ECON 330 6380 Assignment: Business and Economics of Sustainability (2232)

Assignment Directions

This week, you have one assignment to complete. Select the button below to access detailed instructions for this assignment and to submit your work.

Instructions

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

ECON 330 6380 Assignment: Business and Economics of Sustainability (2232)

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Please submit Project #3: Term Paper for grading.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE ECON 330 6380 Assignment: Business and Economics of Sustainability (2232) HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

Project 3_Term Paper Rubric

Course: ECON 330 6380 Business and Economics of Sustainability (2232)

Criteria

Excellent (90 and Above)

Good (80 and Above)

Acceptable (70 and Above)

Below Average (60 and Above)

Poor (30 and Below)

Incomplete (20% and Below)

Criterion Score

Completeness The paper contains Abstract, Literature review, Discussion, and Conclusions. The student included at least one graph develop d in our course

10 points

Outstanding effort in completing the Term Paper. The Term Paper is complete in all respects; reflects all requirements

8 points

A good effort is made to complete the Term paper. The Term Paper is complete in most respects; reflects most requirements.

7 points

The Term Paper is incomplete in many respects; reflects few requirements

6 points

Only a superficial effort to complete the Term Paper.

3 points

Only a poor effort to complete the term paper

0 points

Virtually no effort to complete the Term paper, the paper is unworthy of credit

/ 10

Criteria

Understanding/ Comprehension

Excellent (90 and Above)

Good (80 and Above)

Acceptable (70 and Above)

Below Average (60 and Above)

Poor (30 and Below)

Incomplete (20% and Below)

Criterion Score

20 points

Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s).

Recognizes possible implication s of the course materials beyond the assigned task within the classroom.

16 points

Demonstrates a very good understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s).

Uses the course materials, general background knowledge to draw

complex inferences about the subject of the paper.

14 points

Demonstra tes an acceptable understan ding of the topic(s) and issue(s).

Uses the course materials, general backgroun d knowledge to explain the issues of the paper with minor

12 points

Demonstra tes only a superficial understan ding of the topic(s) and issue(s).

Uses the course materials, general backgroun d knowledge to explain the issues of the paper with significant

6 points

Demonstra tes only a poor understan ding of the topic(s) and issue(s).

0 points

Virtually no effort to complete the Term paper; not worthy of credit.

/ 20

Excellent (90 and Above)

Good (80 and Above)

Acceptable (70 and Above)

Below Average (60 and Above)

Poor (30 and Below)

Incomplete (20% and Below)

Criterion Score

40 points

32 points

28 points

24 points

12 points

0 points

/ 40

Presents an outstandin g analysis of all issues identified. Makes appropriat e and powerful connection s between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading.

Supports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretat ion is both

Presents a thorough analysis of most issues identified. Makes appropriat

connection s between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading.

Supports diagnosis and opinions with

and evidence; presents a fairly balanced view; interpretat ion is both reasonable and objective.

Presents a satisfactor y analysis of some of the issues identified. Makes appropriat e but somewhat vague connection s between the issues and concepts studied in the reading.

Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited

and evidence. Presents acceptable

dations supported by the informatio

Presents only a superficial analysis of the issues identified. Makes little or no connection between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading.

Does not support diagnosis and opinions with any

Does not present realistic or appropriat e

dations.

The analysis, evaluation, and recommen dations of the issues are poor and incomplete

Virtually no effort to complete the Term paper; not worthy of credit.

Criteria	Excellent (90 and Above)	Good (80 and Above)	Acceptable (70 and Above)	Below Average (60 and Above)	Poor (30 and Below)	Incomplete (20% and Below)	Criterion Score
	reasonable	Presents	presented
	and	specific,	and
	objective.	realistic,	concepts
	Presents	and	from the
	detailed,	appropriat	reading,
	realistic,		however
	and		this part of
	appropriat	dations	the paper
		supported	should be
		by the	better
	dations	informatio	developed.
	clearly
	supported	presented
	by the	and
	informatio	concepts
	n	from the
	presented	reading.
	and
	concepts
	from the
	reading

Criteria

Excellent (90 and Above)

Good (80 and Above)

Acceptable (70 and Above)

Below Average (60 and Above)

Poor (30 and Below)

Incomplete (20% and Below)

Criterion Score

Research

10 points

8 points

7 points

6 points

3 points

0 points

/ 10

Supplemen ts analysis with outstandin g research; clearly and thoroughly documents all sources of informatio

Supplemen ts analysis with relevant research, documents all sources of informatio

Supplemen ts analysis with satisfactor y research, provides limited documenta tion of sources used for the term paper.

Only a superficial effort to complete the research for the term paper.

Only a poor effort to complete the research for the term paper.

Virtually no effort to complete the Term paper; not worthy of credit.

The project does not contain any research, that is unworthy of credit

Criteria

Excellent (90 and Above)

Good (80 and Above)

Acceptable (70 and Above)

Below Average (60 and Above)

Poor (30 and Below)

Incomplete (20% and Below)

Criterion Score

Writing mechani cs

10 points

Writing demonstra tes a outstandin g clarity, concisenes s, and correctnes s; includes thorough details and relevant data and informatio n; extremely well‐ organized

8 points

Writing is very good in terms of clarity and concisenes s and contains only a few errors; includes sufficient details and relevant data and informatio n; well‐ organized

7 points

Writing is acceptable, however it lacks clarity or concisenes s and contains

errors; gives insufficient detail and relevant data and informatio n; lacks organizatio n.

6 points

Writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; lacks detail and relevant data and informatio n; poorly organized

3 points

Writing is extremely unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; does not contain detail and relevant data and informatio n; poorly organized, that is unworthy of credit

0 points

Virtually no effort to complete the Term paper; not worthy of credit.

/ 10

APA

guideline s

10 points

Uses APA guidelines accurately and consistentl y to cite sources

8 points

Uses APA guidelines with minor violations to cite

7 points

Reflects acceptable knowledge of APA guidelines

6 points

Reflects only a superficial knowledge of APA guidelines

3 points

Reflects poor knowledge of APA guidelines

0 points

Virtually no effort to complete the Term paper; not worthy of credit.

/ 10

The Term Paper does not use APA

guidelines

Overall Score

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

ECON 330 6380 Assignment: Business and Economics of Sustainability (2232)

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

ECON 330 6380 Assignment: Business and Economics of Sustainability (2232)