NR 361 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-8)

NR 361 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-8)

NR 361 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-8)

NR 361 Week 2 Discussion: Experiences with Healthcare Information Systems

Students,

Welcome to the Week 2 discussion. This week, we are going to discuss your experiences with healthcare information systems, past or present. I am looking forward to our discussion this week.

The Course Outcomes for Week 2 are CO3 and CO4.

CO3: Define standardized terminology that reflects nursing’s unique contribution to patient outcomes. (PO #3)

CO4: Investigate safeguards and decision-making support tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO #4)

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 361 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-8) HERE

Good News For Our New customers . We can write this assignment for you and pay after Delivery. Our Top -rated medical writers will comprehensively review instructions , synthesis external evidence sources(Scholarly) and customize a quality assignment for you. We will also attach a copy of plagiarism report alongside and AI report. Feel free to chat Us

Here’s to a great discussion!

Experiences with Healthcare Information Systems

Discussion

Purpose

This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following Course Outcomes (CO).

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 3: Define standardized terminology that reflects nursing’s unique contribution to patient outcomes. (PO #3)

CO 4: Investigate safeguards and decision-making support tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO #4)

Due Date

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

Posts in the discussion on two different days

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Discussion

Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Discussion Question

Share your experiences with healthcare information systems, past or present. Has it been an easy transition or difficult? Why do you believe your experience has been positive or negative? If you are currently not working in a healthcare setting, how has the medical record exposure in nursing school impacted your current knowledge?

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answer Post

•Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and

•Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts

16 pts

100% Excellent

Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

14 pts

88% Good

Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

13 pts

80% Fair

Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

6 pts

38% Poor

Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and minimally demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not answer the discussion question(s).
16 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Sources

•Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson,

•Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source,

•All sources are credited within the body of the post,

•Evidence supports the discussion, and

•APA format is not required but is encouraged.
12 pts

100% Excellent

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

11 pts

88% Good

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

10 pts

80% Fair

Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not integrate any evidence.

12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reply Post

•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,

•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and

•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

14 pts

100% Excellent

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

12 pts

88% Good

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.

11 pts

80% Fair

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

No reply post to classmates or instructor.

14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates Professionally

All posts:

•are clear and concise,

•are respectful, civil, and caring, and

•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

8 pts

100% Excellent

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

7 pts

88% Good

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

6 pts

80% Fair

All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

3 pts

38% Poor

All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

0 pts

0% Missing

All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.
8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

•Posts in the discussion on two different days
0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 Points)

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Total Points: 50

NR 361 Week 2 Assignment: Course Project Milestone 1

This assignment will be uploaded automatically to Turnitin upon submission to verify this is your original work.

Directions to submit your assignment:
Click the orange “Submit Assignment” button at the top of the page to open the upload window.

Click on “Choose File” to select your assignment file you want to upload.

Check the box to agree to the Turnitin End-User License Agreement.

Click “Submit Assignment.”

Your Turnitin report will be visible in the “Grades” section of your course.

Resources

Please refer to the documentation available on the Turnitin Resource page

Links to an external site..

Submitting Assignments to Turnitin explains how to submit an assignment with Turnitin enabled.

Understanding Turnitin Similarity Reports shows how to access, view, and understand a Turnitin similarity report.

Reviewing Graded Turnitin Assignments shows how to view feedback and similarity score reports on a graded Turnitin assignment.

Please contact your instructor if you have any questions.

Note: Chamberlain Programs may vary in usage of Turnitin features and grading options.

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate the skills of the professional nurse as an educator. You are to prepare a patient scenario based on the required assigned topic. You will choose an already developed and reliable mHealth app to use in the education of your patient.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Describe patient-care technologies as appropriate to address the needs of a diverse patient population. (PO1)

CO 5: Identify patient care technologies, information systems, and communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO5)

Due Date

Submit your completed NR361 Milestone 1 by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, end of Week 2. You may consult the Policies section in the Introduction & Resources module for details regarding late assignments. Post questions about this assignment in the Course Q & A Forum.

Total Points Possible

The entire project is worth 600 points. Milestone 1 is worth 150 points of this total.

Preparing the Assignment

Select ONE of the Health Conditions or Health Behaviors for the focus of your assignment through the Healthy People 2030 link below:

https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives

Links to an external site.

Note: It is important to choose your Health Condition or Health Behavior first, then develop a short, but detailed patient scenario (See the video tutorial, assignment directions, and rubric for details about the scenario.) Then explore a mobile health app (mHealth app) that fits the patient and the topic.

Note: You will use the same scenario you develop and same mHealth app you identify here in future assignments (Week 4 and 6).

Requirements and Guidelines
Download the required Milestone 1 Template

Links to an external site.. Save it to your computer with the file name: Your Last Name NR361 Milestone 1.docx.

Write your own patient scenario using the Required Assignment Topic.

Make sure to include a Healthy People 2030 Health Condition or Health Behavior in the scenario for a patient with a desire to maintain or achieve good health and prevent illness and who could benefit from an already developed and reliable mHealth app from the internet.

Choose a scholarly peer-reviewed journal article published within the last 5 years and related to the health condition or health behavior in your scenario. This required article citation MUST appear in the Patient Scenario section of the paper and support your chosen health topic. You may use other citations/references in your paper however, these would be optional. The Chamberlain Library is your best place to obtain this article. Cite this in APA 7th edition format in this section of the assignment.

Describe in detail the plan for teaching this patient in the scenario.

Include the nurse’s assessment of learning needs and readiness to learn.

Identify a mHealth app that could benefit the patient, considering the teaching/learning needs you identified.

Tips for your internet search for an appropriate mHealth app:

The iPhone App store and Google Marketplace let you search for apps based on key words such as “health” or more specific topics such as “weight loss,” “stress,” and “diabetes”. Look through the descriptions of apps that come up in your results. Does the app address the health concern you have identified? Does it do what you’re looking for with this specific patient? For example, if you’re interested in having your patient track their sleep habits, does the app do this? Please reach out to your instructor if you have questions about a particular mHealth app for this assignment.

Describe the app including the mHealth app name, purpose, intended audience, mobile device(s) upon which it will operate, and where to download or obtain it. Add any other information you believe would be pertinent to this situation.

Include a working link if it is to be downloaded from a website in the area indicated on the template.

Make sure to add a citation for this mHealth app in APA format. The directions and example of how to cite a mobile app are located on page 340 of the APA Manual, 7th edition.

At the end of the Milestone 1 Template there is a References page where you will list your 2 references. One will be the mHealth app reference (also on page 340, APA Manual) and the other will be your scholarly article reference.

You are required to complete the Milestone 1 Template using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu

Links to an external site.

Carefully review the grading rubric criteria for Milestone 1 and type directly on your saved Milestone 1 Template. Be sure to delete the directions under the headings before submitting. The assignment paper should be approximately 2-3 pages, not counting the title page or References page.

The instructor will score Milestone 1 and provide feedback and a clear statement regarding the required assignment topic:

Accepted,

Accepted with revisions needed, OR

Not accepted.

If the Milestone 1 assignment needs revisions or is not accepted, the instructor will indicate if the student should communicate further revisions to the instructor. No additional points will be earned for revisions to Milestone 1, but these revisions will greatly enhance success on later milestones. Milestone 1 must be submitted or re-submitted per instructor feedback before Milestone 2 will be accepted for grading and credit.

The following is a short video that takes you on a tour of the Course Project Milestone 1 Guidelines.

**Academic Integrity**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.

NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.

Rubric

NR361 Milestone 1

NR361 Milestone 1
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scenario

is clear and concise, including an HP2030 health condition or health behavior for a patient with a desire to maintain or achieve good health and prevent illness.

Include the nurse’s assessment of learning needs and readiness to learn as well as a related scholarly peer-reviewed journal article (published within the past 5 years.)
50 pts

Scenario is very thorough, clear and concise with a description of the patient with a specific HP 2030 health condition or health behavior who wants to prevent illness and maintain or achieve good health. Clearly and thoroughly states that the person is seeking information, including a detailed assessment of learning needs and readiness to learn. A related scholarly peer-reviewed journal article is used, published within the past 5 years.

44 pts

Scenario is good. It includes a description of the patient with a specific HP 2030 health condition or health behavior who wants to prevent illness and maintain or achieve good health. Scenario generally describes the nurse’s assessment of learning needs and patient’s readiness to learn. A related scholarly peer-reviewed journal article is used, but not published within the past 5 years.

40 pts

Scenario includes a fair description of the patient with a specific HP 2030 health condition or health behavior who wants to maintain or achieve good health. Scenario may lack the nurse’s assessment of learning needs OR patient’s readiness to learn. A related scholarly source is used but is not a journal article OR is unrelated.

19 pts

Scenario includes a poor description of the patient with a specific HP 2030 health condition or health behavior who wants to maintain or achieve good health. Scenario may lack both the nurse’s assessment of learning needs AND readiness to learn. An unrelated scholarly source is used OR no scholarly source is used.

0 pts

Scenario fails to describe the patient’s situation. The nurse’s assessment of learning needs and readiness to learn are lacking. No scholarly source is used.

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Education:

Describe in detail content planned for teaching this patient in the scenario.

40 pts

Description of details of the planned teaching for the patient is outstanding. Depth and detail are excellent.

36 pts

Description of details of the planned teaching for the patient is good. Depth and detail are good.

32 pts

Description of details of the planned teaching is fair. Depth and detail are fair.

16 pts

Description does not provide adequate explanation of details of the planned teaching for the patient. Lacks depth and detail.

0 pts

No information provided on the planned teaching for the patient.

40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identify a mHealth app that could benefit the patient.

Describe the app including its: Name, Purpose, Intended audience, Mobile device(s) upon which it will operate, and where to download or obtain it. Include a working link if it is to be downloaded from a website and any other information you believe would be pertinent to this situation. Make sure to add a citation for this mHealth app.
45 pts

Describes the mHealth application in excellent detail including its: Name, Purpose, Intended Audience, Mobile device upon which it operates, Download or where to obtain, Other pertinent information and sources that are used are cited.

40 pts

Describes the mHealth application but is lacking one of the elements in the first column.

36 pts

Describes the mHealth application but is lacking two of the elements in column.

17 pts

Describes the mHealth application but is lacking three of the elements in the first column.

0 pts

Provides a poor or confusing description of the mHealth application that lacks many of the elements in the first column.

45 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing

contains no spelling or grammatical errors. Reading level is appropriate for patient described. Sources that are used are cited and referenced in APA format.

15 pts

Grammar, punctuation, and spelling are excellent; Reading level appropriate for patient; Citation and reference present with excellent APA format.

13 pts

Good mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column.

12 pts

Fair mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column.

6 pts

Poor mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column.

0 pts

Very poor mechanics such that assignment is difficult to read.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Correct Topic and Correct Template Use

0 pts

0 points deducted

Correct topic and correct template used for the assignment

0 pts

15 points deducted (10%)

Incorrect topic OR incorrect/no template used results in a 15 point deduction

0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Late Deduction

0 pts

0 points deducted

Submitted on Time

0 pts

Not Submitted on Time – Points Deducted

1 day late = 7.5 deduction; 2 days late = 15 deduction; 3 days late = 22.5 deduction; 4 days late = 30 deduction; 5 days late = 37.5 deduction; 6 days late = 45 deduction; 7 days late = 52.5 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late
0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Milestone 1 assignment is:

0 pts

Accepted

• Accepted

0 pts

Not accepted

Milestone 1 must be submitted or re-submitted per instructor feedback before Milestone 2 will be accepted for grading and credit.
0 pts

Total Points: 150

NR 361 Week 3 Discussion: Standardized Terminology and Language in Informatics

Discussion

Purpose

This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following Course Outcomes (COs)

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 3: Define standardized terminology that reflects nursing’s unique contribution to patient outcomes. (PO 3)

CO 8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in delivery of nursing care. (PO 8)

Due Date

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

Posts in the discussion on two different days

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Discussion

Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Discussion Question

Standardized Terminology and Language in Informatics is an important part of healthcare. Nurses and healthcare workers need to understand and be able to communicate clearly.

Please select one of the following options and discuss your understanding of the role in healthcare and its potential impact on your practice.

Usability

Integration

Interface

Interoperability

Meaningful Use (Meaningful Use terminology has largely been replaced by the phrase ‘Promoting Interoperability’ or ‘PI’)

Reimbursement from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) payment

NANDA

NIC/NOC

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answer Post

•Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and

•Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts

16 pts

100% Excellent

Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

14 pts

88% Good

Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

13 pts

80% Fair

Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

6 pts

38% Poor

Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and minimally demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not answer the discussion question(s).
16 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Sources

•Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson,

•Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source,

•All sources are credited within the body of the post,

•Evidence supports the discussion, and

•APA format is not required but is encouraged

12 pts

100% Excellent

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

11 pts

88% Good

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

10 pts

80% Fair

Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not integrate any evidence.

12 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reply Post

•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,

•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and

•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

14 pts

100% Excellent

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

12 pts

88% Good

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.

11 pts

80% Fair

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

No reply post to classmates or instructor.

14 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates Professionally

All posts:

•are clear and concise,

•are respectful, civil, and caring, and

•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
8 pts

100% Excellent

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

7 pts

88% Good

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

6 pts

80% Fair

All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

3 pts

38% Poor

All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

0 pts

0% Missing

All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.

8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

•Posts in the discussion on two different days
0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 Points)

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Total Points: 50

NR 361 Week 4 Discussion: Your patient has a Personal Health Record…Now what?

Students,

We will be discussing a case study on personal health records (PHRs) this week. I look forward to our dialogue.

The following Course Outcomes will be covered for Week 4:

CO 4: Investigate safeguards and decision-making support tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO 4)

CO 5: Identify patient care technologies, information systems, and communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO 5)

Looking forward to everyone’s insights!

Your patient has a Personal Health Record…Now what?

Discussion

Purpose

This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following Course Outcomes (COs).

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 4: Investigate safeguards and decision-making support tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO 4)

CO 5: Identify patient care technologies, information systems, and communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO 5)

Due Date

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

Posts in the discussion on two different days

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Discussion

Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week

Discussion Question

Case Study: A 65-year-old woman was just been diagnosed with Stage 3 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. She was informed of this diagnosis in her primary care physician’s office. She leaves her physician’s office and goes home to review all of her tests and lab results with her family. She goes home and logs into her PHR. She is only able to pull up a portion of her test results. She calls her physician’s office with this concern. The office staff discussed that she had part of her lab work completed at a lab not connected to the organization, part was completed at the emergency room, and part was completed in the lab that is part of the doctor’s office organization.

The above scenario might be a scenario that you have commonly worked with in clinical practice. For many reasons, patients often receive healthcare from multiple organizations that might have different systems.

As you review this scenario, reflect and answer these questions for this discussion.

What are the pros and cons of the situation in the case study?

What safeguards are included in patient portals and PHRs to help patients and healthcare professionals ensure safety?

Do you agree or disagree with the way that a patient obtains Personal Health Records (PHRs)?

What are challenges for patients that do not have access to all of the PHRs? Remember, only portions of the EHRs are typically included in the PHRs.

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answer Post

•Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and

•Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts

16 pts

100% Excellent

Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

14 pts

88% Good

Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

13 pts

80% Fair

Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

6 pts

38% Poor

Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and minimally demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not answer the discussion question(s).

16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Sources

•Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson,

•Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source,

•All sources are credited within the body of the post,

•Evidence supports the discussion, and

•APA format is not required but is encouraged.

12 pts

100% Excellent

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

11 pts

88% Good

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

10 pts

80% Fair

Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not integrate any evidence.
12 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reply Post

•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,

•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and

•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

14 pts

100% Excellent

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

12 pts

88% Good

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.

11 pts

80% Fair

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

No reply post to classmates or instructor.

14 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates Professionally

All posts:

•are clear and concise,

•are respectful, civil, and caring, and

•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
8 pts

100% Excellent

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

7 pts

88% Good

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

6 pts

80% Fair

All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

3 pts

38% Poor

All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

0 pts

0% Missing

All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

•Posts in the discussion on two different days
0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 Points)

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days
0 pts

Total Points: 50

NR 361 Week 4 Assignment: Course Project Milestone 2

Assignment

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate the skills of the professional nurse as an educator. You are to prepare a patient scenario based on the required assigned topic. You will choose an already developed and reliable mHealth app to use in the education of your patient.

Based on your accepted Milestone 1 assignment, use the information to identify three teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. You will also determine three ways to evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. You will need to provide the mHealth app reference in APA format.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Describe patient-care technologies as appropriate to address the needs of a diverse patient population. (PO1)

CO 5: Identify patient care technologies, information systems, and communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO5)

Due Date

Submit your completed NR361 Milestone 2 by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, at the end of Week 4. You may consult the Policies section in the Introduction & Resources module for details regarding late assignments. Post questions about this assignment in the Course Q & A Forum.

Total Points Possible

The entire project is worth 600 points. Milestone 2 is worth 225 points of this total.

Preparing the Assignment

Required Assignment Topic

Note: You will use the same scenario you developed and same mHealth app you identified in Week 2.

Requirements and Guidelines

Download the required Milestone 2 Template

Links to an external site.. Save it to your computer with the file name: Your Last Name NR361 Milestone 2.docx.

Briefly state the patient scenario from the Milestone 1 assignment.

Include revisions, if required by Milestone 1 faculty feedback.

Identify (3) teaching areas to improve patient outcomes.

Information to be taught to the patient should include information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines, and how to interpret and act on the information that is provided. Remember to cite the mHealth app when appropriate in the Teaching Area (See template).

Use bullet points

Describe 3 ways you would determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app.

Use bullet points

mHealth app citation and reference in APA format. See placement of these on the template

You are required to complete the form using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu

Carefully review the grading rubric criteria for Milestone 2 and type directly on your saved Milestone 2 Template.

Use instructor feedback from Milestone 1 to improve your statements regarding the patient scenario in Milestone 2. Milestone 2 will not be accepted for grading and credit if Milestone 1 is not submitted or not re-submitted per instructor feedback. Milestone projects build on one another and Milestone 1 must be submitted before moving on to submit Milestone 2.

**Academic Integrity**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.

NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.

Hello everyone. My name is Dr. Diane Perry. This video is about the Week Four assignment course project milestone to. This assignment is due by Sunday at the end of week four. To find the assignment guidelines, go to the modules page. Scroll to the week four module. Then click on the Week Four assignment Course Project Milestone two. Based on your accepted Milestone one assignment, you will use the information to identify three teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. You will also determine three ways to evaluate the success of the patients use of the mHealth hap. Be sure to use the template worksheet provided for you for week four, Milestone two. Here is a copy of the course project milestone two template that you will use in this assignment. Please be brief and use bullet points. Bullet points are not full sentences and should be bullet point for each section. In Milestone two. We are preparing this portion of the project for the upcoming assignment in Milestone three, which will be a PowerPoint or poster presentation. Remember your milestones should look differently than mine. You will want to use your chosen topic and examples for your own course project. Using word for word information from the example is considered plagiarism and may be an academic integrity violation. These examples are meant to serve as a guide and give you an idea as to the information that should be included. All submitted work must be original to you. Let’s look at my example of milestone two based on my topic and scenario for milestone one. This first section of the Milestone two assignment is to define your approved patient scenario. For milestone one, you will provide a brief statement of the patient’s scenario from the Milestone one assignment. Remember to include any revisions if required for milestone one instructor feedback. This next section includes the identified teaching areas related to the mHealth app. These three teaching areas are meant to improve patient outcomes. The information to be taught to the patient should include information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines and how to interpret and act on the information that is provided. Cite your source when appropriate, and remember to use bullet points online. Bullet points are not full sentences and should clearly describe the point without a sentence or ending punctuation. Notice the bullet points using my example based on this scenario used in milestone one. This next section is the evaluation section. You will describe three ways you would determine and evaluate the success of the patients use of the mHealth app. Remember again to use bullet points. Here is my example. The final section includes the reference for the mHealth app. Go to page 340 and your APA manual seventh edition. There you will find examples of how to site and list a reference for a mobile app. Please remember to use the assignment rubric as a way to check that you have included all information before submitting. This concludes the Milestone two video tutorial. Please be sure to contact your instructor with any concerns or questions.

Rubric

NR361 Milestone 2

NR361 Milestone 2

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Define: Approved Patient Scenario from Milestone 1

Brief statement of the patient scenario from the Milestone 1 assignment, including revisions if required by Milestone 1 faculty feedback.
30 pts

Defines (states) the brief patient scenario approved from Milestone 1 including excellent details in revisions (if required by Milestone 1 instructor feedback).

26 pts

Defines (states) the brief patient scenario from Milestone 1 including good details in revisions (if required by Milestone 1 instructor feedback).

24 pts

Defines (states) the brief patient scenario approved from Milestone 1 including fair details in revisions (if required by Milestone 1 instructor feedback).

12 pts

Definition of brief patient scenario is poorly done and/or revisions did not adhere to feedback from instructor on Milestone 1

0 pts

Does not define (state) the nursing issue.
30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Teach:

Identify (3) teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Information to be taught to patient should include information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines, and how to interpret and act on the information that is provided. Remember to use bullet points.

75 pts

Identifies 3 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Excellent details includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for mHealth application, and how to interpret and act on the information of the mHealth application. Written in bullet points.

66 pts

Identifies 3 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Good details includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for mHealth application, and how to interpret and act on the information of the mHealth application. Written in bullet points.

60 pts

Identifies 2 or 3 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Fair data includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for mHealth application, and/or how to interpret and act on the information of the mHealth application. Does not use bullet points or information is not clear.

29 pts

Identifies 1-2 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Poor data includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for mHealth application, OR how to interpret and act on the information of the mHealth application. Does not use bullet points AND information is not clear.

0 pts

Did not identify teaching measures to improve patient outcomes.
75 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evaluate:

Describe 3 ways you would determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Remember to use bullet points.

75 pts

Describe in excellent detail 3 ways to determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Written in bullet points.

66 pts

Describes in good detail 3 ways to determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Written in bullet points.

60 pts

Describes in fair detail 2-3 ways to determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. May not use bullet points or information is not clear.

29 pts

Describes in poor detail 1-2 ways to determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Does not use bullet points AND information is not clear.

0 pts

Did not identify ways to evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app.

75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Citations and References:

Include citation and reference for the mHealth application in APA format.

30 pts

Excellent citation and reference in APA format for the mHealth application.

26 pts

Good citation and reference with minor errors in APA format for the mHealth application.

24 pts

Citations and references with some errors in APA format for the mHealth application.

12 pts

Citation and reference with numerous errors in APA format for the mHealth application.

0 pts

Did not cite or reference in APA format.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing

contains no spelling or grammatical errors. Reading level is appropriate for patient described.

15 pts

Grammar, punctuation, and spelling are correct; Reading level appropriate for patient.

 

13 pts

Good mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column12 pts

Fair mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column.

6 pts

Poor mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column

0 pts

Very poor mechanics such that assignment is difficult to read.
15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Correct Topic and correct Template Use

0 pts

0 points deducted

Correct topic and correct template used for the assignment

0 pts

22.5 points deducted (10%)

Incorrect topic OR incorrect/no template used results in a 22.5 point deduction (10%).
0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Late Deduction

0 pts

0 points deducted

Submitted on time

0 pts

Not Submitted on Time – Points Deducted

1 day late =11.25 deduction; 2 days=22.5 deduction; 3 days=33.75 deduction; 4 days =45 deduction; 5 days = 56.25 deduction; 6 days =67.5 deduction; 7 days =78.75 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late

0 pts

Total Points: 225

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 361 Full Course Discussions & Assignments (Week 1-8) HERE

NR 361 Week 5 Discussion: Trends in Informatics (graded)

Discussion

Purpose

This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following Course Outcomes (COs).

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 6: Discuss the principles of data integrity, professional ethics, and legal requirements related to data security, regulatory requirements, confidentiality, and client’s right to privacy. (PO 6)

CO 7: Examine the use of information systems to document interventions related to achieving nurse sensitive outcomes. (PO 7)

Due Date

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

Posts in the discussion on two different days

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Discussion

Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Discussion Question

This is the week to really see where technology and healthcare are connecting. Select ONE of the following trends and discuss your understanding of this trend in healthcare and its potential impact on your practice as a nurse. What are the legal, privacy, and ethical considerations of this trend? (Everyone attempt to choose a different topic so that we will learn about the many advancements in technology).

Nanotechnology

Consumer health informatics (CHI)

Social media healthcare applications

Health-focused wearable technology

eHealth

Artificial Intelligence

Simulation

Computerized provider order entry (CPOE)

Bar Code Medication Administration (BCMA)

Creative measures in healthcare for use with 3D printers

Smart Pumps

Smart Rooms

Robotics in healthcare

Mobile technology in outpatient care

Web-based tools and software technology

Risk Management tools

Chatbots or Bots in healthcare

Telenursing

Telemedicine

Telepharmacy

Telerehabilitation

Teleconsultation

Telehospice

Technology advancement from your clinical practice

Palm Vein Technology

Microchip use in healthcare

Optical head-mounted computer glasses (Google Glass)

Smart hospital beds

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.

Students,

Welcome to the Week 5 discussion. This is my favorite discussion in the course! This week, we are going to discuss trends seen in informatics and technology. I look forward to a lively discussion!

We will cover the following Course Outcomes:
CO1: Describe patient-care technologies as appropriate to address the needs of a diverse patient population. (PO 1)

CO 6: Discuss the principles of data integrity, professional ethics, and legal requirements related to data security, regulatory requirements, confidentiality, and the client’s right to privacy. (PO 6)

CO 7: Examine the use of information systems to document interventions related to achieving nurse-sensitive outcomes. (PO 7)

I’m looking forward to your response.

Brenda

Writing Workshop Rubric
Writing Workshop Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Initial Post

15 pts
The student makes an initial post that includes all or most items required in the writing workshop instructions but may be missing 1 or 2 items. (14-15 point range)

13 pts
The student makes an initial post that includes many of the required items in the writing workshop instructions. Multiple required items (more than 2) may be missing in the main post. (12-13 point range)

11 pts
The student makes an initial post that includes some of the items required in the writing workshop instructions. Most required items may be missing (4 or more) in the main post. (1-11 point range)

0 pts
Select this category only if no initial post is present.

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Peer Review Post

20 pts
The student posts a peer review for a classmate by replying to the classmate’s initial post. The review is either nearly or fully completed according to instructions, missing no more than 2 required “tasks.” (19-20 point range)

18 pts
The student posts a peer review for a classmate by replying to the classmate’s initial post. More than 2 required “tasks” may be missing in the peer review. (17-18 point range)

16 pts
The student posts a peer review for a classmate by replying to the classmate’s initial post. Many to nearly all required items may be missing in the peer review (4 or more missing “tasks”). (1-16 point range)

0 pts
Select this category only if no peer review is posted.

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Continuing the Conversation Post(s)

5 pts
The student completes at least 1 post that continues the conversation after peer reviews have been posted. The “continuing the conversation” post is completed according instructions and is at least 3 sentences in length.

4 pts
The student completes at least 1 post that continues the conversation after peer reviews have been posted. The post may be noticeably lacking in length (only 2 sentences in length) and substance.

3 pts
The student completes at least 1 post that continues the conversation after peer reviews have been posted. The post is very brief and lacking in substance (only 1 sentence or less).

0 pts
Select this category only if no “continuing the conversation” posts were completed.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Late Deduction (Manually deduct from score)

0 pts
0-1 day late: No point deduction

0 pts
2 days late: 1 point deduction

0 pts
3 days late: 2 point deduction

0 pts
4 or more days late: 3 point deduction

0 pts
Total Points: 40

NR 361 Week 5 Assignment: Writing Workshop: Introduction, One Body, Conclusion Paragraph

Introduction, One Body, Conclusion Paragraph

Writing Workshop

Required Resources

Read/review the following resources for this activity:

Week 5 Explore Topics

Week 5 Introduction, One Body, and Conclusion Paragraphs

Week 5 Peer Review Worksheet

Links to an external site.

Initial Post Instructions

Part 1: By Tuesday Night, Share Your Writing as Your Initial Post

In writing workshops, you will be asked to share, as your first post, a specific piece of writing you are working on at the time, along with some comments or adjustments, depending on the assignment. This week, the piece of writing is your Week 4 Assignment: Introduction, One Body Paragraph, and Conclusion.

Please post your writing from Week 4 Introduction, One Body, and Conclusion Paragraphs and use the sample completed items in that worksheet for guidance. 

Make an initial post with your essay attached. In your initial post, please ask at least one question for your reviewer to answer. For example, are you unsure about the strength of your thesis statement? Or you might ask your peer for ideas for details within body paragraphs.

Keep in mind that next week, you will submit a full draft of your Argument Research Essay to your instructor for grading and feedback during Week 6.

*Copying from your classmates’ posts or replies in any way, on any item will be considered plagiarism and will be handled as such. Your instructor may, at any time, check anything you post in workshops for plagiarism by submitting it to Turnitin.

Peer Review Post Instructions

Part 2: By Saturday Night, Complete One Full Peer Review for a Classmate

Choose one classmate who has made their initial post and who does not already have a peer review. Read their question for you in the post, then open their attachment of their Introduction, One Body and Conclusion paragraphs.

Download and complete the Peer Review Worksheet. Complete all tasks with substance (more than just “yes” or “no”).

Reply to your classmate’s initial post and attach the Peer Review Worksheet you completed over their writing.

Your peer review is worth 50% of your grade for this writing workshop; please do your best!

Continue the Conversation Post Instructions

Part 3: By Sunday Night, Continue the Conversation

In addition to making your own initial post and finishing a peer review for one classmate, you must also continue the conversation by making at least 1 additional post of at least 3 full sentences in length. This post may do any of the following:

Respond (kindly) to one of the peer reviews classmates have given you.

Respond (kindly) to any questions your classmate may have for you about the peer review you completed.

Respond (kindly) to a classmate you did not previously review, with some brief comments about their writing.

Please see some sample Continue the Conversation posts

Links to an external site. here.

Writing Requirements

Minimum of 3 posts total:
1 Initial Post with Week 4 Introduction, One Body, and Conclusion Paragraphs (Due Tuesday)

1 Peer review post with completed Peer Review Worksheet (Due Saturday)

1 minimum Continue the Conversation post of at least 3 sentences (Due by Sunday)

Grading

Review the rubric in Canvas to make sure you are completing all required items.

Course Outcomes

1, 2, 3, 4

Due Date

Due Date for the Initial Post: 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday

Due Date for the Peer Review: 11:59 p.m. MT on Saturday

Due Date for Continue the Conversation Post: 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Writing Workshop Rubric
Writing Workshop Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Initial Post

15 pts

The student makes an initial post that includes all or most items required in the writing workshop instructions but may be missing 1 or 2 items. (14-15 point range)

13 pts

The student makes an initial post that includes many of the required items in the writing workshop instructions. Multiple required items (more than 2) may be missing in the main post. (12-13 point range)

11 pts

The student makes an initial post that includes some of the items required in the writing workshop instructions. Most required items may be missing (4 or more) in the main post. (1-11 point range)

0 pts

Select this category only if no initial post is present.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Peer Review Post

20 pts

The student posts a peer review for a classmate by replying to the classmate’s initial post. The review is either nearly or fully completed according to instructions, missing no more than 2 required “tasks.” (19-20 point range)

18 pts

The student posts a peer review for a classmate by replying to the classmate’s initial post. More than 2 required “tasks” may be missing in the peer review. (17-18 point range)

16 pts

The student posts a peer review for a classmate by replying to the classmate’s initial post. Many to nearly all required items may be missing in the peer review (4 or more missing “tasks”). (1-16 point range)

0 pts

Select this category only if no peer review is posted.
20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Continuing the Conversation Post(s)
5 pts

The student completes at least 1 post that continues the conversation after peer reviews have been posted. The “continuing the conversation” post is completed according instructions and is at least 3 sentences in length.

4 pts

The student completes at least 1 post that continues the conversation after peer reviews have been posted. The post may be noticeably lacking in length (only 2 sentences in length) and substance.

3 pts

The student completes at least 1 post that continues the conversation after peer reviews have been posted. The post is very brief and lacking in substance (only 1 sentence or less).

0 pts

Select this category only if no “continuing the conversation” posts were completed.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Late Deduction (Manually deduct from score)
0 pts

0-1 day late: No point deduction

0 pts

2 days late: 1 point deduction

0 pts

3 days late: 2 point deduction

0 pts

4 or more days late: 3 point deduction0 pts

Total Points: 40

NR 361 Week 6 Discussion: Distractors in our Environments

Distractors in our Environments

Discussion

Purpose

This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following Course Outcome (CO).

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 6: Discuss the principles of data integrity, professional ethics, and legal requirements related to data security, regulatory requirements, confidentiality, and client’s right to privacy. (PO 6)

Due Date

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

Posts in the discussion on two different days

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Discussion

Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Discussion Question

Distractions are everywhere. They may include cellphones, multiple alarms sounding, overhead paging, monitors beeping, and various interruptions that disrupt your clinical practice.

Give an example of an ethical or legal issue that may arise if a patient has a poor outcome or sentinel event because of a distraction such as alarm fatigue. What does evidence reveal about alarm fatigue and distractions in healthcare when it comes to patient safety?

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answer Post

•Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and

•Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts
16 pts

100% Excellent

Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

14 pts

88% Good

Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

13 pts

80% Fair

Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

6 pts

38% Poor

Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and minimally demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not answer the discussion question(s).

16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Sources

•Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson,

•Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source,

•All sources are credited within the body of the post,

•Evidence supports the discussion, and

•APA format is not required but is encouraged.

12 pts

100% Excellent

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

11 pts

88% Good

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

10 pts

80% Fair

Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not integrate any evidence.

12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reply Post

•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,

•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and

•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

14 pts

100% Excellent

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

12 pts

88% Good

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.

11 pts

80% Fair

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

No reply post to classmates or instructor.
14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates Professionally

All posts:

•are clear and concise,

•are respectful, civil, and caring, and

•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
8 pts

100% Excellent

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

7 pts

88% Good

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

6 pts

80% Fair

All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

3 pts

38% Poor

All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

0 pts

0% Missing

All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.
8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

•Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 Points)

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days
0 pts

Total Points: 5

Welcome to Week 6! Our topic this week is distractions in healthcare. It is probably safe to say that distractions really are everywhere and can potentially affect us. I look forward to hearing everyone’s input!

We will be addressing the following Course Outcomes:

CO 6: Discuss the principles of data integrity, professional ethics, and legal requirements related to data security, regulatory requirements, confidentiality, and the client’s right to privacy. (PO 6)

NR 361 Week 6 Assignment: Course Project Milestone 3

Assignment

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate the skills of the professional nurse as an educator. You are to prepare a patient scenario based on the required assigned topic. You will choose an already developed and reliable mHealth app to use in the education of your patient.

Based on your accepted Milestone 1 assignment, use the information to identify teaching areas to improve patient outcomes and ways to evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. You will include both the citations and references in APA format.

You will develop the Patient Education Technology Guide using Microsoft PowerPoint OR a Poster in Microsoft Office format. You must use either a PowerPoint presentation or the Poster template provided, depending on which option you choose. Only complete one assignment: PowerPoint or Poster.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Describe patient-care technologies as appropriate to address the needs of a diverse patient population. (PO1)

CO 5: Identify patient care technologies, information systems, and communication devices that support safe nursing practice. (PO5)

Due Date

The Milestone 3 PowerPoint OR Poster assignment is due by Sunday at 11:59 pm MT, at the end of Week 6. Submit your completed assignment. You may consult the Policies section in the Introduction & Resources module for details regarding late assignments. Post questions about this assignment in the Course Q & A Forum.

Total Points Possible

The entire project is worth 600 points. Milestone 3 is worth 225 points of this total.

Preparing the Assignment

Required Assignment Topic

Note: You will use the same scenario you developed and same mHealth app you identified in Week 2.

Directions

Select a Microsoft PowerPoint OR a Poster presentation for this assignment. See the Guidelines below for each of the options.

You are required to complete this assignment using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.pptx” format. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu

Links to an external site.

PowerPoint Assignment Guidelines
You are required to cite your source(s) as it relates to your application slide. Other citations are permitted, but this is not a requirement for the assignment.

Title slide (first slide): Include a title slide with your name and the title of the presentation.

Scenario Slide (one slide): This slide should include the approved patient scenario from Milestone 1 and 2. You will use the approved patient scenario and include a disease process, diagnosis, OR identify a patient with a desire to maintain good health and prevent illness and who would benefit from an already developed and reliable mHealth app. Include the nurse’s assessment of learning needs and readiness to learn.

mHealth application slide (one slide): Identify a developed and reliable mHealth app that could benefit the patient. Describe the app, including the following.

Name of app

Purpose of app

Intended audience

Mobile device(s) upon which the app will operate

Where to download or obtain it (include a working link if it is to be downloaded from a website)

Any other information you believe would be pertinent to this situation

Be sure to cite all sources you use.

Teaching slide(s) (one to three slides): Prepare slides that contain important points about the app that you want to teach to the patient, such as how to use the app safely and effectively (including how to interpret and act on the information that is provided).

Evaluation slide(s) (one to three slides): Describe how you would determine the success of the patient’s use of this app. For example, include ways to evaluate the effectiveness of the teaching plan that are a good fit for the type of app and focus on specific ways that this app benefits the patient’s health and wellness.

References (last slide): List any references for sources that were used and cited in the presentation.

Number of PowerPoint slides: 6-10 slides total

Writing and design: There should be no spelling or grammatical errors. Writing is concise and clear. Avoid words that the patient may not understand. Slides are visually appealing, incorporating graphics, photographs, colors, and themes.

Review the section on Academic Integrity Policy found in the RNBSN Policies. All work must be original (in your own words) unless properly cited.

Best Practices in Preparing PowerPoint Slideshows

Be creative but realistic.

Incorporate graphics, color, themes, or photographs to increase interest.

Make each slide easy to read with short bullet points and large font. You may use speaker notes for full sentences.

Review directions thoroughly.

Cite all sources within the slides with (author, year), as well as on the reference slide.

Proofread prior to final submission.

Check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.

Abide by the Chamberlain academic integrity policy.

Tutorial: For those not familiar with the development of a PowerPoint slideshow, the following link to the Microsoft website may be helpful. http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/support/training-FX101782702.aspx.

Links to an external site. The Chamberlain Student Success Strategies (SSPRNBSN) offers a module on Computer Literacy that contains a section on PowerPoint. SSPRNBSN is a course tile on your dashboard.

Poster Assignment Guidelines

Download and use the Poster Template

Links to an external site.. This should only be one page.

Complete all boxes on the template.

Best practice for Poster Presentations

Be creative but realistic.

Incorporate graphics, color, themes, or photographs to increase interest.

Make the poster easy to read with short bullet points and appropriate sized font.

Review directions thoroughly.

Cite all sources with (author, year) and reference.

Proofread prior to final submission.

**Academic Integrity**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.

NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page. and rubrics on this page.

Rubric

NR361 Milestone 3 – PowerPoint OR Poster Rubric

NR361 Milestone 3 – PowerPoint OR Poster Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scenario

is clear and concise, including a disease process, diagnosis, or identify a patient with a desire to maintain good health and prevent illness. Include the nurse’s assessment of learning needs and readiness to learn.
50 pts

Scenario is very thorough, clear and concise with a description of a patient with a specific disease, diagnosis, or a person who wants to prevent illness and maintain or achieve good health. Clearly and thoroughly states that the patient is seeking information, including a detailed assessment of learning needs and readiness to learn.

44 pts

Scenario is good and concise. It includes a description of the patient with specific disease or diagnosis, or desire to maintain good health. Scenario generally describes the nurse’s assessment of learning needs and patient’s readiness to learn.

40 pts

Scenario includes a fair description of the patient with specific disease or diagnosis, or desire to maintain good health. Scenario may lack the nurse’s assessment of learning needs OR patient’s readiness to learn.

19 pts

Scenario includes a poor description of the patient with a specific disease, diagnosis, or desire to maintain good health. Scenario may lack both the nurse’s assessment of learning needs AND patient’s readiness to learn.

0 pts

Scenario fails to describe the patient’s situation The nurse’s assessment of learning needs and readiness to learn are lacking.
50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application:

Identify a mHealth app that could benefit the patient. Describe the app including its: Name, Purpose, Intended audience, Mobile device(s) upon which it will operate, and where to download or obtain it. Include a working link if it is to be downloaded from a website and any other information you believe would be pertinent to this situation. Make sure to add a citation for this mHealth app.
50 pts

Describes the mHealth application in detail including its: Name, Purpose, Intended Audience, Mobile device upon which it operates, Download or where to obtain, other pertinent information. Sources that are used are cited.

44 pts

Describes the mHealth application but is lacking one of the elements in the first column.

40 pts

Describes the mHealth application but is lacking two of the elements in column.

19 pts

Describes the mHealth application but is lacking three of the elements in the first column.

0 pts

Provides a poor or confusing description of the mHealth application that lacks most of the elements in the first column.

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Teaching :

Information to be taught to patient about the mHealth app including any safety guidelines, and how to interpret and act on the information that is provided.

50 pts

Teach all pertinent details about how to use the app safely and effectively including how to interpret and act on the information that is provided.

44 pts

Teach most of the information about how to use the app safely and effectively including how to interpret the information that is provided.

40 pts

Teach minimal information that the patient needs to know to use the device, for example, lacking safety guidelines that may need to be followed.

19 pts

Teaching section is confusing and does not convey useful information that the patient needs to know.

0 pts

Teaching is not included in the presentation
50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evaluation:

Describe how you would determine the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. For example, include the ways to evaluate the effectiveness of the teaching plan that are a good fit for the type of app and focus on specific ways that this mHealth app benefits the patient’s health and wellness.

50 pts

Describes in detail ways to evaluate the effectiveness of the teaching plan that are a good fit for the type of mHealth app or focus on specific ways that this app benefits the patient’s health and wellness.

44 pts

Describes general or universal ways to evaluate the effectiveness of the teaching plan that considers the nature of the mHealth app.

40 pts

Describes limited ways to evaluate the effectiveness of the teaching plan, which does not reflect the nature of the mHealth app.

19 pts

Describes an evaluation plan but it is confusing and is unlikely to determine if the patient has learned what is necessary.

0 pts

Does not include an evaluation plan.

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing and Design:

Writing contains no spelling or grammatical errors. Bullets should be used instead of long sentences or paragraphs. Reading level is appropriate for patient described. Slides are visually appealing incorporating graphics, photographs, colors and themes. Sources that are used are cited. There is an APA reference information in the assignment. . Assignment has the correct number of slides for the PowerPoint assignment (6-10 slides) or the correct areas for the Poster, which is only one page.
25 pts

Assignment has the following elements: Assignment is visually appealing incorporating graphics, photographs, colors and themes; Assignment has the correct number of slides for the PowerPoint assignment (6-10 slides) or the correct areas for the Poster, which is only one page; Grammar, punctuation, and spelling are correct; Citation present for application. There is APA reference information in the assignment.

22 pts

Good mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column.

20 pts

Fair mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column.

10 pts

Poor mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column.

0 pts

Very poor mechanics such that assignment is difficult to read.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Use of correct topic and Use of Power Point OR Correct Poster Template
0 pts

0 points deducted

Use of correct topic and Power Point/Correct Poster Template used for the assignment

0 pts

22.5 points deducted (10%)

Use of incorrect topic OR NO power point or Poster Template used results in a 22.5 point deduction (10%)
0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Late Deduction

0 pts

0 points deducted

Submitted on time

0 pts

Not Submitted on Time – Points Deducted

1 day late =11.25 deduction; 2 days=22.5 deduction; 3 days=33.75 deduction; 4 days =45 deduction; 5 days = 56.25 deduction; 6 days =67.5 deduction; 7 days =78.75 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late
0 pts

NR 361 Week 7 Discussion: Use of Personal Communication Devices in Patient Care Settings

Discussion

Purpose

This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following Course Outcome (CO).

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 6: Discuss the principles of data integrity, professional ethics, and legal requirements related to data security, regulatory requirements, confidentiality, and client’s right to privacy. (PO 6)

Due Date

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

Posts in the discussion on two different days

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Discussion

Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Integrate outside scholarly sources when required

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Discussion Question

A nurse colleague uses his personal cell phone to take a photo of a patient’s wound and then sends a message with the photo to the primary care provider via a text. Please consider the following in your discussion post:

What principles of patient confidentiality might be an issue? Consider legal and ethical.

How might this nurse use a communication device to support safe patient practices?

What would your organization’s policy on ‘personal communication device use in a patient care setting’ reveal related to this case? (If your organization does not have a written policy, or you are not currently working in an organization, what do you think should be included in such a policy and why?)

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.

Students,

This week, we will discuss the use of personal communication devices in healthcare. This will be an interesting conversation, especially when it feels like we are attached to our phones 24/7.

We are covering the following Course Outcomes:

CO 6: Discuss the principles of data integrity, professional ethics, and legal requirements related to data security, regulatory requirements, confidentiality, and the client’s right to privacy. (PO 6)

I look forward to more exciting discussions!

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answer Post

•Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and

•Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts
16 pts

100% Excellent

Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

14 pts

88% Good

Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

13 pts

80% Fair

Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

6 pts

38% Poor

Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and minimally demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not answer the discussion question(s).
16 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Sources

•Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson,

•Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source,

•All sources are credited within the body of the post,

•Evidence supports the discussion, and

•APA format is not required but is encouraged.

12 pts

100% Excellent

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

11 pts

88% Good

Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

10 pts

80% Fair

Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not integrate any evidence.

12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reply Post

•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,

•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and

•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.
14 pts

100% Excellent

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

12 pts

88% Good

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.

11 pts

80% Fair

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

No reply post to classmates or instructor.
14 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates Professionally

All posts:

•are clear and concise,

•are respectful, civil, and caring, and

•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
8 pts

100% Excellent

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

7 pts

88% Good

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

6 pts

80% Fair

All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

3 pts

38% Poor

All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

0 pts

0% Missing

All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.

8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):

•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

•Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 Points)

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days
0 pts

Total Points: 50

NR 361 Week 8 Discussion: Reflection on AACN Essentials Informatics Self-Assessment

Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of this week’s reflection topic relates to the following Course Outcome (CO):

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in delivery of nursing care. (PO 8)

Due Date

Post a response to the initial discussion question by Wednesday 12/20 11:59pm MT.

Total Points Possible: 50 points

Preparing the Discussion

Reflection is an activity that involves your deep thought into your own experiences related to the concepts of the week. Answers should be detailed. In reflections students:

Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week

Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and/or instructor

Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.

Scholarly sources are NOT required for this reflection

Best Practices include:

Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.

Enter the reflection often during the week to read and learn from posts.

Select different classmates for your reply each week.

Reflection Question

Prior to posting your answer, complete the Week 8 AACN Essentials Self-Assessment

Links to an external site. linked here. Compare your scores from Week 1 to Week 8. Reflect on the following:
How far have you come?

How will you apply this information to continue to improve your informatics knowledge in nursing practice?

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_Wk8_1_21

RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_Wk8_1_21
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Answer Post

•Answers the reflection question(s) in a detailed manner applying one or more weekly concept(s),

•Incorporates own experiences relating to weekly concept(s), and

• Compares scores from Week 1 to Week 8 Self-assessments.
28 pts

100% Excellent

Meets all criteria: •Answers the reflection question(s) in a detailed manner applying one or more weekly concept(s), •Incorporates own experiences relating to weekly concept(s), and • Compares scores from Week 1 to Week 8 Self-assessments.

25 pts

88% Good

Includes all three criteria but answer is not detailed.

22 pts

80% Fair

Meets two of three criteria

11 pts

38% Poor

Meets one of three criteria

0 pts

0% Missing

Does not answer the discussion question(s).

28 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reply Post

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.
14 pts

100% Excellent

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.

12 pts

88% Good

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.

11 pts

80% Fair

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.

5 pts

38% Poor

Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.

0 pts

0% Missing

No reply post to classmates or instructor.
14 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communicates Professionally

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
8 pts

100% Excellent

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

7 pts

88% Good

All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

6 pts

80% Fair

All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

3 pts

38% Poor

All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

0 pts

0% Missing

All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.
8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Saturday the end of the assigned week):

•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and

•Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

No Points Deducted

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Saturday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days

0 pts

Points Deducted (-5 Points)

During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Saturday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different days
0 pts

Total Points: 50