaboration.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON; Assignment: ARC Grading NU 690 AGPCNP II

Agency is the ability for one to act independently and make their own choices. When applied to learning, students will have the ability to take control of their own mental activity, to be responsible for constructing knowledge.

Reflection is the ability to look at information and be able to draw significant ideas, insights, and questions.

Collaboration means working together by sharing resources, information, and knowledge to improve the outcomes for all involved.

Instructions

Students will work together in their simulation lab group to conduct an in-depth case study analysis related to the information obtained from the simulation.

Each student will identify their learning objectives for the information that will be shared with the class , focusing on the primary diagnosis and related issues discussed in the case study.

Learning Objectives must be clearly identified with observable behavior or action that can be measured at the end of the assignment.

Analysis should include:

Epidemiology

Causes (primary and secondary)

Pathophysiology

Risk Factors

Evaluation (screening, history, physical exam, initial workup/ diagnostics)

Differential diagnoses

Treatment (pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic management, patient education/ teaching)

Gerontologic considerations

Cultural, Social (disparities in diagnosis or management), Economic considerations

Identify evidence-based research material that informs their discussion.

Each student in the group will be responsible for their work

Once completed, groups will share their work with the class in a round-table discussion.

Each group will create a cohesive outline, overview or algorithm that will standardize the selection and application of treatment regimens based on evidence and standards of care, to be given to fellow student colleagues at the time of the presentation.

Work will be graded according to the rubric provided.

ARC Grading Rubric

ARC Criteria	Meets Criteria	Partially Meets Criteria	Does Not Meet Criteria
Learning Objectives   (20 points)	Students identify relevant learning objectives with appropriate evidence to support the objectives.   20 points	Students partially identify relevant learning objectives with some evidence to support their selection.     17-19 points	Learning objectives are not identified or no evidence is provided to support selection.     0-18 points
Identifies evidence-based resources that informs and supports learning objectives.   (15 points)	Students provide thorough and relevant evidence-based resources that informs and supports learning objectives.   15 points	Students provide partial evidence-based resources that informs and supports learning objectives.     11–14 points	Students provide little or no evidence-based resources that informs and supports learning objectives.   0–11 points
Analysis of selected topic includes discussion of: epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, evaluation, relevant differential diagnoses, treatment, cultural, ethical, social and economic gerontologic considerations.   (25 points)	Students provide a comprehensive discussion of relevant information related to the topic.     25 points	Students provide a limited discussion of relevant information related to the topic.       22–25 points	Students provide little or no discussion of relevant information related to the  topic.     0–21 points
Develops an outline, overview or algorithm that will standardize the selection and application of treatment regimens supported by evidence and clinical practice guidelines.     (30 points)	Students develop a detailed outline, overview or algorithm supported by evidence and clinical practice guidelines.     30 points	Students develop a partially detailed outline, overview, or algorithm supported by evidence and clinical practice guidelines.       27-29 points	Students develop an overview, outline or algorithm that lacks detail and is not supported by evidence and/ or clinical practice guidelines.     0-26 points
APA Format.   Cite references; correct spelling and grammar   (10 points)	Provides a reference list of current resources that support discussion and medical algorithm. APA format correct with no more than 1–2 minor errors. 10 points	Partially provides a reference list of current resources that support discussion and medical algorithm.   Three to five errors in APA format and/or 1–2 citations missing 7-9 points	Does not provide a reference list of current resources that support discussion and medical algorithm.   Multiple errors in APA formatting and/or several citations missing 0–6 points