Leadership Journal Assignment Paper

Leadership Journal Assignment Paper

Leadership Journal Assignment Paper

Practicum Activities Reflection

The bulk of the past two weeks has been on strategic planning and budgeting. I have amassed immeasurable lessons on the same, especially on their need in the healthcare sector. Regarding strategic planning, I have understood that it follows five steps where one starts by establishing a strategic position, follows up by prioritizing objectives, coming up with a strategic plan, executing and managing the plan, and finally reviewing and revising the plan (Ali, 2018). In healthcare, strategic planning not only looks at the goals and objectives but also integrates the economic trends, government policies, and technological advancements. There is also a need to assess how the organization operates to create an effective strategic plan for the entire healthcare system. On budgeting, the takeaway was the need to create a sound capital budgeting process to allow more useful investments and less room for errors in purchasing. Equally, I had a deeper insight into the four phases of the budget cycle namely preparation and submission, approval, execution, and audit and evaluation (Stadhouder et al., 2019). My preceptor was instrumental in the two weeks as she acted as a role model and monitored and guided my learning experience. She provided feedback regarding my questions and corrected my errors. She displays competency in instructing, interpersonal, and competency assessment. She also practices effective communication, coaching, critical thinking, and reflective practice.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Application of Leadership

Change management refers to an organized, structured approach that helps a healthcare organization transform workflows seamlessly. Any change comes with challenges, distress as well as opportunities. To manage change, I prepare by paying attention to talk about change, and understanding what’s happening, its impact on my profession, and the opportunities available. I further look at worst-case scenarios and take steps to reduce their impact through training or updating my CV. I have learned to accept the reality of change, adjust my expectations, and control myself. Empowering myself through the identification and use of resources, skills, strengths, and support network places facilitates the change management process (Rosenbaum et al., 2018). Acknowledging my feelings tackles the emotional aspects of change while taking my time act as a coping strategy to dispel the stress and disorienting aspects of change. I re-examine my priorities through reflection and re-evaluation as I adapt to the new situation and learn from the experience of change. 

My approach aligns with the principles of strategic management linked to change management. First, the principles advocate for understanding change by outlining what needs to change, key objectives, benefits of the change, impact, effect, and resources needed to achieve the change. People have to be confident that the new approach will be better compared to the old way of doing things. The second principle is planning the change by adopting the right change methodology (Rosenbaum et al., 2018). Some aspects to consider are sponsorship, involvement, and buy-in of the proposed change. Implementation follows where a model like Kotter’s 8-Step change model is used to guide the process. 

Practicum Project Preparation

My project goal is to create a happy positive environment where staff/leaders are open, receptive, and have trust in each other as this will increase motivation and productivity among staff. I also expect to decrease burnout and decrease high staff turnover while creating a solid foundation of team building/teamwork and promoting resiliency. The project plans to establish HRO with an overall goal of fostering happy staff and a positive environment and promoting high quality and safe care. The goals align with the current organization whose mission is to provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service, and access. Vision-wise, the organization aims at creating a community in which all people achieve their full potential for health and well-being across their lifespan. The organization needs to cultivate an environment of trust, honesty, mutual respect, equality, and ethics and work continuously to improve medical care to sustain and further improve clinical outcomes, patient safety, and patient satisfaction. Project goals should always align with the organization’s needs to avoid poor utilization of the organization’s resources.

Leadership Video Reflection

According to DelHousaye (2016), authority refers to legitimate power that allows one to influence and benefit others. It depicts the legitimate right that paves way for someone to influence others without forcing them. Authority can either be formal or informal. Formal authority is what gives a person their right and their position. As long the position is acknowledged one gets the right to make decisions and steer an organization or a group. Informal authority on the other hand arises when people give a person the right to make decisions in their life because they trust them and their integrity (DelHousaye, 2016). As a servant leader, it is crucial to progress from formal authority to informal authority to have a power that people desire willfully instead of dictating decisions. 

References

Ali, A. A. (2018). Strategic planning–organizational performance relationship: Perspectives of previous studies and literature review. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 11(1), 8-24. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047971915Y.0000000017

DelHousaye, D. (2016). Servant Leadership – The Issue Of Authority. https://youtu.be/Z8yMNFMp0k8?list=PLqKj_eriTOI9Js2i_C2mitH1P96Zf6Q__

Rosenbaum, D., More, E., & Steane, P. (2018). Planned organisational change management: Forward to the past? An exploratory literature review. Journal of Organizational Change Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-06-2015-0089

Stadhouders, N., Kruse, F., Tanke, M., Koolman, X., & Jeurissen, P. (2019). Effective healthcare cost-containment policies: a systematic review. Health Policy, 123(1), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.10.015

BUY A CUSTOM PAPER HERE

Practicum Journal: Authority
Assessment Traits
Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
Journaling provides a valuable tool for recording, reflecting on, and reviewing your learning. This approach provides an opportunity for you to “connect the dots” and observe the relationships between and among activities, interactions, and outcomes.
Unlike a personal journal of thoughts and feelings, this leadership journal is a record of your activities, assessments, and learning related to this academic experience.
Journal entries should include a record of the number of hours spent with your nurse leader each week.
Write a journal entry of 750-1,500 words on the subject of authority, including the following:
Practicum Activities Reflection: Provide observations and thoughts on the activities in your practicum setting during Weeks 3-4.
Application of Leadership: Reflect on how change management is handled in your professional life. How is this related to strategic management principles? Explain your answer and provide an example.
Practicum Project Preparation: Explain how your project goals align with the mission and vision of your organization, as well as with the organizational needs. Is it important that these align? Provide your rationale.
Leadership Video Reflection: Reflect on at least two things you learned from the “Servant Leadership – Issue of Authority” video.
Use the “Leadership Journal Template” to complete this assignment.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

***I can say my preceptor is a servant leader. She always prioritizes need of her staff. She tries to accommodate staff, when possible, for example with work schedules. Like me, she believes in ensuring staff can attend to their personal and social needs which in turn, they are happy and motivated to work. As a leader, she is very approachable. Her staff do not hesitate to come to her to talk about work or personal events. Since a good relationship and communication has been established, trying to get new employees that are joining her unit to understand the unit is not so difficult.
***I’m learning from her that being a servant leader takes compassion, kindness, and patience. She did mention that there are some staff that takes advantage so, it is also important to set boundaries and make them realize rules and regulations.
***I can say that continuous activity on team building (my proposed project) will help maintain what she already started. I believe that it’s important to take care of staff as they are the backbone of the organization.
***I would to work on team building. Though there is a great relationship between staff and manager, I would like to work on relationship among staff.
***With a full day schedule of different meetings and issues in the unit, I saw how good she is with time management, prioritization, delegation, and multitasking.
***I spent a full day with her and in the unit on May 12 and 19 with total 19 hours. I will be spending 10 hours tomorrow, May 26 and plan on spending 10 more hours on June 1st.

Practicum Journal: Authority – Rubric

Collapse All Practicum Journal: Authority – RubricCollapse All

Practicum Activities Reflection

8.75 points

Criteria Description

Practicum Activities Reflection

5. Target

8.75 points

A reflection of the observations and activities in the practicum setting is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.

4. Acceptable

8.05 points

A reflection of the observations and activities in the practicum setting is complete and includes supporting details.

3. Approaching

7.7 points

A reflection of the observations and activities in the practicum setting is included but lacks supporting details.

2. Insufficient

7 points

A reflection of the observations and activities in the practicum setting is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A reflection of the observations and activities in the practicum setting is not present.

Application of Leadership

7 points

Criteria Description

Application of Leadership

5. Target

7 points

A description of the application of leadership skills in the professional setting is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.

4. Acceptable

6.44 points

A description of the application of leadership skills in the professional setting is complete and includes supporting details.

3. Approaching

6.16 points

A description of the application of leadership skills in the professional setting is included but lacks supporting details.

2. Insufficient

5.6 points

A description of the application of leadership skills in the professional setting is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the application of leadership skills in the professional setting is not present.

Practicum Project Preparation

7 points

Criteria Description

Practicum Project Preparation

5. Target

7 points

A description of the work done towards planning and completion of the practicum project is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.

4. Acceptable

6.44 points

A description of the work done towards planning and completion of the practicum project is complete and includes supporting details.

3. Approaching

6.16 points

A description of the work done towards planning and completion of the practicum project is included but lacks supporting details.

2. Insufficient

5.6 points

A description of the work done towards planning and completion of the practicum project is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the work done towards planning and completion of the practicum project is not present.

Leadership Video Reflection

7 points

Criteria Description

Leadership Video Reflection

5. Target

7 points

A reflection of learning resulting from the assigned leadership video is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.

4. Acceptable

6.44 points

A reflection of learning resulting from the assigned leadership video is complete and includes supporting details.

3. Approaching

6.16 points

A reflection of learning resulting from the assigned leadership video is included but lacks supporting details.

2. Insufficient

5.6 points

A reflection of learning resulting from the assigned leadership video is incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A reflection of learning resulting from the assigned leadership video is not present.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

1.75 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Target

1.75 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable

1.61 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

3. Approaching

1.54 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient

1.4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Format/Documentation

3.5 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target

3.5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable

3.22 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching

3.08 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

2. Insufficient

2.8 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Total 35 points