DNP 835 Assignment: Sustainability Plan Presentation
DNP 835 Assignment: Sustainability Plan Presentation
Assessment Description
For this assignment, you will create a sustainability plan and present your plan using PowerPoint and Loom.
General Requirements:
Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
A minimum of three scholarly or peer-reviewed research articles are required. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE DNP 835 Assignment: Sustainability Plan Presentation HERE
Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.
Directions:
Based on the feedback you have received from your instructor on the “Sustainability Plan Worksheet,” compile the elements (measurement, ownership, communication, change management, and workload) into a presentation that you would present to the stakeholders of your proposed quality and/or safety sustainability program.
Develop a PowerPoint presentation (10-15 slides) to present your final sustainability plan. Create speaker notes of 100-250 words for each slide. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to create a voice-over or a video. Refer to the topic Resources for additional guidance on recording your presentation with Loom. Include an additional slide for the title and Loom link at the beginning and an additional slide for References at the end.
Include the following:
Describe one or two measures that are critical to the sustainability of your proposed quality and/or safety sustainability program and decide on the data collection and monitoring process. Additionally, discuss whether you will reduce or eliminate the frequency of certain measurements.
Describe a measurement threshold that will trigger investigation.
Describe the owner of the improvement process who authorizes changes and will be responsible for sustaining improvement.
Outline a communication and training plan for improvements and learning. Consider who needs to know what, when and how often they need to know it, what communication method would work best, and who the best person is for initiating communication or sharing information.
Identify a change management theory that you will use to standardize the process so that it supports the improved process.
Explain how the proposed changes will affect staff workload. Ideally, the improvement has removed work and made people’s jobs easier and more efficient. Changes that decrease workload have a higher chance of success over time.
Rubric Criteria
Total
175 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Layout
Layout
0 points
Layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read, with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
11.2 points
Layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting, with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
12.32 points
Layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts from or does not enhance readability.
12.88 points
Layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
14 points
Layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Language Use and Audience Awareness
Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.
0 points
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
9.8 points
Some distracting inconsistencies in language or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
10.78 points
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
11.27 points
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
12.25 points
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Proposed Changes and Effect on Workload
Explanation for how proposed changes will affect staff workload.
0 points
How the proposed changes will affect staff workload is omitted.
14 points
How the proposed changes will affect staff workload is not fully explained.
15.4 points
The presentation generally explains how proposed changes will affect staff workload. Some aspects are unclear. Additional information may be needed. Some aspects are unclear. Additional information may be needed.
16.1 points
The presentation adequately explains how the proposed changes will affect staff workload. Some detail is needed for clarity.
17.5 points
The presentation thoroughly explains how proposed changes will affect staff workload.
Measures Critical to Sustainability
One or two measures critical to suitability of proposed quality and/or sustainability program. Data collection and monitoring process. Reduction or elimination of frequency of certain measurements.
0 points
The measures critical to the sustainability of the proposed quality and/or sustainability program are omitted; or, the measures presented are not conducive to sustainability or the proposed quality and/or safety program.
14 points
The measures critical to the sustainability of the proposed quality and/or sustainability program are incomplete. It is unclear how the measures will be support sustainability for the proposed quality and/or safety program.
15.4 points
One or two measures critical to the sustainability of the proposed quality and/or sustainability program are presented. The data collection and monitoring process are summarized, but some aspects are unclear. Whether the frequency of certain measurements will be reduced or eliminated is generally outlined. In general, the measures presented support sustainability and are appropriate for the proposed quality and/or safety program. Some aspects are vague. Additional support is needed.
16.1 points
One or two measures critical to the sustainability of the proposed quality and/or sustainability program are presented. The data collection and monitoring process is determined. Whether the frequency of certain measurements will be reduced or eliminated is outlined. The measures critical to sustainability are adequately supported and generally appropriate for the proposed quality and/or safety program. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
17.5 points
One or two measures critical to the sustainability of the proposed quality and/or sustainability program are detailed. The data collection and monitoring process is clearly determined. Whether the frequency of certain measurements will be reduced or eliminated is outlined. The measures critical to sustainability are clear, well-supported, and appropriate for the proposed quality and/or safety program.
Documentation of Sources
Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.
0 points
Sources are not documented.
7 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
7.7 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
8.05 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
8.75 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of errors.
Measurement Threshold
Measurement threshold triggering investigation.
0 points
A measurement threshold triggering investigation is omitted.
14 points
A measurement threshold is presented, but it is unclear how it will trigger an investigation.
15.4 points
An adequate measurement threshold triggering investigation is presented. Some aspect is unclear. Additional information or support is needed.
16.1 points
An appropriate measurement threshold triggering investigation is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity.
17.5 points
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE DNP 835 Assignment: Sustainability Plan Presentation HERE
A highly appropriate measurement threshold triggering investigation is clearly presented.
A Minimum of Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Research
A Minimum of Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Research
0 points
Scholarly or peer-reviewed research is omitted.
7 points
Scholarly or peer-reviewed research is lacking; the sources provided do not provide support. Fewer than three sources are provided.
7.7 points
Scholarly or peer-reviewed research provides general support. Most sources are published within the last 5 years and generally appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing practice.
8.05 points
Scholarly or peer-reviewed research provides adequate support. Sources are published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing practice.
8.75 points
Scholarly or peer-reviewed research provides excellent support. Sources are published within the last 5 years and highly appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing practice.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.
0 points
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
7 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
7.7 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.
8.05 points
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.
8.75 points
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
Owner of Improvement Process
Owner of improvement process, authorizing changes and responsible for sustaining improvement.
0 points
The owner of improvement process is omitted.
14 points
The owner of improvement process is presented but it is unclear why this person is selected or how the person will authorize changes and sustain improvement.
15.4 points
The owner of improvement process is presented. Some additional information or rationale is needed to fully present why this owner is the best person for authorizing changes and sustaining improvement.
16.1 points
The owner of improvement process, including authorizing changes and responsibility for sustaining improvement, is appropriate and adequately presented. Some detail is needed for clarity.
17.5 points
The owner of improvement process, including authorizing changes and responsibility for sustaining improvement, is appropriately selected and clearly presented.
Presentation
Submission is effectively presented, including required speaker notes and Loom presentation.
0 points
The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.
14 points
The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required elements.
15.4 points
The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.
16.1 points
The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.
17.5 points
The submission is effectively presented, and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts.
Change Management Theory
Change management theory to standardize process to support the improved process.
0 points
A theory is omitted
14 points
A theory is presented, but it is unclear how it will standardize the process and support the improved process.
15.4 points
A theory to standardize the process and support the improved process is presented. Some aspects are unclear. Additional information may be needed.
16.1 points
A change management theory adequate for standardizing the process and supporting the improved process is presented.
17.5 points
A change management theory appropriate to standardizing the process and supporting the improved process is clearly presented.
Communication and Training Plan
Communication and training plan for improvements and learning. Individuals needed. Method of communication. Individual communicating.
0 points
A communication and training plan for improvements and learning is omitted.
14 points
A communication and training plan for improvements and learning is incomplete. The individuals needed for the plan are unclear.
15.4 points
A general communication and training plan for improvements and learning is presented. Most key individuals needed, what they need to know, when, how often, and the method of communication and the individual communicating are outlined. Some aspects are unclear. Additional information or support is needed.
16.1 points
A communication and training plan for improvements and learning is presented. Key individuals needed, what they need to know, when, how often, and the method of communication and the individual responsible communicating is outlined. Some detail is needed for clarity.
17.5 points
A well-organized communication and training plan for improvements and learning is presented. All individuals needed, what they need to know, when, how often, and the method of communication and the individual responsible for communicating is clearly outlined.