Assignment: The purpose of this assignment is to incorporate the instructor-recommended revisions or changes from the Topic 3 Rough Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal to develop a 1,500-1,750-word final draft

Assignment: The purpose of this assignment is to incorporate the instructor-recommended revisions or changes from the Topic 3 Rough Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal to develop a 1,500-1,750-word final draft

Assignment: The purpose of this assignment is to incorporate the instructor-recommended revisions or changes from the Topic 3 Rough Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal to develop a 1,500-1,750-word final draft

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to incorporate the instructor-recommended revisions or changes from the Topic 3 “Rough Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal” to develop a 1,500-1,750-word final draft.

Use the “Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Guidelines” document to organize your essay. Questions under each heading should be addressed in the structure of a formal paper.

You are required to cite a minimum of four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competency 4.1, 4.2, 5.1

Attachments

NRS-445-RS-ResearchCritiquePICOTGuidelines.doc

Final Draft – Research Critiques and Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total260 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target
Introduction Part 1: Nursing Practice Problem

Integration of revisions and changes indicated in instructor feedback for introduction of nursing practice problem from rough draft into final draft
0 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the introduction of nursing practice problem are not integrated into final draft.
13.65 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the introduction of nursing practice problem are incompletely or inaccurately integrated into the final draft.
14.38 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the introduction of nursing practice problem are integrated into the final draft with major inaccuracies.
16.2 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the introduction of nursing practice problem are integrated into the final draft with minor inaccuracies.
18.2 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the introduction of nursing practice problem are thoroughly and accurately integrated into the final draft OR no changes were indicated.
PICOT Question

Integration of revisions and changes indicated in instructor feedback for statement of PICOT question from rough draft into final draft
0 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the statement of PICOT question are not integrated into the final draft.
13.65 points

N/A
14.38 points

N/A
16.2 points

N/A
18.2 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the statement of PICOT question are thoroughly and accurately integrated into final draft OR no changes were indicated.
Method of Studies

Integration of revisions and changes indicated in instructor feedback for description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question from rough draft into final draft
0 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question are not integrated into the final draft.
27.3 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question are incompletely or inaccurately integrated into the final draft.
28.76 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for the description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question are integrated into the final draft with major inaccuracies.
32.4 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question are integrated into the final draft with minor inaccuracies.
36.4 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for description of how the method of study in each of the four articles answers the associated research question are thoroughly and accurately integrated into final draft OR no changes were indicated.
Results of Studies

Integration of revisions and changes indicated in instructor feedback for summary of the key findings of the four studies from rough draft into final draft.
0 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for summary of the key findings of the four studies are not integrated into the final draft.
27.3 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for summary of the key findings of the four studies are incompletely or inaccurately integrated into the final draft.
28.76 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for summary of the key findings of the four studies are integrated into the final draft with major inaccuracies.

32.4 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for summary of the key findings of the four studies are integrated into the final draft with minor inaccuracies.

36.4 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for summary of the key findings of the four studies are thoroughly and accurately integrated into final draft OR no changes were indicated.
Outcomes Comparison Part 1: Anticipated Outcome

Integration of revisions and changes indicated in instructor feedback for explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question from rough draft into final draft
0 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question are not integrated into the final draft.
13.65 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question are incompletely or inaccurately integrated into the final draft.
14.38 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question are integrated into the final draft with major inaccuracies.
16.2 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question are integrated with minor inaccuracies.
18.2 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for explanation of anticipated outcomes for PICOT question, are thoroughly and accurately integrated into final draft OR no changes were indicated.
Outcomes Comparison Part 2: Four Articles

Integration of revisions and changes indicated in instructor feedback for comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome from rough draft into final draft
0 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome are not integrated into the final draft.
13.65 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome are incompletely or inaccurately integrated into the final draft.
14.38 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome are integrated into the final draft with major inaccuracies.
16.2 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome are integrated into the final draft with minor inaccuracies
18.2 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for comparison of outcomes of the four articles to the anticipated PICOT outcome, are thoroughly and accurately integrated into final draft OR no changes were indicated.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Changes Part 1: Link Between PICOT Question

Integration of revisions and changes indicated in instructor feedback for description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem from rough draft into final draft
0 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem are not integrated into the final draft.
13.65 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem are integrated into the final draft incompletely or inaccurately.
14.38 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem are integrated into the final draft with major inaccuracies.
16.2 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem are integrated into the final draft with minor inaccuracies.
18.2 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for description of the link between the PICOT question, research articles, and the identified nursing problem are thoroughly and accurately integrated into final draft OR no changes were indicated.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change Part 2: EBP Proposal

Integration of revisions and changes indicated in instructor feedback for proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting from rough draft into final draft
0 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting are not integrated into the final draft.
13.65 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting are integrated into the final draft incompletely or inaccurately.
14.38 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting are integrated into the final draft with major inaccuracies.
16.2 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting are integrated into the final draft with minor inaccuracies.
18.2 points

Revisions and changes indicated in the rough draft from instructor feedback for proposal of evidence-based practice change to improve outcomes of patient care for identified setting are thoroughly and accurately integrated into final draft OR no changes were indicated.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
13.65 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.
14.38 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
16.2 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
18.2 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
13.65 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.
14.38 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
16.2 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
18.2 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
11.7 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.
12.32 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
13.88 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
15.6 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.
Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
11.7 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
12.32 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
13.88 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
15.6 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
7.8 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
8.22 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
9.26 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
10.4 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
© 2023. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.