HP 626 Week 4 Discussion: Social Perspectives: Senior Housing and Long-Term Care 

HP 626 Week 4 Discussion: Social Perspectives: Senior Housing and Long-Term Care

HP 626 Week 4 Discussion: Social Perspectives: Senior Housing and Long-Term Care

Value: 100 points

Due: In an effort to facilitate scholarly discourse, create your initial post by Day 4, and reply to at least two of your classmates, on two separate days, by Day 7.

Note: In this type of discussion, you will not see the responses of your classmates until after you have posted your own response to the question below.

Initial Post

If your first name begins with the letters A–M: Topic 1 – Senior Housing Trends and Social Capital

In your initial post, respond to the following prompts:
Describe sociocultural and economic impacts of housing trends for seniors that surprised you. Analyze why these impacts and trends surprised you.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE HP 626 Week 4 Discussion: Social Perspectives: Senior Housing and Long-Term Care HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Differentiate the impact the Baby Boomer generation will have on the senior housing industry. What impacts will there be on aging service providers such as a nursing home administrator or a nurse practitioner working with the aging population?

What senior housing option would you recommend to a loved one based on what you learned from the readings and your analysis?

Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of senior living options that are currently available to aging adults.

Describe the role senior housing has in offering social capital to seniors.

Your initial post should be 500 to 700 words, with one to two supporting references included.

If your first name begins with the letters N–Z: Topic 2 – Long-Term Care – Cultural Care

In your initial post, respond to the following prompts:

Discuss the concept of cultural change in long-term care organizations through healthcare reform.

Identify barriers to cultural change in long-term care organizations and discuss what you found surprising.

Identify solutions you would employ as a service provider for aging adults to achieve higher quality of care in long-term care.

Your initial post should be 500 to 700 words, with one to two supporting references included.

Replies

If your first name begins with the letters A–M: Reply to at least two of your classmates whose first names begin with the letters N–Z. In your reply posts, identify possible solutions to overcome barriers described in changing the culture of nursing homes from institutional care to residential, home-like environments. What are possible risk factors associated with focusing more on residential style of care versus medical and institutional care delivery? Discuss challenges an aging service provider might encounter in implementing culture change initiatives within a long-term care organization.

Your reply posts should be 200 to 400 words, with a minimum of one supporting reference included.

If your first name begins with the letters N–Z: Reply to at least two of your classmates whose first names begin with the letters A–M. In your reply posts, identify whether there are specific housing trends that may be more popular over time than others. Are there generational differences in regard to senior housing options that might influence choice for senior living options? (USE THIS)

Your reply posts should be 200 to 400 words, with a minimum of one supporting reference included.

Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.

Posting to the Discussion Forum

Select the appropriate Thread.

Select Reply.

Create your post.

Select Post to Forum.

Graduate Program in Health Administration Discussion Question Rubric

Note: The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range (example: 25–20 points, 20–15 points, 15–10 points, 10–0 points).

Discussion Board Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Needs Improvement Inadequate Total Points
Quality of Initial Post Initial post is on time and of the correct length (500–750 words).

All components of the initial post requirements are addressed.

Course content synthesis is applied.

References are included according to the Discussion instructions.

25 points Initial post is on time and of the correct length (500–750 words).

Most components of the initial post requirements are addressed.

Course content synthesis is applied but limited.

References are included according to the Discussion instructions.

20 points Initial post is one day late.

Does not meet the correct length (500–750 words).

Some components of the initial post requirements are addressed.

Course content synthesis is weak or missing.

References are included but not according to the Discussion instructions.

15 points Initial post is more than one day late.

Initial post much fewer than (500–750 words).

Few components of the initial post requirements are addressed.

Course content synthesis is missing.

References are not included.

10 points 25
Peer Replies On time.

There was substantial evidence and synthesis of course content utilizing course topics and the introduction of questions and new information.

Replies are 200–400 words.

References are included according to the Discussion instructions.

25 points On time. There was some evidence and synthesis of course content utilizing course topics and the introduction of questions or new information.

Replies are 200–400 words.

References are included according to the Discussion instructions.

20 points There was either some synthesis of course content or the introduction of questions or new information.

Replies are less than 200 words.

References are included but not according to the Discussion instructions.

15 points There was little or no evidence of course content utilizing course topics or the introduction of questions or new information.

Replies are less than 200 words

References are not included.

10 points 25
Frequency of Contribution Initial post with two peer replies posted on two separate days.

25 points Initial post with two peer replies posted on the same day.

20 points Initial post with one peer reply.

15 points Only initial post submitted or only replied to peers.

10 points 25
Organization, Writing Mechanics, and APA Format Clearly organized, no or limited writing mechanics and/or APA errors.

25 points Clearly organized, few to some writing mechanics and/or APA errors.

20 points Poorly organized, several to moderate writing mechanics and/or APA errors.

15 points Poorly organized, many writing mechanics and/or APA errors.

10 points 25
Total points 100