Complete the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool Links to an external site. Download Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool. Once you have completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following:

Complete the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool Links to an external site. Download Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool. Once you have completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following:

Complete the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool Links to an external site. Download Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool. Once you have completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following:

Quantitative Research

Collaboration Café

Purpose

With new information continually emerging, professional nurses must be equipped to critique scholarly literature and discern its value for practice. Select one current, quantitative scholarly nursing article related to your PICOT question and determine its strengths, limitations, and potential application.

Complete the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal ToolLinks to an external site. Download Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool. Once you’ve completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following:

Description of the purpose

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

 

Explanation of research design

Discussion of sample

Description of data collection methods

Summary of findings

Strengths of the study (minimum of 1)

Limitations of the study (minimum of 1)

Recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful and appropriate.

Attach the article to your post, in addition to including the full reference for the article in your post.

During the week, read a minimum of two articles posted by peers and add your thoughts about whether you feel their article would support an EBP change.

The John Hopkins tool does not need to be turned in, it is a worksheet for you to decide what type of article you have.

For full credit, submit your initial post by Wednesday at 11:59 PM MT. Complete your two responses to peers by Sunday at 11:59 PM MT.

**To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.

NR505NP Collaboration Cafe Rubric

NR505NP Collaboration Cafe Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Initial Posting

• Addresses the collaboration café question in a thorough, substantive manner.

• Demonstrates application of course concepts.

• Discusses implications for advanced nursing practice.

• Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner following rules of English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation

25 pts

Excellent

Fully meets all requirements

23 pts

Very Good

Most requirements fully met, but one requirement is superficial

21 pts

Satisfactory

All elements are addressed, but two items are covered in a superficial or limited manner

13 pts

Needs Improvement

All elements are addressed, but all are covered in a superficial or limited manner OR missing one element

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Does not address the initial question(s) OR missing more than one element
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Responsive Postings

• Responds to 2 separate classmates with substantive dialogue that is collaborative in nature.

• Each of the 2 postings asks questions, offers new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice

25 pts

Excellent

Fully meets all requirements

23 pts

Very Good

Most requirements fully met, but one requirement is superficial

21 pts

Satisfactory

All elements are addressed, but two items are covered in a superficial or limited manner

13 pts

Needs Improvement

All elements are addressed, but all are covered in a superficial or limited manner OR missing one element

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No response post to another student.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0)
0 pts

0 Points Deducted

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0)

0 pts

5.0 Points Deducted
0 pts

Total Points: 50