Assignment: PRAC 6665 Week 11 Journal Entry

Assignment: PRAC 6665 Week 11 Journal Entry

Assignment: PRAC 6665 Week 11 Journal Entry

WAL_DEST0004_Pixabay_writing-1149962_1920.jpg Critical reflection of your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you to identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills, while also recognizing your strengths and successes.

Use this Journal to reflect on your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement, the progress you made, and what insights you will carry forward into your next practicum.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Meditrek

Links to an external site.

https://edu.meditrek.com/Default.html

To Prepare

Refer to the “Population-Focused Nurse Practitioner Competencies” found in the Week 1 Learning Resources, and consider the quality measures or indicators advanced nursing practice nurses must possess in your specialty of interest.

Refer to your Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form you submitted in Week 1, and consider your strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Refer to your Patient Log in Meditrek, and consider the patient activities you have experienced in your practicum experience and reflect on your observations and experiences.

Journal Entry (450–500 words)

Learning From Experiences

Revisit the goals and objectives from your Practicum Experience Plan. Explain the degree to which you achieved each during the practicum experience.

Reflect on the three (3) most challenging patients you encountered during the practicum experience. What was most challenging about each?

What did you learn from this experience?

What resources were available?

What evidence-based practice did you use for the patients?

What would you do differently?

How are you managing patient flow and volume?

How can you apply your growing skillset to be a social change agent within your community?

Communicating and Feedbac
Reflect on how you might improve your skills and knowledge, and communicate those efforts to your Preceptor.

Answer the questions: How am I doing? What is missing?

Reflect on the formal and informal feedback you received from your Preceptor.

By Day 7 of Week 11

Submit your Journal.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.

Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.

Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

PRAC_6665_Week11_Assignment_Rubric

PRAC_6665_Week11_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection

50 to >44.0 pts

Excellent

Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or experiences. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples.

44 to >39.0 pts

Good

Reflection demonstrates moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or experiences. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples.

39 to >34.0 pts

Fair

Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or experiences. Minimal connections made through explanations and/or examples.

34 to >0 pts

Poor

Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments.
50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work.
15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Contains no APA errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one to two (1–2) APA errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains three to five (3–5) APA errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains more than five (>5) APA errors.
5 pts

Total Points: 100