DNP 835 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-8)

DNP 835 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-8)

DNP 835 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-8)

DNP 835 Topic 1 DQ 1 Discussion

Assessment Description

Reflecting on the “IHI Module PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety,” summarize why it is essential to improve patient safety. Use one of the articles from this week’s topic Resources and describe the framework or theory that was used to improve the patient outcome. What outcome measures were identified and how did they align with the improvement project? Explain how the authors learned from the error or unintended events to ensure patient safety. Provide supporting evidence.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE DNP 835 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-8) HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

DNP 835 Topic 2 DQ 1 Discussion

Assessment Description

Reflecting on the “IHI Module TA 103: Increasing Value and Reducing Waste at the Point of Care,” describe the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in managing costs. Identify one common barrier to cost management and inappropriate resource use. Discuss a change theory and how it can be applied in nursing practice to integrate sustainable care delivery. Provide supporting evidence.

DNP 835 Topic 3 DQ 1 Discussion

Assessment Description

Reflecting on the “IHI Module TA 102: Improving Health Equity,” describe two causes of health disparities in the United States, or in your local community, that lead to health inequity. What ethical issues inhibit access and quality for care for these issues? Outline an initiative, integrating your faith and ethical principles surrounding practice, to reduce these health inequities and sustain the change within the health care system.

DNP 835 Topic 5 DQ 1 Discussion

Reflect on the “IHI Module QI 201: Planning for Spread: From Local Improvements to System-Wide Change.” Describe how change spreads according to Kurt Lewin and Everett Rogers. Using the IHI Framework for Spread, assess the current culture of your organization or practice site and explain how likely a new idea will spread. Provided rationale and support for your explanation.

DNP 835 Topic 6 DQ 1 Discussion

Assessment Description

Reflect on the “IHI Module PS 203: Pursuing Professional Accountability and a Just Culture.” As a future DNP leader describe what quantitative and qualitative data you could use to assess the culture of your practice site or organization. Explain how you can create, shape, and sustain a culture of safety for your site or organization using the six domains of a culture of safety. How will you inspire, motivate, and inform your organization on a journey of zero harm? Provide rationale and support for your explanation.

DNP 835 Topic 7 DQ 1 Discussion

Assessment Description

Reflect on the “IHI Module PFC 102: Key Dimensions of Patient and Family Centered Care” module. Explain how the four dimensions of patient- and family-centered care are applied or can be applied within your organization. How does your organization collaborate with patients and families to redesign care?

DNP 835 Topic 8 DQ 1 Discussion

Assessment Description

Reflecting on the “IHI Module: PS 202 Achieving Total Systems of Safety,” describe the eight recommendations proposed in the IHI report that DNP leaders can apply to accelerate patient safety and the prevention of harm. What three key recommendations will you use as a DNP leader to promote safety among the workforce in your organization to improve health outcomes?

Attachments

DNP-RS-Professionalism-Assignment.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE DNP 835 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Topic 1-8) HERE

DNP 835 Topic 8 Assignment: Reflective Journal

Assessment Description

Learners must maintain a reflective journal integrating self-reflection and inquiry demonstrated in the current Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) course.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

Download the “Reflective Journal Template,” located in the DNP PI Workspace, for submission. Directions provided in the template should be followed because they align to the assignment rubric.

A minimum of three peer-reviewed references published within the last 5 years is required.

Doctoral learners are required to use the current APA style for their essay writing assignments. The current APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use. Failure to submit the reflective journal to both locations can result in an Incomplete for the course

Directions:

Using a scholarly approach, maintain a reflective journal integrating self-reflection and inquiry demonstrated in the current DNP course.

Topic 8 Reflective Journal – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total20 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Course Outcomes and Competencies Aligned to the Course

Course Outcomes and Competencies Aligned to the Course

0 points

A description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is not included.
3.2 points

A description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is incomplete or otherwise deficient.
3.52 points

An introductory description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is provided with minimal detail or support.
3.68 points

A complete description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is provided with appropriate details and support.

4 points

A cogent, scholarly description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.

Personal Knowledge and Skills

Personal Knowledge and Skills

0 points

A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is not included.

3.2 points

A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is incomplete or otherwise deficient.

3.52 points

A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is provided, but with minimal detail or support.

3.68 points

A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is provided with appropriate details and support.

4 points

A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.

Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
0.64 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

0.7 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
0.74 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
0.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
0.64 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

0.7 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

0.74 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

0.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

0.64 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

0.7 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
0.74 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.
0.8 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

0.64 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
0.7 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
0.74 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

0.8 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

Professional Practice and Approach

Professional Practice and Approach
0 points

A discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is incomplete or limited.
3.2 points

A discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is not included.
3.52 points

An introductory discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice is included, but only minimal detail or support is provided for approach.
3.68 points

A detailed discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is complete, with appropriate details and support.
4 points

A cogent, scholarly discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is clearly explained, with relevant details and support.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

0.64 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

0.7 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

0.74 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

0.8 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Additional Resources for Influencing Optimal Learning Outcomes

Additional Resources for Influencing Optimal Learning Outcomes
0 points

A discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is not included.
3.2 points

A discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is incomplete or otherwise deficient.

3.52 points

An introductory discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided, but with minimal detail or support.
3.68 points

A complete discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided with appropriate details and support.

4 points

A clear discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided, with relevant details and support.