Assignment: NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table
Assignment: NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table
Assessment Description
In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research are essential to achieving successful outcomes. The ability to articulate research data and summarize relevant content supports the student’s ability to further develop and synthesize the assignments that constitute the components of the capstone project.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON; Assignment: NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table
Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. We have attached a well-researched, instruction-compliant sample at the end of the instructions. If you are satisfied with the sample, you can request us to customize your assignment. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper. Kindly scroll down to review the sample.
The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
Assignment: NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
For this assignment, provide a synopsis of the review of the research literature. Using the “Literature Evaluation Table,” determine the level and strength of the evidence for each of the eight research articles you have selected. The articles should be current (within the last 5 years) and closely relate to the PICOT question developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Attachments
NRS-493-RS4-LiteratureEvaluationTable.docx
BUY A CUSTOM PAPER HERE ON: Assignment: NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table
Rubric
| Criterion | 1. Unsatisfactory | 2. Insufficient | 3. Approaching | 4. Accpetable | 5. Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article |
0 points
Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is not included. |
1.88 points
Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
1.98 points
Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present. |
2.23 points
Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is clearly provided and well developed. |
2.5 points
Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Article Title and Year Published
Article Title and Year Published |
0 points
Article title and year published section is not included. |
1.88 points
Article title and year published section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
1.98 points
Article title and year published section is present. |
2.23 points
Article title and year published section is clearly provided and well developed. |
2.5 points
Article title and year published section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Research Questions (Qualitative) or Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes or Aim of Study
Research Questions (Qualitative) or Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes or Aim of Study |
0 points
Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is not included. |
3.75 points
Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
3.95 points
Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present. |
4.45 points
Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is clearly provided and well developed. |
5 points
Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) |
0 points
Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is not included. |
1.88 points
Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
1.98 points
Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present. |
2.23 points
Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is clearly provided and well developed. |
2.5 points
Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Setting or Sample
Setting or Sample |
0 points
Setting or sample section is not included. |
1.88 points
Setting or sample section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
1.98 points
Setting or sample section is present. |
2.23 points
Setting or sample section is clearly provided and well developed. |
2.5 points
Setting or sample section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Methods: Intervention or Instruments
Methods: Intervention or Instruments |
0 points
Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is not included. |
1.88 points
Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
1.98 points
Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is present. |
2.23 points
Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is clearly provided and well developed. |
2.5 points
Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Analysis
Analysis |
0 points
Analysis section is not included. |
3.75 points
Analysis section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
3.95 points
Analysis section is present. |
4.45 points
Analysis section is clearly provided and well developed. |
5 points
Analysis section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Key Findings
Key Findings |
0 points
Key findings section is not included. |
3.75 points
Key findings section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
3.95 points
Key findings section is present. |
4.45 points
Key findings section is clearly provided and well developed. |
5 points
Key findings section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Recommendations
Recommendations |
0 points
Recommendations section is not included. |
3.75 points
Recommendations section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
3.95 points
Recommendations section is present. |
4.45 points
Recommendations section is clearly provided and well developed. |
5 points
Recommendations section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP or Capstone
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP or Capstone |
0 points
Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is not included. |
3.75 points
Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. |
3.95 points
Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is provided. |
4.45 points
Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is clearly provided and well developed. |
5 points
Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Presentation
Presentation |
0 points
The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. |
3.75 points
The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. |
3.95 points
The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. |
4.45 points
The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. |
5 points
The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. |
| Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. |
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. |
3.75 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. |
3.95 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. |
4.45 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. |
5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. |
| Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline. |
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided. |
1.88 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident. |
1.98 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors. |
2.23 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors. |
2.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. |
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
Assignment: NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!