Assignment: Methodology/Data Collection

Assignment: Methodology/Data Collection

Assignment: Methodology/Data Collection

Methodology

A clear description of the methodology is imperative. The methodology describes how the project will be implemented. It addresses the process by which the project aims and objectives will be met and describes the plan in detail.

This is the succinct, brief summary of your project plan and includes key components asked from the IRB including background, aims, objectives, population/data source to be used, project interventions, outcomes, and data analysis plan. Also included are all supplementary materials to be included in the application (data collection sheets, information sheets, topical outlines for education, etc.).

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: Methodology/Data Collection HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

The methodology Includes data to be collected to answer the clinical question and meet the aim(s) and objectives of the project. This assignment starts with recapping the clinical question, the project aim, and no more than 3 to 5 SMART objectives. Students will also include details of “who”, “what”, “where” and “how” of the project as well as the specifics of data collection points.

Who -staff in outpatient mental health clinic (nurses, SW and secretary)

Where -outpatient mental health clinic

How -mindfulness application -diaphragmatic breathing exercise done for 5 minutes 3 times a week to help mitigate stress and increase resilience offered in 4 weeks. Explanation will be given about breathing exercises to help manage stressful situations. Pre and post-intervention surveys will be done using a valid PSS tool and BRS to measure stress and resilience

All participants’ data results, including survey responses, will be deidentified. Data security

and integrity was maintained by storing all such data in a safe and secure location known to the principal investigator and the project team only.

The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

Six items make up the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)

The time frame is 4 weeks

Anticipated data analysis = descriptive statistics for demographics of the participants

Data will be compiled in Excel and SPSS. T-test to measure the difference between pre and post-intervention

Clinical Question

Does implementing Mindfulness during lunch break help reduce stress levels and increase resilience in outpatient mental health clinic staff over 4 weeks?

Project Aim

The aim is to assist outpatient mental health clinic staff in reducing stress and increasing resilience through the use of mindfulness.

Project Objectives

To expand outpatient mental health staff’s advantages of awareness of mindfulness use in reducing stress and increasing resilience by the end of the 4-week MSBR program

To increase outpatient mental health staff’s ability to handle stress through coping strategies by completing the MSBR program by the end of 4-weeks.

To raise self-reported resilience and decrease stress levels by 25% among outpatient mental health personnel by the completion of the MSBR program by the end of 4- weeks compared to baseline using a validation tool.

Some of the variables that can be used include (age, gender, experience, pre test, post test, Any anxiety disorder ruled out,

RN =1

SW =2

Secretary =3

Methodology

Methodology

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBrief Summary

Brief Summary

Describe the specific objectives, background information, and rationale for the proposed project:

– Use key phrasing (see exemplar) to introduce your project as a QI project specific to your site and with no intention to have generalizable information. (40 points max.)

— Avoid using terms such as study, research, subjects,

recruitment.

— Instead use terms such as Quality improvement,

evidence-based practice project, implementing standards

of care, participants, participant engagement

–Provide brief, succinct background information about the

broader project topic and how it is of a specific need of the intended project site

– List the aim and objectives of this project

– List the “methods” (interventions) to be conducted once you receive approval

– List the metrics (data points/outcomes) you will measure

• This submission should be approximately one single-spaced pages.

40 pts

Excellent

Clearly introduces the project as a Quality Improvement (QI) project with specific key phrasing, avoiding terms like study or research. Provides a concise background relevant to the project site’s specific need. Clearly lists the aim, objectives, interventions, and metrics. The submission is approximately one single-spaced page.

20 pts

Satisfactory

Introduces the project as a QI project with key phrasing, but there may be minor issues in clarity or conciseness. Background information is mostly clear and relevant. Lists the aim, objectives, interventions, and metrics with some clarity. The submission is close to one single-spaced page.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Introduces the project as a QI project, but key phrasing may lack clarity or may not be consistent. Background information is somewhat clear. Lists the aim, objectives, interventions, and metrics with some room for improvement. The submission may need refinement for conciseness.
0 pts

Insufficient

The introduction lacks clarity as a QI project, and key phrasing is insufficient. Background information is unclear or not directly relevant. Lists the aim, objectives, interventions, and metrics with significant issues in clarity and conciseness. The submission needs substantial improvement.
40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the subject population/type of data (or biospecimens) to be studied.

You will identify who your project population will be and indicate the

type of data you will connect.

– Make sure you have a paragraph on each type of participant and

observations.

• Describe the methods in which the data will be collected, store, and

how confidentiality will be maintained.

– This may include medical record review, IT reports generated

from the EHR, staff survey component, etc.

– Include a paragraph with key phrasing assuring no personal

health information will be collected for data analysis purposes.

• See exemplar.

35 pts

Excellent

Clearly identifies the project population, type of data, and bio-specimens. Provides a paragraph for each type of participant and observations. Describes data collection methods, storage, and confidentiality maintenance effectively.

18 pts

Satisfactory

Identifies the project population and data type with some clarity. Provides paragraphs for each type of participant and observations, but there may be minor issues in clarity. Describes data collection methods, storage, and confidentiality with some clarity.

9 pts

Needs Improvement

Identifies the project population and data type with room for improvement in clarity. Provides paragraphs for each type of participant and observations, but there are noticeable issues. Describes data collection methods, storage, and confidentiality with some room for improvement.

0 pts

Insufficient

Identification of project population and data type is unclear. Paragraphs for each type of participant and observations are insufficient. Description of data collection methods, storage, and confidentiality needs significant improvement.
35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdditional Supporting Information

Attach any supporting documents needed for IRB review.

o Label files with FOR REFERENCE

(ex: FOR REFERENCE Data Collection Tool v1 2023-01-17)

o Include any files including education/in-service outline, data

collection tools, surveys, informative emails (recruitment),

checklists to be implemented, risk assessments, toolkits,

protocols, etc.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: Methodology/Data Collection HERE

o Include the site approval letter. (Does not need to be labeled FOR

REFERENCE) see exemplar.

• Include a final summary statement using key phrasing (see exemplar) to

reiterate this project is specific to the project site and uses evidencebased

strategies/

25 pts

Excellent

Attaches all necessary supporting documents for IRB review, appropriately labeled with “FOR REFERENCE.” Includes a final summary statement with key phrasing to reinforce the project’s specificity to the site and use of evidence-based strategies.
13 pts

Satisfactory

Attaches most supporting documents for IRB review, but there may be minor omissions or labeling issues. The final summary statement may lack some key phrasing or clarity.
7 pts

Needs Improvement

Includes some supporting documents, but there are noticeable omissions or labeling issues. The final summary statement lacks key phrasing and clarity.
0 pts

Insufficient

Fails to include essential supporting documents for IRB review. The final summary statement lacks key phrasing and is unclear.

25 pts

Total Points: 100

Data collection

This assignment pairs with the Methodology assignment to provide an Excel file/spreadsheet that will be used for DNP Project data collection and analysis. The assignment includes the identification of all data parameters, application-appropriate coding and definitions (as needed), and a data analysis plan. All collected data must be necessary (but not extraneous) to answer the clinical question, aims, and objectives of the project. Furthermore, the proposed data analysis plan must be relevant and appropriate to the data collected and the project.

The student will complete a draft tool for project data collection. Students should include an Excel file that will mimic data construction regardless of method (e.g. Qualtrics, RedCap, EHR report, or manual data entry). Excel file submission includes identifying the level of measurement for the outcome variable and an explanation of definitions and coding.

INCLUDE THE ATTACHEMENT 2 of them

Data Collection Set-up

Data Collection Set-up

Criteria
Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary

A brief summary provides an overview of (a) clinical question, (b) aims and objectives, and (c) data analysis plan from Project Planning. Plan includes (d) method of data collection for each (EHR report in excel, manual chart review, manually collected survey data, electronically collected survey data, plus type (e.g. Qualtrics or RedCap). Re: attachments re data from IRB submission

5 to >0.0 pts

Full Marks

0 pts

No Marks
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExcel Spreadsheet

Student includes an Excel file set up with a tab for each data collection instrument and a tab for data definitions.

10 to >0.0 pts

Full Marks
0 pts

No Marks
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExcel tabs formatting of demographic info and coding (Data Analysis Plan)

Following the data analysis plan, excel file tabs are formatted with demographic information for each approach which are coded and explained on the data definitions tab Following the data analysis plan, excel file tabs are formatted with demographic information for each approach which are coded and explained on the data definitions tab.

10 to >0.0 pts

Full Marks

0 pts

No Marks
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection Tabs – Rows of Data Collection Sheet

Data Collection tabs have rows anticipating sample size (each row is a participant, chart review, or type of observation).

10 to >0.0 pts

Full Marks

0 pts

No Marks
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection Tabs – Comparison of means/independent groups

Data collection tabs have clearly delineated setup for comparison of means or counts for 2 independent groups, or for paired/dependent observations. Data collection tabs have clearly delineated setup for comparison of means or counts for 2 independent groups, or for paired/dependent observations.

20 to >0.0 pts

Full Marks

0 pts

No Marks

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection Tabs – Variables

Data Collection tabs have columns representing each variable using a 10 or less character descriptor with no spaces or symbols.

“Check all that apply” (multiple response questions) are set up with each choice as a separate variable, and each possible answer is dichotomous: 1=checked 0=not checked.

20 to >0.0 pts

Full Marks
0 pts

No Marks
20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection Tabs – Formatting of cells

Data Collection tabs are formatted correctly for dates and times (if applicable). Comments and open-ended questions are formatted as text fields. All other variables are formatted as numbers in the data collection tab and coding/labels explained on the data definitions tab

15 to >0.0 pts

Full Marks
0 pts

No Marks

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection Tabs – Data Definitions/Coding

Data definitions tab includes three columns: the first column includes variable names with no spaces, less than 10 characters, a columns providing an explanation, i.e. a label, and a third column with the coding (i.e. 1=male, 2=female, 3=transgender). Data definitions tab includes three columns: the first column includes variable names with no spaces, less than 10 characters, a columns providing an explanation, i.e. a label, and a third column with the coding (i.e. 1=male, 2=female, 3=transgender).

5 to >0.0 pts

Full Marks
0 pts

No Marks

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting/Setup

Data setup will facilitate analysis consistent with the clinical question, aims/objectives, and proposed data analysis plan.

5 to >0.0 pts

Full Marks

0 pts

No Marks
5 pts

Total Points: 100