Order Now

Assignment: Working Through Ethical Dilemmas and Other Issues in Advanced Nursing Practice

NRNP 6552 Assignment: Working Through Ethical Dilemmas and Other Issues in Advanced Nursing Practice

The Discussion for this week is to provide you an opportunity to discuss with your colleagues the case studies presented in the interactive media program. These case studies involve ethical dilemmas or other issues encountered in advanced nursing practice.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

ORDER A WELL RESEARCHED, AI FREE ASSIGNMENT NRNP 6552 Assignment: Working Through Ethical Dilemmas and Other Issues in Advanced Nursing Practice HERE

What is special with us? We prioritize customer satisfaction by offering a “pay after delivery” policy, meaning you will pay when you’re fully satisfied with the quality of your work. Our commitment to originality means that every assignment is compiled from scratch, thoroughly checked for plagiarism and AI, and tailored to meet your specific requirements. We guarantee timely delivery, meaning you are assured that your assignments will always be submitted on time.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

Assignment: Working Through Ethical Dilemmas and Other Issues in Advanced Nursing Practice

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Meet My Deadline

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

  • Schuiling, K. D., & Likis, F. E. (2022). Gynecologic health care (4th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning.
    • Chapter 3,” Women’s Growth and Development Across the Life Spans) pp. 39–49)
    • Chapter 13, “Contraception” (pp. 236–266)

Adult Gerontology Resources

Clinical Guideline Resources

As you review the following resources, you may want to include a topic in the search area to gather detailed information (e.g., breast cancer screening guidelines; CDC – for zika in pregnancy, etc.).

Required Media

  • Links to an external site.
    In this interactive media program, you will be presented with various case studies with a variety of decision paths to take as an Advanced Nurse Practitioner.

Optional Resources

Note: In Weeks 1-10, these resources are optional for your review. In Week 11, you will be required to review each of the PowerPoint slides from the text Gynecologic Health Care (4th ed.).

By Day 3

To prepare:

  • Review the interactive case studies in this week’s Learning Resources. Select one of the cases to prepare your discussion post. Your post should address the following:
    • Summary of your chosen case study
    • What is your differential diagnosis?
    • Why did you make this diagnosis decision?
    • What is your treatment plan?
    • What evidence-based research can you provide to support your decision (choice for differential diagnosis and plan/intervention)?
    • What resources did you use to meet your best practice guidelines?
    • Address the ethical dilemmas and/or other issues for your case study:
      • Ethical issues
      • Psychological issues
      • Physical issues
      • Financial issues NRNP 6552 Assignment: Working Through Ethical Dilemmas and Other Issues in Advanced Nursing Practice

By Day 6

Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts (from a different group) on two different days and provide additional insight that might be useful and appropriate for the issue addressed. Use your learning resources and/or evidence from the literature to support your position.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the Reply button to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Post Reply, you cannot delete or edit your own posts and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Post Reply!

NRNP 6552 Assignment: Working Through Ethical Dilemmas and Other Issues in Advanced Nursing Practice Rubric

NRNP_6552_Week9_Case_Study_Discussion_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Posting:Response to the case study discussion questions includes appropriate diagnoses with explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options as directed, is based on evidence-based research where appropriate, and is incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
44 to >39.16 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)… Post includes appropriate diagnoses including explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options… Incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources, with no less than 75% of post the post having exceptional depth and breadth… Supported by at least 3 current credible sources.

 39.16 to >34.76 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Responds to most of the discussion question(s).. Post includes appropriate diagnoses with explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options… Somewhat incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources with no less than 50% of the post having exceptional depth and breadth… Supported by at least 3 credible references.

 34.76 to >30.36 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Responds to some of the discussion question(s)… Post contains incomplete or vague diagnoses or explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options… Is somewhat lacking in synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources… Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references.

 30.36 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Does not respond to the discussion question(s)… Post contains incomplete diagnoses or explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options, or diagnoses and/or explanations are missing… Lacks synthesis gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources… Contains only 1 or no credible references.
44 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Posting:Writing
6 to >5.34 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Written clearly and concisely… Contains no grammatical or spelling errors… Further adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

 5.34 to >4.74 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Written concisely… May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors… Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

 4.74 to >4.14 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Written somewhat concisely… May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors… Contains some APA formatting errors.

 4.14 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Not written clearly or concisely… Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors… Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Posting:Timely and full participation
10 to >8.9 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation… Posts main discussion by due date.

 8.9 to >7.9 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Posts main discussion by due date… Meets requirements for full participation.

 7.9 to >6.9 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Posts main discussion by due date.

 6.9 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Does not meet requirements for full participation… Does not post main discussion by due date.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome First Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 to >8.01 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings… Responds to questions posed by faculty… The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 8.01 to >7.11 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

 7.11 to >6.21 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

 6.21 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome First Response:Writing
6 to >5.34 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues… Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed… Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources… Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.

 5.34 to >4.74 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues… Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed… Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources… Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

 4.74 to >4.14 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication… Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed… Few or no credible sources are cited.

 4.14 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication… Response to faculty questions are missing… No credible sources are cited.
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome First Response:Timely and full participation
5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation… Posts by due date.

 4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Meets requirements for full participation… Posts by due date.

 3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Posts by due date.

 3.45 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Does not meet requirements for full participation… Does not post by due date.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Second Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 to >8.01 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings… Responds to questions posed by faculty… The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 8.01 to >7.11 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

 7.11 to >6.21 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

 6.21 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Second Response:Writing
6 to >5.34 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues… Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed… Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources… Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.

 5.34 to >4.74 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues… Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed… Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources… Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

 4.74 to >4.14 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication… Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed… Few or no credible sources are cited.

 4.14 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication… Response to faculty questions are missing… No credible sources are cited.
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Second Response:Timely and full participation
5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation… Posts by due date.

 4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Meets requirements for full participation… Posts by due date.

 3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Posts by due date.

 3.45 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Does not meet requirements for full participation… Does not post by due date. NRNP 6552 Assignment: Working Through Ethical Dilemmas and Other Issues in Advanced Nursing Practice
5 pts
Total Points: 100 










		

			

					

		

					

		

				

				

																														

				

				

		

					

				

				

					
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
				

				

		

					

				

				

					
Get assistance on 
				

				

				

				

					
Assignment: Working Through Ethical Dilemmas and Other Issues in Advanced Nursing Practice
				

				

				

				

					
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
				

				

					

				

				

				

									

					
						
						
							
									Meet My Deadline
					
					
				

								

				

					

				

					

				

					

				

				

				


		
		
		
		
	


	
		
			


	


	










	

		

											
Open chat

						
				
				
			
										
WhatsApp chat +1 908-954-5454

					

			

			

									We are online
								

			

			

				

					
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?