Assignment: NR505NP Week 5 Research Summary
Assignment: NR505NP Week 5 Research Summary
Purpose
This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to find and appraise resources related to the PICOT question from Week 2. The focus of this assignment is to evaluate pertinent literature that supports the practice change intervention.
Note: You are to locate original studies with research conducted and published by the primary investigator. You may also use quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods studies, meta-analyses or Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs).
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO1: Integrate evidence-based and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 1,4)
CO2: Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve health outcome. (PO 1, 2)
CO4: Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 5)
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us
CO5: Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)
Due Date
Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 5
Total Points Possible
This assignment is worth 200 points.
Requirements
Find and review ten (10) scholarly, peer-reviewed research articles, meta-analyses, or CPGs in support of the practice change intervention. Complete the appropriate section in the worksheet for each article.
State the PICOT question
For each article, supply the information for each of the seven headings for the appropriate article type.
Preparing the Assignment:
Use the designated Research Summary Table WorksheetLinks to an external site. Links to an external site.to supply the required information.
All scholarly, peer-reviewed research articles must be current within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided, and the instructor has approved the use of an older reference.
Use APA 7th edition formatting for references.
Directions and Assignment Criteria
Assignment Criteria
Points
%
Description
PICOT question
20
10%
PICOT question provided in sentence format
Articles 1-10
15/article
150 total
7.5% / article
75% total
For each article:
Scholarly article: US based peer reviewed journal focused for clinicians
Publication date is current within 5 years
Correctly categorizes article type
Completes all seven areas of article analysis
Explains relevance to PICOT question and implications for advanced nursing practice
APA
20
10%
Use of worksheet template
Correct APA 7th edition format for the following:Font style and size
Citing and referencing sources
Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
Graduate-level writing style
10
5%
Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure
Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing
Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes
Correct APA 7th edition format for the following:Font style and size
Citing and referencing sources
Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
Use of template
Total
200
100 %
Rubric
NR505NP Week 5 Research Summary Assignment Rubric
NR505NP Week 5 Research Summary Assignment Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePICOT Question
20 ptsExceptional
PICOT question provided in sentence format and all five attributes are listed. (Six critical elements.)
18 ptsExceeds
PICOT question provided in sentence format, but one attribute is not defined. (Five critical elements.)
16 ptsMeets
PICOT question provided in sentence format, but two attributes are not defined. (Four critical elements.)
8 ptsNeeds Improvement
PICOT question is not in sentence format and/or three or more attributes are not defined.
0 ptsDeveloping
PICOT question not supplied.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 1
15 ptsExceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 ptsExceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 ptsMeets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 ptsNeeds Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.
0 ptsDeveloping
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 2
15 ptsExceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 ptsExceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 ptsMeets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 ptsNeeds Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements
0 ptsDeveloping
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 3
15 ptsExceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 ptsExceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 pts
Meets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.
0 ptsDeveloping
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 4
15 ptsExceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 ptsExceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 ptsMeets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.
0 pts
Developing
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 5
15 pts
Exceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 ptsExceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 ptsMeets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 ptsNeeds Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements
0 ptsDeveloping
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 6
15 ptsExceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 ptsExceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 ptsMeets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 ptsNeeds Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.
0 pts
Developing
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 7
15 ptsExceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 ptsExceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 ptsMeets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 ptsNeeds Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.
0 ptsDeveloping
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 8
15 ptsExceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 ptsExceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 ptsMeets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.
0 pts
Developing
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 9
15 pts
Exceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 pts
Exceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 pts
Meets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements.
0 pts
Developing
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 10
15 pts
Exceptional
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all seven elements required for study type. (Seven critical elements.)
13 pts
Exceeds
Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the seven elements required for study type.
12 pts
Meets
Presentation of information included six of the seven critical elements required for study type.
6 pts
Needs Improvement
Presentation missing two or three of the seven critical elements
0 pts
Developing
Presentation missing four or more of the seven critical elements.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
20 pts
Exceptional
• Correct APA format with 0-1 error for the following: • Font style and size • Citing and referencing sources • Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
18 pts
Exceeds
• APA format with 2-4 errors for the following: o Font style and size o Citing and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
16 pts
Meets
• APA format with 5-7 errors for the following: o Font style and size o Citing and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
8 pts
Needs Improvement
• APA format with 8-9 errors for the following: o Font style and size o Citing and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
0 pts
Developing
• APA format with > 10 errors for the following: o Font style and size o Citing and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing
10 ptsExceptional
0-1 errors total in: • Writing • Organization • No Direct Quotes • Scholarly sources And template is used.
9 pts
Exceeds
2-4 errors total in: • Writing • Organization • No Direct Quotes • Scholarly sources And template is used.
8 pts
Meets
5-7 errors total in: • Writing • Organization • No Direct Quotes • Scholarly sources And template is used.
4 pts
Needs Improvement
8-9 errors total in: • Writing • Organization • No Direct Quotes • Scholarly sources And template is used.
0 pts
Developing
10 or more errors total in: • Writing • Organization • No Direct Quotes • Scholarly sources OR template is not used.
10 pts
Total Points: 200
PreviousNext