LDR 615 Assignment: Contemporary Organization Evaluation

 LDR 615 Assignment: Contemporary Organization Evaluation

 LDR 615 Assignment: Contemporary Organization Evaluation

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

In today’s fast-paced and global community, most organizations are faced with constant change. Research contemporary organizations that are currently responding to a significant change within the industry, such as disruptive technology; state, government, or industry regulations; environmental constraints; judicial or legislative rulings; etc.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE  LDR 615 Assignment: Contemporary Organization Evaluation HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Choose one organization from your research that has recently responded to major change, or is currently responding to change. Write a paper (1,250-1,500 words) discussing how well the organization is responding to the change dynamics. Include the following:

Describe the organization and the change to which it is responding.

Discuss the degree to which the change has been disruptive and how the organization has responded to the dynamics created by this change.

Evaluate the strategies the organization used in its change plan and determine the level of success the organization experienced with the strategies.

Determine the effect the change had on stakeholders, and to what degree stakeholders have resisted. Assess how well stakeholder resistance was addressed.

Evaluate the overall implications the change had on interdepartmental collaboration.

In your opinion, how well did the leaders of the organization respond and prepare for the change? What worked and what did not work with the strategies they implemented?

What modifications would you suggest the leaders of the organization make in order to better address the change dynamics? What additional strategies would you recommend to assist the organization through this change?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Contemporary Organization Evaluation – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total200 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Less than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory

4. Good

5. Excellent

Contemporary Organization (Description of Organization and Responding to Change)

Contemporary Organization (Description of Organization and Responding to Change)

0 points

Description of a contemporary organization responding to change is not provided.
14.8 points

A partial description of the organization is presented; major relevant details are missing. A description of the change to which the organization is responding is cursory and incomplete. The organization and change issue are not contemporary or current.
15.8 points

A cursory description of a contemporary organization is presented; most major details are included. A general description of the change to which the organization is responding is presented, but contains some inaccuracies or lacks some relevant details; the change to which the organization is responding is not a current event.

17.4 points

A description of a contemporary organization is presented; all major details are included. A description of the change to which the organization is responding is current and accurately represented.
20 points

A detailed description of a contemporary organization is presented; all relevant details are included and description provides insight into the organization. The description of the current change to which the organization is responding is well developed and contains relevant detail.

Effects of Change (Discusses Effects of Change, Organizational Response and Strategies Utilized)

Effects of Change (Discusses Effects of Change, Organizational Response and Strategies Utilized)

0 points

The effects of change on the organization and the response of the organization to change are not discussed.
14.8 points

An incomplete discussion on the effects of change on the organization is presented. The response of the organization is not discussed.
15.8 points

A general discussion on the effects of change on the organization is presented. The response of the organization to the change is presented, but it does not include a clear evaluation of the strategies of the organization. The discussion lacks relevant details, facts, and support.

17.4 points

A discussion on the effects of change on the organization and its response to the change is presented. The discussion is supported by relevant and documented facts.

20 points

A well-rounded discussion on the effects of change on the organization and its response to the change is presented. The discussion is detailed and strongly supported by documented facts.

Stakeholders (Determine Effects of Change and Response to Change)

Stakeholders (Determine Effects of Change and Response to Change)
0 points

The effect of change on the stakeholders is not addressed.

14.8 points

The effect of change on stakeholders is briefly considered, but no evidence or rationale is provided for claims made. Stakeholder response/resistance to change is not presented. No suggestions are provided in responding to stakeholder resistance.
15.8 points

The effect of change on stakeholders is discussed, but little evidence or rationale is provided for claims made. Stakeholder response/resistance to change is generally presented, but it is lacking in detail. Cursory suggestions are provided in responding to stakeholder resistance, but these strategies are incomplete and lack support for validity.

17.4 points

The effect of change on stakeholders is discussed. Stakeholder response/resistance to change is presented. Suggestions are provided in responding to stakeholder resistance. Evidence or rationale is provided for claims made. Some evidence is provided to support statements, and common strategies are offered to help stakeholders overcome resistance.

20 points

The effect of change on stakeholders is discussed in detail. Stakeholder response/resistance to change is presented with accurate and relevant examples. Well-developed recommendations are provided in responding to stakeholder resistance. Strong evidence or rationale is provided for claims made, and strategies relevant to the organization and stakeholders are offered to help stakeholders overcome resistance.

Effects of Change on Interdepartmental Collaboration

Effects of Change on Interdepartmental Collaboration

0 points

The effects of change on interdepartmental collaboration are not evaluated.

14.8 points

General effects of change on interdepartmental collaboration are discussed, but the specific effects for the departments within the organization are not included.
15.8 points

A superficial evaluation of the effects of change on interdepartmental collaboration for the organization is presented. The evaluation lacks detail, facts, support, or rationale.

17.4 points

An evaluation of the effects of change on interdepartmental collaboration for the organization is presented. The evaluation is supported with some detail, facts, support, or rationale.
20 points

A detailed evaluation of the effects of change on interdepartmental collaboration for the organization is presented and provides insight into the situation. The evaluation is supported with strong detail, facts, support, and rationale.

Evaluation of the Response of the Leaders to Change and the Strategies Presented by Leaders

Evaluation of the Response of the Leaders to Change and the Strategies Presented by Leaders
0 points

Evaluation response of the leaders to change is not addressed, and strategies presented by leaders are not referenced.
22.2 points

A clear evaluation of the response of the leaders to change is not addressed, and strategies presented by leaders are referenced, but not formally addressed. Overall, the involvement of leadership in response to change is unclear.

23.7 points

Evaluation of the response of the leaders to change is presented, but it lacks detail or information vital to understanding the actual involvement of the leaders. Strategies presented by leaders in response to change are generally addressed. Overall, it is apparent that the leaders were responsive to change, but significant information or details are missing to discern the actual extent of leadership involvement or the degree to which leadership involvement was influential.
26.1 points

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE  LDR 615 Assignment: Contemporary Organization Evaluation HERE

Evaluation of the response of the leaders to change is presented, but it lacks detail or information vital to understanding the involvement of the leaders. Strategies presented by leaders in response to change are generally addressed. Overall, it is apparent that the leaders were responsive to change, but significant information or details are missing to discern the actual extent of leadership involvement or the degree to which leadership involvement was influential.

30 points

Evaluation of the response of the leaders to change is presented with sufficient detail and supporting information vital to understanding the involvement of the leaders. Strategies presented by leaders in response to change are clearly addressed and provide insight into the outcomes the organization experienced in responding to change. Overall, leadership response to change is clear and contains significant information or details that describe the extent of leadership involvement and the degree to which leadership involvement was influential.

Recommendations (Suggestions to Better Address Change Dynamics, Additional Strategies)

Recommendations (Suggestions to Better Address Change Dynamics, Additional Strategies)
0 points

No recommendations are made.
22.2 points

Recommendations to address change dynamics or for additional strategies are incomplete. Recommendations do not contain substantial rationale or support and do not seem relevant to the organization or circumstances.
23.7 points

General recommendations to address change dynamics are presented. Additional strategies are offered, but lack detail, rationale, or a clear plan to illustrate that the recommendations are relevant and would support a better change option in response to change.
26.1 points

Recommendations to address change dynamics are presented. Additional strategies are offered, with appropriate rationale or a clear plan to illustrate that the recommendations are relevant and would support a better change option in response to change.
30 points

Well-supported recommendations to address change dynamics are clearly presented. Additional strategies are offered, with strong rationale or a clear plan to illustrate that the recommendations are relevant and would indeed support a better change option in response to change.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis Development and Purpose
0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
10.36 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
11.06 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

12.18 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
14 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction

Argument Logic and Construction

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

11.84 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
12.64 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
13.92 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

16 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.
7.4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

7.9 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

8.7 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

10 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
7.4 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
7.9 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

8.7 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

10 points

All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
0 points

Sources are not documented.
7.4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

7.9 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
8.7 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

10 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.