DNP 830 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-8)

DNP 830 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-8)

DNP 830 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-8)

DNP 830 Topic 1 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion

Topic 1 DQ 1

The DPI Project is conducted using a quantitative method driven by quality improvement. Provide a rationale for using a quantitative method in contrast to other methods (e.g., qualitative method or mixed method). Describe how the quantitative method is in line with quality improvement. Provide evidence supporting your response.

Topic 1 DQ 2

Define and distinguish among nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio variables used in the measurement of DPI Project outcomes. Discuss the errors which can be made by failing to understand the proper use of measurement variables based on level and type of comparison.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE DNP 830 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-8) HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

DNP 830 Topic 2 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion

Topic 2 DQ 1

Assessment Description

Describe the survey, instrument, or tool you plan to use in your DPI Project and explain why this is the best for your project. Describe the tool in terms of name, the number of items, how it is answered (e.g., multiple choice, Likert scale, yes/no, open answer), the total score, and the level of measurement. Describe the reliability and validity of the instrument including the applicable psychometric data. Provide evidence supporting your response

Topic 2 DQ 2

Assessment Description

There are many types of errors that can be found in data. Depending on the source of data, the cleansing process can take a substantial amount of time, and the attention to detail should not be underestimated. After reading Chapter 12 in Clinical Analytics and Data Management for the DNP, compare four common types of data errors and identify a method for cleaning each error. Provide evidence supporting your response.

DNP 830 Topic 3 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion

Topic 3 DQ 1

Descriptive statistics, such as demographics of the sample, are required for the DPI Project. Describe the project population and project sample. What demographic variables of your sample will you collect? What data source will you use to get these data? What do these data tell you about your sample? Provide evidence supporting your response.

Topic 3 DQ 2

Compare parametric and nonparametric statistical tests. How does each test depend on the assumption of normality? What would you do if the data are not normally distributed? Provide evidence supporting your response.

DNP 830 Topic 4 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion

Topic 4 DQ 1

Power analysis is used to determine if a sample size is adequate to evaluate project outcomes prior to initiating any project. This is also called a priori. Justify the project sample size for your DPI Project by using the sample size calculator to conduct a power analysis. Discuss how your sample size may affect the validity of your project. Determine the sampling method used in your project. Compare the convenience sample to other sampling methods. Provide evidence supporting your response.

Topic 4 DQ 2

While the goal of the DPI Project is to achieve clinical significance, you will also need to discuss if the data analysis also has statistical significance. Statistical significance (p = .05) helps determine whether a result is by chance. On the chance that your DPI Project does not result in statistical significance, explain how you can justify clinical significance.

DNP 830 Topic 5 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion

Topic 5 DQ 1

Assessment Description

Identify the statistical analysis technique that will be used for your project, including the descriptive and inferential analysis. Justify how the analyses are aligned with the methodology and design. How does each analysis answer the clinical question in your project? Provide evidence supporting your respons

Topic 5 DQ 2

Assessment Description

Data visualization allows data findings to be reported in a graph, chart, or other visual format. It communicates the relationship of the data with images. This is important because it allows trends and patterns to be more easily seen. Describe the best way to visualize the data you will collect for your DPI Project to have the most effect on your audience.

DNP 830 Topic 6 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion

Topic 6 DQ 1

Assessment Description

Discuss the basic principles of data interpretation, including the validity and reliability of the data used to translate outcomes into practice. What are common barriers to translating outcomes into practice? Analyze the importance of critically appraising the findings. Describe any barriers you may anticipate as you plan to translate the results of your own DPI Project into practice.

Topic 6 DQ 2

Assessment Description

Read the Bible verses listed in the topic Resources. What does the Bible have to say about how one should view work in general? How does this Christian worldview of work affect the approach to the DPI Project?

Resources

Collapse All ResourcesCollapse All

Clinical Analytics and Data Management for the DNP

Read Chapters 15, 16, and 18 in Clinical Analytics and Data Management for the DNP.

View Resource

The Bible

Read Proverbs 6:6-8; Proverbs 13:4; 2 Timothy 2:5-6; and Colossians 3:23-24.

Use one of the following versions of the Bible: the En

… Read More

Imprecise Data and Their Impact on Translational Research in Medicine

Read:

Capobianco, E. (2020). Imprecise data and their impact on translational research in medicine. Frontiers in Medicine,

… Read More

https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-

DNP 830 Topic 7 DQ 1 & 2 Discussion

Topic 7 DQ 1

Assessment Description

In the United States, disparities in health care for vulnerable populations are of great concern, with much attention focused on the potential for unconscious (implicit) bias. Christians are not immune to these human biases. Implicit bias has many effects on DPI projects including, data collection, data analysis, and patient outcomes. Based on your knowledge of the Christian worldview, how can a Christian worldview help eliminate bias from your DPI project.

Topic 7 DQ 2

Assessment Description

Review the types of data that are considered protected health information (PHI). How would the collection of this data affect your project (whether you plan to collect it or not) and how would you store it in order to protect what you are collecting?

DNP 830 Topic 8 DQ 1 & DQ 2 Discussion

Topic 8 DQ 1

Assessment Description

The “Revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence: SQUIRE 2.0” guidelines, located in the topic Resources, provide some guidance on the evaluation of quality improvement efforts. They are used as both grant proposal and manuscript publication preparation guidelines. Discuss how your project aligns with the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines. Explain why your DPI Project is a quality improvement project and not a research project.

Topic 8 DQ 2

Assessment Description

Select a nursing journal in which you would be interested in having your completed DPI Project published. Identify the journal and include a summary of the author guidelines. Describe at least two other methods commonly used by authors to disseminate or report quality improvement outcomes. How could the author guidelines, or those additional strategies you identified, be beneficial to you as you develop and implement your DPI Project? How could the author guidelines be beneficial to your practice?

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE DNP 830 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-8) HERE

DNP 830 Topic 8 Assignment: Reflective Journal

Assessment Description

Learners must maintain a reflective journal integrating self-reflection and inquiry demonstrated in the current Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) course.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Download the “Reflective Journal Template,” located in the DNP PI Workspace, for submission. Directions provided in the template should be followed because they align to the assignment rubric.

A minimum of three peer-reviewed references published within the last 5 years is required.

Doctoral learners are required to use the current APA style for their essay writing assignments. The current APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use. Failure to submit the reflective journal to both locations can result in an Incomplete for the course.

Directions:

Using a scholarly approach, maintain a reflective journal integrating self-reflection and inquiry demonstrated in the current DNP course.

Topic 8 Reflective Journal – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total20 points

Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Professional Practice and Approach

Professional Practice and Approach
0 points

A discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is incomplete or limited.

3.2 points

A discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is not included.

3.52 points

An introductory discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice is included, but only minimal detail or support is provided for approach.
3.68 points

A detailed discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is complete, with appropriate details and support.
4 points

A cogent, scholarly discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is clearly explained, with relevant details and support.

Personal Knowledge and Skills

Personal Knowledge and Skills

0 points

A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is not included.

3.2 points

A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is incomplete or otherwise deficient.
3.52 points

A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is provided, but with minimal detail or support.

3.68 points

A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is provided with appropriate details and support.
4 points

A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.

Additional Resources for Influencing Optimal Learning Outcomes

Additional Resources for Influencing Optimal Learning Outcomes
0 points

A discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is not included.

3.2 points

A discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is incomplete or otherwise deficient.
3.52 points

An introductory discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided, but with minimal detail or support.

3.68 points

A complete discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided with appropriate details and support.
4 points

A clear discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided, with relevant details and support.

Course Outcomes and Competencies Aligned to the Course

Course Outcomes and Competencies Aligned to the Course

0 points

A description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is not included.
3.2 points

A description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is incomplete or otherwise deficient.

3.52 points

An introductory description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is provided with minimal detail or support.

3.68 points

A complete description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is provided with appropriate details and support.
4 points

A cogent, scholarly description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

0.64 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
0.7 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
0.74 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

0.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
0.64 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

0.7 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
0.74 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
0.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

0.64 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

0.7 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

0.74 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.
0.8 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

0.64 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

0.7 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

0.74 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
0.8 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
0.64 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

0.7 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
0.74 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
0.8 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.