Assignment: The purpose of this Assignment is to systematically appraise published evidence related to the DNP project area of inquiry to establish quality and relevance

Assignment: The purpose of this Assignment is to systematically appraise published evidence related to the DNP project area of inquiry to establish quality and relevance

Assignment: The purpose of this Assignment is to systematically appraise published evidence related to the DNP project area of inquiry to establish quality and relevance

Instructions

The purpose of this Assignment is to systematically appraise published evidence related to the DNP project area of inquiry to establish quality and relevance.

This Assignment will serve as the Course Level Assessment for:

Critique clinical evidence using databases and information technology to promote optimal health outcomes for patients, families and communities.

Directions:

1. Select two peer-reviewed articles with content that supports the DNP project area of inquiry. The articles must reflect a quantitative study or a qualitative study or a mixed-methods article. The two articles selected cannot reflect the same research design.
2. Download the JHNEBP Research Evidence Appraisal Tool.
3. Critique the evidence by completing the sections in the Research Evidence Appraisal Tool for a quantitative and/or qualitative and/or mixed-methods study.
4. You do not need to complete the sections on a systematic review or meta-analysis.
   

   ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

   Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside an AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Further instructions

Hi Class,

I want to clarify some points about the Unit 6 assignment. The form is a little confusing. You can download the form twice and use one each for the different articles you review. One for quantitative and one for qualitative, or one for quantitative and mixed-methods or one for qualitative and mixed methods. You only have to complete the form for two articles. Please do not use a systematic review or meta-analysis for your article.

For one type, either quantitative or qualitative, you will identify the article, complete the checklist, and then provide a synthesis of the article in the box provided. All parts of the checklist should be addressed – use yes/no/NA. There will be huge sections of the form that you will skip as you move to the section for your specific article type.

So, you can upload in the dropbox two forms – one for each of the two articles. If you select a mixed-methods study, then you will complete both the quantitative and qualitative sections for that article.

I hope this helps. You do not need a title page or reference page. Please make sure your name is on the form somewhere.

Thanks and take care.

Unit 6 Assignment Rubric

Assignment Criteria	Level III	Level II	Level I	Not Present
Criteria 1	Points: 39	Points: 31	Points: 22	0 Points
Research Article Selection	All of the following are true: ●       Selects two articles for critique that describe a research study. ●       The research studies in the two articles are a different research design. ●       Relevance of research to DNP area of inquiry/EBP question is evident.	Two of the following are true: ●       Selects two articles for critique that describe a research study. ●       The research studies in the two articles are a different research design. ●       Relevance of research to DNP area of inquiry/EBP question is evident.	One of the following is true: ●       Selects two articles for critique that describe a research study. ●       The research studies in the two articles are a different research design. ●       Relevance of research to DNP area of inquiry/EBP question is evident.	●       Does not meet the criteria.
Assignment Criteria	Level III	Level II	Level I	Not Present
Criteria 2	Points: 42	Points: 34	Points: 27	0 Points
Research Appraisal and Synthesis	All of the following are true: ●       All required sections of the Research Evidence Appraisal Tool are complete. ●       Synthesis of study findings is included for each research study. ●       Synthesis reflects application of the research study to the DNP area of inquiry/EBP question.	Two of the following are true: ●       All required sections of the Research Evidence Appraisal Tool are complete. ●       Synthesis of study findings is included for each research study. ●       Synthesis reflects application of the research study to the DNP area of inquiry/EBP question.	One of the following is true: ●       All required sections of the Research Evidence Appraisal Tool are complete. ●       Synthesis of study findings is included for each research study. ●       Synthesis reflects application of the research study to the DNP area of inquiry/EBP question.	●       Does not meet the criteria.
Assignment Criteria	Level III	Level II	Level I	Not Present
Criteria 3	Points: 9	Points: 7	Points: 5	0 Points
Citations and Formatting	All of the following are true: ●       Accurate use of standard English grammar/spelling ●       Accurate use of citation and reference ●       Accurate use of APA document formatting	One of the following is true: ●       Minor errors in the use of standard English grammar/spelling ●       Minor errors in the use of citation and reference ●       Minor errors in the use of APA document formatting	One of the following is true: ●       Significant errors in the use of standard English grammar/spelling ●       Significant errors in the use of citation and reference ●       Significant errors in the use of APA document formatting	●       Does not meet the criteria.
Maximum Total Points	90	72	54	0
Minimal Total Points	68.1 points minimum	51.1 points minimum	1 point minimum	0