Assignment: NRS 445 Rough Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal

Assignment: NRS 445 Rough Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal

Assignment: NRS 445 Rough Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to synthesize a literature review that will be used to draw conclusions in order to propose an evidence-based practice change to address your identified nurse practice problem.

Using the “Literature Evaluation Table” assignment in Topic 1, and accompanying faculty feedback, you will synthesize the information created for your PICOT question into a literature review and evidence-based proposal.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: NRS 445 Rough Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

In a 1,500-1,750-word paper, provide an overview that illustrates the research related to your particular PICOT question.

Use the following components from the “Literature Evaluation Table” to complete the assignment:

Identified practice problem

Two qualitative peer-reviewed research articles

Two quantitative peer-reviewed research articles

Use the “Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Guidelines” document to organize your paper.

You are required to cite a minimum of four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments

NRS-445-RS-ResearchCritiquePICOT

Rough Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Rubric

Rubric Criteria

Total 180 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Introduction Part 1: Nursing Practice Problem

Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay

0 points

Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is omitted.

9.45 points

Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is incomplete or inaccurate.

9.95 points

Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is present.
11.21 points

Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is detailed.
12.6 points

Introduction of the nursing practice problem and purpose of the essay is thorough.

PICOT Question

Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received from instructor
0 points

Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received from instructor is omitted.

9.45 points

Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received from instructor is incomplete or inaccurate.

9.95 points

Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received from instructor is present with minor inaccuracies.
11.21 points

Statement of updated PICOT question incorporating any feedback that was received from instructor is accurately written and uses the templated language.
12.6 points

Statement of updated PICOT question is concise, accurately written, and uses the templated language.

Method of Studies

Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question
0 points

Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question is omitted.
18.9 points

Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question is incomplete or inaccurate.

19.91 points

Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question is present.

22.43 points

Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question is detailed and demonstrates a basic understanding of research methods.
25.2 points

Description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question is thorough and demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods.

Results of Studies

Summary of the key findings of the four studies
0 points

Summary of the key finding of the four studies is omitted.

18.9 points

Summary of the key finding of the four studies is incomplete or inaccurate.

19.91 points

Summary of the key finding of the four studies is present with some inconsistencies.

22.43 points

Summary of the key finding of the four studies is complete with some minor inconsistencies.
25.2 points

Summary of the key findings of the four studies is thorough and accurate.

Outcomes Comparison Part 1: Anticipated Outcome

Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question
0 points

Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is omitted.

9.45 points

Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is incomplete or inaccurate.

9.95 points

Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is present with some inconsistencies.
11.21 points

Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is complete with some minor inconsistencies and includes relevant details and supporting explanation.
12.6 points

Explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question is thorough and accurate with substantial relevant details.

Outcomes Comparison Part 2: Four Articles

Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome

0 points

Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is omitted.

9.45 points

Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is incomplete or inaccurate.

9.95 points

Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is present with some inconsistencies.
11.21 points

Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is complete with some minor inconsistencies.
12.6 points

Comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome is thorough accurate.

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Changes Part 1: Link Between PICOT Question

Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem
0 points

Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem is omitted.

9.45 points

Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem is incomplete or inaccurate.

9.95 points

Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem is present with some inconsistencies.

11.21 points

Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem is complete with some minor inconsistencies.
12.6 points

Description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem is thorough, and accurate.

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change Part 2: EBP Proposal

Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting
0 points

Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting is omitted.
9.45 points

Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting is incomplete or inaccurate.
9.95 points

Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting is present with some inconsistencies.
11.21 points

Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting is complete and includes relevant details.

12.6 points

Proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting is thorough with substantial relevant details.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
9.45 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.
9.95 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

11.21 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

12.6 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
9.45 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
9.95 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
11.21 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
12.6 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
8.1 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.

8.53 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
9.61 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

10.8 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

8.1 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
8.53 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

9.61 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
10.8 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

5.4 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

5.69 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
6.41 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
7.2 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.