HSS261 Ethics in Healthcare Essay Assignment

HSS261 Ethics in Healthcare Essay Assignment

HSS261 Ethics in Healthcare Essay Assignment

Epidemics and pandemics entail increased stress and strain on healthcare workers because of the right in demand against the available workforce. Studies show that pandemics like the Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic entail the increased need for healthcare which makes healthcare providers like nurses the face of the situation and “frontline soldiers” (Adams & Walls, 2020). According to Shanafelt et al. (2020), it is essential to understand and tackle the different sources of anxiety that healthcare professionals may have during pandemics. These include their safety because of access to sufficient personal protective equipment (PPEs), exposure to the disease and infecting their loved ones, lack of access to rapid testing if they develop symptoms and uncertainty about the support that they will get from their organizations. The implication is that these concerns affect their ability to make ethical decisions because of the dilemma they face of either providing care or protecting their own lives.

BUY A CUSTOM- PAPER HERE ON;HSS261 Ethics in Healthcare Essay Assignment

The case of Janet demonstrates the anxiety and dilemmas that these providers face. In making her decision, Janet as a nurse has an obligation to care for the patients and help them through the pandemic. However, she also has an equally an important and personal and life-threatening situation and obligation. She must protect herself from exposure as a health care provider. More importantly she needs to ensure that she does not spread the virus to her family. The personal values and morals as well as professional ethics that contribute to the dilemma include the love for her family and job, the need to offer best care and support her patients, honesty and integrity where she will have to be clear and not jeopardize her health and that of others, especially colleagues and family (Adams & Walls, 2020). Biomedical principles like justice, beneficence and non-maleficence are also essential.

Healthcare professionals and public health officials encounter ethical dilemmas when dealing with pandemics like COVID-19 that include integrity, duty of care and need to meet the principles of beneficence and justice for patients (Shanafelt et al., 2020). These professionals and officials have an obligation to protect the public against the spread of the disease yet the duty exposes them to the pandemics and threatens their health

References

Adams, J. G., & Walls, R. M. (2020). Supporting the health care workforce during the COVID-

            19 global pandemic. Jama, 323(15), 1439-1440. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.3972

Shanafelt, T., Ripp, J., & Trockel, M. (2020). Understanding and addressing sources of anxiety

among health care professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Jama, 323(21), 2133-2134. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.5893

Course Overview
Course Title: Ethics in Healthcare
Course Code: HSS261
Section: 01
Prerequisites: There is no prerequisite for this course.
Course Description:

This course focuses on the role of ethics in healthcare delivery. The student is introduced to basic ethical principles and its application while considering personal bias within the context of working with diverse individuals.

Course Information

Ethics is important in everyday life and in the workplace. In healthcare, there are many different ethical issues that are encountered in both the direct care of patients and in the administration and management of healthcare organizations. As a healthcare professional, you will experience situations that represent ethical dilemmas. Personal values and professional ethics will influence your response and decisions. Understanding the ethical principles and personal biases that influence ethical decision making will help you respond appropriately to ethical issues that arise in the healthcare field.
Course Objectives:

Apply basic ethical principles to healthcare dilemmas
Describe common ethical issues as they relate to healthcare policy.
Explore conflicts of interest and personal biases within the context of ethical decision making
Express skills in equity, inclusion and diversity while working in the healthcare arena.
Identify fundamental ethical principles

Credit Hours: 4.5 credit hours

Unit Overview
Unit Outcomes Readings & Other Resource Materials Assignments
Unit 1: Introduction to Ethics in Healthcare

Apply basic ethical principles to healthcare dilemmas
Identify fundamental ethical principles

Ethics of Health Care: A Guide for Clinical Practice:
Chapter 1 (pp. 1–16)
Chapter 2 (pp. 17–24)
Chapter 3 (pp. 41–67)
Chapter 4 (pp. 70–94)

Ethical and Unethical Behavior Examples in the Workplace
Ethics
Glossary of Ethics and Compliance Terms

Unit 1 – Discussion Board (10 points)
Unit 1 – intellipath (125 points)
Unit 1 – Live Chat Extra Credit Summary (15 points)

Unit 2: Ethical Decision Making in Healthcare

Apply basic ethical principles to healthcare dilemmas
Describe common ethical issues as they relate to healthcare policy.
Explore conflicts of interest and personal biases within the context of ethical decision making
Identify fundamental ethical principles

Ethics of Health Care: A Guide for Clinical Practice:
Chapter 8 (pp. 180–198)
Chapter 9 (pp. 213–227)
Chapter 10 (pp. 257–270)

Seven Steps to Ethical Decision Making
American College of Physicians Ethics Manual
Ethical Considerations During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Unit 2 – Discussion Board (75 points)
Unit 2 – intellipath (125 points)
Unit 2 – Live Chat Extra Credit Summary (15 points)

Unit 3: Ethical Dilemmas in Healthcare

Apply basic ethical principles to healthcare dilemmas
Describe common ethical issues as they relate to healthcare policy.

Ethics of Health Care: A Guide for Clinical Practice:
Chapter 8 (pp.199–209)
Chapter 9 (pp. 228–253)
Chapter 10 (pp. 271–282)

Ethics in the Time of Coronavirus:Recommendations in the COVID-19 Pandemic
Medical Ethics
Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice
Societal and Ethical Issues of Digitization
Trends in Precision Medicine: Emerging Ethical, Legal and Social Implications

Unit 3 – Discussion Board (75 points)
Unit 3 – Individual Project (125 points)
Unit 3 – Live Chat Extra Credit Summary (15 points)

Unit 4: Ethics and Cultural Competence

Express skills in equity, inclusion and diversity while working in the healthcare arena.

Ethics of Health Care: A Guide for Clinical Practice:
Chapter 2 (pp. 25–40)
Chapter 3 (pp. 41–67)

How to Reduce Implicit Bias

Cultural Competence: It Starts at the Front Desk
Benefits of Having Cultural Diversity in a Healthcare Organization
Cultural Competence and Patient Safety
Culturally Competent Healthcare: Lessons from a Safety-Net Hospital in the COVID Era
Developing Workforce Diversity in the Health Professions: A Social Justice Perspective
Disparities in Health and Health Care: Five Key Questions and Answers
Health Equity: Why it Matters and How to Achieve it

Unit 4 – Discussion Board (75 points)
Unit 4 – Individual Project (125 points)
Unit 4 – Live Chat Extra Credit Summary (15 points)

Unit 5: Organizational and Professional Ethics in Healthcare

Apply basic ethical principles to healthcare dilemmas
Explore conflicts of interest and personal biases within the context of ethical decision making
Identify fundamental ethical principles
Describe common ethical issues as they relate to healthcare policy.
Express skills in equity, inclusion and diversity while working in the healthcare arena.

Ethics of Health Care: A Guide for Clinical Practice:
Chapter 5 (pp. 97–118)
Chapter 6 (pp. 120–148)
Chapter 7 (pp. 152–177)

The Ethics of Managing People
Ethical Framework for Health Care Institutions Responding to COVID-19
Ethics in Clinical Research

Unit 5 – Discussion Board – Academic (75 points)
Unit 5 – intellipath (125 points)
Unit 5 – Live Chat Extra Credit Summary (15 points)

Course Assignments Breakdown and Weighting Section
During the course students will complete assignments and activities related to the course learning objectives. In each course, the assignments and activities may vary and they may be completed individually or in a group.

Assignments Categories & Weights
Assignment Type Points Possible % of Course Grade
Discussion Board 310 33.16
Individual Project 250 26.74
Intellipath 375 40.11
Discussion Boards:

Discussion Board topics are tied to specific course Tasks for each week of the session. Discussion board participation and active student engagement in course work is required and evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively by the Instructor. Each week students will be expected to post their initial discussion posting to the discussion board by Thursday. In turn, students will post responses to their colleagues (as specified in the course room) by the following Saturday. Discussion posts will be graded according to the late policy.
Grading Scale
Letter Grade Percentage
A 100.00 – 94.00
A- 93.99 – 90.00
B+ 89.99 – 86.00
B 85.99 – 83.00
B- 82.99 – 80.00
C+ 79.99 – 76.00
C 75.99 – 73.00
C- 72.99 – 70.00
D+ 69.99 – 65.00
D 64.99 – 60.00
F Below 59.99
Course Policies
Academic Honesty and Integrity

All students are expected to conform to the accepted standards of academic honesty. Any work submitted by a student must represent original work produced by that student, and any source used by a student must be documented through normal scholarly references and citations. Any clear violations of these standards, such as cheating, violating copyright laws, falsification of data, plagiarism, or submitting the same work in more than one course without obtaining advance approval will not be tolerated by the University and may be grounds for dismissal. Such violations are to be processed promptly, firmly, privately, and fairly by the instructor and may result in sanctions up to and including dismissal from the University. The instructor will promptly notify the University of the discovery of the incident. All instances are cumulative, permanently recorded, and tracked across a student’s tenure at all CTU campuses. The final determination of academic dishonesty will be decided by the appropriate academic official for the particular program or campus.

Academic Honesty violations are documented in the student’s file. The student will be notified by the appropriate University official and required to review the Academic Honesty Policy and Honor Code and affirm the CTU Honor Statement. Multiple violations of the Academic Honesty Policy may result in repercussions up to and including dismissal from the University.

The student may appeal any decision to the appropriate Appeals Board. The Appeals Board will render a final decision after appropriate investigation, which may include factors such as prior academic honesty violations, previous correspondence and warnings, and academic history. Decisions from the Appeals Board may have stipulations attached to outcomes.
Cheating
Cheating shall be defined as:

Copying to any extent the work of another;
Intentionally assisting another student during an examination;
Having unauthorized access to material related to an examination during the examination;
Possessing or having access to unauthorized copies of an examination;
Departing from any stated examination conditions.

Plagiarism

The New International Dictionary of the English Language (Funk & Wagnalls, 2000) defines plagiarize as “to appropriate and pass off as one’s own (the writings, ideas, etc., of another)” (p. 965).
Plagiarism involves:

Submitting another person’s work as one’s own;
Submitting work from any source that is not properly acknowledged by footnote, bibliography, or reference within a paper;
Submitting work pieced together from phrases and/or sentences from various sources without acknowledgment;
Submitting work that uses any phrase(s), sentence, or stylistic mannerism rearranged or otherwise without acknowledgment;
Omitting quotation marks from any directly quoted material;
Failure to use ellipsis (…) to indicate omission of one or more words;
Submitting an assignment that is an exact copy of work completed for a course at another University;
Submitting an assignment(s), or any part of an assignment, for more than one class without enhancing and refining the assignment, and without first receiving instructor permission. In cases where revision of previous assignments is permitted by the instructor, the student should be prepared to submit the original assignment for comparison purposes;
Any other actions deemed to be plagiarism by the faculty.

Originality Policy

We at Colorado Technical University (CTU) value integrity, honesty, and originality. In order to uphold these values in the classroom, CTU utilizes the TurnitIn® Originality Verification Tool. This tool assists Faculty, students, & staff by ensuring that all student work adheres to the University’s Academic Integrity policy.

Students are encouraged to utilize this tool prior to their official submission to ensure that the work they are producing is in fact their own. While the TurnitIn® Originality Verification Tool does not detect plagiarism, it does assist in the investigation and verification of overall integrity of the material provided by the student.

The University places emphasis on the following originality guidelines:

Students are expected to produce work that displays proper use of the most up-to-date version of APA. This includes, but is not limited to, the use of in-text citations, quotation marks, and references to ensure proper acknowledgment is given to any external source(s) used in the creation of academic material.
Since academic integrity concerns come in many forms (i.e. plagiarism, cheating, purchasing of work, lack of original content, etc.), a specific similarity percentage (%) rendered by the TurnitIn® tool does not necessarily result in the same outcomes for all content. Each student assignment should be thoroughly reviewed no matter the score provided by TurnitIn® in order for the Faculty to determine the most appropriate action (see Academic Integrity Policy).

Note: Exclusive use of the similarity score % as criteria for identifying possible violations of academic integrity is prohibited. All students are to be assessed based on the content and contextual use of sources.
Resubmission

At Colorado Technical University, students are given the opportunity to resubmit work that was previously submitted to past courses if the instructor has given his/her approval to the student to do so and if the submission complies with the Academic Honesty & Integrity guidelines outlined above. The resubmission policy applies to all assignment types except intellipath and the introductory discussion board assignment.

Student Responsibilities

It is a student’s responsibility prior to assignment submission to submit a written request to the instructor that details for which course and term the work was originally submitted along with justification for the resubmission request.
It is a student’s responsibility to wait to submit resubmitted work until after receiving written approval from the instructor.
If a student is resubmitting an individual project:
Once the request to resubmit has been approved by the instructor, it is the student’s responsibility to document that the work is his/her own by including the following verbiage at the beginning of the document: “This assignment was originally submitted during the [previous session] in [previous course & section] with [previous instructor name]. Approval to resubmit this assignment was obtained from [current instructor name] on [MM/DD/YY].”
If a student is resubmitting a non-introductory discussion board assignment:
Once the request to resubmit has been approved by the instructor, the student can submit the assignment. The student does not need to include a statement in the assignment that it is resubmitted work.
It is a student’s responsibility to ensure alignment with expectations of the current course assignment, and so the student should update his/her assignments to meet new or modified assignment requirements within the new course or updated version of a course.
It is a student’s responsibility to review his/her work, making necessary changes to enhance the quality based on the resources provided in the current course, current instructor feedback and guidelines, and previous instructor feedback.
It is a student’s responsibility to keep pace with assignment due dates and to participate fully in every course; therefore, if there are multiple assignments being resubmitted, students should submit tasks during the unit in which it is due.

Instructor Guidelines

Instructors will make determinations of approvals or denials of the use of resubmitted work in consultation with their lead faculty member (as deemed necessary) and will provide a written approval or denial of the resubmission request to the student.
If the request is denied, the instructor will provide justification for that denial.
If an instructor is not made aware of work being resubmitted, the instructor will treat the assignment as plagiarized and reserves the right to post an F (0) grade and submit it for review until proof of originality is provided, at which point the instructor will make a grade change determination.
If resubmitted work is accepted, the instructor will include the following statement within the gradebook acknowledging that the work was accepted under the Academic Honesty Policy Resubmission Clause:
Resubmitted work has been accepted for this assignment in accordance with the Academic Honesty Policy Resubmission Clause.
An instructor is under no obligation to allow students to resubmit work in order to make corrections if the work does not meet the requirements of the new session.
An instructor is under no obligation to consider the grade that was originally received in a previous course on resubmitted work. Therefore, there is no guarantee the same grade will be awarded.
If a student is awarded a lower grade for resubmitted work, this is not considered grounds for a grade appeal.

***Policy Exception: The resubmission policy does not apply to posts made in introductory discussion boards, those students who are building a body of work (example: a capstone portfolio), or to those who are revising work as a compilation for a final project (example: a dissertation). Please discuss any questions or concerns with the Student Success Coach and the instructor.
Late Submissions of Assignments

A key characteristic of successful working professionals is the ability to meet project and assignment deadlines. CTU fosters and supports this responsibility, as each student is expected to submit the course assignments on or before the due dates. Specific deadlines for all assignments are clearly stated in the syllabus addendum or assignment list and through each of CTU faculty members.

A student may experience certain life events or other pressing commitments that may result in the submission of late work. In all instances, CTU encourages the student to work closely with his/her faculty member to meet the course requirements while balancing professional and personal obligations. If you are going to be late submitting an assignment, communicate with your faculty member within a reasonable amount of time prior to or immediately after the assignment due date.

Please inform your faculty member in writing about circumstances contributing to the late assignment or if there is an unforeseen, extenuating, or extreme circumstance(s). For extreme circumstances, late penalties will be waived and the assignment will be accepted. Examples of extenuating or extreme circumstances would be but are not limited to:

Loss of home
Medical conditions, injuries, hospital stays, and medical emergencies
Natural disasters
Loss of family members
Family emergencies or care for a family member
Military commitments

For late assignments not due to extreme circumstances, a 10% penalty of total possible points per assignment will be deducted. For discussion board assignments, only the initial reply will be accepted late. Replies to peers posted after the discussion board due date will not be accepted. All late assignments will be graded within seven days of a student’s submission or prior to the end of session grading deadline for the course, whichever is earlier.

In all instances, no late work will be accepted from a student beyond the timeframe of the course end date, unless an Incomplete has been granted. For courses that include intellipath technology for graded assignments, students are encouraged to participate often to improve their knowledge; therefore, the late assignment policy does not apply. Submissions made through intellipath assignments are subject to the Late Policy. Additional information about intellipath grading can be found in the course information section of the classroom.