Assignment: NR 503 Week 5 Infectious disease occurs worldwide and must be addressed just as chronic disease is approached. This assignment will present the learner an opportunity to explore a communicable disease, to apply the epidemiological triad, and to discern the demographic and at-risk background data for a specific infectious disease agent

Assignment: NR 503 Week 5 Infectious disease occurs worldwide and must be addressed just as chronic disease is approached. This assignment will present the learner an opportunity to explore a communicable disease, to apply the epidemiological triad, and to discern the demographic and at-risk background data for a specific infectious disease agent

Assignment: NR 503 Week 5 Infectious disease occurs worldwide and must be addressed just as chronic disease is approached. This assignment will present the learner an opportunity to explore a communicable disease, to apply the epidemiological triad, and to discern the demographic and at-risk background data for a specific infectious disease agent

Purpose

Infectious disease occurs worldwide and must be addressed just as chronic disease is approached. This assignment will present the learner an opportunity to explore a communicable disease, to apply the epidemiological triad, and to discern the demographic and at-risk background data for a specific infectious disease agent.

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this assessment, the student will meet the following Course Outcomes.

Identify appropriate outcome measures and study designs applicable to epidemiological sub-fields such as infectious disease, chronic disease, environmental exposures, reproductive health, and genetics. (CO3)

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Identify important sources of epidemiological data. (CO6)

Due Date

Assignment is due by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 5

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

Total Points Possible

This assignment is worth 125 points.

Preparing the Assignment

Requirement

Choose a topic from the list provided to you by your course faculty. Apply the concepts of population health and epidemiology to the topic.

Synthesize Course content from Weeks 1-5 according to the following sections:

Introduction: Analysis of the communicable disease (causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment) to include demographic break down that includes age, gender, race, or other at-risk indicators (da ta per demographics should include mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence).

Determinants of Health: Define, identify and synthesize the determinants of health as related to the development of the infection. Utilize HP2020.

Epidemiological Triad: Identify and describe all elements of the epidemiological triad: Host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors. Utilize the demographic break down to further describe the triad.

Role of the NP: Succinctly define the role of the nurse practitioner according to a national nurse practitioner organization ( National Board of Nursing or AANP, for example) and synthesize the role to the?management of infectious diseases (surveillance, primary/secondary/tertiary interventions, reporting, data collecting, data analysis, and follow-up). This includes the integration of a model of practice which supports the implementation of an evidence-based practice.? Refer to your course textbook for models of practice examples.

Preparing the paper

Submission Requirements

Application: Use Microsoft Word™ to create the written assessment.

Length: The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be limited to a maximum of four (4) pages. Papers not adhering to the page length may be returned to you for editing to meet the length guidelines.

A minimum of three (3) scholarly research/literature references must be used. CDC or other web sources may be utilized but are not counted towards the three minimum references required. Your course text may be used as an additional resource but is not included in the three minimum scholarly references.

APA format current edition.

Include scholarly in-text references and a reference list.

Adhere to the Chamberlain College of Nursing academic policy on integrity as it pertains to the submission of student created original work for assignments.

Do not write in the first person (such as “me” “I”)

Best Practices in Preparing the Project

The following are best practices in preparing this project:

Review directions and rubric thoroughly.

Follow submission requirements.

Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included. Organize the paper using the rubric sections and appropriate headings to match the sections.

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.

Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.

Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly.

A minimum of three (3) scholarly literature references must be used. **See above section on “Preparing the Paper”.

Abide by Chamberlain College of Nursing academic integrity policy.

This assignment will be run through Turn It In. You may submit your assignment one time and you must be sure you are submitting your final submission for grading.

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT
Category Points % Description
Introduction 15 12%

Comprehensive description of the infectious disease (causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment) and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Integrate at risk aggregate populations with related descriptive epidemiology.
Determinants of Health 40 32% Robust identification and description of the determinants of health with explanation of how those factors contribute to the development of this disease. Evidence supports background.
Epidemiological Triad 30 24% Comprehensive review of the epidemiological triad (host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors). Uses example/s, resources, to fully describe the triad.
Role of the NP 25 20% Succinctly defines the role of the nurse practitioner according to a national nurse practitioner organization (Board of Nursing, AANP, for example) and synthesize the role to the management of infectious diseases (surveillance, primary/secondary/tertiary interventions, reporting, data collecting, data analysis, and follow-up). This includes the integration of a model of practice which supports the implementation of an evidence-based practice.
110 88% Total CONTENT Points = 110 pts

ASSIGNMENT FORMAT
Category Points % Description
APA 10 8% All elements of the paper utilize APA Format current ed.
Spelling/grammar/ voice 5 4% All elements of the paper correctly utilize spelling, grammar and a scholarly voice.
15 12% Total FORMAT Points= 15 pts
125 100% DISCUSSION TOTAL= 125 points

Rubric

NR503_Week 5 Infectious Diseases Paper_Sept19

NR503_Week 5 Infectious Diseases Paper_Sept19

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content Possible Points =110 Points

Introduction of Infectious Disease
15 pts

Excellent

Comprehensive description of the communicable disease (causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment) and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Integrate at risk aggregate populations.

14 pts

V. Good

Adequately identifies the communicable disease (causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment) and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Integration of at-risk aggregate populations.

12 pts

Satisfactory

Limited description of the communicable disease (causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment) and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Integration of at-risk aggregate populations scantly present.

8 pts

Needs Improvement

Unclear description of the communicable disease (causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment) and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Integration of at-risk aggregate populations inaccurately discussed/not related.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Data is minimal or absent.
15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDeterminants of Health
40 pts

Excellent

Robust identification and description of the determinants of health with explanation of how those factors contribute to the development of this disease. Evidence supports background.

36 pts

V. Good

Identification of determinants is complete but lack depth in an area or overall, presents risk factors, disease impact and at least one set of incidence and prevalence statistics which are presented and supported by evidence.

33 pts

Satisfactory

Description of determinants is missing one or more key points. Limited presentation of the contributing factors. Lack of evidence to support writing may be present or evidence may be inconsistent throughout.

20 pts

Needs Improvement

Determinants missing depth in general and more than one key point and lack of contributing factors. There is may be no evidence or evidence may be present inconsistently or without relationship to writing.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Content is minimal if present or not included in writing at all.
40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEpidemiological Triad
30 pts

Excellent

Comprehensive review of the epidemiological triad (host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors). Writing includes examples that expand content beyond a definition into application. Full integration of evidence, sources.

27 pts

V. Good

Adequate review of the epidemiological triad (host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors.) Examples may be omitted. There is integration of evidence in the majority of the writing.

25 pts

Satisfactory

Limited review of the epidemiological triad (host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors.) Examples may be omitted. There is integration of evidence in the writing, which may be inconsistent.

15 pts

Needs Improvement

Minimal or unclear review of the epidemiological triad (the host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors.) There are no examples. Evidence is present but may not be consistent throughout.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Review of the epidemiological triad (host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors) scant, unclear, or not provided.
30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRole of the NP
25 pts

Excellent

Succinctly defines the role of the nurse practitioner according to a national nurse practitioner organization (Board of Nursing, AANP, for example) and synthesizes the role to the management of infectious diseases (surveillance, primary/secondary/tertiary interventions, reporting, data collecting, data analysis, and follow-up). Writing includes integration of a model of practice which supports the implementation of an evidence-based practice. References support all writing.

23 pts

V. Good

An adequate, but not fully comprehensive review

21 pts

Satisfactory

A limited review

13 pts

Needs Improvement

Minimal or unclear

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Not provided
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Format Possible Points =15 Points

APA current edition
10 pts

Excellent

APA is accurate throughout the paper.

9 pts

V. Good

There are 1-3 APA errors.

8 pts

Satisfactory

There are 4-5 APA errors.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

There are 6-7 APA errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

There are greater than 7 APA errors.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling/grammar/ voice
5 pts

Excellent

No errors in spelling, grammar, and voice

4 pts

V. Good

There are 1-3 errors

3 pts

Satisfactory

There are 4-5 errors

2 pts

Needs Improvement

There are 6-7 errors

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

There are greater than 7 errors
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductions

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.
0 pts

Minus Points

0 pts

Minus Points
0 pts

Total Points: 125