Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan 

Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan

Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan

Assessment Description

In 750-1,000 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project proposal. You will use the evaluation plan in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan  HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:

Discuss the expected outcomes for your evidence-based practice project proposal.

Review the various data collection tools associated with your selected research design and select one data collection tool that would be effective for your research design. Explain how this tool is valid, reliable, and applicable.

Select a statistical test for your project and explain why it is best suited for the tool you choose.

Describe what methods you will apply to your data collection tool and how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool you selected.

Propose strategies that will be used if outcomes do not provide positive or expected results.

Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document, located in Class Resources for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Complete the “APA Writing Checklist,” located in Class Resources, to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total120 points

Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal

Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal

0 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are not discussed.
11.52 points

Some expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are only partially outlined.
12.67 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are summarized. More information is needed.

13.25 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

14.4 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are discussed. Thorough explanations and strong supporting research are provided.

Data Collection Tools

Data Collection Tools

0 points

A data collection tool is not discussed.

9.6 points

A data collection tool is selected, but it is unclear why the tool would be effective for the research design. A valid, reliable, and applicable explanation for the tool is incomplete.

10.56 points

A data collection tool is selected, and a summary for why the tool would be effective for the research design is presented. A general explanation for the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable, but more information and support are needed.

11.04 points

A data collection tool is selected, and an explanation for why the tool would be effective for the research design is presented. An explanation for the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

12 points

A data collection tool is selected and a well-supported explanation for why the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable and would be effective for the research design is presented.

Statistical Test for Project

Statistical Test for Project
0 points

A statistical test is omitted.

9.6 points

A statistical test is selected, but it is unclear why the test is best suited for the tool.

10.56 points

A statistical test is selected, and a summary for why the test is best suited for the tool is presented. More information or support is needed.

11.04 points

A statistical test is selected, and an explanation for why the test is best suited for the tool is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

12 points

A statistical test is selected, and a well-supported explanation for why the test is best suited for the tool is clearly presented.

Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool

Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool
0 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection tool are not discussed.
9.6 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection tool partially discussed. It is unclear how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected
10.56 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection are outlined. A summary of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected is presented. More information or support is needed.
11.04 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection are discussed. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

12 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection are thoroughly discussed. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected are presented.

Strategies for Outcomes That Are Nonpositive

Strategies for Outcomes That Are Nonpositive
0 points

Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are not discussed.
11.52 points

Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are incomplete.

12.67 points

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan  HERE

General strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented. More information and support are needed.
13.25 points

Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.
14.4 points

Clear and well-supported strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented.

Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution

Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution
0 points

Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are not discussed.
10.56 points

Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are incomplete.
11.62 points

General plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented. More information and support are needed.
12.14 points

Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.
13.2 points

Detailed and well-supported plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented.

Required Sources

Required Sources
0 points

Sources are not included.
4.8 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.

5.28 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

5.52 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
6 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
6.72 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
7.39 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

7.73 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

8.4 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
7.68 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
8.45 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
8.83 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
9.6 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
4.8 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
5.28 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
5.52 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.
6 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

4.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
5.28 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
5.52 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

4.8 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

5.28 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
5.52 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.