NR 351 Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 3-8)

NR 351 Week 3 Discussion: Building Communication and Collaboration Skills

Building Communication and Collaboration Skills (Graded)

Discussion

Purpose

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NR 351 Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 3-8)

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

The purpose of this discussion is for learners to examine their own growth in communication and collaboration skills.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 3: Demonstrate effective communication and interprofessional collaboration in professional decision-making. (POs 3, 4)

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 351 Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 3-8) HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Due Date

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

Posts in the discussion on two different days

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Discussion

Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Discussion

Building self-awareness of our verbal and non-verbal communication allows us to grow in our communication skills. What resources do you use to improve your awareness of your communication skills in the professional setting?

Interprofessional collaboration to improve patient outcomes depends on our professional communication skills. What are the most effective communication skills that nurses bring to collaborative interactions? Why are those so important in your own practice?

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answer Post

•Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and

•Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts

16 pts

100% Excellent

Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

14 pts

88% Good

Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

13 pts

80% Fair

Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

6 pts

38% Poor

Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and minimally demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not answer the discussion question(s).
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Sources

•Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson,

•Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source,

•All sources are credited within the body of the post,

•Evidence supports the discussion, and

•APA format is not required but is encouraged.
12 pts

100% Excellent

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

11 pts

88% Good

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

10 pts

80% Fair

Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not integrate any evidence.
12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reply Post

•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,

•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and

•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.
14 pts

100% Excellent

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

12 pts

88% Good

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.

11 pts
80% Fair

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.

5 pts
38% Poor

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

No reply post to classmates or instructor.

14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates Professionally

All posts:

•are clear and concise,

•are respectful, civil, and caring, and

•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
8 pts

100% Excellent

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

7 pts

88% Good

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

6 pts

80% Fair

All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

3 pts

38% Poor

All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

0 pts

0% Missing

All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

•Posts in the discussion on two different days
0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 Points)

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Total Points: 50

NR 351 Week 5 Discussion: Evidence to Support Nursing Practices

Evidence to Support Nursing Practices (Graded)

Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is for learners to demonstrate their ability to search for evidence in the scholarly nursing literature and share with colleagues.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 5: Discuss theories and evidence-based practice in the planning of patient-centered care. (POs 1, 8)

Due Date

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

Posts in the discussion on two different days

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Discussion

Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Discussion

Evidence is necessary to improve our nursing practice. Using the CINAHL database in the Chamberlain Library, search for and locate a scholarly professional nursing journal article that meets these criteria:

Full-text

English language

Peer-reviewed

NOT an Evidence-Based Care Sheet or CINAHL Guide

Published in the past five years

Contains evidence to support a nursing practice in your practice area

Summarize this article in one paragraph. Explain why you selected this article. Provide an APA reference for this article.

Remember to credit an assigned reading or the lesson, in addition to your article selection.

Grading

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answer Post

•Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and

•Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts
16 pts

100% Excellent

Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

14 pts

88% Good

Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

13 pts

80% Fair

Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

6 pts

38% Poor

Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and minimally demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not answer the discussion question(s).

16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Sources

•Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson,

•Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source,

•All sources are credited within the body of the post,

•Evidence supports the discussion, and

•APA format is not required but is encouraged.
12 pts

100% Excellent

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

11 pts

88% Good

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

10 pts

80% Fair

Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not integrate any evidence.

12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reply Post

•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,

•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and

•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.
14 pts

100% Excellent

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

12 pts

88% Good

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.

11 pts
80% Fair

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

No reply post to classmates or instructor.
14 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates Professionally

All posts:

•are clear and concise,

•are respectful, civil, and caring, and

•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
8 pts

100% Excellent

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

7 pts

88% Good

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

6 pts

80% Fair

All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

3 pts

38% Poor

All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

0 pts

0% Missing

All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

•Posts in the discussion on two different days
0 pts

No Points Deducted

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 Points)

Total Points: 50

NR 351 WEEK 6 ASSIGNMENT: PROFESSIONAL PAPER

Assignment

This assignment will be uploaded automatically to Turnitin upon submission to verify this is your original work.

Directions to submit your assignment:

Click the orange Submit Assignment button at the top of the page to open the upload window.

Under the File Upload tab, click on Browse to select your assignment file you want to upload.

Check the box to agree to the Turnitin End-User License Agreement.

Click Submit Assignment.

Your Turnitin report will be visible in the Assignment Details or Grades section of your course.

Steps 2, 3, and 4 in a Turnitin Submission

Resources

Please refer to the documentation available on the Turnitin Resource page

Links to an external site..

Submitting Assignments to Turnitin explains how to submit an assignment with Turnitin enabled.

Understanding Turnitin Similarity Reports shows how to access, view, and understand a Turnitin similarity report.

Reviewing Graded Turnitin Assignments shows how to view feedback and similarity score reports on a graded Turnitin assignment.

Please contact your instructor if you have any questions.

TRANSCRIPT

>Hello, class. This tutorial is designed to provide you with helpful hints for the week 6 check-in for the professional paper, due Wednesday of week 6, and the week 6 professional paper due Sunday, the end of week 6. In the week 6 check-in for the professional paper, you will answer questions to document your progress on the week 6 professional paper. You will also ask questions about the week 6 professional paper assignment and about APA format. Carefully read the directions. Click on the “Take the quiz” button at the bottom of the page to read the questions and load your answers. Click “Submit quiz” below the questions, when you are done. The week 6 check-in is due Wednesday of week 6, but you may submit it earlier that week. Your instructor will provide you with scores and comments by Friday of week 6 or earlier to promote your success on the week 6 professional paper due Sunday. The week 6 professional paper is due Sunday at the end of week 6. Follow the directions carefully to complete this assignment. Just as in the week 4, professional paper worksheet assignment number 5 in the week 6 directions, sends you to an announcement in NR 351, where you will find the assigned article link and information. The same article is used for both the week 4 and the week 6 assignments. You should already have this article saved on your computer from your week 4 assignment. Use the required template that is linked on this assignment page. Delete the yellow directions after reading them and type your paper sections directly on that template after saving it to your computer. Notice that the week 6 assignment is a paper. The week 6 professional paper assignment is submitted through Turnitin, so the submission area looks slightly different. You will select the correct file to upload, click the box to agree to the end user license agreement, and click “Submit Assignment.” Be sure to double-check that you have submitted the correct document. Please, contact your instructor with questions. Thank you.

Note: Chamberlain Programs may vary in usage of Turnitin features and grading options.

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to allow the learner to demonstrate good organization, appropriate scholarly writing, and correct APA formatting in writing a professional paper.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 3: Demonstrate effective communication and interprofessional collaboration in professional decision-making. (POs 3, 4)

CO 4: Apply concepts of ethics and professionalism to nursing practice, nursing roles, and academic development. (POs 5, 6)

Due Date

Sunday end of Week 6, 11:59 p.m. MT.

Total Points Possible

This assignment is worth 225 points.

Late Assignment Policy

If the assignment is not submitted by due date, a late deduction will be applied. See rubric below.

Preparing the Assignment

Carefully read these directions and the grading rubric below.

Download the required template below under Template.

Rename that template as Your Last Name Professional Paper.docx. This must be saved as a Microsoft Word document (.docx). Save it to your own computer or flash drive in a location where you will be able to retrieve it later. Type your assignment directly on the saved document. Save your work often.

View the Week 6 Professional Paper Tutorial below.

In the NR351 Announcements, locate the announcement entitled IMPORTANT: Assigned Article for Weeks 4 & 6 Assignments. In this announcement you will find:

The link to the assigned article (you must be logged into the Chamberlain Library before clicking the link). Download this article in PDF format to your own computer for use in this assignment. Read the entire article once downloaded and saved.

The location of the required sentence for the quotation and citation.

The location of the required sentence for paraphrasing and citation.

NOTE: This is the same article used for the Week 4 Professional Paper Worksheet.

This assignment must use the required article stated in the announcement described above to complete the following items:

Title Page

Introduction

Explain that this paper is a summary of the assigned article

Explain that the impact of the article contents on your own future practice will be presented

Length of Introduction must be 50-75 words

Assigned Article Summary

Clearly summarize the major content of the assigned article. This should be an improved version of your Week 4 submission.

One or two short quotations with citations (must include the assigned sentence for quotation)

Several paraphrased areas with citations (must include the assigned sentence for paraphrasing)

Length must be 175-200 words

Impact of Assigned Article Content on Future Practice

Clearly state how learning from the assigned article will impact your future practice

Must be your own ideas about the impact of the article on your future nursing practice

Use first person in this section

No citations are needed in this section

Length must be 125-150 words

Conclusion

Write a concise summary of the main points of the paper

Provide a concluding statement

Length must be 75-100 words

Reference for the assigned article should be a revised version of the Week 4 reference improved based on your instructor’s Week 4 feedback. Include the following:

Author(s)

Year

Article title

Journal name

Volume number

Issue number

Page numbers

Parentheses

Double line spacing

Hanging indent

DOI if available

Each of required items above is clearly described on the Professional Paper Template and Rubric (below on this page).

When your Week 6 Professional Paper Assignment is completed, save and close the completed template. Follow the submission instructions at the top of this page to upload your assignment.

Template

Professional Paper Template [LINK]

Links to an external site.

Best Practices

Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.

Use the template provided. Points will be deducted for incorrect or no template used.

Contact your instructor with any questions.

Scholarly Sources and Citations

Cite and reference the required article in APA format

**Academic Integrity**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.

Rubric

NR351 W6 Professional Paper Assignment Rubric

NR351 W6 Professional Paper Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Title Page

Title page adheres to APA format

5 pts

Exceptional

Title page adheres to APA format (0-1 errors).

4 pts

Exceeds

Title page mostly adheres to APA format (2 errors).

3 pts

Meets

Title page somewhat adheres to APA format (3 errors).

2 pts

Needs Improvement

Title page poorly adheres to APA format (4 or more errors).

0 pts

Developing

No title page.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Margins, Headings, Page numbers, Font, Spacing:

Margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing adhere well to APA format.
5 pts

Exceptional

Margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing adhere very well to APA format (0-1 errors).

4 pts

Exceeds

Margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing mostly adhere to APA format (2 errors).

3 pts

Meets

Margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing somewhat adhere to APA format (3-4 errors).

2 pts

Needs Improvement

Margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing poorly adhere to APA format (5 or more errors).

0 pts

Developing

Margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing do not adhere to APA format.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction:

Clearly explains that paper is summary of the assigned article and explains that the impact of article contents on own future professional nursing practice. Length is 50-75 words.
20 pts

Exceptional

Clearly explains that paper is summary of the assigned article and explains that the impact of article contents on own future professional nursing practice will be included. Length is 50-75 words.

18 pts

Exceeds

States in a mostly clear manner that paper is summary of the assigned article and explains that the impact of article contents on own future professional nursing practice will be included. Length is 50-75 words.

16 pts
Meets

Vaguely explains that paper is summary of the assigned article and explains that the impact of article contents on own future professional nursing practice will be included. OR uses 25-45 or 80-100 words (10-25 words over or under required amount).

8 pts

Needs Improvement

Did not sufficiently explain all required items in previous columns of this criterion. OR uses fewer than 25 words or more than 100 words (25 or more words over or under required amount).

0 pts

Developing

Did not provide an introduction.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assigned Article Summary:

Clearly summarizes the major content of the assigned article using 175-200 words. Content includes main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are excellent. The Summary contains appropriately formatted assigned quotation, assigned paraphrased sentence, additional paraphrased areas, and citations. Excellent revisions from Week 4 Professional Paper Worksheet based on Week 4 instructor feedback.

65 pts

Exceptional

57 pts

Exceeds

Summarizes the major content of the assigned article using 175-200 words. Content includes most of the main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are good. The Summary contains mostly well formatted assigned quotation, assigned paraphrased sentence, additional paraphrased areas, and citations. Good revisions from Week 4 Professional Paper Worksheet based on Week 4 instructor feedback.

52 pts

Meets

Summarizes a fair amount of the content of the assigned article. Content includes a fair amount of the main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are fair. The Summary is missing the assigned quotation, assigned paraphrased sentence, OR citations. Fair revisions from Week 4 Professional Paper Worksheet based on Week 4 instructor feedback. OR word count is 125-165 or 210-250 (10-50 words over or under required amount).

25 pts

Needs Improvement

25.0 pts Needs Improvement Provides a summary but assigned article is not used. OR any of the following: Word count is fewer than 75 or over 250 words (51 or more words over or under required amount); Content includes few of the main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are poor; The Summary is missing the assigned quotation, assigned paraphrased areas, AND citations.

0 pts

Developing

No article summary is provided.
65 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Impact of Assigned Article on Future Practice:

Clearly states how learning from the article will impact your future practice in 125-150 words clearly relating article contents to practice. Uses first person.
65 pts

Exceptional

Clearly states how learning from the article will impact your future practice in 125-150 words clearly relating article contents to practice. Uses first person

57 pts

Exceeds

States how some learning from the article will impact your future practice in 125-150 words somewhat relating article contents to practice. Uses first person.

52 pts

Meets

Vaguely states how learning from the article will impact your future practice. OR article contents related to practice in a fair manner. May or may not first person. OR word count is 75-115 or 160-200 (10-50 words over or under required amount).

25 pts

Needs Improvement

Did not sufficiently state how content of the article impacts your future practice OR article contents related to practice in a poor manner. Specifics are poor. May or may not use first person. ORâ€¯word count is fewer than 75 or over 200 words (51 or more words over or under required amount).

0 pts

Developing

Did not provide statements required in this criterion.

65 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion:

Clearly writes a concise summary of this paper. Clearly writes a strong concluding statement. No new information included. Section is 75-100 words.
25 pts

Exceptional

Clearly writes a concise summary of this paper. Clearly writes a strong concluding statement. No new information included. Section is 75-100 words.

22 pts

Exceeds

Writes a concise summary of this paper. Writes a good concluding statement. No new information included. Section is 75-100 words.

20 pts

Meets

Writes a vague summary of this paper. Writes a fair concluding statement. May or may not have included new information. OR uses 40-65 or 110-135 words (10-35 words over or under required amount).

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Writes a poor summary of this paper. Writes a poor concluding statement. OR word count is fewer than 40 or over 135 words (35 or more words over or under required amount).

0 pts

Developing

Did not provide a conclusion section.
25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reference for the Assigned Article:

Create a reference for the assigned article using correct APA format including: author(s), year, article title, journal name, volume number, issue number, page numbers, italics, parentheses, punctuation, double line spacing, and hanging indent. Include DOI if available.

10 pts

Exceptional

9 pts

Exceeds

Creates a reference for the assigned article using correct APA format including items in left column. 3-4 elements missing or incorrectly done.

8 pts

Meets

Creates a reference for the assigned article using correct APA format including items in left column. 5-6 elements missing or incorrectly done.

4 pts

Needs Improvement

Creates a reference for the assigned article using correct APA format including items in left column with 7 or more elements missing or incorrectly done. OR creates reference for article other than the assigned article.

0 pts

Developing

No reference provided.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quotation(s) and Citation(s):

Types 1 or 2 short quotations from assigned article including assigned sentence using correct APA citation including quotation marks, names of author(s), year, page abbreviation, page numbers, parentheses, and punctuation with 0-1 minor error. Did not use words or ideas that the authors cited from another source.

10 pts

Exceptional

Types 1 or 2 short quotations from assigned article including assigned sentence using correct APA citation including quotation marks, names of author(s), year, page abbreviation, page numbers, and parentheses, and punctuation with 0-1 minor error. Did not use words or ideas that the authors cited from another source.

9 pts

Exceeds

Types 1 or 2 short quotations from assigned article including assigned sentence using correct APA citation including quotation marks, names of author(s), year, page numbers, and parentheses with 2-3 minor errors. Did not use words or ideas that the authors cited from another source.

8 pts
Meets

Types 1 or 2 short quotations from the assigned article including assigned sentence using correct APA citation including quotation marks, names of author(s), year, page numbers, and parentheses with 4-5 minor errors. May or may not have used words or ideas that the authors cited from another source. OR uses 3 or more quotations.

4 pts

Needs Improvement

Types a quotation other than the assigned sentence OR from a non-assigned article. OR has 6-7 minor errors.

0 pts

Developing

Developing More than 7 errors in APA quotation and citation format OR no quotation provided.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Paraphrased Areas and Citations:

Paraphrased Areas and Citations:

Types appropriately paraphrased versions of assigned sentence and other specific ideas from assigned article using correct APA citations including authors’ names, year, punctuation, and parentheses.
10 pts

Exceptional

10.0 pts Exceptional Types appropriately paraphrased versions of assigned sentence and other specific ideas from assigned article using correct APA citations including authors’ names, year, punctuation, and parentheses with 0-1 error.

9 pts

Exceeds

9.0 pts Exceeds Paraphrased versions of the assigned sentence and other specific ideas from assigned article are mostly appropriate using good APA citation including names of author(s), year, punctuation, and parentheses with 2-3 errors.

8 pts

Meets

8.0 pts Meets Paraphrased versions of the assigned sentence and other specific ideas from assigned article are minimally appropriate using fair APA citation including names of author(s), year, punctuation, and parentheses with 4-5 errors.

4 pts

Needs Improvement

Omits paraphrasing and citation of assigned sentence and/or other specific ideas from assigned article OR paraphrases and cites from a non-assigned article. OR has 6-7 minor errors. May inappropriately paraphrase words or ideas that the authors cited from another source.

0 pts

Developing

More than 7 errors in APA paraphrase and citation format OR no paraphrase or citation provided.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics and Organization:

Excellent mechanics and organization with minimal errors of the following: – well organized and logical, – correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling, – professional wording is used, – uses complete sentences, – paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas expressed.
10 pts

Exceptional

9 pts

Exceeds

Good mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. A few minor errors noted.

8 pts

Meets

Fair mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. Some errors noted.

4 pts

Needs Improvement

Poor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. Many errors noted.

0 pts

Developing

Very poor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column such that writing is difficult to follow or understand.
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Late Deduction
0 pts

No points deducted

Submitted on time

0 pts

Not Submitted on Time – Points Deducted (5% per day)

1 day late = 11.25 Deduction; 2 days late = 22.5 Deduction; 3 days late = 33.75 Deduction; 4 days late = 45 Deduction; 5 days late = 56.25 Deduction; 6 days late = 67.5 Deduction; 7 days late = 78.75 Deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late
0 pts

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 351 Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 3-8) HERE

NR 351 Week 7 Discussion: Leaders and Systems-Based Practice

Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is for learners to discuss how they will use systems-based practice to grow in the role of nursing leader.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Plan leadership strategies within systems-based practice. (PO 2)

Due Date

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

Posts in the discussion on two different days

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Discussion

Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Discussion

Leaders use systems-based practice to empower other nurses. Considering your current or former clinical setting, share how you will use principles of systems-based practice to grow in your role as a leader in nursing. Include a scholarly outside source to support your answer.

Grading

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answer Post

•Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and

•Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts

16 pts

100% Excellent

Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

14 pts

88% Good

Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

13 pts

80% Fair

Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

6 pts

38% Poor

Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and minimally demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not answer the discussion question(s).
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Sources

•Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson,

•Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source,

•All sources are credited within the body of the post,

•Evidence supports the discussion, and

•APA format is not required but is encouraged.

12 pts

100% Excellent

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

11 pts

88% Good

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

10 pts

80% Fair

Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not integrate any evidence.

12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reply Post

•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,

•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and

•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.
14 pts

100% Excellent

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

12 pts

88% Good

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.

11 pts

80% Fair

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

No reply post to classmates or instructor.

14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates Professionally

All posts:

•are clear and concise,

•are respectful, civil, and caring, and

•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
8 pts

100% Excellent

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

7 pts

88% Good

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

6 pts

80% Fair

All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

3 pts

38% Poor

All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

0 pts

0% Missing

All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

•Posts in the discussion on two different days
0 pts

No Points Deducted

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 Points)

Total Points: 50

NR 351 Week 8 Discussion: Reflection on Essentials and Competencies

Reflection on Essentials and Competencies (Graded) (1 PAGE)

Discussion

Purpose.

The purpose of this reflection is for learners to reflect on essentials and competencies crucial to professional nursing.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 2: Identify safety and quality improvement strategies in nursing practice. (PO 7)

CO 4: Apply concepts of ethics and professionalism to nursing practice, nursing roles, and academic development. (POs 5, 6)

Due Date

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Saturday the end of the assigned week):

Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

Posts in the discussion on two different days

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Discussion

Reflection is an activity that involves your deep thought into your own experiences related to the concepts of the week. Answers should be detailed. In reflections students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Scholarly sources are NOT required for this reflection

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the reflection often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Reflection Question (1 PAGE)

As we finish NR351, think about all the competencies you have explored in these eight weeks. Using reflective practice, address the following in your answer:

Select two Massachusetts Nurse of the Future Nursing Core Competencies that you believe will have the most impact on your future professional nursing practice. Why are these the most important ones for you?

Identify one AACN BSN Essential that will be most important in improving quality in your future nursing practice. Explain why you selected that essential and how your practice will be improved by its use.

Grading

Welcome to Week 8! Can you believe we are beginning the final week of this course? This week, we will consider how we each can shape the future of professional nursing. By starting your BSN program, you are opening doors to your future.

If you have not already done so, please complete the End of Course Survey. All of us at Chamberlain appreciate your constructive comments to help us improve the courses and our teaching.

Week 8 Course Outcome

CO 4: Apply concepts of ethics and professionalism to nursing practice, nursing roles, and academic development. (POs 5, 6)

Due in Week 8:

Review the Student Lesson Plan for Learning Success

Complete the Lessons and Assigned Readings

Complete Discussion: Reflection on Essentials and Competencies (The Week 8 Discussion is a Reflection Discussion. Please note the differences in the directions and rubric on the Week 8 Discussion page.)

Complete End of Course Survey

RNBSN_50_Point_Reflection_Discussion_Rubric_Wk8_1_21

RNBSN_50_Point_Reflection_Discussion_Rubric_Wk8_1_21
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answer Post

•Answers the reflection question(s) in a detailed manner applying one or more weekly concept(s),

•Incorporates own experiences relating to weekly concept(s), and

•Reflects about specified time frame indicated in question
28 pts

100% Excellent

Meets all criteria: •Answers the reflection question(s) in a detailed manner applying one or more weekly concept(s), •Incorporates own experiences relating to weekly concept(s), and •Reflects about specified time frame indicated

25 pts

88% Good

Includes all three criteria but answer is not detailed.

22 pts

80% Fair

Meets two of three criteria

11 pts

38% Poor

Meets one of three criteria

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not answer the discussion question(s).

28 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reply Post

•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,

•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and

•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.
14 pts

100% Excellent

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

12 pts

88% Good

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.

11 pts

80% Fair

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

No reply post to classmates or instructor.

14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates Professionally

All posts:

•are clear and concise,

•are respectful, civil, and caring, and

•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
8 pts

100% Excellent

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

7 pts

88% Good

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

6 pts

80% Fair

All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

3 pts

38% Poor

All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

0 pts

0% Missing

All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Saturday the end of the assigned week):

•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

•Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Saturday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 Points)

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Saturday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Total Points: 50

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

NR 351 Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 3-8)

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

NR 351 Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 3-8)