Assignment: For this assignment, you will create a sustainability plan and present your plan using PowerPoint and Loom

Assignment: For this assignment, you will create a sustainability plan and present your plan using PowerPoint and Loom

Assignment: For this assignment, you will create a sustainability plan and present your plan using PowerPoint and Loom

Assessment Description

For this assignment, you will create a sustainability plan and present your plan using PowerPoint and Loom.

General Requirements:

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
A minimum of three scholarly or peer-reviewed research articles are required. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: For this assignment, you will create a sustainability plan and present your plan using PowerPoint and Loom HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.
Directions:

Based on the feedback you have received from your instructor on the “Sustainability Plan Worksheet,” compile the elements (measurement, ownership, communication, change management, and workload) into a presentation that you would present to the stakeholders of your proposed quality and/or safety sustainability program.

Develop a PowerPoint presentation (10-15 slides) to present your final sustainability plan. Create speaker notes of 100-250 words for each slide. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to create a voice-over or a video. Refer to the topic Resources for additional guidance on recording your presentation with Loom. Include an additional slide for the title and Loom link at the beginning and an additional slide for References at the end.

Include the following:

Describe one or two measures that are critical to the sustainability of your proposed quality and/or safety sustainability program and decide on the data collection and monitoring process. Additionally, discuss whether you will reduce or eliminate the frequency of certain measurements.
Describe a measurement threshold that will trigger investigation.
Describe the owner of the improvement process who authorizes changes and will be responsible for sustaining improvement.
Outline a communication and training plan for improvements and learning. Consider who needs to know what, when and how often they need to know it, what communication method would work best, and who the best person is for initiating communication or sharing information.
Identify a change management theory that you will use to standardize the process so that it supports the improved process.
Explain how the proposed changes will affect staff workload. Ideally, the improvement has removed work and made people’s jobs easier and more efficient. Changes that decrease workload have a higher chance of success over time.
Rubric Criteria
Total

175 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Communication and Training Plan

Communication and training plan for improvements and learning. Individuals needed. Method of communication. Individual communicating.

0 points

A communication and training plan for improvements and learning is omitted.

14 points

A communication and training plan for improvements and learning is incomplete. The individuals needed for the plan are unclear.

15.4 points

A general communication and training plan for improvements and learning is presented. Most key individuals needed, what they need to know, when, how often, and the method of communication and the individual communicating are outlined. Some aspects are unclear. Additional information or support is needed.

16.1 points

A communication and training plan for improvements and learning is presented. Key individuals needed, what they need to know, when, how often, and the method of communication and the individual responsible communicating is outlined. Some detail is needed for clarity.

17.5 points

A well-organized communication and training plan for improvements and learning is presented. All individuals needed, what they need to know, when, how often, and the method of communication and the individual responsible for communicating is clearly outlined.

Measurement Threshold

Measurement threshold triggering investigation.

0 points

A measurement threshold triggering investigation is omitted.

14 points

A measurement threshold is presented, but it is unclear how it will trigger an investigation.

15.4 points

An adequate measurement threshold triggering investigation is presented. Some aspect is unclear. Additional information or support is needed.

16.1 points

An appropriate measurement threshold triggering investigation is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity.

17.5 points

A highly appropriate measurement threshold triggering investigation is clearly presented.

Documentation of Sources

Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

0 points

Sources are not documented.

7 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

7.7 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

8.05 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

8.75 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of errors.

Measures Critical to Sustainability

One or two measures critical to suitability of proposed quality and/or sustainability program. Data collection and monitoring process. Reduction or elimination of frequency of certain measurements.

0 points

The measures critical to the sustainability of the proposed quality and/or sustainability program are omitted; or, the measures presented are not conducive to sustainability or the proposed quality and/or safety program.

14 points

The measures critical to the sustainability of the proposed quality and/or sustainability program are incomplete. It is unclear how the measures will be support sustainability for the proposed quality and/or safety program.

15.4 points

One or two measures critical to the sustainability of the proposed quality and/or sustainability program are presented. The data collection and monitoring process are summarized, but some aspects are unclear. Whether the frequency of certain measurements will be reduced or eliminated is generally outlined. In general, the measures presented support sustainability and are appropriate for the proposed quality and/or safety program. Some aspects are vague. Additional support is needed.

16.1 points

One or two measures critical to the sustainability of the proposed quality and/or sustainability program are presented. The data collection and monitoring process is determined. Whether the frequency of certain measurements will be reduced or eliminated is outlined. The measures critical to sustainability are adequately supported and generally appropriate for the proposed quality and/or safety program. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

17.5 points

One or two measures critical to the sustainability of the proposed quality and/or sustainability program are detailed. The data collection and monitoring process is clearly determined. Whether the frequency of certain measurements will be reduced or eliminated is outlined. The measures critical to sustainability are clear, well-supported, and appropriate for the proposed quality and/or safety program.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

7 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

7.7 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

8.05 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

8.75 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

Change Management Theory

Change management theory to standardize process to support the improved process.

0 points

A theory is omitted

14 points

A theory is presented, but it is unclear how it will standardize the process and support the improved process.

15.4 points

A theory to standardize the process and support the improved process is presented. Some aspects are unclear. Additional information may be needed.

16.1 points

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: For this assignment, you will create a sustainability plan and present your plan using PowerPoint and Loom HERE

A change management theory adequate for standardizing the process and supporting the improved process is presented.

17.5 points

A change management theory appropriate to standardizing the process and supporting the improved process is clearly presented.

Proposed Changes and Effect on Workload

Explanation for how proposed changes will affect staff workload.

0 points

How the proposed changes will affect staff workload is omitted.

14 points

How the proposed changes will affect staff workload is not fully explained.

15.4 points

The presentation generally explains how proposed changes will affect staff workload. Some aspects are unclear. Additional information may be needed. Some aspects are unclear. Additional information may be needed.

16.1 points

The presentation adequately explains how the proposed changes will affect staff workload. Some detail is needed for clarity.

17.5 points

The presentation thoroughly explains how proposed changes will affect staff workload.

Layout

Layout

0 points

Layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read, with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

11.2 points

Layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting, with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

12.32 points

Layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts from or does not enhance readability.

12.88 points

Layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

14 points

Layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

Language Use and Audience Awareness

Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

9.8 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

10.78 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

11.27 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

12.25 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

A Minimum of Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Research

A Minimum of Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Research

0 points

Scholarly or peer-reviewed research is omitted.

7 points

Scholarly or peer-reviewed research is lacking; the sources provided do not provide support. Fewer than three sources are provided.

7.7 points

Scholarly or peer-reviewed research provides general support. Most sources are published within the last 5 years and generally appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing practice.

8.05 points

Scholarly or peer-reviewed research provides adequate support. Sources are published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing practice.

8.75 points

Scholarly or peer-reviewed research provides excellent support. Sources are published within the last 5 years and highly appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing practice.

Presentation

Submission is effectively presented, including required speaker notes and Loom presentation.

0 points

The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.

14 points

The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required elements.

15.4 points

The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.

16.1 points

The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.

17.5 points

The submission is effectively presented, and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts.

Owner of Improvement Process

Owner of improvement process, authorizing changes and responsible for sustaining improvement.

0 points

The owner of improvement process is omitted.

14 points

The owner of improvement process is presented but it is unclear why this person is selected or how the person will authorize changes and sustain improvement.

15.4 points

The owner of improvement process is presented. Some additional information or rationale is needed to fully present why this owner is the best person for authorizing changes and sustaining improvement.

16.1 points

The owner of improvement process, including authorizing changes and responsibility for sustaining improvement, is appropriate and adequately presented. Some detail is needed for clarity.

17.5 points

The owner of improvement process, including authorizing changes and responsibility for sustaining improvement, is appropriately selected and clearly presented.