Capella NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 1 Assignment Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Video

Capella NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 1 Assignment Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Video

For this assessment you will create a 5-10 minute video reflection on an experience in which you collaborated interprofessionally, as well as a brief discussion of an interprofessional collaboration scenario and how it could have been better approached.

Interprofessional collaboration is a critical aspect of a nurse’s work. Through interprofessional collaboration, practitioners and patients share information and consider each other’s perspectives to better understand and address the many factors that contribute to health and well-being (Sullivan et al., 2015). Essentially, by collaborating, health care practitioners and patients can have better health outcomes. Nurses, who are often at the frontlines of interacting with various groups and records, are full partners in this approach to health care.

Reflection is a key part of building interprofessional competence, as it allows you to look critically at experiences and actions through specific lenses. From the standpoint of interprofessional collaboration, reflection can help you consider potential reasons for and causes of people’s actions and behaviors (Saunders et al., 2016). It also can provide opportunities to examine the roles team members adopted in a given situation as well as how the team could have worked more effectively.

As you begin to prepare this assessment you are encouraged to complete the What is Reflective Practice? activity. The activity consists of five questions that will allow you the opportunity to practice self-reflection. The information gained from completing this formative will help with your success on the Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Video assessment. Completing formatives is also a way to demonstrate course engagement

Note: The Example Kaltura Reflection demonstrates how to cite sources appropriately in an oral presentation/video. The Example Kaltura Reflection video is not a reflection on the Vila Health activity. Your reflection assessment will focus on both your professional experience and the Vila Health activity as described in the scenario.

Capella NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 1 Assignment Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Video References

Saunders, R., Singer, R., Dugmore, H., Seaman, K., & Lake, F. (2016). Nursing students’ reflections on an interprofessional placement in ambulatory care. Reflective Practice, 17(4), 393–402.

Sullivan, M., Kiovsky, R., Mason, D., Hill, C., Duke, C. (2015). Interprofessional collaboration and education. American Journal of Nursing, 115(3), 47–54.

Demonstration of Proficiency

• Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
  • Identify how poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources supported by evidence from the literature.

• Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
  • Reflect on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes.
  • Identify best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team to achieve its goals and work more effectively together.
• Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
  • Identify best-practice leadership strategies from the literature, which would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals.
• Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
  • Communicate via video with clear sound and light.
  • The full reference list is from relevant and evidence-based (published within 5 years) sources, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Professional Context

This assessment will help you to become a reflective practitioner. By considering your own successes and shortcomings in interprofessional collaboration, you will increase awareness of your problem-solving abilities. You will create a video of your reflections, including a discussion of best practices of interprofessional collaboration and leadership strategies, cited in the literature.

Scenario

As part of an initiative to build effective collaboration at your Vila Health site, where you are a nurse, you have been asked to reflect on a project or experience in which you collaborated interprofessionally and examine what happened during the collaboration, identifying positive aspects and areas for improvement.

You have also been asked to review a series of events that took place at another Vila Health location and research interprofessional collaboration best practices and use the lessons learned from your experiences to make recommendations for improving interprofessional collaboration among their team.

Your task is to create a 5–10 minute video reflection with suggestions for the Vila Health team that can be shared with leadership as well as Vila Health colleagues at your site. Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact DisabilityServices@Capella.edu to request accommodations. If, for some reason, you are unable to record a video, please contact your faculty member as soon as possible to explore options for completing the assessment.

Capella NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 1 Reflection Video Instructions

Using Kaltura, record a 5–10 minute video reflection on an interprofessional collaboration experience from your personal practice, proposing suggestions on how to improve the collaboration presented in the Vila Health: Collaboration for Change activity.

Be sure that your assessment addresses the following criteria. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you will know what is needed for a distinguished score:

• Reflect on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes.
• Identify how poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources, citing supporting evidence from the literature.
• Identify best-practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals, citing at least one author from the literature.
• Identify best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team achieve its goals and work together, citing the work of at least one author.
• Communicate in a professional manner, is easily audible, and uses proper grammar. Format reference list in current APA style.

You will need to relate an experience that you have had collaborating on a project. This could be at your current or former place of practice, or another relevant project that will enable you to address the requirements. In addition to describing your experience, you should explain aspects of the collaboration that helped the team make progress toward relevant goals or outcomes, as well as aspects of the collaboration that could have been improved.

A simplified gap-analysis approach may be useful:

• What happened?
• What went well?
• What did not go well?
  • What should have happened?

After your personal reflection, examine the scenario in the Vila Health activity and discuss the ways in which the interdisciplinary team did not collaborate effectively and the negative implications for the human and financial resources of the interdisciplinary team and the organization as a whole.

Building on this investigation, identify at least one leadership best practice or strategy that you believe would improve the team’s ability to achieve their goals. Be sure to identify the strategy and its source or author and provide a brief rationale for your choice of strategy.

Additionally, identify at least one interdisciplinary collaboration best practice or strategy to help the team achieve its goals and work more effectively together. Again, identify the strategy, its source, and reasons why you think it will be effective.

You are encouraged to integrate lessons learned from your self-reflection to support and enrich your discussion of the Vila Health activity.

You are required to submit an APA-formatted reference list for any sources that you cited specifically in your video or used to inform your presentation. The Example Kaltura Reflection will show you how to cite scholarly sources in the context of an oral presentation.

Refer to the Campus tutorial Using Kaltura [PDF] as needed to record and upload your reflection.

Additional Requirements 

• References: Cite at least 3 professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.
• APA Reference Page: Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video.
  • You may wish to refer to the Campus APA Module for more information on applying APA style.

See Also:

NURS-FPX4010 Assessment 2 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal NURS-FPX4010

Capella NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 1 Assignment Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Video Example Paper

Hello everyone, welcome to my collaboration and leadership reflection for Assessment 1. My name is (Insert name).

In this presentation, I intend to:

• Reflect on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience while summarizing a Vila Health Activity, including what was successful and what faltered in achieving the desired outcomes.
• Elaborate on how poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources.
• Explain the best leadership strategies to improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve collective goals while integrating insights from the literature.

Reflection of an Interdisciplinary Collaboration Experience

Change is inevitable in the healthcare sector, considering the need to provide quality care and address the increasing demand for healthcare services. One of the most profound strategies to enhance healthcare services is integrating technological advances by revamping the existing healthcare systems. After analyzing the importance of new technologies, our organization (Clarion Court Skilled Nursing Facility) embarked on a multidisciplinary commitment to implementing Healthix, a new electronic health record (EHR).

Since we relied on relatively outdated health record systems, the organizational management selected a team to collaborate with designers and information technology (IT) experts from Healthix for localized installations Capella NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 1 Assignment Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Video. The team comprised local computer experts, advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), the director of operations, and administrators.

The team from Healthix headquarters was supposed to interact with the local team to oversee the effective installation and replacement of the existing health record systems. However, that was not the case because IT experts from Healthix opted to ignore our team by downplaying our suggestions regarding the new EHR. Undoubtedly, this factor affected interdisciplinary collaboration, rendering the project ineffective and inefficient.

What went well?

Our team at Clarion Court Skilled Nursing Facility spearheaded an internal preparedness plan for implementing Healthix by embracing new approaches, including convincing the organization to avail resources for the new system. Also, we consolidated opinions from patients and other stakeholders regarding the importance of revamping and replacing old systems with Healthix. As a result, we were adequately prepared to embrace advanced technologies for promoting quality care and enhancing process efficiency.

What did not go well?

Ineffective collaboration between the team from Healthix headquarters and our implementation team hampered the overall process of incorporating a new electronic health record (EHR) system. The external team had a responsibility to design Healthix based on organizational needs and inputs for local professionals. However, IT experts opted to implement it based on their experience and expertise without considering insights from corporate stakeholders. Consequently, this consideration led to dissatisfaction from the local team, project ineffectiveness, and additional risks to patient safety.

How poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources.

Poor collaboration can lead to the inefficient management of human and financial resources due to ineffective communication patterns and conflicting ideologies.

Busari et al. (2017) describe collaboration in healthcare as “the capacity of every healthcare professional to effectively embrace complementary roles within a team, work cooperatively, share responsibilities for problem-solving, and make the decisions needed to formulate and carry out patient care” (p. 228).

In this sense, interprofessional and interdisciplinary collaboration between nurses, physicians, and other stakeholders enhances collective awareness and promotes knowledge and skills.

Amidst the need to deliver quality care in scenarios of financial and human resource constraints, team performance and collaboration enable healthcare professionals to pool skills and competencies together to enhance process effectiveness. In the Vila Health experience case study, it is clear that ineffective collaboration between the Healthix team and local stakeholders affected the overall utilization of financial and human resources to realize the collective objective of implementing the Healthix record system.

The best leadership strategies for enabling interdisciplinary teams to achieve collective goals

Appropriate leadership and change management strategies are crucial in enhancing the team’s effectiveness and ability to realize goals. Xu (2017) proposes transformational and participative leadership as appropriate styles to guarantee proper change management. The author suggests that the transformational leadership style enables nursing leaders to create an ideal impact, motivate followers, integrate intellectual stimulation, and incorporate personal considerations in decisions. On the other hand, participative leadership allows followers to connect and participate in the change management process by being more committed to goals.

Transformational and participative leadership styles complement other strategies for ensuring team effectiveness. Buljac-Samardzic et al. (2020) contend that a lack of team performance is a primary point of susceptibility to quality and safety of care. Further, the authors argue that organizational interventions, including simulation training, effective resource management, and interprofessional collaboration, are practical strategies for enhancing team effectiveness.

In the Vila Health experience, proper change management and leadership strategies were inadequate because they failed to uphold the tenets of interprofessional collaboration. This aspect jeopardized the adoption of Healthix electric health records systems.

In conclusion, interprofessional collaboration is an essential aspect of organizational change in the healthcare sector since it enables stakeholders to consolidate efforts, manage resources, and focus on achieving collective outcomes. The Vila Health experience shows that a lack of stakeholder engagement and participation presents a primary weakness when embracing new ways. Also, change management and leadership strategies determine the trajectories of institutional change by determining the levels of resource management and structural alignment to new ways.

Capella NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 1 Reflection Video References

Buljac-Samardzic, M., Doekhie, K., & van Wijngaarden, J. (2020). Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade. Human Resources for Health, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0411-3

Busari, J., Moll, F., & Duits, A. (2017). Understanding the impact of interprofessional collaboration on the quality of care: a case report from a small-scale resource-limited health care environment. Journal Of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 10, 227-234. https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s140042

Xu, J. (2017). Leadership theory in clinical practice. Chinese Nursing Research, 4(4), 155-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnre.2017.10.001

Capella NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 1 Assignment Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Video Scoring Guide

CRITERIA	NON-PERFORMANCE	BASIC	PROFICIENT	DISTINGUISHED
Reflect on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes.	Does not describe an interdisciplinary collaboration experience.	Describes an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, but the reflection on the success or failure to achieve desired outcomes is missing or unclear.	Reflects on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes.	Reflects on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes. Includes ways in which reflective nursing practice can help build a better understanding of past experiences to improve future practice decisions.
Identify ways poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources, supported by evidence from the literature.	Does not Identify ways poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources	Identifies poor collaboration, but does not address how it can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources or does not provide supporting evidence from the literature.	Identifies how poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources supported by evidence from the literature.	Identifies how poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources supported by evidence from the literature. Multiple authors from the literature are discussed.
Identify best- practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals.	Does not identify best-practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals.	Identifies leadership strategies, but it is unclear how they would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals, or does not provide supporting evidence from the literature.	Identifies best- practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals.	Identifies best-practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals. Multiple authors from the literature are discussed.
Identify best- practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team to achieve its goals and work together more effectively.	Does not identify best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team to achieve its goals and work together more effectively.	Identifies interdisciplinary collaboration strategies, but it is unclear how they would help a team to achieve its goals and work together more effectively together	Identifies best- practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team to achieve its goals and work together more effectively.	Identifies best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team to achieve its goals and work together more effectively. Multiple authors from the literature are discussed.
Communicate via video with clear sound and light.	Does not communicate professionally in a well-organized presentation.	Does not communicate via video or video is difficult to hear and see.	Communicates via video with clear sound and light.	Communicates via video with clear sound and light. Content delivery is focused, smooth, and well-rehearsed
The full reference list is from relevant and evidence-based (published within 5 years) sources, exhibiting nearly	Does not provide a reference list of relevant and/or evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).	A majority of reference list sources are relevant and/or evidence-based (published within 5	The full reference list is from relevant and evidence-based (published within 5 years) sources, exhibiting nearly	The full reference list is from relevant and evidence-based (published within 5 years) sources, exhibiting

Assessment 2 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

For this assessment, you will create a 2-4 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved with an interdisciplinary approach, and review best practices and evidence to address the issue.

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, your participation and leadership in interdisciplinary teams will be vital to the health outcomes for your patients and organization. One way to approach designing an improvement project is to use the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement describes it thus:

The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is shorthand for testing a change in the real work setting—by planning it, trying it, observing the results, and acting on what is learned. This is the scientific method adapted for action-oriented learning…Essentially, the PDSA cycle helps you test out change ideas on a smaller scale before evaluating the results and making adjustments before potentially launching into a somewhat larger scale project (n.d.).

You might also recognize that the PDSA cycle resembles the nursing process. The benefit of gaining experience with this model of project design is that it provides nurses with an opportunity to ideate and lead improvements.

For this assessment, you will not be implementing all of the PDSA cycle. Instead, you are being asked to interview a health care professional of your choice to determine what kind of interdisciplinary problem he or she is experiencing or has experienced in the workplace. This interview, in Assessment 2, will inform the research that you will conduct to propose a plan for interdisciplinary collaboration in Assessment 3.

It would be an excellent choice to complete the PDSA Cycle activity prior to developing the report. The activity consists of four questions that create the opportunity to check your understanding of best practices related to each stage of the PDSA cycle. The information gained from completing this formative will promote your success with the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification report. This will take just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.

Reference

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). How to improve. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx

Demonstration of Proficiency

• Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
  • Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
  • Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
• Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
  • Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
• Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
  • Describe change theories and a leadership strategy that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
• Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
  • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
  • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Professional Context

This assessment will introduce the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model to create change in an organization. By interviewing a colleague of your choice, you will begin gathering information about an interprofessional collaboration problem that your colleague is experiencing or has experienced. You will identify a change theory and leadership strategies to help solve this problem.

Scenario

This assessment is the first of three related assessments in which you will gather interview information (Assessment 2); design a proposal for interdisciplinary problem-solving, (Assessment 3); and report on how an interdisciplinary improvement plan could be implemented in a place of practice (Assessment 4). At the end of the course, your interviewee will have a proposal plan based on the PDSA cycle that he or she could present to stakeholders to address an interdisciplinary problem in the workplace.

For this assessment, you will need to interview a health care professional such as a fellow learner, nursing colleague, administrator, business partner, or another appropriate person who could provide you with sufficient information regarding an organizational problem that he or she is experiencing or has experienced, or an area where they are seeking improvements. Consult the Interview Guide [DOCX] for an outline of how to prepare and the types of information you will need to complete this project successfully.

Remember: this is just the first in a series of three assessments.

Instructions

For this assessment, you will report on the information that you collected in your interview, analyzing the interview data and identifying a past or current issue that would benefit from an interdisciplinary approach. This could be an issue that has not been addressed by an interdisciplinary approach or one that could benefit from improvements related to the interdisciplinary approach currently being used. You will discuss the interview strategy that you used to collect information. Your interview strategy should be supported by citations from the literature.

Additionally, you will start laying the foundation for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal (Assessment 3) by researching potential change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to issue you have identified. Please be certain to review the scoring guide to confirm specific required elements of this assessment. Note that there are differences between basic, proficient and distinguished scores.

When submitting your plan, use the Interview and Issue Identification Template [DOCX], which will help you to stay organized and concise. As you complete the template, make sure you use APA format for in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that are informing your plan, as well as for the reference list at the end.

Additionally, be sure to address the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

• Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
• Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
• Describe potential change theories and leadership strategies that could inform an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
• Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could facilitate establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
• Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, and using current APA style.

Additional Requirements

• Length of submission: Use the provided template. Most submissions will be 2 to 4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
• Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
• APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.

Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Scoring Guide

CRITERIA	NON-PERFORMANCE	BASIC	PROFICIENT	DISTINGUISHED
Summarize an	Does not	Discusses an	Summarizes an	Summarizes an
interview focused on	summarize an	interview, but the	interview focused on	interview focused on
past or current issues	interview focused	focus of the interview,	past or current issues	past or current issues at
at a health care	on past or current	the issues addressed,	at a health care	a health care
organization.	issues at a health	or the specifics of	organization.	organization. Notes
	care organization.	health care		strategies employed in
		organizational context		the interview to ensure
		are unclear or		that sufficient
		missing.		information was
				gathered.
Identify an issue from	Does not identify	Identifies an issue	Identifies an issue	Identifies an issue from
an interview for which	an issue from an	with an unclear	from an interview for	an interview for which an
an evidence-based	interview for which	connection to the	which an evidence-	evidence-based
interdisciplinary	an evidence-based	interview or for which	based	interdisciplinary
approach would be	interdisciplinary	an evidence-based	interdisciplinary	approach would be
appropriate.	approach would be	interdisciplinary	approach would be	appropriate, providing
	appropriate.	approach seems	appropriate.	one or more specific
		inappropriate.		reasons to justify this
				approach.
Describe potential	Does not describe	Identifies change	Describes potential	Describes potential
change theories and	potential change	theories and	change theories and	change theories and
leadership strategies	theories and	leadership strategies	leadership strategies	leadership strategies
that could help	leadership	that are unclear,	that could help	that could help develop
develop an	strategies that	incomplete, or	develop an	an interdisciplinary
interdisciplinary	could help develop	irrelevant to	interdisciplinary	solution to an
solution to an	an interdisciplinary	developing an	solution to an	organizational issue.
organizational issue.	solution to an	interdisciplinary	organizational issue.	Notes which sources
	organizational	solution to an		seem most credible or
	issue.	organizational issue.		relevant to the specific
				organizational issue.
Describe	Does not describe	Identifies	Describes	Describes collaborative
collaborative	collaborative	collaborative	collaborative	approaches from the
approaches from the	approaches from	approaches from the	approaches from the	literature that could be
literature that could	the literature that	literature but the	literature that could	relevant in establishing
be relevant in	could be relevant	relevance to	be relevant in	or improving an
establishing or	in establishing or	establishing or	establishing or	interdisciplinary team to
improving an	improving an	improving an	improving an	address an
interdisciplinary team	interdisciplinary	interdisciplinary team	interdisciplinary team	organizational issue.
to address an	team to address	to address an	to address an	Notes which sources
organizational issue.	an organizational	organizational issue	organizational issue.	seem most credible or
	issue.	is unclear or		relevant to the specific
		insufficiently		organizational issue.
		explained.
Organize content so	Does not organize	Organizes content	Organizes content so	Organizes content with a
ideas flow logically	content for ideas.	with some logical flow	ideas flow logically	clear purpose. Content
with smooth	Lacks logical flow	and smooth	with smooth	flows logically with
transitions; contains	and smooth	transitions. Contains	transitions; contains	smooth transitions using
few errors in	transitions.	errors in	few errors in	coherent paragraphs,
grammar/punctuation,		grammar/punctuation,	grammar/punctuation,	correct
word choice, and		word choice, and	word choice, and	grammar/punctuation,
spelling.		spelling.	spelling.	word choice, and free of
				spelling errors.

 

CRITERIA	NON-PERFORMANCE	BASIC	PROFICIENT	DISTINGUISHED
Apply APA formatting	Does not apply	Applies APA	Applies APA	Exhibits strict and
to in-text citations	APA formatting to	formatting to in-text	formatting to in-text	flawless adherence to
and references	headings, in-text	citations, headings	citations and	APA formatting of
exhibiting nearly	citations, and	and references	references, exhibiting	headings, in-text
flawless adherence to	references. Does	incorrectly and/or	nearly flawless	citations, and
APA format.	not use quotes or	inconsistently,	adherence to APA	references. Quotes and
	paraphrase	detracting noticeable	format.	paraphrases correctly.
	correctly.	from the content.
		Inconsistently uses
		headings, quotes
		and/or paraphrasing.

NURS-FPX4010 Assessment 3 Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Scoring Guide

for this assessment you will create a 2-4 page plan proposal for an interprofessional team to collaborate and work toward driving improvements in the organizational issue you identified in the second assessment.

The health care industry is always striving to improve patient outcomes and attain organizational goals. Nurses can play a critical role in achieving these goals; one way to encourage nurse participation in larger organizational efforts is to create a shared vision and team goals (Mulvale et al., 2016). Participation in interdisciplinary teams can also offer nurses opportunities to share their expertise and leadership skills, fostering a sense of ownership and collegiality.

You are encouraged to complete the Budgeting for Nurses activity before you develop the plan proposal. The activity consists of seven questions that will allow you the opportunity to check your knowledge of budgeting basics and as well as the value of financial resource management. The information gained from completing this formative will promote success with the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal. Completing this activity also demonstrates your engagement in the course, requires just a few minutes of your time, and is not graded.

Demonstration of Proficiency

• Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
  • Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to be a success and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done, related to the improvements sought by the plan.
• Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
  • Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific objective related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
  • Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
• Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
  • Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
• Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
  • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
  • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Reference

Mulvale, G., Embrett, M., & Shaghayegh, D. R. (2016). ‘Gearing up’ to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: A systematic review and conceptual framework. BMC Family Practice, 17.

Professional Context

This assessment will allow you to describe a plan proposal that includes an analysis of best practices of interprofessional collaboration, change theory, leadership strategies, and organizational resources with a financial budget that can be used to solve the problem identified through the interview you conducted in the prior assessment.

Scenario

Having reviewed the information gleaned from your professional interview and identified the issue, you will determine and present an objective for an interdisciplinary intervention to address the issue.

Note: You will not be expected to implement the plan during this course. However, the plan should be evidence-based and realistic within the context of the issue and your interviewee’s organization.

Instructions

For this assessment, use the context of the organization where you conducted your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific patient or organizational outcome or objective based on the information gathered in your interview.

The goal of this assessment is to clearly lay out the improvement objective for your planned interdisciplinary intervention of the issue you identified. Additionally, be sure to further build on the leadership, change, and collaboration research you completed in the previous assessment. Look for specific, real-world ways in which those strategies and best practices could be applied to encourage buy-in for the plan or facilitate the implementation of the plan for the best possible outcome.

Using the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX] will help you stay organized and concise. As you complete each section of the template, make sure you apply APA format to in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that inform your plan, as well as the reference list at the end.

Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

• Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
• Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
• Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
• Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if the improvements described in the plan are not made.
• Communicate the interdisciplinary plan, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Additional Requirements

• Length of submission: Use the provided template. Remember that part of this assessment is to make the plan easy to understand and use, so it is critical that you are clear and concise. Most submissions will be 2 to 4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
• Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
• APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style

Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Scoring Guide

CRITERIA	NON-PERFORMANCE	BASIC	PROFICIENT	DISTINGUISHED
Describe an objective	Does not describe	Identifies an objective	Describes an	Describes an objective
and predictions for an	an objective and	for an evidence-	objective and	and predictions for an
evidence-based	predictions for an	based	predictions for an	evidence-based
interdisciplinary plan	evidence-based	interdisciplinary plan	evidence-based	interdisciplinary plan to
to achieve a specific	interdisciplinary	but does not clearly	interdisciplinary plan	achieve a specific goal
goal related to	plan to achieve a	explain how the	to achieve a specific	related to improving
improving patient or	specific goal	objective will help	goal related to	patient or organizational
organizational	related to	achieve a specific	improving patient or	outcomes, including
outcomes.	improving patient	goal related to	organizational	methods from the
	or organizational	improving patient or	outcomes.	literature that may be
	outcomes.	organizational		used to determine
		outcomes.		success.
Explain a change	Does not explain a	Describes a change	Explains a change	Explains a change
theory and a	change theory and	theory and a	theory and a	theory and a leadership
leadership strategy,	a leadership	leadership strategy	leadership strategy,	strategy, supported by
supported by relevant	strategy, supported	but the relevance to	supported by relevant	relevant evidence, that
evidence, that is most	by relevant	the success of	evidence, that is most	is most likely to help an
likely to help an	evidence, that is	interdisciplinary team	likely to help an	interdisciplinary team
interdisciplinary team	most likely to help	in collaborating and	interdisciplinary team	succeed in collaborating
succeed in	an interdisciplinary	implementing, or	succeed in	and implementing, or
collaborating and	team succeed in	creating buy-in for,	collaborating and	creating buy-in for, the
implementing, or	collaborating and	the project plan is not	implementing, or	project plan, providing
creating buy-in for,	implementing, or	clearly explained and	creating buy-in for,	real-world examples
the project plan.	creating buy-in for,	no evidence is	the project plan.	relevant to the health
	the project plan.	provided.		care organization that is
				the context for the plan.
Explain the	Does not explain	Explains collaboration	Explains the	Explains the
collaboration needed	the collaboration	but not in terms of an	collaboration needed	collaboration needed by
by an	needed by an	interdisciplinary team	by an interdisciplinary	an interdisciplinary team
interdisciplinary team	interdisciplinary	or does not include	team to improve the	to improve the likelihood
to improve the	team to improve	best practices from	likelihood of	of achieving the plan’s
likelihood of	the likelihood of	the literature.	achieving the plan’s	objective, including best
achieving the plan’s	achieving the		objective, including	practices of
objective, including	plan’s objective.		best practices of	interdisciplinary
best practices of	Does not cite best		interdisciplinary	collaboration from the
interdisciplinary	practices of		collaboration from the	literature. Provides real-
collaboration from the	interdisciplinary		literature.	world examples relevant
literature.	collaboration from			to the health care
	the literature.			organization that is the
				context for the plan.
Explain	Does not explain	Identifies	Explains	Explains organizational
organizational	organizational	organizational	organizational	resources, including a
resources, including	resources,	resources needed for	resources, including a	financial budget,
a financial budget,	including a	the plan to succeed	financial budget,	needed for the plan to
needed for the plan to	financial budget,	and the impacts on	needed for the plan to	succeed and the
succeed and the	needed for the plan	those resources if	succeed and the	impacts on those
impacts on those	to succeed and the	nothing is done to	impacts on those	resources if nothing is
resources if nothing	impacts on those	make the	resources if nothing is	done to make the
is done to make the	resources if	improvements sought	done to make the	improvements sought
improvements sought	nothing is done to	by the plan. Does not	improvements sought	by the plan. Provides
by the plan.	make the	include a financial	by the plan.	real-world examples
	improvements	budget.		relevant to the health
	sought by the plan.			care organization that is
				the context for the plan.

 

CRITERIA	NON-PERFORMANCE	BASIC	PROFICIENT	DISTINGUISHED
Organize content so	Does not organize	Organizes content	Organizes content so	Organizes content with
ideas flow logically	content for ideas.	with some logical flow	ideas flow logically	a clear purpose.
with smooth	Lacks logical flow	and smooth	with smooth	Content flows logically
transitions; contains	and smooth	transitions. Contains	transitions; contains	with smooth transitions
few errors in	transitions.	errors in	few errors in	using coherent
grammar/punctuation,		grammar/punctuation,	grammar/punctuation,	paragraphs, correct
word choice, and		word choice, and	word choice, and	grammar/punctuation,
spelling.		spelling.	spelling.	word choice, and free of
				spelling errors.
Apply APA formatting	Does not apply	Applies APA	Applies APA	Exhibits strict and
to in-text citations	APA formatting to	formatting to in-text	formatting to in-text	flawless adherence to
and references,	headings, in-text	citations, headings	citations and	APA formatting of
exhibiting nearly	citations, and	and references	references, exhibiting	headings, in-text
flawless adherence to	references. Does	incorrectly and/or	nearly flawless	citations, and
APA format.	not use quotes or	inconsistently,	adherence to APA	references. Quotes and
	paraphrase	detracting noticeably	format.	paraphrases correctly.
	correctly.	from the content.
		Inconsistently uses
		headings, quotes
		and/or paraphrasing.