MGT 605  Leadership in An Organization Self-Assessment Reflection Paper

Healthcare organizations require leaders who can effectively guide teams and manage resources. As nurse leaders or aspiring leaders, it is crucial to understand one’s skills and how to execute them. Self-assessment tests help nurse leaders understand their leadership potential, values, and intelligence, and other elements. Self-awareness ensures nurse leaders can relate well with their followers and exercise leadership according to their strengths. It also helps them to improve their weaknesses through learning, mentorship, and research, among other ways. The purpose of this paper is to provide the self-assessment results, appropriate leadership approach, professional nurse leader’s characteristics, and how leadership theories and styles shape the nurse leader.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON;MGT 605  Leadership in An Organization Self-Assessment Reflection Paper

Rationale, Brief Summary, and Self-Assessment Results

I used three self-assessment tests for self-reflection: the emotional intelligence test, values profile, and the VARK (visual, aural, read/write, kinesthetic) questionnaire. Nurse leaders should be emotionally intelligent hence selecting the emotional intelligence test. From a leadership or management dimension, emotional intelligence demotes an individual’s ability to use, understand, and manage feelings and emotions (Prezerako, 2018). Since nurse leaders must be critical decision-makers, the emotional intelligence test helps them to assess their ability to understand and deal with emotions. Values determine how nurse leaders relate with other people and perceive issues. The VARK questionnaire illustrates an individual’s learning styles. Since nursing professionals should improve their knowledge, the VARK questionnaire results guide them in selecting the best learning style.

My results on emotional intelligence were encouraging (EQ score = 124, percentile score = 95). The results imply that I can understand and deal with emotions. A high EQ illustrates leaders with high problem-solving skills and leadership ability. On the values profile, I regard social values over other values. My top core value is social values implying that I enjoy helping and being kind and agreeable. My top personal value is social values too. The implication is that my home life, general attitude, and interests revolve around people. My top work value is social; hence, I am the happiest when utilizing individual talents to benefit others. People with social values see their career as a “helping profession.” The VARK results were visual-3, aural- 2, read/write- 8, and kinesthetic- 8 (Appendix 1). The results show that I learn best through reading, writing, and kinesthetic activities.

Leadership Style and Philosophy of Care

Nurse leaders’ philosophy of care determines their leadership approaches. As a nursing professional, I believe in providing patient-centered, compassionate, high-quality care that engages the patient and family in decision-making. Providing such care requires nurse leaders to serve nurses humanely and guide them to understand and solve patient needs. As a result, the servant leadership style closely aligns with my philosophy of care. According to Best (2020), servant leaders are committed to determining the needs of their staff and regularly ask them how they can be supported to solve problems and grow professionally. Servant leadership appeals to me since it is people-centered. Leaders work hard to cultivate and develop followers. Enabling nurses to reach their full potential improves their competence, builds better organizations, and promotes a caring world. Eva et al. (2019) observed that followers are more engaged and effective in their work when servant leaders prioritize their well-being and growth. Similarly, nurses are more engaged and effective in patient care under servant leadership. They benefit steward and empowerment, among other benefits central to servant leadership.

Incorporating Servant Leadership in Practice

Effective incorporation of servant leadership’s elements requires nurse leaders to understand its guiding principles and implement them in routine practice. These elements include engaging followers, empowering staff, and stewardship (Eva et al., 2019). As a result, I will exercise servant leadership if I engage followers and ensure they are empowered to grow and achieve their full potential. Unlike performance-oriented leadership that sacrifices followers, servant leadership empowers them to improve their potential and competence. Stewardship means taking care of resources entrusted to leaders. Similarly, I am responsible for growing material and financial resources entrusted to me as a servant leader.

Areas of Improvement

The assessments revealed that I can effectively cope with emotions (the emotional intelligence test), and I highly regard social values (values profile). In the learning preferences, I scored dismally in the visual (3) and aural (2) aspects. The VARK questionnaire results showed that I learn best through reading/writing and kinesthetic activities. However, leaders should be multidimensional as far as learning is concerned. They need to learn through observations, listening, and other styles. Therefore, I should improve on learning preferences by being more open to other learning styles, such as utilizing charts, simulations, and listening to audios.

Characteristics of an Effective Professional Nurse Leader

Professional nurse leaders should exemplify excellence in guidance, managing people and resources, and responding to the organization’s issues. Their routine work should be characterized by problem-solving brilliancy, openness to change, engagement, and staff empowerment. Anthony and Brett (2020) noted that problem-solving skills combine decision-making and critical thinking, which are essential for nurse leaders in the evolving practice. Openness to change typifies promoting innovative practice. Nurse leaders should also promote employee growth through engagement and empowerment. Nurse leaders must be brilliant problem solvers to address issues undermining a culture of safety, such as disruptive behavior, aggression, and incivility. The problem-solving ability allows nurse leaders to promote team integration and achieve maximum efficiency. Leaders open to change prepare organizations and staff to embrace change hence continuous organizational growth. Staff engagement and empowerment promote teamwork and enable the staff to improve their skills. Skilled nurses improve the quality of patient care and the organization’s productivity.

Leadership Theory and Leadership Style

Different leadership theories and styles influence nurse leaders differently. Common theories include contingency, transformational, and authoritarian leadership theories. Leaders guided by these theories apply leadership styles that implement the theories’ fundamental principles. The transformational leadership theory is among the widely applied theories in nursing leadership. Its basic guideline is that leaders must prioritize intrinsic motivation and move it from low levels to high levels to enable the nursing workforce to deliver excellent results (Chu et al., 2021). Accordingly, transformational leaders inspire employees as they look forward to a more outstanding employee and organizational outcomes in transformational development. Chu et al. (2021) explained that the transformational leadership style’s dominant characteristics include idealized influence, empowerment, inspiration, and motivation. Leaders and employees collaborate in decision-making and problem-solving. They work together to achieve the desired vision as they consult each other, negotiate, and address practice issues as a team.

Conclusion

Health care organizations require forward-thinking leadership to optimize their productivity. Nurse leaders are critical in promoting teamwork and empowering the nursing staff. To perform excellently, self-assessment of emotional intelligence, values, and learning preferences is crucial. My assessment results demonstrated that I excel in managing emotions and score highly in social values. Concerning learning preferences, I scored highly in reading/writing and kinesthetic activities. The assessment will guide me to improve where necessary as I utilize my leadership skills to empower and guide individuals, organizations, and the entire nursing practice.

References

Anthony, M. R., & Brett, A. L. (2020). Nurse leaders as problem-solvers: Addressing lateral and horizontal violence. Nursing Management, 51(8), 12-19. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000688928.78513.86

Best, C. (2020). Is there a place for servant leadership in nursing?. Practice Nursing, 31(3), 128-132. https://doi.org/10.12968/pnur.2020.31.3.128

Chu, H., Qiang, B., Zhou, J., Qiu, X., Yang, X., Qiao, Z., … & Yang, Y. (2021). The impact of transformational leadership on physicians’ performance in China: A cross-level mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 586475. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.586475

Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., Van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004

Prezerakos, P. E. (2018). Nurse managers’ emotional intelligence and effective leadership: A review of the current evidence. The Open Nursing Journal, 12, 86-92. https://doi.org/10.2174%2F1874434601812010086

Appendices

Appendix 1: Self-Assessments

1. Emotional Intelligence Test: https://testyourself.psychtests.com/results.htm
2. Values Profile: https://testyourself.psychtests.com/results.htm
   

   BUY A CUSTOM- PAPER HERE ON;MGT 605  Leadership in An Organization Self-Assessment Reflection Paper

Self-awareness is essential for developing leadership skills. Recognizing your own strengths, weaknesses, and values, and understanding emotional intelligence and learning styles can help you to be a more effective nurse leader.

For this assignment, you have the opportunity to take a variety of self-assessments to learn more about yourself and identify your assets and weaknesses as a leader. This will assist you in discovering how you can improve your own self-leadership skills. You will be asked to think critically about your results and submit a reflection as directed below.

Refer to the topic Resources. Select and complete three self-assessments. Be sure to document the results of each assessment to assist you in completing the reflection portion of the assignment below.

Rubric Criteria

Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All

Summary of Self-Assessment Selections and Results

6.25 points

Criteria Description

Summary of Self-Assessment Selections and Results

5. 5: Excellent

6.25 points

A comprehensive summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

4. 4: Good

5.75 points

A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is clearly provided and well developed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

5.5 points

A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5 points

A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is not included.

A Specific Leadership Style That Aligns With Philosophy of Care, Including Appeal

6.25 points

Criteria Description

A Specific Leadership Style That Aligns With Philosophy of Care, Including Appeal

5. 5: Excellent

6.25 points

A comprehensive discussion of a specific leadership style that aligns with philosophy of care, including appeal, is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

4. 4: Good

5.75 points

A discussion of a specific leadership style that aligns with philosophy of care, including appeal, is clearly provided and well developed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

5.5 points

A discussion of a specific leadership style that aligns with philosophy of care, including appeal, is present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5 points

A discussion of a specific leadership style that aligns with philosophy of care, including appeal, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A discussion of a specific leadership style that aligns with philosophy of care, including appeal, is not included.

Reflection on How to Incorporate Elements of the Leadership Style

6.25 points

Criteria Description

Reflection on How to Incorporate Elements of the Leadership Style

5. 5: Excellent

6.25 points

A comprehensive reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

4. 4: Good

5.75 points

A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is clearly provided and well developed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

5.5 points

A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5 points

A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is not included.

Areas for Self-Improvement, Including Steps to Improve Leadership Capabilities

6.25 points

Criteria Description

Areas for Self-Improvement, Including Steps to Improve Leadership Capabilities

5. 5: Excellent

6.25 points

A comprehensive discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

4. 4: Good

5.75 points

A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is clearly provided and well developed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

5.5 points

A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5 points

A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is not included.

Characteristics of Effective Professional Nurse Leader

6.25 points

Criteria Description

Characteristics of Effective Professional Nurse Leader

5. 5: Excellent

6.25 points

Characteristics of an effective professional nurse leader, or individuals in nursing leadership, are thoroughly discussed. A detailed explanation for why these are effective for leadership in nursing is clearly presented.

4. 4: Good

5.75 points

Characteristics of an effective professional nurse leader, or individuals in nursing leadership, are discussed. An explanation for why these are effective for leadership in nursing is presented.

3. 3: Satisfactory

5.5 points

Characteristics of an effective professional nurse leader, or individuals in nursing leadership, are summarized. An explanation why these are effective for leadership in nursing is outlined.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5 points

Characteristics of an effective professional nurse leader, or individuals in nursing leadership, are only partially discussed.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Characteristics of an effective professional nurse leader, or individuals in nursing leadership, are not discussed.

Application of Leadership Theory and Style Different Personal Style

6.25 points

Criteria Description

Application of Leadership Theory and Style Different Personal Style

5. 5: Excellent

6.25 points

A different theory and leadership style, and how they support a professional nurse leader, or individual in nursing leadership are clearly explained. How the theory shapes the nurse leader in such things as collaboration, conflict resolution, decision making, and negotiation is thoroughly discussed.

4. 4: Good

5.75 points

A different theory and leadership style, and how they support a professional nurse leader, or individual in nursing leadership are explained. How the theory shapes the nurse leader in such things as collaboration, conflict resolution, decision making, and negotiation is generally discussed.

3. 3: Satisfactory

5.5 points

A different theory and leadership style, and how they support a professional nurse leader, or individual in nursing leadership are summarized. How the theory shapes the nurse leader in such things as collaboration, conflict resolution, decision making, and negotiation is outlined.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5 points

A different theory and leadership style, and how they support a professional nurse leader, or individual in nursing leadership, are only partially discussed.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A different theory and leadership style, and how they support a professional nurse leader, or individual in nursing leadership, are omitted.

Required Sources

6.25 points

Criteria Description

Required Sources

5. 5: Excellent

6.25 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

4. 4: Good

5.75 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

3. 3: Satisfactory

5.5 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not included.

Title Page

6.25 points

Criteria Description

Title Page

5. 5: Excellent

6.25 points

The title page is presented. The required format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

4. 4: Good

5.75 points

The title page is presented. The required formatting is applied, although there may be one or two errors.

3. 3: Satisfactory

5.5 points

The title page is presented. The required formatting is applied but there are minor errors.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5 points

The title page reflects some required formatting, but overall it is not correctly applied.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The title page is not formatted according to required style. The title page is omitted.

Introduction

12.5 points

Criteria Description

Introduction

5. 5: Excellent

12.5 points

The introduction is presented. The required formatting is applied correctly. There are no errors.

4. 4: Good

11.5 points

The introduction is presented. The required formatting is applied, although there may be one or two errors.

3. 3: Satisfactory

11 points

An introduction is presented. The required formatting is applied but there are minor errors.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

10 points

An introduction is presented but the overall required formatting is not consistently or correctly applied.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The introduction is not presented in required format. The introduction is omitted.

Main Body

18.75 points

Criteria Description

Main Body

5. 5: Excellent

18.75 points

The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. The required formatting is applied correctly. There are no errors.

4. 4: Good

17.25 points

The sections of the main body are clear. The required formatting is applied, although there may be one or two errors.

3. 3: Satisfactory

16.5 points

The sections of the main body are generally identifiable. The required formatting is applied but there are minor errors.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

15 points

The main body is disorganized. Overall, the required formatting is not consistently or correctly applied.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The required formatting is not used for the main body.

APA Style Citations

12.5 points

Criteria Description

APA Style Citations

5. 5: Excellent

12.5 points

All sources are cited. The required style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.

4. 4: Good

11.5 points

All sources are cited. The required style and format are applied and mostly correct. There may be one or two errors.

3. 3: Satisfactory

11 points

Most sources are cited. One may be missing. The required style and format are typically applied. Some errors are present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

10 points

Citation of sources is incomplete. The use of the required style for citation of sources is inconsistent and incorrect.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not cited throughout. The required style is not used for citations. Sources are not included.

Appendix

6.25 points

Criteria Description

Appendix

5. 5: Excellent

6.25 points

The APA Writing Checklist is complete and attached in the appendix. The required formatting is applied correctly. There are no errors.

4. 4: Good

5.75 points

The APA Writing Checklist is complete and attached in the appendix. The required formatting is applied, although there may be one or two errors.

3. 3: Satisfactory

5.5 points

The APA Writing Checklist is complete and attached in the appendix. The required formatting is applied but there are minor errors.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5 points

The APA Writing Checklist is attached in the appendix but is incomplete. The appendix reflects some of the required formatting, but overall it is not correctly applied.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The appendix is not formatted according to the required style. The appendix and APA Writing Checklist are omitted.

References

6.25 points

Criteria Description

References

5. 5: Excellent

6.25 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and the required style, and format is free of error.

4. 4: Good

5.75 points

Sources are documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and the required style, and format is mostly correct.

3. 3: Satisfactory

5.5 points

The APA Writing Checklist is complete and attached in the appendix. The required formatting is applied but there are minor errors.Sources are documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and the required style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5 points

Documentation of sources using a References page is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and the required style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented. A References page is not included.

Thesis Development and Purpose

12.5 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. 5: Excellent

12.5 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. 4: Good

11.5 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. 3: Satisfactory

11 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

10 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

6.25 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

5. 5: Excellent

6.25 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. 4: Good

5.75 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. 3: Satisfactory

5.5 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

Total125 points