ETHC 445 Week 3 Assignment: Course Project Milestone

ETHC 445 Week 3 Assignment: Course Project Milestone

ETHC 445 Week 3 Assignment: Course Project Milestone

Start Assignment

• Due Monday by 12:59am
• Points 100
• Submitting a file upload

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

• Textbook: Chapter 5, 6
• Lesson
• Minimum of 2 scholarly sources (in addition to the course textbook)
  

  ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE ETHC 445 Week 3 Assignment: Course Project Milestone HERE

  Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Instructions
This assignment is the first step in a three part project. You only need to focus on part one at this point. Each step will build on earlier steps. However, it is not a matter of providing a rough draft of all or even part of the entire project here in week three. That is, further steps might require completely new and original text.  At the same time, completing each step will aid you in completing a future step or future steps. And, you should use the same topic in all steps.

First, select a topic of moral controversy, debate, disagreement, and dispute, Examples of such topics are euthanasia, the death penalty, abortion, cloning, etc. You can pick any such topic. It need not be listed here.

Next, detail the positions of each side of the ethical debate. Note at least two moral reasons each side presents to show their view on the topic is correct.

Now, we want to evaluate these positions using the moral theories we studied this week:

• What would an Ethical Egoist say about this topic? What side would the Ethical Egoist take? What would the Ethical Egoist say to justify their moral position? Is there a conflict between loyalty to self and to community relevant to your topic? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
• What would a Social Contract Ethicist say about this topic? What side would the Social Contract Ethicist take? What would the Social Contract Ethicist say to justify their moral position? Does your topic involve a collision between personal obligations and national ones? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action.

Finally, reference and discuss any professional code of ethics relevant to your topic such as the AMA code for doctors, the ANA code for nurses, or any other pertinent professional code. State whether and how your chosen topic involves any conflicts between professional and familial duties.

Cite the textbook and incorporate outside sources, including citations.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

• Length: 3-4pages (not including title page or references page)
• 1-inch margins
• Double spaced
• 12-point Times New Roman font
• Title page
• References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to the course textbook)

Grading
This activity will be graded based on the rubric provided.

Course Outcomes (CO): 4, 6

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Rubric

ETHC445 Week 3 Assignment Rubric – 100 pts.

ETHC445 Week 3 Assignment Rubric – 100 pts.
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetails positions of ethical debate	20 pts Thoroughly notes two moral reasons each side presents. 17 pts Notes two moral reasons each side presents 15 pts Thoroughly notes one moral reason each side presents. 12 pts Notes only one moral reason each side presents. 0 pts The student does not note moral reasons.	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content	50 pts Addresses all aspects of the questions, applying professional knowledge, and research regarding weekly concepts. 42.5 pts Addresses most aspects of the questions, applying professional knowledge, , and research regarding weekly concepts. 37.5 pts Addresses some aspects of the questions, applying professional knowledge, and research regarding weekly concepts. 30 pts Minimally addresses the questions, applying professional knowledge, and research regarding weekly concepts. 0 pts No effort	50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Communication	10 pts Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 8.5 pts Presents information in an organized manner (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 7.5 pts Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 6 pts Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation). 0 pts No effort	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Integration	10 pts Paper includes reference to 2 scholarly sources and properly integrates the sources. 7 pts Paper includes reference to 2 scholarly sources but does not properly integrate the sources. 0 pts Paper does not make reference to a scholarly sources.	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format	10 pts Paper meets all source requirements, and is properly formatted in APA style throughout (i.e. title page, spacing, font, in-text citations and references.) 8.5 pts Paper meets all source requirements, and is mostly properly formatted in APA style (i.e. title page, spacing, font, in-text citations and references.) 7.5 pts Paper meets all source requirements, and is somewhat properly formatted in APA style (i.e. title page, spacing, font, in-text citations and references.) 6 pts Paper fails to meet source requirements and/or is improperly formatted in APA style throughout 0 pts No effort	10 pts
Total Points: 100